642 Comments

Pandemic of the Vaccinated!

Expand full comment

Pandemic of the Unboosted 😂😂

Expand full comment

The boosted are getting it, too. Just ask Spartacus and Pocahantas.

Pandemic of the vaxxed and boosted!

Expand full comment

And yet Biden is about to give a speech tripling down on his "dark winter of sickness and death for the unvaccinated". He is quite literally flying the plane straight into the ground. Then urinating on it. Then setting it on fire again.

Expand full comment

Trump's doing his part to further Biden's agenda by announcing that he just got the booster.

Expand full comment

Trump is pretty much finishing off his hopes of a '24 candidacy by sticking like glue to "his vaccines". The moment it becomes inescapable that they are unsafe and ineffective the entire pharma/media establishment is going to turn and blame him for that.

Expand full comment

He should just retire. Leave the way open for DeSantis.

Expand full comment

That would be the only good news about this mess. Trump should ride off into the sunset.

Expand full comment

Agreed … He was owning “Operation Warp Failure “ , if he had big ones he’d come out and say it’s a failure.

Lose all respect if he got a jab/booster after contracting it and getting monoclonal treatment.

Expand full comment

DeSantis.

Expand full comment

Yeah it is dumb for him to get a booster, let alone a vaccine at all as he recovered from the 'rona. However, just like everyone else, his doctor apparently recommended it and it is his choice. He is opposed to mandates. That is the problem, mandates.

Expand full comment

Back when the vaccines first came out. They saved a lot of at risk people. The fact that the vaccines didn't last is a different problem. I still think operation warp speed was a success. He also knew we needed therapeutics much of which was poo-pooed by the establishment.

Expand full comment

Trump's an Idiot...Period.

Expand full comment

No he's not. We aren't leftists. We can accept that people can be good in some areas and terrible in others.

Trump is a very trusting person. It's why he continuously chose bureaucrats who were desperate to betray him. It's also why he did nothing to shop the mass censorship by social media of all of his allies. Facebook and Twitter told him they wouldn't abuse their powers and they wouldn't turn around and censor him.

Expand full comment

I'll take the mean tweets and inartful language over any of the Democrats any time. You must like the direction of the country. How odd.

Expand full comment

Spoken like a tru no nothin

Expand full comment

I'm surprised you didn't call him a poopyhead, Spanky.

Expand full comment

Maybe he got the booster, maybe he didn't. Who knows? He was probably pressured - or forced - to make that statement.

Expand full comment

So we agree he's conning somebody.

Expand full comment

Awwww. No 🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment

Bad things happen when you "triple dog dare" nobody likes being stuck on a pole

Expand full comment

Well, yes and no. Centuries ago it was just the severed head impaled on a pike. By then, the victim would not feel a thing. 😈

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2021·edited Dec 21, 2021

Will it be a word soup...with a massive mix of threats and tell the legal citizens they are stupid? The news today is full of could be's and may be's. 73% of the country may be infected with Omicron variant and the Midwest may be as high as 90% infected! And the citizens have to take urgent action to stop hospitalations and deaths connected to the virus!

Are they not adding deaths all the time that have no relationship to the virus? And a huge push for massive testing! Why? The tests can't tell the difference between flu or Covid, right? So they are going to replace it with a new test? And why can we not have inexpensive medication (think OTC) at home if we think that a runny nose and low fever cold might be covid. Why shod people run out and get tested for a cold? I do not understand this absurdity and loss of common sense. And let's continue letting illegals & terrorists stream across the southern border and transport them across the country to states they need to keep or turn permanent blue (super spreaders). "C"mon man!"

Expand full comment

I think they have all jumped off the cliff...walked back up the hill..and jumped again.

Expand full comment

I'm so worried he'll do something stupid like lockdowns. We have a couple of gigs and need them.

Expand full comment

I'm worried that Biden will forced by his handlers to declare martial law. If that happens, we'll have no human or civil rights at all. Game over.

Biden is nothing but a senile, pathetic, disgusting puppet. But the powers that created this gain-of-function-enhanced coronavirus and the bioweapon "vaccines" are satanic. Don't confuse the two.

Expand full comment

If his handlers actually try that, I'm not sure the military will go along with enforcing it. Not very many state and local police forces will be on board, either. Everyone seems pretty 'covided out'.

Expand full comment

he's always been incompetent, dishonest and corrupt (and handsy), I don't feel sorry for him. not at all...

Expand full comment

Trump declared an National Emergency which sets the stage for Marshall Law.

Expand full comment

You've done your home work!

