Boosters create uncertainty about how the body deals with accumulating spike proteins as well as uncertainty on immune system adaptation to repeated innoculation.
It's horrifying to think nobody knows how this is going to play out while forcing it on populations globally.
And yet the people running it claim The Science supports forcing it even onto children at close to no risk to covid, with a leaky shot that doesn't prevent spread.
Define short-term protection. Define Efficacy. High zone tolerance?? 🤣 If you define them as I do (medical definitions) then there is no protection and therefore there is no efficacy. Negative efficacy?do you mean side effects of vaccines-- if so there is a many page bio of books I can send you that have shown just that-- that there are damaging immune system impacts done by vaccines and I don't mean the gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine (that redefinition CDC, WHO etc)
You seem knowledgeable about these things whereas I am a construction guy. What do you know about the Novavax that Canada is supposed to get? Is it more of the same crap or does it actually work?
If the booster is required to be fully vaccinated - they are they not just moving the goal post - ergo everyone double jabbed get reclassified as the unvaccinated?
Actually, it has already occurred in the UK and in Sweden. Probably has also in other countries but most steadfastly refuse to give infection rates since time of vaccinated. They’ll give it up to 6 months where efficacy has dropped to null, but not after that.
Boosters create uncertainty about how the body deals with accumulating spike proteins as well as uncertainty on immune system adaptation to repeated innoculation.
It's horrifying to think nobody knows how this is going to play out while forcing it on populations globally.
And yet the people running it claim The Science supports forcing it even onto children at close to no risk to covid, with a leaky shot that doesn't prevent spread.
Janti….your last 2 sentences show wisdom beyond stats and anecdotes…big picture !
Define short-term protection. Define Efficacy. High zone tolerance?? 🤣 If you define them as I do (medical definitions) then there is no protection and therefore there is no efficacy. Negative efficacy?do you mean side effects of vaccines-- if so there is a many page bio of books I can send you that have shown just that-- that there are damaging immune system impacts done by vaccines and I don't mean the gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine (that redefinition CDC, WHO etc)
You seem knowledgeable about these things whereas I am a construction guy. What do you know about the Novavax that Canada is supposed to get? Is it more of the same crap or does it actually work?
Bingo!! the boosters are to avoid negative efficacy.
If the booster is required to be fully vaccinated - they are they not just moving the goal post - ergo everyone double jabbed get reclassified as the unvaccinated?
Well there's only one way to find out.. Boost away!!
Sure!…what could go wrong?
(Sarc on)
Or how many shots until your odds of a serious AE become 1.0?
Actually, it has already occurred in the UK and in Sweden. Probably has also in other countries but most steadfastly refuse to give infection rates since time of vaccinated. They’ll give it up to 6 months where efficacy has dropped to null, but not after that.