URGENT: Giving mRNA Covid vaccines to pregnant rats caused brain changes and autism-like behavior in their young, a new study shows
Naturally, the disturbing finding - which was published in a respected, peer-reviewed journal last week - didn't come from American scientists.
The babies of pregnant rats given Pfizer’s mRNA Covid shot had sharply lower levels of a protein crucial for learning and memory, Turkish researchers have reported.
The male rat offspring also displayed behaviors that correlate to autism in humans, including reduced sociability and repetitive behaviors, the researchers reported. (Female rats did not show similar behaviors; but males generally have higher rates of autism.) The peer-reviewed journal Neurochemical Research published the findings, from four researchers at a medical university in Istanbul.
The study coved only about 40 rats, and it does not prove the vaccines cause autism or similar brain changes in the children of vaccinated pregnant women.
But it does show - again - that the jabs can cause powerful inflammatory and autoimmune responses with unknown consequences, and that their long-term risks have barely been studied.
—
(The news you need. The news you don’t get anywhere else. For 20 cents a day.)
—
The Turkish researchers did not sugarcoat their findings, writing:
Notably, male rats exhibited pronounced autism-like behaviors, characterized by a marked reduction in social interaction and repetitive patterns of behavior. Furthermore, there was a substantial decrease in neuronal counts in critical brain regions, indicating potential neurodegeneration or altered neurodevelopment. Male rats also demonstrated impaired motor performance, evidenced by reduced coordination and agility.
—
(Luckily Pfizer did a ton of work to make sure this wouldn’t be problem in humans. Oh, they didn’t? Hey, everyone makes mistakes.)
(SOURCE)
—
The findings will raise even more questions about whether pregnant women should receive mRNA Covid jabs, an issue that has been controversial for three years.
Pregnant women were excluded in 2020 from the big clinical trials that led to the approval of the shots, but ever since regulators and obstetricians have strongly encouraged them to take the shots. The reason is that pregnancy causes weight gain and blood pressure changes that increase Covid risk.
Still, many women, especially healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies, have a very low baseline risk from Covid and have avoided the jabs.
The obvious failure of the jabs against Omicron has only increased that reluctance. Almost no pregnant women are now getting mRNA boosters.
Yet the Centers for Disease Control and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology continue to recommend the shots for pregnant women.
(An aside: because the mRNAs frequently cause menstrual cycle changes, some mRNA skeptics believe the jabs cause miscarriage and stillbirth. But a large study from Norway in 2022 showed definitively they do not. An even bigger dataset from Britain proves women who receive the shots do not have a higher risk of stillbirth or preterm or low-birthweight babies, though it does not cover miscarriage.)
—
(No, the mRNAs don’t cause miscarriages.)
—
However, the potential autism and brain changes the Turkish researchers found are much harder to track and diagnose than obvious problems like low birthweight or pre-term birth.
Linking them to vaccines given years before will would require large-scale epidemiologic studies, along with expensive basic research to determine potential mechanisms of action.
As the Turkish researchers concluded:
Further research is warranted to validate these findings in human populations and to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying the observed effects.
But neither governments nor vaccine companies have shown any inclination to do that work. And so even if autism diagnoses notably rise in the next few years, proving the mRNAs are responsible will be next to impossible.
An outcome that’ll work out fine for everyone involved - except kids with autism and their families.
Alex: Your unwillingness, to date, to consider the childhood vaccine schedule’s role in the autism epidemic has been very frustrating for people like me who otherwise conisder you a hero. I hope this revalation helps you re-consider that somehow, magically, the childhood vaccines cause no problems…If you are looking for a mechanism of action, Cal Tech’s Paul Patterson proposed a very clear one more than a decade ago: immune activation events in the brains of babies during critical periods of brain formation. These simmering brain infections can be caused my many different antagonists, but man-made nanoparticle aluminum (the kind found in vaccines that isn’t found in nature) is an obvious culprit, becuase lymphocytes transport it to the brain and the body cant excrete it. There’s likely something similar happening with the mRNA shots that hit the brains of the baby rats, perhaps it’s the spike protein. Anyone who takes the time to read Paterson’s seminal paper will be forever changed: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/697/2/Pregnancy.pdf
Thank you for writing this Alex. I'm a friend, not an opponent, but I need to understand why you are relying on a Norway study and a British study to conclude that the shots don't cause stillbirths? What about the Pfizer clinical trials and all the shady things they did there with pregnant women? What about the fact that Pfizer stopped their study of vaccinated pregnant women early? Why would they do this? Here's what an internal email revealed from Jelena Vojicic, vaccines medical lead at Pfizer Canada: “The study enrollment was stopped with incomplete numbers because recruitment was slow and it became unreasonable/inappropriate to randomise pregnant women to placebo given the amount of observational evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, coupled with increasing number of technical committees supporting immunization of pregnant women." So, they stopped the study of pregnant women because of their a priori commitment to the "safe and effective" baloney. And due to the fact that various committees were recommending the shot to pregnant women, never mind finishing the study to see if they're actually safe.
Also, what about the FOIA request of Pfizer that showed that only 270 pregnant women were vaccinated, and out of the 270, there was no outcome reported for 238 of them. Hmmmm. Amongst the remaining 32 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions!!! That's astonishing. This is a document by Pfizer that was forced out of them by FOIA -- the same Pfizer that asked if they could wait 75 years to release such damning data.
Additionally there is the VAERS data and the anecdotal evidence from OBGYN whistleblowers.
So, why are these things not valid, but the Norway and Britain studies are. What would be the explanation for the discrepancy?