Expand full comment

I know that sounds selfish but I'm so sick of this shit over a virus that shouldn't exist and shouldn't have locked down our world.

Expand full comment

Its what happens with the Faucis and the Gates having power and the money to play God with the rest of us. There wil always be a Josef Mengele out there.

Expand full comment

Wow, that describes Biden to a tee!

Expand full comment

And as for boosters…even if they did work against Omicron, which I think is doubtful, ANY vaccine depresses your immune system for a few weeks—the reason they ask if you feel well when you get any vaccine. I think that heading into any viral surge, or a major family holiday, is probably the worst time to want to depress your immune system, contrary to all the official calls to “get boosted now!”

Expand full comment

So the booster is going to depress the immune system also? Won't that lead to higher infection risk? Also the booster is not a "booster" as in say tetanus - it's another dose of the same medicine which was designed for the original Alpha variant so what's that going to do?

Expand full comment

Doesn't each variant diminish the potency of the virus? So if you contract the Omicron after taking the booster, wouldn't your natural immunity also automatically kick-in? Or, are you saying the booster would depress that natural process?

It is a tough decision for an 80 year old, especially one in excellent health....at this age, when friends and family members are dropping like flies, one does not suddenly become fatalistic. But, I'm not spending my last few years hiding behind a mask, afraid to entertain. Nope, we are having our annual Christmas Eve party, Biden be damned!

Expand full comment

Which is to say - get yourself some first line therapeutics (see FLCCC and Zelenko protocols). Have ivermectin or hydroxy prescribed online if your doctor won't do it. And then, GET OUT AND ENJOY YOUR LIFE!!!

Expand full comment

No, sadly, the booster stifles your innate immune system. (same as the 1st two doses). It simply programs your body to respond with only one particular antibody that was designed to target the spike protein from the original virus. The spike has changed since then, so the antibody is useless. The innate immune system just doesn't kick in, which is exactly how the vx is meant to work.

Expand full comment

Have a fantastic time too!

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

Bingo. Makes no scientific sense.

Expand full comment

Logic says you are correct. Are you available to advise the President

Expand full comment

Don'ttell Donald Trump. He just announced he got boosted. So, everyone should just relax and go get the shot like good little guru followers.

Expand full comment

Probably saline. Someone please prove that ANY politician ANYWHERE has got the real shot(s).

Expand full comment

Add Brian May of Queen to the list. He finally ventured out after two years to have lunch with friends. They made sure everyone tested negative before the lunch but virus gonna virus. He said he thought he was in a "safe bubble" but he now has C19 and he's vaccinated and boosted..

Expand full comment

These fuckin navel gazers who make all these demands before they will socialize deserve everything they get. Stay home already you ridiculous ninnies.

Expand full comment
founding

Post of the day right here!

Expand full comment

Ha ha! Love his Baroque haircut and guitar playing but he turns out to be a Leftist turd. "Climate change will kill all! Don't use fossil fuels and stay in your houses. "

Expand full comment

What about Eric Clapton and Van Morrison? What is their current vaxx status? I'd be shocked if Clapton came out and said he'd had the booster.

Expand full comment

From my understanding Slow Hand got his first shot and experienced weeks of pain in his extremities. He was worried he would never play again. He came out with a short video criticizing mandates. I seriously doubt if he received any more experimental mRNA gene therapy

Expand full comment

Clapton was so sick and angry after his first vaccine, I sincerely doubt he ever got another. I didn't know Van Morrison had issues too.

Expand full comment

really.

Expand full comment

Yup…

Expand full comment

Aka the booster needs a booster. And another round of boosters - on the house!

Expand full comment

And now Jim Cramer CNBC too. He wants the gov't to forcibly vax all us dirty unvaxxed. https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnbc-jim-cramer-doubles-down-belief-government-right-force-citizens-obey-vax-mandate.

Covid couldn't happen to a nicer guy.

Expand full comment

Hard to say what their angle is. They may have it OR they are doing this in order to shut our country down.

Expand full comment

They really arent sick just sniffles for publicity

Expand full comment

hahahaha!

Expand full comment

And Cramer.

Expand full comment

Cramer is an idiot. He doesn't even know much about the market (said Bear, Stern's wouldn't fail two days before it did), so why would anyone believe him about Covid.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Corey Booker actually called himself "Spartacus" when trying to boost his relevancy during the Kavanaugh hearings., trying to prove how "brave" he was to release documents that he claimed were not allowed to be released, but, in fact, had already been released. Ben Shapiro had hilarious set of tweets about it.

