Moderna says its new Covid mRNA booster makes twice the Omicron antibodies. Think DAYS of extra protection. Yay! Also, what's with the post-booster death Moderna went out of its way not to mention?
a colleague of mine who said "third time's the charm" for his 3rd shot just posted that the fourth shot knocked him out. Maybe... 5th time's the charm?
The standard response is they get annual flu shots too and they have low efficacy but better than nothing. Now I’ve never bought the flu shot (as most of the world doesn’t, or check also Cochrane for decent data)… so the folks in this group will line up every month if told to.
Imagine: you get a flu shot, then you get the flu, anyway. So you go get another flu shot, and you get the flu AGAIN. So you go get ANOTHER flu shot, and you hope the third one works.
You do not question a religious zealot. You do not ask them why they partake of the holy shot several times. Their high priests have ordained that they do and they obey. You are the oddball for questioning.
Ever since I have started looking at this as a religious affliction, rather than anything to be reasoned with, my life has improved by leaps and bounds. Here is why this is a religion
1. An enemy that cannot be seen or heard, or for that matter defeated (the virus of course is real)
2. The only way to 'fight' against this is to listen to what the high priests of the NIH, CDC and other such Churches say
3. Ritualistic behavior which is totally illogical (walking into a restaurant masked, and promptly removing it upon sitting down. Early in 2020 banging of pans in the evening to 'salute' doctors)
4. Condemnation, to the point of ostracism, of people that do not go along
5. Promises of great misery and death to visit those that do not follow the religion, while painting followers as virtuous
6. Deeply held beliefs, that even the believers know deep down to be nonsensical, but are held on as they are precious pieces of their identity now
7. Salvation promised through partaking the Holy Shot. If the shot doesn't work, it is YOUR fault for being unclean (you didn't wear a mask properly, you went to that block party, you shopped in store etc)
8. Ultimately, you are unclean and can only be absolved through rituals and the Holy Shot.
Now tell me will you waste your time arguing with someone who belongs to the new religion of Coronaism?
But you *do* question them if the point is to shove some cognitive dissonance up their arses. That's the point of most uses of the Socratic method when debating Leftists and other LIVs - to get them to realize how stupid they are, and to force them to marinate in it.
Multi-dose flu shots still contain a pretty big dose of Thimerosal (WE TOOK IT OUT ALL THE VAXES JUST TO BE SURE!*)
That mercury will eventually do damage. 1 shot or 15 years of shots... eventually it will hurt you.
So it is a waste of time getting a flu shot but if you must make sure they are single dose.
*We took it out then the next year we stuck it in flu vaxxines and told pregnant women and kids to get flu shots for the first time. A cynical person would question this but... PUBLIC HEALTH CARES ABOUT YOU!
As much as I dislike those people I feel sorry for them for trusting. I guess from their point of view they are saving lives and we are crazy psychos that are actually causing all the problems.
It would be hard to step back from that and think "wow. I probably didn't save a single life by wearing gloves + a N95 to the shops. I wasted 2 years of my life?"
I got COVID in. January. I was one of the lucky ones to get the infusion for Omicron. I get bronchitis/ asthma when I get sick, so I also used my nebulizer. The infusion was hard to obtain, but maybe my age played a part in it. I am 82 years old.
In March, I asked my doctor to test for my antibodies. My number is 49. He had told me anything over 10 would be good. It was 49. I have not had any COVID vacs. Or boosters. And I never will. It is better to get COVID, that those nasty vaccines.
Great piece. @Alex have you seen this publicly available Walgreens data? Here is the link: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp (go to the 3rd screen and you can view cases by vaccine status). Essentially this proves that NOBODY should get a vaccine with the possible exception of a person >65 yrs old who took ONE DOSE ONLY. Curious how this is so "out there" yet crickets from the media.
This is awesome. The key data is on slide 3. Click on the buttons to the side of the graph to see the current COVID positivity rate by vaccination status and age. In every case, the unvaxxed have the lowest positivity rates for current infections.
I had to re-read the chart a bunch of times to make sure I was reading it correctly. I forwarded it to a few people and we all had the same conclusion....
Fascinating indication of negative efficacy with the "vaccines". Best way to get the virus is to take 3 doses of the vaccines. Best way to avoid the virus is to take no doses.
now do this mental exercise- put all the jabbed in one column and all the pure in another. Look at the population as jabbed vs untouched. According to the Mayo clinic web site, any jab any time- Ct, RI, Vt, Ma, NJ are at or above 90% jabbed population. The over all US average is around 75% any jab any time or so. If walgreens is seeing better than 90% positive with any jab what so ever across all ages, what does that tell you?
