Trump could have done a little checking on Fauci and found out how he handled HIV and never used him. Trump could have paid attention to Scott Atlas’ description of Fauci and Birx.
Doreen is correct. Running a whole county takes lots of people and Trump's biggest problem was that he relied on experts that were part of the swamp. If Trump were to win the presidency a second time, I expect that he will come in and clean house. Who knew that the FBI, DOJ, etc. were so corrupt.
This video talks about the Chinese vaccine starting at approximately 59.0. It was apparently a conventional vaccine and it’s construction could have started in 2018 based upon the "BID". This type of vaccine has a history of a short development time of five months. This alone is an important fact and the process has a good safety record. I believe the conventional method of construction requires the dead COVID-19 virus for creation. However the conventional method for vaccine construction has been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of people with HIV. which is very important in this case.
"Reference the “Johnson and Johnson’s highly anticipated HIV vaccine failed to demonstrate adequate protection in a clinical trial involving more than 2,600 young women in sub-Saharan Africa.”
So why was Moderna working on the mRNA vaccine in 2018, because this "genome modifier" was expected to take a year to complete. Recalling that it needed a COVID-19 spike in its construction with an unknown safety record. While maintaining the ability to deliver a HIV pathogen. O'yes, the Arbutus patents are still owned by Arbutus.
Arbutus’ U.S. Patent No. 9,364,435 (IPR2018-00739 filed March 5, 2018: claims 1-6, 9, 12, 14, and 15 found unpatentable),
Arbutus’ U.S Patent No. 8,058,069 (IPR2019-00554 filed January 9, 2019: no challenged claims found unpatentable),
Given the above information, the mRNA vaccine that carried the "Spike Protein' with the HIV pathogen would not have been ready for use until March of 2019 given it's development time.
So why was China being asked to "Bid" on a COVID-19 vaccine since it would not work on a HIV pathogen in 2018. Because it was never intended to. The original COVID-19 was a flu type virus. The vaccine (a.k.a, "genome modifier") is a pathogen carrier and delivery system.
Run FROM office, who would honestly, attentively, responsibly want to answer to 200 million + citizens who can’t effectively consistently advocate for themselves?!
Besides, let’s have a brutal moment of candor, people these days clamor for a scapegoat, yet, amazing all the mirrors in their homes are blocked when accountability is due.
Misread the way you wrote of disagreeing of vaccines, yes, I erred,…
When do you hear someone in power or authority say that?!
President, no F’ing way I would EVER want that job.
But I said I disagreed with him about rushing the vaccine. Did you not read that?
But, nice deflection. When would you have fired Fauci?
People like you find fault in everyone. But do nothing. Why don’t you tun for office and show us how it is done?
I would have fired Fauci after he screwed up the HIV/AIDS fiasco years ago.
Trump could have done a little checking on Fauci and found out how he handled HIV and never used him. Trump could have paid attention to Scott Atlas’ description of Fauci and Birx.
Doreen is correct. Running a whole county takes lots of people and Trump's biggest problem was that he relied on experts that were part of the swamp. If Trump were to win the presidency a second time, I expect that he will come in and clean house. Who knew that the FBI, DOJ, etc. were so corrupt.
And that is why the Swamp does NOT want him re-elected and exactly why I do.
Just my opinion
"genome modifier" = vaccine
"flu" = covid
You don't create a Binary Delivery System without it being planned. (flu + "genome modifier").
Dr John Campbell and Dr Robert Clancy (highly cited immunologist)
https://youtu.be/FPPnyzvO7J4
This video talks about the Chinese vaccine starting at approximately 59.0. It was apparently a conventional vaccine and it’s construction could have started in 2018 based upon the "BID". This type of vaccine has a history of a short development time of five months. This alone is an important fact and the process has a good safety record. I believe the conventional method of construction requires the dead COVID-19 virus for creation. However the conventional method for vaccine construction has been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of people with HIV. which is very important in this case.
"Reference the “Johnson and Johnson’s highly anticipated HIV vaccine failed to demonstrate adequate protection in a clinical trial involving more than 2,600 young women in sub-Saharan Africa.”
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/johnson-johnson-hiv-vaccine-trial-fails-mid-stage/story?id=79745098"
So why was Moderna working on the mRNA vaccine in 2018, because this "genome modifier" was expected to take a year to complete. Recalling that it needed a COVID-19 spike in its construction with an unknown safety record. While maintaining the ability to deliver a HIV pathogen. O'yes, the Arbutus patents are still owned by Arbutus.
Arbutus’ U.S. Patent No. 9,364,435 (IPR2018-00739 filed March 5, 2018: claims 1-6, 9, 12, 14, and 15 found unpatentable),
Arbutus’ U.S Patent No. 8,058,069 (IPR2019-00554 filed January 9, 2019: no challenged claims found unpatentable),
https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/04/11/mrna-ip-competitive-landscape-one-year-covid-19-pandemic-part/id=132130/
Given the above information, the mRNA vaccine that carried the "Spike Protein' with the HIV pathogen would not have been ready for use until March of 2019 given it's development time.
So why was China being asked to "Bid" on a COVID-19 vaccine since it would not work on a HIV pathogen in 2018. Because it was never intended to. The original COVID-19 was a flu type virus. The vaccine (a.k.a, "genome modifier") is a pathogen carrier and delivery system.
DR. DAVID MARTIN - COVID REVEALED PART 2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E6e0thNlnhsd/
Along with everything Trump was doing? He has to rely upon advisors. What were they advising?
Trump did start distrusting Fauci. But, it was after that evil man did most of his damage.
Run FROM office, who would honestly, attentively, responsibly want to answer to 200 million + citizens who can’t effectively consistently advocate for themselves?!
Besides, let’s have a brutal moment of candor, people these days clamor for a scapegoat, yet, amazing all the mirrors in their homes are blocked when accountability is due.
Misread the way you wrote of disagreeing of vaccines, yes, I erred,…
When do you hear someone in power or authority say that?!
President, no F’ing way I would EVER want that job.
Trump apologized about the p*ssy comment.
Great! Then Biden can apologize for mandates and all will be well.
False equivalent.