Alex: Your unwillingness, to date, to consider the childhood vaccine schedule’s role in the autism epidemic has been very frustrating for people like me who otherwise conisder you a hero. I hope this revalation helps you re-consider that somehow, magically, the childhood vaccines cause no problems…If you are looking for a mechanism of action, Cal Tech’s Paul Patterson proposed a very clear one more than a decade ago: immune activation events in the brains of babies during critical periods of brain formation. These simmering brain infections can be caused my many different antagonists, but man-made nanoparticle aluminum (the kind found in vaccines that isn’t found in nature) is an obvious culprit, becuase lymphocytes transport it to the brain and the body cant excrete it. There’s likely something similar happening with the mRNA shots that hit the brains of the baby rats, perhaps it’s the spike protein. Anyone who takes the time to read Paterson’s seminal paper will be forever changed: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/697/2/Pregnancy.pdf
Thank you for writing this Alex. I'm a friend, not an opponent, but I need to understand why you are relying on a Norway study and a British study to conclude that the shots don't cause stillbirths? What about the Pfizer clinical trials and all the shady things they did there with pregnant women? What about the fact that Pfizer stopped their study of vaccinated pregnant women early? Why would they do this? Here's what an internal email revealed from Jelena Vojicic, vaccines medical lead at Pfizer Canada: “The study enrollment was stopped with incomplete numbers because recruitment was slow and it became unreasonable/inappropriate to randomise pregnant women to placebo given the amount of observational evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, coupled with increasing number of technical committees supporting immunization of pregnant women." So, they stopped the study of pregnant women because of their a priori commitment to the "safe and effective" baloney. And due to the fact that various committees were recommending the shot to pregnant women, never mind finishing the study to see if they're actually safe.
Also, what about the FOIA request of Pfizer that showed that only 270 pregnant women were vaccinated, and out of the 270, there was no outcome reported for 238 of them. Hmmmm. Amongst the remaining 32 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions!!! That's astonishing. This is a document by Pfizer that was forced out of them by FOIA -- the same Pfizer that asked if they could wait 75 years to release such damning data.
Additionally there is the VAERS data and the anecdotal evidence from OBGYN whistleblowers.
So, why are these things not valid, but the Norway and Britain studies are. What would be the explanation for the discrepancy?
With this study, it would not qualify for use in humans. This is not looking good for the people who fell for what our government leaders and legacy media have been telling everyone. I feel bad for all the children who were forced to take these mRNA shots.
" the potential autism and brain changes the Turkish researchers found are much harder to track and diagnose than obvious problems like low birthweight or pre-term birth." Yet no govt wants to investigate? As always, "follow the money."
This is a significant finding. I have a five year old grandson that is autistic. After doing research on the subject, I have found that the rate of autism is increasing at a concerning rate even before the gene therapy shots. The rate of autism is approaching 4% and is three times as prevalent in males as in females. The strain on parents is immense. We have him in ABA training that has helped a lot and are giving him supplemental vitamins because autistic kids need more vitamins than normal .We also have him on an experimental program that is designed to repair the brain damage caused by demyelination of the brain nerves caused by excessive inflammation. Time will tell.
An aside: because the mRNAs frequently cause menstrual cycle changes, some mRNA skeptics believe the jabs cause miscarriage and stillbirth. But a large study from Norway in 2022 showed definitively they do not. An even bigger dataset from Britain proves women who receive the shots do not have a higher risk of stillbirth or preterm or low-birthweight babies, though it does not cover miscarriage.)
Sure would like to hear Naomi Wolfe's response to this.
Pregnant rats and autism link a pretty bleak recommendation for prescription for pregnant women. This from the trial:
“Pregnant women were excluded in 2020 from the big clinical trials that led to the approval of the shots, but ever since regulators and obstetricians have strongly encouraged them to take the shots. The reason is that pregnancy causes weight gain and blood pressure changes that increase Covid risk.”
No, doctors knew better but prescribed anyway. They know that unknown adverse risks downstream (in this case autism as one) would be lurking. They were bullied and scared like so many. But here, their weakness affects the most vulnerable. Fear is everywhere, courage hides.
Nothing new here other than since 2020 the psychopathic entities and criminals responsible for it all have doubled and tripled down within the church of vaccinology. Watch ALL 8 episodes of remedy.film ZERO accountability....its all just "allowed" to continue. All the same players in all the same positions and STILL there are people who ask WHY it all continues. A rapist will rape until IT is not allowed too. It's never been rocket science. Just sayin...
What we don't know is how much of the negative effects of the mRNAs are due to the MRNAs themselves and how much is due to the DNA "Klingons" that come along with them.
You wrote "And so even if autism diagnoses notably rise in the next few years, proving the mRNAs are responsible will be next to impossible. An outcome that’ll work out fine for everyone involved - except kids with autism and their families." True that. But the larger issue is less that point than the fact that autism rates have been exploding for decades now, and began rising shortly after the NCVIA unleashed Merck, GSK and Sanofi to perform a vast uncontrolled experiment on 2 generations of children. You want to be the heroic critic of Pfizer and the narrow class of mRNA products and have done good work in that regard. But the problems with the industry, regulatory capture and vaccine injury are so much larger and you are far too reluctant to deal with them. You love to criticize Steve Kirsch and others for being too aggressive in their arguments. Maybe they've had their eyes opened more widely than yours have been. That makes you less a hero than a coward.