This is powerful! But I didn’t understand what they meant by this explanatory note on slide 4 - did you? “Controlling for recent COVID-19 cases, results show that the unvaccinated group has a 17.1% higher positivity rate compared to the 3-dose group.” What do they mean controlling for recent cases?
I think this is a constantly updated dataset so that 3/11 note, in my view is outdated as of today. What we are seeing on the graphs is a reflection of the data as of April 9. I think what they might have been doing was discounting the most recent data and then adding some points/narrative. I don't know what the bar graphs looked like on March 11 and I think we'd need to see that to interpret the comment fully.
It’s easier to fool a person than to convince them they have been fooled. The ones who will be the most regretful are the ones who injected their children... if and when they see the lifelong complications they’ve forced on the defenseless.
I completely agree. Everyone at this point knows people who have had very serious adverse reactions - whether their own friends and family or friends of friends. Strange cancers, allergic reactions, continuous bleeding from injection site, dropping dead of heart attacks etc.
Years ago I was a captain on the B727 with a crew of three. The flight engineer sat behind the two pilots. He/she could often see the chaos and confusion going on with the pilots even when the front seaters didn’t recognize it themselves - because the FE was far enough behind the crew to be “outside looking in.” I feel like one of those flight engineers with friends and family that just cannot (will not?) connect the dots between their health problems and being triple Vaxxed. Some just won’t make the connection - the CDC and/or FDA being wrong (intentionally or not) is too far out of their consciousness. Those who have considered the connection immediately dismiss it out of hand. I can see they’re in the “cone of confusion” but they cannot. It’s the darnedest thing I’ve ever seen.
Great analogy. I often feel like I’m at a party where everyone is drunk except I, who can see everything so clearly. I hold my tongue so I’m not accused of being a buzzkill. They’re too drunk to listen anyway.
I have also heard that a high percent of politicians, CEOs and others in power have sociopathic attributes.
Another observation: many on these substacks about the present tyranny are from divergent politics and I’m so glad to see us coming together and agreeing on liberty. You were a Democrat who woke up. I’m a Conservative (saying Republican makes me uncomfortable) who never understood why my Democrat friends didn’t trust big corporations. Now I totally get it! I was in the dark assuming all capitalism is good. Will be more open minded in the future.
You've got to love the outcome measures they use. Generation of antibodies is not the equivalent of the development of immunity for COVID. Antibodies in the blood are nice to have I guess, and for as long as they last I suppose. But the more important antibody response would be with secretory IgA antibodies that are found on mucosal surfaces where SARS CoV-2 lands! Their endpoints are meaningless. And they could, who knows, temporarily reduce the risk of severe disease and hospitalization (I don't really believe that mind you). But once they're gone completely, then there's zero protection plus all the risk.
"The report spends considerably more time praising the booster’s efficacy against the Omicron variant. Moderna actually designed the booster - technically called m1273.211 - against the now-extinct Beta variant. It contains an equal mixture of mRNA designed against the original coronavirus spike and the Beta variant."
How interesting.
Off-label use of the vaxx is OK, but off-label use of IVM will get a doctor's license revoked.
People are reading the science now more than ever. Sunlight is the best disinfect. It might be late in the game, but it’s making people really pay attention to the other vaccines and scrutinize the information we all should have known long before now. No vaccine is safe, effective or necessary as formulated and manufactured now. Not a single one.
The biggest damage to come out of this is to the public health community -- and the medical community in general. Where were the 95% of physicians who could have supported their colleagues who actually dared to treat covid patients.
Having said that, what about the "1 physician decision" to discontinue? Why did the doc decide to discontinue. Was this question answered in the report?
And what about the "3 withdrawn consents"? Why? Was this in the report?
I think it would be fair to say most conservatives wouldn't have gotten any shots had they known you could still be infected and spread covid even if you get jabbed.
The ones that will still wear masks on airplanes will be the first in line for any new booster.
a colleague of mine who said "third time's the charm" for his 3rd shot just posted that the fourth shot knocked him out. Maybe... 5th time's the charm?
Why not just go with a subclavian drip.
I like your idea
Lol 😂
Ask that colleague, "You ever get shot with a vaxx about which you said "third time's a charm"? Or is this the first?"
