Some argue the vax impairs natural immunity response going forward. It will be very interesting to follow the data on reinfection for the vaxxed then infected, infected then vaxxed, vs. natural immunity no vax.
If only we had a public health system that wants to collect and share this data.
Some argue the vax impairs natural immunity response going forward. It will be very interesting to follow the data on reinfection for the vaxxed then infected, infected then vaxxed, vs. natural immunity no vax.
If only we had a public health system that wants to collect and share this data.
It does. We have data on this-- there are SO many books that have done research on the health between unvaccinated and vaccinated-- focusing on children. (check out Vaccine Coalition Canada, Childrens Health Defense)
The data seems clear that natural infection is much better protection than getting vaxxed. Calling vaxxed infections breakthroughs is ridiculous. For claimed breakthroughs on natural immunity, I would question the PCR threshold on the supposed two infections.
The data I want to learn about is reinfection for the vaxxed. I am guessing unlikely since we probably would have seen it in heavily vaxxed old age homes.
The coach of the NFL New Orleans Saints was diagnosed with Covid in March 2020. Despite my efforts, I was unable to determine if he was a "case" or had symptomatic Covid. But he tested positive last week (the NFL stupidly was testing asymptomatic vaccinated). If he had actual Covid in 2020 (not just a positive test), then was vaccinated, and then tests positive, which conclusion is most likely: (1) the tests are useless, (2) vaccination after previous infection destroys natural immunity, (3) the vaccines fail to protect against infections, or (4) all of the above.
My son in law got a positive test 9 months after the whole family got it. He was sick for 2 days tops then fine. Daughter and kids never got a positive test. My daughter had to stay out of work for 14 days as a close contact. I questioned PCR cycles myself. But they don't tell you what it was.
My SIL got it from a vexed boosted person. So my personal evidence of this being a pandemic of the vaccinated
PCR thresholds were changed. But there was also a period in 2020 where some locations weren't even testing to count a case. The assumption was if you exhibited symptoms in a high spread area, you were counted as a case. I think this was mainly during the initial infection spike of 2020.
I'm not sure what was going on when the flu magically disappeared during the next winter spike. I have heard some say the tests confuse covid and flu, which seems odd.
That kind of info is all over the place-- adding to what I suggested in an earlier post check also the Weston Price Foundation. Del Bigtrees site etc.-- TONS Of stuff (if you use duck Duck Go ЁЯШК)
Problem being all the charts and numbers being put out are from the very same entities that have lied to us from the beginning. You trust a chart or numbers from any of them to be factual? Not me. Figures lie and liars figureЁЯдФ if someone gets A vax then gets the very virus they were vaxxed against--thats an Epic Fail in my book
Some argue the vax impairs natural immunity response going forward. It will be very interesting to follow the data on reinfection for the vaxxed then infected, infected then vaxxed, vs. natural immunity no vax.
If only we had a public health system that wants to collect and share this data.
That would require honest hospital personnel.
And honest public health spokespeople, honest government bureaucrats, honest politicians, honest scientists, etc. Probably too much to hope for.
One of the problems in this is hospital administrators dependent on government money.
Yes and means being brave and telling the truth no matter what, because you cannot be a slave to two masters
It does. We have data on this-- there are SO many books that have done research on the health between unvaccinated and vaccinated-- focusing on children. (check out Vaccine Coalition Canada, Childrens Health Defense)
That info exists but I can't find it now. The vaxxed then infected were more likely to be infected then the infected then vaxxed. If I remember correctly, it was a pretty small sample size with some pretty large confidence intervals that made it inconclusive. I couldn't find the original post, but I think it was related to this study from Denmark https://dailysceptic.org/2021/12/15/danish-study-confirms-that-natural-immunity-protects-better-against-infection-than-the-vaccines/.
The data seems clear that natural infection is much better protection than getting vaxxed. Calling vaxxed infections breakthroughs is ridiculous. For claimed breakthroughs on natural immunity, I would question the PCR threshold on the supposed two infections.
The data I want to learn about is reinfection for the vaxxed. I am guessing unlikely since we probably would have seen it in heavily vaxxed old age homes.
The coach of the NFL New Orleans Saints was diagnosed with Covid in March 2020. Despite my efforts, I was unable to determine if he was a "case" or had symptomatic Covid. But he tested positive last week (the NFL stupidly was testing asymptomatic vaccinated). If he had actual Covid in 2020 (not just a positive test), then was vaccinated, and then tests positive, which conclusion is most likely: (1) the tests are useless, (2) vaccination after previous infection destroys natural immunity, (3) the vaccines fail to protect against infections, or (4) all of the above.
Not seems clear--is clear.
My son in law got a positive test 9 months after the whole family got it. He was sick for 2 days tops then fine. Daughter and kids never got a positive test. My daughter had to stay out of work for 14 days as a close contact. I questioned PCR cycles myself. But they don't tell you what it was.
My SIL got it from a vexed boosted person. So my personal evidence of this being a pandemic of the vaccinated
A VA long-term care facility near me is having significant тАШbreak throughтАЩ infections. Visitors not allowed so staff is pinned as the source.
PCR thresholds were changed. But there was also a period in 2020 where some locations weren't even testing to count a case. The assumption was if you exhibited symptoms in a high spread area, you were counted as a case. I think this was mainly during the initial infection spike of 2020.
I'm not sure what was going on when the flu magically disappeared during the next winter spike. I have heard some say the tests confuse covid and flu, which seems odd.
I Heard the same thing that the test can't tell the difference between the flu and covid.
That kind of info is all over the place-- adding to what I suggested in an earlier post check also the Weston Price Foundation. Del Bigtrees site etc.-- TONS Of stuff (if you use duck Duck Go ЁЯШК)
If only !
Problem being all the charts and numbers being put out are from the very same entities that have lied to us from the beginning. You trust a chart or numbers from any of them to be factual? Not me. Figures lie and liars figureЁЯдФ if someone gets A vax then gets the very virus they were vaxxed against--thats an Epic Fail in my book