Expand full comment

Corey Booker is still on a quest to be relevant. At something🙄

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I think he's actually pretty smart, just opportunistic and dishonest, which is actually worse than being a well-intentioned, low IQ person.

Expand full comment

But isn't he some sort of genius Rhodes Scholar?

Expand full comment

Cory Booker

Expand full comment

Oh that was amazing when he said that

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Actually, we do know it likely would have been mild for them given the data we have. It's strange to give the vaccine credit when it's not warranted. It's a religion.

Expand full comment

So true. When my double-vaxxed parents came down with Delta last summer and were sick in bed for 2 weeks, my older sister (an MD), assured me that they only survived because they'd been vaxxed. I countered with, "or they were much sicker than they would've been without it." Of course, we have no way of knowing. It's a study of two, and the important studies to actually test these things with large groups double-blinded will NEVER be done, so the True Believers will keep on believing...

Expand full comment

You’re comment is spot on! I read a few headlines today about fully vaxxed and boosted persons that have tested positive and the articles say exactly what you stated…”thankfully they had the booster or it would have been much worse”. How can anyone say that? No one knows how mild or severe it would have been. This is yet another point that drives me crazy.

Expand full comment

Mass formation. Google it.

Expand full comment

I don't fully agree. I just finished Alex's book. One of its messages should be is that the powers that be, especially the media but also government apparatchiks who should have known better, have been incompetent at best, or deliberately lying and deceitful at worst, from the beginning. Alex amply documents statement after statement from them that was probably known to be at best a half-truth, at worst a total lie, even at the time it was made. As you put it: "There is a lot being stated as fact that has no basis in factual evidence." That's a rather serious problem, when it occurs repeatedly in official channels and especially coming from authorities (e.g. scientists who presumably have the same, or better evidence than we have access to), wouldn't you think?

Expand full comment

You make such great points.

Expand full comment

Wasn't Spartacus also someone writing on Substack in the early stages of this gong show?

Expand full comment

Pandemic of the Blocked ,Effective , Early Treatments. No Need for the "ClotShots"

Expand full comment

Snopes: TRUE!

We need weekly boosts to be "fully vaccinated". Also, my boosters don't work unless you get them too.

OBEY

Expand full comment

Jeopardy question right there. Lol. Like you will die if I dont use my seatbelt🤣

Expand full comment

Perhaps a bit off topic, but did you know that if you, as a sober driver, through no fault of your own, hit and kill a pedestrian who was drunk, it is still considered an "alcohol-related vehicle fatality" for government statistics? Although I'm sure these are a bare chemical trace of total alcohol related deaths, it's still a curious example of record-keeping. Sort of like blaming the tree when you plow into it, isn't it?

Expand full comment

No, YOU will die if I don't use MY seatbelt! Ha ha h! <evil laugh>

Expand full comment

I'm very confused by this chart. I just went to the Ontario web site and the graph there looks nothing like the one here. What am I missing?

https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

Expand full comment

Alex’s graph is number of cases and yours is rate per 100,000. I commented along these lines earlier. Rate seems a more honest measure than raw number, since there are simply more vaxxed people in Ontario than unvaxxed.

Expand full comment

The government isn't going to make it easy.

Expand full comment

"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" (correcting the typo in this statement will save 2 characters in Twitter messaging).

Expand full comment

Well said!!

Expand full comment

Using the same dataset Alex linked to above, you can click the "per 100,000" button to get the rates. Not sure if we can say for certain yet that the virus preferentially targets vaccinated people - Rate per 100,000 still shows unvaxed higher than vaxed. 24.3 per 100,000 unvaxed vs. 17.2 per 100,000 for fully vaxed. So 1.4 unvaxed cases for every 1 vaxed case.

However, they're converging.

Back in September, per the same data set, the unvaxed/vaxed ratio was 6!

At the end of November it was 4!

Now, it's 1.4.

Certainly we can say the vaccine protection has eroded to the point of near parity with unvaccinated. We should watch to see if we hit negative efficacy - where rate per 100,000 of fully vaxed is higher than unvaxed. THAT is the true inflection point.

Expand full comment

Ontario also has a very high vaccination rate across the entire population. They are probably reaching a point where the unvaccinated are less susceptible due to prior immunity due to exposure.

Expand full comment

Some argue the vax impairs natural immunity response going forward. It will be very interesting to follow the data on reinfection for the vaxxed then infected, infected then vaxxed, vs. natural immunity no vax.

If only we had a public health system that wants to collect and share this data.

Expand full comment

That would require honest hospital personnel.