The standard response is they get annual flu shots too and they have low efficacy but better than nothing. Now I’ve never bought the flu shot (as most of the world doesn’t, or check also Cochrane for decent data)… so the folks in this group will line up every month if told to.
Yeah...but have they ever gotten THREE flu shots in a year, hoping that at least the third one will work?
That's the point in asking that colleague this question.
Imagine: you get a flu shot, then you get the flu, anyway. So you go get another flu shot, and you get the flu AGAIN. So you go get ANOTHER flu shot, and you hope the third one works.
And you do this all in the SAME flu season!
THAT is what Jasmine's colleague did.
You do not question a religious zealot. You do not ask them why they partake of the holy shot several times. Their high priests have ordained that they do and they obey. You are the oddball for questioning.
Ever since I have started looking at this as a religious affliction, rather than anything to be reasoned with, my life has improved by leaps and bounds. Here is why this is a religion
1. An enemy that cannot be seen or heard, or for that matter defeated (the virus of course is real)
2. The only way to 'fight' against this is to listen to what the high priests of the NIH, CDC and other such Churches say
3. Ritualistic behavior which is totally illogical (walking into a restaurant masked, and promptly removing it upon sitting down. Early in 2020 banging of pans in the evening to 'salute' doctors)
4. Condemnation, to the point of ostracism, of people that do not go along
5. Promises of great misery and death to visit those that do not follow the religion, while painting followers as virtuous
6. Deeply held beliefs, that even the believers know deep down to be nonsensical, but are held on as they are precious pieces of their identity now
7. Salvation promised through partaking the Holy Shot. If the shot doesn't work, it is YOUR fault for being unclean (you didn't wear a mask properly, you went to that block party, you shopped in store etc)
8. Ultimately, you are unclean and can only be absolved through rituals and the Holy Shot.
Now tell me will you waste your time arguing with someone who belongs to the new religion of Coronaism?
But you *do* question them if the point is to shove some cognitive dissonance up their arses. That's the point of most uses of the Socratic method when debating Leftists and other LIVs - to get them to realize how stupid they are, and to force them to marinate in it.
Multi-dose flu shots still contain a pretty big dose of Thimerosal (WE TOOK IT OUT ALL THE VAXES JUST TO BE SURE!*)
That mercury will eventually do damage. 1 shot or 15 years of shots... eventually it will hurt you.
So it is a waste of time getting a flu shot but if you must make sure they are single dose.
*We took it out then the next year we stuck it in flu vaxxines and told pregnant women and kids to get flu shots for the first time. A cynical person would question this but... PUBLIC HEALTH CARES ABOUT YOU!
Great comeback
Only if he’s hoping for an early grave
As much as I dislike those people I feel sorry for them for trusting. I guess from their point of view they are saving lives and we are crazy psychos that are actually causing all the problems.
It would be hard to step back from that and think "wow. I probably didn't save a single life by wearing gloves + a N95 to the shops. I wasted 2 years of my life?"
Ooof. Hard one to take.
and have the highest rate of death from "long Covid"
There's a sucker born every minute...
The ones alone inside cars or alone in the woods wearing mask will want the 100-mg dose. Bring on the side effects!!
They’ll have them every year, the managing partner of the us law firm I work for in London is just one of those people.
😆😆😆😆😆
Here’s their next reformulation:
"Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and howlet's wing,--
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble."
Macbeth
lead to macdaddy Death
Move over Moderna
Recipients will spurn ya
Oh the trouble trouble
With each shot tends to double double
Evil at this point
By the prickling of my thumbs, Dr. Fauci this way comes.
Another Fake-spear..... mean Shakespeare reader in the 'hood
Another Fake-spear..... I mean Shakespeare reader I see
You caught me!
It will work better than what they have now!
Sounds delicious, but I would add spam or vegemite to enhance immunity destruction
Dr. Suess could have handled this pandemic better than Dr. Fauci.
Maybe that’s why Dr. Seuss was canceled early on.....🤔
Or Dr. Jekyll.
Dr. Frankenstein.
Dr. Demento.
Perpetual Halloween brew.....😜🦇
Sounds safer then the current vaccines! 🤪
Wait- I thought that was the current formulation.
Ah yes! High school Brit-lit. I remember it well.
freaking hilarious
I got COVID in. January. I was one of the lucky ones to get the infusion for Omicron. I get bronchitis/ asthma when I get sick, so I also used my nebulizer. The infusion was hard to obtain, but maybe my age played a part in it. I am 82 years old.