Alex: Your unwillingness, to date, to consider the childhood vaccine schedule’s role in the autism epidemic has been very frustrating for people like me who otherwise conisder you a hero. I hope this revalation helps you re-consider that somehow, magically, the childhood vaccines cause no problems…If you are looking for a mechanism of action, Cal Tech’s Paul Patterson proposed a very clear one more than a decade ago: immune activation events in the brains of babies during critical periods of brain formation. These simmering brain infections can be caused my many different antagonists, but man-made nanoparticle aluminum (the kind found in vaccines that isn’t found in nature) is an obvious culprit, becuase lymphocytes transport it to the brain and the body cant excrete it. There’s likely something similar happening with the mRNA shots that hit the brains of the baby rats, perhaps it’s the spike protein. Anyone who takes the time to read Paterson’s seminal paper will be forever changed: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/697/2/Pregnancy.pdf
"No, the mRNAs don’t cause miscarriages"
Hey Alex are you staking your reputation on this statement?
Thank you for writing this Alex. I'm a friend, not an opponent, but I need to understand why you are relying on a Norway study and a British study to conclude that the shots don't cause stillbirths? What about the Pfizer clinical trials and all the shady things they did there with pregnant women? What about the fact that Pfizer stopped their study of vaccinated pregnant women early? Why would they do this? Here's what an internal email revealed from Jelena Vojicic, vaccines medical lead at Pfizer Canada: “The study enrollment was stopped with incomplete numbers because recruitment was slow and it became unreasonable/inappropriate to randomise pregnant women to placebo given the amount of observational evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, coupled with increasing number of technical committees supporting immunization of pregnant women." So, they stopped the study of pregnant women because of their a priori commitment to the "safe and effective" baloney. And due to the fact that various committees were recommending the shot to pregnant women, never mind finishing the study to see if they're actually safe.
Also, what about the FOIA request of Pfizer that showed that only 270 pregnant women were vaccinated, and out of the 270, there was no outcome reported for 238 of them. Hmmmm. Amongst the remaining 32 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions!!! That's astonishing. This is a document by Pfizer that was forced out of them by FOIA -- the same Pfizer that asked if they could wait 75 years to release such damning data.
Additionally there is the VAERS data and the anecdotal evidence from OBGYN whistleblowers.
So, why are these things not valid, but the Norway and Britain studies are. What would be the explanation for the discrepancy?
"which was published in a respected, peer-reviewed journal last week"
You mean like Lancent or JAMA.
F all the experts. This is the wild wild west, everyone is on their own.
With this study, it would not qualify for use in humans. This is not looking good for the people who fell for what our government leaders and legacy media have been telling everyone. I feel bad for all the children who were forced to take these mRNA shots.
Still claiming all cause mortality isn’t caused by vaccines ?
" the potential autism and brain changes the Turkish researchers found are much harder to track and diagnose than obvious problems like low birthweight or pre-term birth." Yet no govt wants to investigate? As always, "follow the money."
This is a significant finding. I have a five year old grandson that is autistic. After doing research on the subject, I have found that the rate of autism is increasing at a concerning rate even before the gene therapy shots. The rate of autism is approaching 4% and is three times as prevalent in males as in females. The strain on parents is immense. We have him in ABA training that has helped a lot and are giving him supplemental vitamins because autistic kids need more vitamins than normal .We also have him on an experimental program that is designed to repair the brain damage caused by demyelination of the brain nerves caused by excessive inflammation. Time will tell.
An aside: because the mRNAs frequently cause menstrual cycle changes, some mRNA skeptics believe the jabs cause miscarriage and stillbirth. But a large study from Norway in 2022 showed definitively they do not. An even bigger dataset from Britain proves women who receive the shots do not have a higher risk of stillbirth or preterm or low-birthweight babies, though it does not cover miscarriage.)
Sure would like to hear Naomi Wolfe's response to this.
Hi Alex,
Have you read “Turtles All The Way Down”?
Alex,
Pregnant rats and autism link a pretty bleak recommendation for prescription for pregnant women. This from the trial:
“Pregnant women were excluded in 2020 from the big clinical trials that led to the approval of the shots, but ever since regulators and obstetricians have strongly encouraged them to take the shots. The reason is that pregnancy causes weight gain and blood pressure changes that increase Covid risk.”
No, doctors knew better but prescribed anyway. They know that unknown adverse risks downstream (in this case autism as one) would be lurking. They were bullied and scared like so many. But here, their weakness affects the most vulnerable. Fear is everywhere, courage hides.
Another example of how the pandemic was handled so horribly. Encouraging pregnant women was so against common sense.
Nothing new here other than since 2020 the psychopathic entities and criminals responsible for it all have doubled and tripled down within the church of vaccinology. Watch ALL 8 episodes of remedy.film ZERO accountability....its all just "allowed" to continue. All the same players in all the same positions and STILL there are people who ask WHY it all continues. A rapist will rape until IT is not allowed too. It's never been rocket science. Just sayin...
I'm giving up. Vaccine schedule for infants including newborns? Ivermectin? Soaring excess deaths?
What we don't know is how much of the negative effects of the mRNAs are due to the MRNAs themselves and how much is due to the DNA "Klingons" that come along with them.
You wrote "And so even if autism diagnoses notably rise in the next few years, proving the mRNAs are responsible will be next to impossible. An outcome that’ll work out fine for everyone involved - except kids with autism and their families." True that. But the larger issue is less that point than the fact that autism rates have been exploding for decades now, and began rising shortly after the NCVIA unleashed Merck, GSK and Sanofi to perform a vast uncontrolled experiment on 2 generations of children. You want to be the heroic critic of Pfizer and the narrow class of mRNA products and have done good work in that regard. But the problems with the industry, regulatory capture and vaccine injury are so much larger and you are far too reluctant to deal with them. You love to criticize Steve Kirsch and others for being too aggressive in their arguments. Maybe they've had their eyes opened more widely than yours have been. That makes you less a hero than a coward.