Yes....I long ago learned about Wikipedia....from the founder of it himself, no less. Some things on it are fine, but anything controversial or even slightly political are "curated" and not necessarily factual. Unfortunately, a great many people like my friend believe it is 100% correct and there is no discussion to the contrary.
Yes....I long ago learned about Wikipedia....from the founder of it himself, no less. Some things on it are fine, but anything controversial or even slightly political are "curated" and not necessarily factual. Unfortunately, a great many people like my friend believe it is 100% correct and there is no discussion to the contrary.
Yes....I long ago learned about Wikipedia....from the founder of it himself, no less. Some things on it are fine, but anything controversial or even slightly political are "curated" and not necessarily factual. Unfortunately, a great many people like my friend believe it is 100% correct and there is no discussion to the contrary.
They see the Quackwatch quack as authoritative, that’s enough for me …