Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.
Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.
More like standard corporate behavior vs actively sabotaging science. Part of J&J's corporate culture is based on a story about doing the right thing by recalling defective/poisoned Tylenol in the early 80's. Pfizer's corporate culture is about buyouts and boner pills.
Alex Berenson had a post suggesting the J&J as the least likely to cause harm. Also, I used to work for J&J. While the company isn't as altruistic as it likes to pretend internally, it isn't as actively malicious as Pfizer.
So just a second level Bond villain type behaviour?
More like standard corporate behavior vs actively sabotaging science. Part of J&J's corporate culture is based on a story about doing the right thing by recalling defective/poisoned Tylenol in the early 80's. Pfizer's corporate culture is about buyouts and boner pills.
I know a 42-year-old woman who had a brain hemorrhage after the J and J. She will never be well again.
Devastating!тАжsorry to hear this.
Yeah but new CEO, schooled in China.