Or more likely, the unvaxxed dont get sick because they have strong innate and adaptive immune system. Every jab your immune system weakens. Its like wiring a lamp wrong-- it will work but not as well.
That's the primary reason I went for the J&J option. A single, less immunogenic shot was less likely to trigger OAS, ADS, or autoimmune issues. It's also why the boosters are stupid even if you can make a case for the original vaccination being beneficial.
Well this is nice to hear because this is exactly what I did. I plan to be on a pro-autophagy diet for about 5 years anyway. I just had a nasty cold but cleared it quickly so I seem to not have damaged the native plumbing
Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.
More like standard corporate behavior vs actively sabotaging science. Part of J&J's corporate culture is based on a story about doing the right thing by recalling defective/poisoned Tylenol in the early 80's. Pfizer's corporate culture is about buyouts and boner pills.
You're oversimplifying. So am I. ЁЯдУ OAS can happen with natural immunity, too. The main indictments against the mRNA injections are: they induce production of only one type of antibody, against "Classic Wuhan" original virus, presumably long gone from the wild. They produce a huge burst of antibodies that quickly fades (few months), hence the urging for boosters after just few months*; also the unproven and increasingly dubious long-term safety of the jab. Natural infection produces a broader immune response, the body doesn't go ape shit producing just the one type of antibody. In general, the natural immunity should be many times better as it will be more "up to date" (more recent viruses), multiple immune responses, not just one, and expected to better respond to similar future viruses.
*Absent other immune system issues, an apparent problem with repeated mRNA doses is that with repeated applications, the immune system mounts a weaker response. This is claimed to have been a problem with the early mRNA research; it was thought that a better application would be for "vaccines." So perhaps it should be no surprise that the immunity fades quickly, and thus the need for boosters. Well if the fade issue holds, then each additional booster will produce a flaccid response, yet one more problem for the vaxx cheerleaders.
Alex mentions this issue in his book, but apparently doesn't provide a cite for the source(s).
Prof Byram Bridle (find him on Rumble) a Canadian virologist banned from his own lab at the University of Guelph for refusing the vaccine has said that he has information from many sources that are seeing an exponential rise in soft tissue cancers in recent months. This is in line with Dr Ryan Cole who has said the same. Byram is one of the bravest scientists in North America and has had death threats and all sorts of intimidation thrown at him. His original rejection of the vaxxes came back in May when he said "we made a big mistake with the spike protein manufacture, that it is actually toxic". He had access to Pfizer data from trials in Japan that showed the biodistribution of the vaccine went all through the body - it did not stay in the shoulder muscle.
This is one of the scenarios we have to look out for -- the unvaxxed will get sick once, the vaxxed keep catching Covid due to OAS.
I'm terribly worried about this. It's why my kids will never get vaxed.
Great move, they will be the ones left with a brain and energy to help the rest of the sorry lot to get on with their lives.
Or more likely, the unvaxxed dont get sick because they have strong innate and adaptive immune system. Every jab your immune system weakens. Its like wiring a lamp wrong-- it will work but not as well.
very cool way of putting it
That's the primary reason I went for the J&J option. A single, less immunogenic shot was less likely to trigger OAS, ADS, or autoimmune issues. It's also why the boosters are stupid even if you can make a case for the original vaccination being beneficial.
Well this is nice to hear because this is exactly what I did. I plan to be on a pro-autophagy diet for about 5 years anyway. I just had a nasty cold but cleared it quickly so I seem to not have damaged the native plumbing
Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.
So just a second level Bond villain type behaviour?
More like standard corporate behavior vs actively sabotaging science. Part of J&J's corporate culture is based on a story about doing the right thing by recalling defective/poisoned Tylenol in the early 80's. Pfizer's corporate culture is about buyouts and boner pills.
I know a 42-year-old woman who had a brain hemorrhage after the J and J. She will never be well again.
Devastating!тАжsorry to hear this.
Yeah but new CEO, schooled in China.
You're oversimplifying. So am I. ЁЯдУ OAS can happen with natural immunity, too. The main indictments against the mRNA injections are: they induce production of only one type of antibody, against "Classic Wuhan" original virus, presumably long gone from the wild. They produce a huge burst of antibodies that quickly fades (few months), hence the urging for boosters after just few months*; also the unproven and increasingly dubious long-term safety of the jab. Natural infection produces a broader immune response, the body doesn't go ape shit producing just the one type of antibody. In general, the natural immunity should be many times better as it will be more "up to date" (more recent viruses), multiple immune responses, not just one, and expected to better respond to similar future viruses.
*Absent other immune system issues, an apparent problem with repeated mRNA doses is that with repeated applications, the immune system mounts a weaker response. This is claimed to have been a problem with the early mRNA research; it was thought that a better application would be for "vaccines." So perhaps it should be no surprise that the immunity fades quickly, and thus the need for boosters. Well if the fade issue holds, then each additional booster will produce a flaccid response, yet one more problem for the vaxx cheerleaders.
Alex mentions this issue in his book, but apparently doesn't provide a cite for the source(s).
Prof Byram Bridle (find him on Rumble) a Canadian virologist banned from his own lab at the University of Guelph for refusing the vaccine has said that he has information from many sources that are seeing an exponential rise in soft tissue cancers in recent months. This is in line with Dr Ryan Cole who has said the same. Byram is one of the bravest scientists in North America and has had death threats and all sorts of intimidation thrown at him. His original rejection of the vaxxes came back in May when he said "we made a big mistake with the spike protein manufacture, that it is actually toxic". He had access to Pfizer data from trials in Japan that showed the biodistribution of the vaccine went all through the body - it did not stay in the shoulder muscle.