Expand full comment

And honest public health spokespeople, honest government bureaucrats, honest politicians, honest scientists, etc. Probably too much to hope for.

Expand full comment

One of the problems in this is hospital administrators dependent on government money.

Expand full comment

Yes and means being brave and telling the truth no matter what, because you cannot be a slave to two masters

Expand full comment

It does. We have data on this-- there are SO many books that have done research on the health between unvaccinated and vaccinated-- focusing on children. (check out Vaccine Coalition Canada, Childrens Health Defense)

Expand full comment

That info exists but I can't find it now. The vaxxed then infected were more likely to be infected then the infected then vaxxed. If I remember correctly, it was a pretty small sample size with some pretty large confidence intervals that made it inconclusive. I couldn't find the original post, but I think it was related to this study from Denmark https://dailysceptic.org/2021/12/15/danish-study-confirms-that-natural-immunity-protects-better-against-infection-than-the-vaccines/.

Expand full comment

The data seems clear that natural infection is much better protection than getting vaxxed. Calling vaxxed infections breakthroughs is ridiculous. For claimed breakthroughs on natural immunity, I would question the PCR threshold on the supposed two infections.

The data I want to learn about is reinfection for the vaxxed. I am guessing unlikely since we probably would have seen it in heavily vaxxed old age homes.

Expand full comment

The coach of the NFL New Orleans Saints was diagnosed with Covid in March 2020. Despite my efforts, I was unable to determine if he was a "case" or had symptomatic Covid. But he tested positive last week (the NFL stupidly was testing asymptomatic vaccinated). If he had actual Covid in 2020 (not just a positive test), then was vaccinated, and then tests positive, which conclusion is most likely: (1) the tests are useless, (2) vaccination after previous infection destroys natural immunity, (3) the vaccines fail to protect against infections, or (4) all of the above.

Expand full comment

Not seems clear--is clear.

Expand full comment

My son in law got a positive test 9 months after the whole family got it. He was sick for 2 days tops then fine. Daughter and kids never got a positive test. My daughter had to stay out of work for 14 days as a close contact. I questioned PCR cycles myself. But they don't tell you what it was.

My SIL got it from a vexed boosted person. So my personal evidence of this being a pandemic of the vaccinated

Expand full comment

A VA long-term care facility near me is having significant ‘break through’ infections. Visitors not allowed so staff is pinned as the source.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

PCR thresholds were changed. But there was also a period in 2020 where some locations weren't even testing to count a case. The assumption was if you exhibited symptoms in a high spread area, you were counted as a case. I think this was mainly during the initial infection spike of 2020.

I'm not sure what was going on when the flu magically disappeared during the next winter spike. I have heard some say the tests confuse covid and flu, which seems odd.

Expand full comment

That kind of info is all over the place-- adding to what I suggested in an earlier post check also the Weston Price Foundation. Del Bigtrees site etc.-- TONS Of stuff (if you use duck Duck Go 😊)

Expand full comment

If only !

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2021·edited Dec 21, 2021

Problem being all the charts and numbers being put out are from the very same entities that have lied to us from the beginning. You trust a chart or numbers from any of them to be factual? Not me. Figures lie and liars figure🤔 if someone gets A vax then gets the very virus they were vaxxed against--thats an Epic Fail in my book

Expand full comment

This is one of the scenarios we have to look out for -- the unvaxxed will get sick once, the vaxxed keep catching Covid due to OAS.

Expand full comment

I'm terribly worried about this. It's why my kids will never get vaxed.

Expand full comment

Great move, they will be the ones left with a brain and energy to help the rest of the sorry lot to get on with their lives.

Expand full comment

Or more likely, the unvaxxed dont get sick because they have strong innate and adaptive immune system. Every jab your immune system weakens. Its like wiring a lamp wrong-- it will work but not as well.

Expand full comment

very cool way of putting it

Expand full comment

That's the primary reason I went for the J&J option. A single, less immunogenic shot was less likely to trigger OAS, ADS, or autoimmune issues. It's also why the boosters are stupid even if you can make a case for the original vaccination being beneficial.

Expand full comment

Well this is nice to hear because this is exactly what I did. I plan to be on a pro-autophagy diet for about 5 years anyway. I just had a nasty cold but cleared it quickly so I seem to not have damaged the native plumbing

Expand full comment

Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.

Expand full comment

So just a second level Bond villain type behaviour?

Expand full comment

I know a 42-year-old woman who had a brain hemorrhage after the J and J. She will never be well again.

Expand full comment

Yeah but new CEO, schooled in China.