In March, I asked my doctor to test for my antibodies. My number is 49. He had told me anything over 10 would be good. It was 49. I have not had any COVID vacs. Or boosters. And I never will. It is better to get COVID, that those nasty vaccines.
Lol they told me 2500 nuahahaha. They have no clue. That is anti spike antibody.
It’s the number of T cells post-covid, too. Good for you to not fall for the 65+ nonsense.
900 person trial! 😂😂😂😂😂
I think all 10 "discontinuations" need explanation. "Physician's decision" -- sounds like a probable severe reaction.
Lost to follow up? Withdrawal of consent?
Maybe they were lost to follow up because they died?
only 300 with the 50 ug treatment. 1 death.. pretty good odds
They could only coerce 900 people to sign up. Would you? Hell no!
Better than the kiddo booster trial (5-11 year olds)… they had a whopping 140=n 😂
140 shit bag parents. Maybe even 280.
Was the dead person grateful for their shot?
Woulda been worse withou...oh, never mind.
You beat me to it.
At this point, I suspect the dead person is better off than the rest of us having to deal with this bullshit
As long as 50% of the country still drives their car, alone, with a mask on…
Moderna will always have a market for their potions.
Just seen it! A dude pulling into the same parking lot as me. Couldn't believe it, here in Florida too. So sad
How about the guy riding his motorcycle without a helmet, but wearing a mask. Some serious inability to assess risk there, lol.
Reminds me of the guy wearing a N95 mask during one of our smoky CA fires. He’d pull it down to puff on his cigarette!
I read somewhere today that viruses can enter through your eyes. If true, the next thing will be masks and goggles!
I always want to flag them down and ask: do you ever open your doors or windows at home? Because if you do you're going to need a mask there too.
Great piece. @Alex have you seen this publicly available Walgreens data? Here is the link: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp (go to the 3rd screen and you can view cases by vaccine status). Essentially this proves that NOBODY should get a vaccine with the possible exception of a person >65 yrs old who took ONE DOSE ONLY. Curious how this is so "out there" yet crickets from the media.
This is awesome. The key data is on slide 3. Click on the buttons to the side of the graph to see the current COVID positivity rate by vaccination status and age. In every case, the unvaxxed have the lowest positivity rates for current infections.
I had to re-read the chart a bunch of times to make sure I was reading it correctly. I forwarded it to a few people and we all had the same conclusion....
I’ll bet it gets deleted soon.
And soon some blue check or talking head will say you can't compare the jabbed to the unjabbed because the unjabbed are younger and healthier...
Those poor unvaxxed people.....wait, what? lol
Fascinating indication of negative efficacy with the "vaccines". Best way to get the virus is to take 3 doses of the vaccines. Best way to avoid the virus is to take no doses.
now do this mental exercise- put all the jabbed in one column and all the pure in another. Look at the population as jabbed vs untouched. According to the Mayo clinic web site, any jab any time- Ct, RI, Vt, Ma, NJ are at or above 90% jabbed population. The over all US average is around 75% any jab any time or so. If walgreens is seeing better than 90% positive with any jab what so ever across all ages, what does that tell you?
This is powerful! But I didn’t understand what they meant by this explanatory note on slide 4 - did you? “Controlling for recent COVID-19 cases, results show that the unvaccinated group has a 17.1% higher positivity rate compared to the 3-dose group.” What do they mean controlling for recent cases?
I'm not seeing that...you are referring to the Walgreens slide 4 data?
Sorry - it's slide 5! The update from 3/11/22.
I think this is a constantly updated dataset so that 3/11 note, in my view is outdated as of today. What we are seeing on the graphs is a reflection of the data as of April 9. I think what they might have been doing was discounting the most recent data and then adding some points/narrative. I don't know what the bar graphs looked like on March 11 and I think we'd need to see that to interpret the comment fully.
That makes sense - thanks for clarifying!
It’s easier to fool a person than to convince them they have been fooled. The ones who will be the most regretful are the ones who injected their children... if and when they see the lifelong complications they’ve forced on the defenseless.
I completely agree. Everyone at this point knows people who have had very serious adverse reactions - whether their own friends and family or friends of friends. Strange cancers, allergic reactions, continuous bleeding from injection site, dropping dead of heart attacks etc.
