21 Comments
ā­  Return to thread
Comment deleted
Dec 20, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Corey Booker actually called himself "Spartacus" when trying to boost his relevancy during the Kavanaugh hearings., trying to prove how "brave" he was to release documents that he claimed were not allowed to be released, but, in fact, had already been released. Ben Shapiro had hilarious set of tweets about it.

Expand full comment

Corey Booker is still on a quest to be relevant. At somethingšŸ™„

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Dec 20, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I think he's actually pretty smart, just opportunistic and dishonest, which is actually worse than being a well-intentioned, low IQ person.

Expand full comment

I used to admire him but it's almost like the bodysnatchers got him

Expand full comment

Amen and Amen Again! I'd say there is nothing "wrong" with being "a well-intentioned, low IQ person." They're supposed to be balanced out by well-intentioned high IQ persons, not scapegoated and victimized by pimps and carpetbaggers.

Expand full comment

But isn't he some sort of genius Rhodes Scholar?

Expand full comment

Like Bill Clinton?

Expand full comment

Cory Booker

Expand full comment

Oh that was amazing when he said that

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Dec 20, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Actually, we do know it likely would have been mild for them given the data we have. It's strange to give the vaccine credit when it's not warranted. It's a religion.

Expand full comment

So true. When my double-vaxxed parents came down with Delta last summer and were sick in bed for 2 weeks, my older sister (an MD), assured me that they only survived because they'd been vaxxed. I countered with, "or they were much sicker than they would've been without it." Of course, we have no way of knowing. It's a study of two, and the important studies to actually test these things with large groups double-blinded will NEVER be done, so the True Believers will keep on believing...

Expand full comment

Youā€™re comment is spot on! I read a few headlines today about fully vaxxed and boosted persons that have tested positive and the articles say exactly what you statedā€¦ā€thankfully they had the booster or it would have been much worseā€. How can anyone say that? No one knows how mild or severe it would have been. This is yet another point that drives me crazy.

Expand full comment

Mass formation. Google it.

Expand full comment

I don't fully agree. I just finished Alex's book. One of its messages should be is that the powers that be, especially the media but also government apparatchiks who should have known better, have been incompetent at best, or deliberately lying and deceitful at worst, from the beginning. Alex amply documents statement after statement from them that was probably known to be at best a half-truth, at worst a total lie, even at the time it was made. As you put it: "There is a lot being stated as fact that has no basis in factual evidence." That's a rather serious problem, when it occurs repeatedly in official channels and especially coming from authorities (e.g. scientists who presumably have the same, or better evidence than we have access to), wouldn't you think?

Expand full comment

You make such great points.

Expand full comment

Wasn't Spartacus also someone writing on Substack in the early stages of this gong show?

Expand full comment