Expand full comment

You're oversimplifying. So am I. 🤓 OAS can happen with natural immunity, too. The main indictments against the mRNA injections are: they induce production of only one type of antibody, against "Classic Wuhan" original virus, presumably long gone from the wild. They produce a huge burst of antibodies that quickly fades (few months), hence the urging for boosters after just few months*; also the unproven and increasingly dubious long-term safety of the jab. Natural infection produces a broader immune response, the body doesn't go ape shit producing just the one type of antibody. In general, the natural immunity should be many times better as it will be more "up to date" (more recent viruses), multiple immune responses, not just one, and expected to better respond to similar future viruses.

*Absent other immune system issues, an apparent problem with repeated mRNA doses is that with repeated applications, the immune system mounts a weaker response. This is claimed to have been a problem with the early mRNA research; it was thought that a better application would be for "vaccines." So perhaps it should be no surprise that the immunity fades quickly, and thus the need for boosters. Well if the fade issue holds, then each additional booster will produce a flaccid response, yet one more problem for the vaxx cheerleaders.

Alex mentions this issue in his book, but apparently doesn't provide a cite for the source(s).

Expand full comment

Prof Byram Bridle (find him on Rumble) a Canadian virologist banned from his own lab at the University of Guelph for refusing the vaccine has said that he has information from many sources that are seeing an exponential rise in soft tissue cancers in recent months. This is in line with Dr Ryan Cole who has said the same. Byram is one of the bravest scientists in North America and has had death threats and all sorts of intimidation thrown at him. His original rejection of the vaxxes came back in May when he said "we made a big mistake with the spike protein manufacture, that it is actually toxic". He had access to Pfizer data from trials in Japan that showed the biodistribution of the vaccine went all through the body - it did not stay in the shoulder muscle.

Expand full comment

This creates a curious situation. Giving them the benefit of doubt, the Gov is pushing vaccines/boosters because they are therapeutic and thus reduce the severity of infection. If, however, the vaccines are NOT immunizing, then by pushing vaccines they are postponing herd immunity. This appears to be case given that we are 2 years into this. What we really need is a thorough study of breakthrough cases to see if these folks have lasting immunity comparable to those infected prior to vaccination.

Expand full comment

I'd love to know on what basis anyone can assert that the gene therapy "vaccines" reduce hospitalizations. They are not sterilizing as you said. It's like saying that because I wore two tee shirts on a cold day I didn't get as sick as I might have if I only wore one. How would you know what didn't happen? It's entirely subjective.

Expand full comment

🛎 🛎 🛎 ding ding ding !!!

Expand full comment

Sorry why are you giving them a benefit of a doubt at this point? Didn't a lot of Americans do that before they were hoodwinked into going into Iraq-- how long does it take to see these "authoriites" for what they are criminal organizations.

Expand full comment

Only a true Canuck would start a sentence with "Sorry". :))

Expand full comment

but they won't

Expand full comment

Setting Ontario aside for a minute, take a look at Ireland where apparently they have vaxxed over 90% of the population and are now in a partial lockdown. The vaccines are designed to fail. This is not about a virus or a vaccine.

Expand full comment

How furious must these people be…buying into and being vaxxed

…then still succumbing to the ‘ro and then lockdowns, to boot !

Expand full comment

Another problem comparing to a small group (only 14% unvaxxed) is small group bias (term made up by me). For example, in a group of only 2, if 1 gets sick, that's a 50% rate but you can't extrapolate that to a larger group.

Expand full comment

There is a very real problem with comparing unvaxxed to vaxxed populations with no controls. These groups can look very different. For instance, the unvaxxed population likely has a few people who are very committed to natural, healthy lifestyles but also some who are already very sick with other ailments that make it inadvisable to get the vaccine.

Expand full comment

Quite the opposite can happen too. Alex cites in his book this possibility. Especially in the very highly vaxxed nations, it was usually the most at-risk (the elderly) who received the vaxx. Since the virus does its worst on the most frail and usually the very old, that of necessity means that many of the "unvaccinated" the press so disdainfully reports as being in hospital or dead were precisely the people who COULDN'T BE VAXXED because they were too frail already! The media lie about damned near everything. In the case of bemoaning all the ill or dying unvaxxed, then, they are basically blaming the victim, people who simply could not be vaxxed.

Expand full comment

🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment

Yes, without knowing the underlying rate of infection in both populations, this is a serious confounding variable.