Years ago I was a captain on the B727 with a crew of three. The flight engineer sat behind the two pilots. He/she could often see the chaos and confusion going on with the pilots even when the front seaters didn’t recognize it themselves - because the FE was far enough behind the crew to be “outside looking in.” I feel like one of those flight engineers with friends and family that just cannot (will not?) connect the dots between their health problems and being triple Vaxxed. Some just won’t make the connection - the CDC and/or FDA being wrong (intentionally or not) is too far out of their consciousness. Those who have considered the connection immediately dismiss it out of hand. I can see they’re in the “cone of confusion” but they cannot. It’s the darnedest thing I’ve ever seen.
Great analogy. I often feel like I’m at a party where everyone is drunk except I, who can see everything so clearly. I hold my tongue so I’m not accused of being a buzzkill. They’re too drunk to listen anyway.
I have also heard that a high percent of politicians, CEOs and others in power have sociopathic attributes.
Another observation: many on these substacks about the present tyranny are from divergent politics and I’m so glad to see us coming together and agreeing on liberty. You were a Democrat who woke up. I’m a Conservative (saying Republican makes me uncomfortable) who never understood why my Democrat friends didn’t trust big corporations. Now I totally get it! I was in the dark assuming all capitalism is good. Will be more open minded in the future.
You've got to love the outcome measures they use. Generation of antibodies is not the equivalent of the development of immunity for COVID. Antibodies in the blood are nice to have I guess, and for as long as they last I suppose. But the more important antibody response would be with secretory IgA antibodies that are found on mucosal surfaces where SARS CoV-2 lands! Their endpoints are meaningless. And they could, who knows, temporarily reduce the risk of severe disease and hospitalization (I don't really believe that mind you). But once they're gone completely, then there's zero protection plus all the risk.
Exactly. Antibody levels aren’t accepted as proof of immunity but I guess they’re fine and dandy for fda approval. 🙄
True immunity would be antibodies to the nucleocapsid but the current mRNA shots don’t offer that 😝
Not meaningless. This crap will get them the coveted FDA approval.
"The report spends considerably more time praising the booster’s efficacy against the Omicron variant. Moderna actually designed the booster - technically called m1273.211 - against the now-extinct Beta variant. It contains an equal mixture of mRNA designed against the original coronavirus spike and the Beta variant."
How interesting.
Off-label use of the vaxx is OK, but off-label use of IVM will get a doctor's license revoked.
If it weren't for double standards, they'd have no standards at all.
Hey, Stephen, how'd you get more thumbs-ups than I?! ;-)
It’s better to be lucky than good.
NYT is a joke.
Worse than a joke. An outrage. A criminal enterprise.
People are reading the science now more than ever. Sunlight is the best disinfect. It might be late in the game, but it’s making people really pay attention to the other vaccines and scrutinize the information we all should have known long before now. No vaccine is safe, effective or necessary as formulated and manufactured now. Not a single one.
The biggest damage to come out of this is to the public health community -- and the medical community in general. Where were the 95% of physicians who could have supported their colleagues who actually dared to treat covid patients.
The "1 death" is obviously troubling..
Having said that, what about the "1 physician decision" to discontinue? Why did the doc decide to discontinue. Was this question answered in the report?
And what about the "3 withdrawn consents"? Why? Was this in the report?
Inquiring minds want to know...
Don't worry. Surely they'll release those inconsequential details within 75 years.
And Fauci is admitting natural immunity and herd immunity in his new paper
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/fauci-co-authors-new-paper-on-herd?s=w
A paper by Fauci? An Apology, I hope.
Don't hold your breath on that.
LOL
WTF???
FAUCI? That QUACK?
I bet he plagiarized the paper.
Good point! I hear the little masked fascist has been reading “Mein Kampf.”
You give him too much credit. He's using the Cliff Notes.
BTW, the author of "Mein Kampf" wrote it in jail.
Another great idea, Rio Rosie!
I think it would be fair to say most conservatives wouldn't have gotten any shots had they known you could still be infected and spread covid even if you get jabbed.
So I guess with the fading protection on the variants the booster train will just keep on rolling to the Bank of Fauci & Trudeau.
At least we can freeze Trudeau's bank account. Oh... maybe not.
Maybe Pfizer will start a cryogenics program and we can enroll him right away. He claims he is fully vaxxed so should be good to go.
Well most journalists won't take time to read 53 pages. Glad you're not most journalists
I think 2 pages of tweets would be stretching it.