Whatever happened to citizens acting to keep their government within its constitutional limits? THEY only exist to serve US, the States are supreme in the constitution, the supremacy clause only applies to powers granted the Feds under the enumerated powers, and the Feds have zero authority to mandate a vax.
Whatever happened to citizens acting to keep their government within its constitutional limits? THEY only exist to serve US, the States are supreme in the constitution, the supremacy clause only applies to powers granted the Feds under the enumerated powers, and the Feds have zero authority to mandate a vax.
Guessing that’s why the beagle killer and the ginger said the government didn’t have the authority to pass a vax mandate. Now OSHA is going to do it under an “emergency” like 3 months later and won’t make it effective till after the holiday season. Where is the emergency OSHA. I assume the emergency is because the mayor from small town south bend Indiana can’t seem to find Washington DC so he can try and fix the backlog. Crazy that his previous job didn’t prepare him for being a CEO who can’t take 4 months off to start a family. Should also feel pretty silly since nobody noticed he was gone must be a very important person 🤡
OSHA regs (and all other federal regulations) aren't laws. That has been ignored by the courts for too long, and is now about to be subject to more legal challenges than ever before. The same is true of executive orders. They aren't laws and are only binding upon employees of Executive Branch departments and agencies. EOs can only legally be used to issue directives to Executive Branch entities.
And these are not even vaccines. They are experimental. Mandating them is against all laws, especially the Nurnberg protocols, agreed after WW2 to avoid thing like the Nazis did. And that is exactly what is happening now. Where are the judges to forbid this illegal use of power?
The vaccine inserts do not contain the ingredients, so no informed consent possible. Also, just read within last 2-3 days, that just prior to their "debut" the govt changed the definition of "vaccine" to include these biological agents, aka "death shots".
Why rely on federal courts to define federal authority? They’re part of the same federal gov limited by the Constitution. Some of the vax have been approved - so what? Feds STILL lack the authority. Hanging our hat on tangential stuff will never work.
The only officially FDA approved vaccine is Comirnaty (may not be spelled right) made by Pfizer’s development partner Biontech - and as yet not available in the United States.
Whatever happened to citizens acting to keep their government within its constitutional limits? THEY only exist to serve US, the States are supreme in the constitution, the supremacy clause only applies to powers granted the Feds under the enumerated powers, and the Feds have zero authority to mandate a vax.
Guessing that’s why the beagle killer and the ginger said the government didn’t have the authority to pass a vax mandate. Now OSHA is going to do it under an “emergency” like 3 months later and won’t make it effective till after the holiday season. Where is the emergency OSHA. I assume the emergency is because the mayor from small town south bend Indiana can’t seem to find Washington DC so he can try and fix the backlog. Crazy that his previous job didn’t prepare him for being a CEO who can’t take 4 months off to start a family. Should also feel pretty silly since nobody noticed he was gone must be a very important person 🤡
Politician like most. Take what they deprive their voters from
OSHA regs (and all other federal regulations) aren't laws. That has been ignored by the courts for too long, and is now about to be subject to more legal challenges than ever before. The same is true of executive orders. They aren't laws and are only binding upon employees of Executive Branch departments and agencies. EOs can only legally be used to issue directives to Executive Branch entities.
And these are not even vaccines. They are experimental. Mandating them is against all laws, especially the Nurnberg protocols, agreed after WW2 to avoid thing like the Nazis did. And that is exactly what is happening now. Where are the judges to forbid this illegal use of power?
The vaccine inserts do not contain the ingredients, so no informed consent possible. Also, just read within last 2-3 days, that just prior to their "debut" the govt changed the definition of "vaccine" to include these biological agents, aka "death shots".
Why rely on federal courts to define federal authority? They’re part of the same federal gov limited by the Constitution. Some of the vax have been approved - so what? Feds STILL lack the authority. Hanging our hat on tangential stuff will never work.
The only officially FDA approved vaccine is Comirnaty (may not be spelled right) made by Pfizer’s development partner Biontech - and as yet not available in the United States.