I also know that the campaign has pushed hard to get people to take the vaccine even if they had covid. We'd need to know if the prior infected are disproportionately among the unvaccinated. I'd say that it's likely to skew in the direction of the unvaccinated, but by how much is hard to say.

Expand full comment

We will never get that info. VAR's are being covered up and passed off as "coincidence" and so will the vaxx failures. And the labs in Ontario still run the CT above 35. Most of the "cases" are no worse than a normal cold or mild flu. People are just crazy here, getting tested. I know at least 50 people who have been tested positive in the last 2 weeks and I was sicker than all of them with what was no more than a normal heavy cold. I'm leaning heavily towards the "Unbekoming" view point that this is all a massive Ponzi scheme to make money for Big Pharma.

Expand full comment

Also in Ontario. I guess because I am in the medical profession that I gasped at your last sentence. I am like REALLY you just figured that out now?

Expand full comment

I've thought that for some time but I kept trying to take off my tinfoil hat, then events just seemed to continue to confirm my original thinking. Then I listened to Sukharit Bakdhi who now says the vaxxes were designed to fail. Then I read that Trudeau's family trust is heavily invested in Acuitas who make the LNP's. Then I read that the Shermans were murdered because they knew this was coming and had stockpiled HCQ for the Canadian government then threatened to blow the whistle that the virus was actually developed in the Winnipeg lab. How far down the rabbit hole do we go?

Expand full comment

I venture to say the rabbit hole has turned into a rat tunnel

Expand full comment

Sorry? what? Where are you getting that Ontario has a "very high vaccination rate across the entire population"? Love to see your sources. What do you mean where the unvaccinated are less susceptible " due to prior immunity due to exposure". Do you mean a natural immunity reaction. The one that has kicked in every year of that persons life for whatever virus comes their way. ?

Expand full comment

Based on the linked data, the unvaccinated over 5 years of age is only 14%. That is a very high vaccination rate and skews the results as the unvaccinated aren't going to be generally representative of the population. They are also likely to be people who have either been infected or trust their immune systems. So yes, I mean people with good immune systems.

Expand full comment

Are they putting their thumb on the scales with higher PCR threshold for the unvaxxed? So many games that these people play with the stats.

Expand full comment

Be careful what you define as "unvaxxed". Ontario doesn't count you as vaxxed until 14 days after the 2nd shot. So anyone up to and including day 14 is classified as unvaxxed. Also Trudeau's "one shot summer" is now coming into play. Majority of vaxxed did not get their second shot until the Sept/Oct period. They waited up to 12 weeks after the first shot. Then he said it was a good idea (based on nothing) to mix and match. This PM used to be drama teacher so he knows as much as a chipmunk about epidemiology. Anyway - say October + 4 months = February based on what happened in Ireland in terms of waning efficacy. Hence the massive push for 3rd and even 4th shots now. Omicron is a diversionary tactic to explain away the useless vaccines.

Expand full comment

The mix and match recommendations with no data should be one of the highlights of the mass psychosis. Zero actual science.

Great point too on people with one shot potentially excluded from breakthrough cases. More juking the stats by design.

Expand full comment

Also our PM has a 17% stake in a UofBC developed Pharma company that was involved in the creation of the nano-lipid protein cover which permits the mRNA to enter the blood system easily and then of course spread ALL through the body including permeating the blood brain barrier. A big no no in medicine.

Expand full comment

Notice that the case counts give you a choice of current or 7 day rolling average, the surge has happened entirely in the last week, but the rate display only gives you a 7 day average - it's lagged and we will have to wait a week to see the rate display catch up.

Expand full comment

Nice catch. If you look at the daily data for 12/20, the unvaxed case rate per 100,000 is 26.29 and the vaxed is 24.6. Single dose is 20.31 and has been trending lower than two dose for days.

It should be noted that these all seem like too low of numbers of infections to really get any information and they haven't updated the data per age group which is important to know. All it would take is spread in a long term care facility to really screw up the numbers.

Expand full comment

Yeah good point.

Expand full comment

The per-100,000 rate is a seven-day average, though, and the number of vaccinated cases has shot up only in the past few days.

Expand full comment

If you compare the over 12 age group only then the vaxxed are more likely to get infected than the unvaxxed.

Expand full comment

Can you age limit this data set? You're quite possibly right (previous infection counfounder still granted, though).

Expand full comment

Rate per 100k may be the best metric that we have but a very flawed metric. As someone gives as an example: in a population of 10 (7 vaxxed/ 3 unvaxxed) with 3 vaxxed and 3 unvaxxed cases, the rates would be 42% & 100% which would lead you to believe significant protection for the vaxxed component. The smaller the unvaxxed group is (and it is shrinking), the less relevant the rates per 100k are and the more relevant actual case numbers begin to be.- JMO

Expand full comment

The original Phase 3 tests (Pfizer? Moderna? Both?) even though each arm (vaccine, placebo) had about 20,000 people each, the claimed success rates for efficacy were based on not much larger numbers! Talk about making grandiose extrapolations from tiny samples!.

Expand full comment

They should give the numbers since time of vaccination. Since its known vaccine wanes with time this would show how long it takes for the protection to turn negative.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that. Poor form from Alex.

Expand full comment

Thanks, great observations. When I went to the actual data set as you did, I didn't spot the difference right away.

Expand full comment

Their push to vaccinate everyone with a vaccine that doesn't work isn't going to bode well.

Expand full comment

Did you keep the data from September and end of November? I haven't been able to find historic data except for the raw data.

Expand full comment

Wish I could post screenshots :-)

On the website he links, you can change past 30 days to past 90 days. You can see the time series there.

Expand full comment

thanks for being so helpful! will try.

Expand full comment

Some pretty good data for downloading here: https://data.ontario.ca/dataset?keywords_en=COVID-19 and here: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/covid-19-epidemiologic-summaries-public-health-ontario.

Also, follow @Golden_Pup on twitter. He is an Ontario guy who is all over this data daily.

Expand full comment

Yes! @Golden_Pup is doing amazing work to make the data easy to read.

The most galling aspect of Ontario's stats is the daily "unknown" vax status when it comes to hospitalizations and icu admittance. Many figure it is a way to sweep vax injuries out of the vaxxed column, but we don't know because they never explain it, so everyone speculates.

Either way, it doesn't look good on the government's ability to track anything.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Boosters create uncertainty about how the body deals with accumulating spike proteins as well as uncertainty on immune system adaptation to repeated innoculation.

It's horrifying to think nobody knows how this is going to play out while forcing it on populations globally.

And yet the people running it claim The Science supports forcing it even onto children at close to no risk to covid, with a leaky shot that doesn't prevent spread.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Janti….your last 2 sentences show wisdom beyond stats and anecdotes…big picture !

Expand full comment

Define short-term protection. Define Efficacy. High zone tolerance?? 🤣 If you define them as I do (medical definitions) then there is no protection and therefore there is no efficacy. Negative efficacy?do you mean side effects of vaccines-- if so there is a many page bio of books I can send you that have shown just that-- that there are damaging immune system impacts done by vaccines and I don't mean the gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine (that redefinition CDC, WHO etc)

Expand full comment

You seem knowledgeable about these things whereas I am a construction guy. What do you know about the Novavax that Canada is supposed to get? Is it more of the same crap or does it actually work?

Expand full comment

Bingo!! the boosters are to avoid negative efficacy.

Expand full comment

If the booster is required to be fully vaccinated - they are they not just moving the goal post - ergo everyone double jabbed get reclassified as the unvaccinated?

Expand full comment

Well there's only one way to find out.. Boost away!!

Expand full comment

Sure!…what could go wrong?

(Sarc on)

Expand full comment

Or how many shots until your odds of a serious AE become 1.0?

Expand full comment

Actually, it has already occurred in the UK and in Sweden. Probably has also in other countries but most steadfastly refuse to give infection rates since time of vaccinated. They’ll give it up to 6 months where efficacy has dropped to null, but not after that.

Expand full comment

Alec Baldwin has still killed more people than Omicron.

Expand full comment

He didn't pull the trigger the gun just you know went off. That happens to my Glock all the time. Why do you spread misinformation

Expand full comment

Yup, He's bored plenty of people to death.

Expand full comment

They will eat their young! Anyone who fears Covid more than the arbitrary edicts designed to provide the illusion of safety must already be sick in the head.

Expand full comment

Well, we sort of already know that they will at least "use" their young because all three vaccines required (either for development or testing) fetal cell lines developed from aborted fetal tissue. If they have an alternative to using fetal tissues, they haven't disclosed it, despite the fact that doing so would eliminate the religious exemption and would gut a good chunk of the opposition, from a legal standpoint. So, apparently, they can only produce and test it if they use fetal tissue, i.e. "eat the young".

Expand full comment

Too bad Trump lost the election he could have pardoned Alec

Expand full comment

Probably true, since he didn’t have the stones to pardon Julian Assange or Ross Ulbricht

Expand full comment

lol

Expand full comment

Too soon? 🤣

Expand full comment

Never😏

Expand full comment

I hate to see anyone get sick, but that loudmouth tyrant Jim Cramer just said he’s positive for Convid. Tough to feel sorry for him after his insane rant last week, but hope he recovers soon.

Expand full comment

It’s not very Christian of me but with the news that Jim Cramer, Cory Booker, and Fauxcahontas are positive puts a tiny smile on my face. I normally would never think this way but the disgusting vitriol aimed at us by these very people make me angry

Expand full comment

It's not schadenfreude to appreciate Karma.

Expand full comment

All boosted out the wazooooo!

Expand full comment

“…out the wazoooo!”….there goes that giggle-inducing phrase again

Expand full comment

"Wazoo" is mentioned in the Frank Zappa song that also choruses "Look here brother, who you trying to jive with that cosmic debris?" 😜

Expand full comment

Thanks for the musical history lesson! I’ll look for the entire song, just for fun!

Expand full comment

I think you are NOT alone 😊

Expand full comment

It might be fake. He felt the need to show his test, to prove a lie? Add him to pocahontas and spartacus and you have some of the most dishonest shills in the country. Why believe them now?

Expand full comment

Oh no...he only has a 99.98% chance of survival. Or, the inverse odds of you making money on his stock picks.

Expand full comment

Hah nice!

Expand full comment

Buffoon Cramer who’s pushing the jab mandates. And now he has it.

Expand full comment

Failure has never stopped mandates, has it?

Expand full comment

BAM 💥

Expand full comment

I wonder if he got monoclonals yet. He'd still say the shot saved him.

Expand full comment

His comment was that he definitely would have been a lot sicker if he hadn't had all 3 shots. How, just HOW, does he know this? And yet, it never occurs to these people to wonder why they've had all these shots and they're still getting sick?!!

Expand full comment

But they told those of us that had mild cases because we were healthy and took various supplements that it was just because we "got lucky."

Expand full comment

Exactly! I was one of those people with a very mild case, and I AM quite healthy (exercise, eat right, take vitamins). From the very beginning, I have questioned why public health "experts" have never so much as suggested increasing vitamin D intake, getting a little more exercise, losing a little weight. Just sit in your house and wait for the vaccine! So aggravating.

Expand full comment

I bet he's frantically looking for ivermectin too.

Expand full comment

To covidians, IVM is blasphemous. Like HCQ. They're lucky the people running this disaster allowed them MABs as an option.

Personally I would avoid monoclonals because it's another EUA. But for people at serious risk, it's better than nothing (or even worse, remdesevir and a vent).

Expand full comment

He's white so that "equity might kick in."

Expand full comment

Ha ha. Sorry you get no sympathy when you act like that.

Expand full comment

I can't stand that blowhard!

Expand full comment

Can you say...."Vaccine Enhanced Disease?"

Expand full comment

I can! aka ADE or Pathogenic Priming

Expand full comment

Any data on unvaccinated previously infected? Always one category they never seem to be interested in. 🤔

Expand full comment

Not reported because you know how strong and effective natural immunity is. Cannot have humanity knowing this. Kind of like not having humanity know about all the wonderful, cheap, safe and effective preventative and early treatment options there has been like Ivernectin and HCQ. God forbid these perps suggest the right thing to do!

Expand full comment

Exactly!!

Expand full comment

Yep, natural immunity is even more a taboo topic in the propaganda stream media. It's almost as if they discourage mention of anything that might interfere with a narrative that ensures profits to Pharma and power to petty tyrants...but perhaps I'm just paranoid? 🤫

Expand full comment

Hmmm…I wonder why???

Expand full comment

The Dems know this virus is burning out as all flu’s do, and are concerned the fear of it is waning. Biden’s remarks on Tuesday are probably an attempt to infuse another shot of fear into our society for the purposes of keeping this going until 2024.

Expand full comment

I wouldn't know what the piece of crap said last Tuesday. I pay zero attention to him or any of those in his corrupt camp.

Expand full comment

But, but, but…. The CDC & Uncle Joe assured us this was "the virus of the unvaxed!" Now this is the biggest "variant surprise" yet. Let's go Brandon!!

Expand full comment

"Any comment on what's happened in Gibraltar, Mr. President?" 🤪

Expand full comment

"Sure I got knocked up, but thanks to the Pill, at least I'm not having twins!"

Expand full comment
founding

Hahahahahahahaha hahahhahaha Hahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahaha hahahhahaha hahahhahaha!!!

That’s a PERFECT analogy!

Hahahahahahahaha hahahhahaha Hahahahahahahaha!

Expand full comment