202 Comments

This needs to be challenged legally. Biden isn’t competent to have decided anything.

Expand full comment

Hell yes.

So the Democrats said that Biden was not mentally fit to stand before a trial so now he’s magically mentally fit to pardon these people who literally killed millions of grandparents, locked away innocent people in prison for four years and sold our secrets to China?!?!

I'm sorry when Trump pardons the J6 protesters he needs to tell the radicals to STFU.

Expand full comment

Yes, not fit to stand trial, only fit to waive them.

Expand full comment

IMO, J6 pardons are largely for “punishment not fitting the (invented?) crime. Fauci has large scale murder and Nuremberg 2 offenses against humanity. Unrelated, with one being righting a wrong, and the other one of no informed consent and false clinical trials. Malice aforethought. Millions affected and brainwashed today. The new RSV vaccines had a Gillian Barre warning by FDA two weeks ago. Though I wish accountability, Fauci was and is guilty of murder and more - and will walk away. Birx wasn’t pardoned. Many others were not, so perhaps justice will come otherwise? I don’t wish for retribution nor to be compared to the previous and serially criminal prior administration. Biden proved his guilt this morning. The J6 group had violation of the 8th amendment - unjust punishment.

Expand full comment

Birx has admitted much of this was wrong, so I wouldn't want to see them go after her for Fauci's disaster. That guy should pay.

Expand full comment

go after her and she'll squeal on fauci to protect her own ass.

go after fauci for his pre 2014 crimes during the AIDS epidemic. celia farber is the expert on this

Expand full comment

Exactly. That's how it's done.

Expand full comment

According to Scott Atlas (on Trump’s covid task force), it was Birx who drove most of the task force insanity. That doesn’t absolve Fauci from his obviously criminal activity but she was driving things in the White House.

Expand full comment

She also admitted she made mistakes. They all did. And she didn't fund the Wuhan Lab and she did little lying to people. Early on nobody knew what we were dealing with. I'm more understanding of that than Fauci funding that after Obama halted it. He is responsible for this mess. I really felt Birx was doing what she was doing because she truly believed it was right at the time. Fauci was covering his ass.

Expand full comment

I don’t disagree with you. I was just telling you what Dr. Scott Atlas had to say about Birx’s role. He felt that if either one of them had listened to any of what he had to say (with papers he brought with facts to prove) the direction the administration took wouldn’t have happened. (You remember that Trump said after a few weeks that his gut instinct was not to shut things down. And he was correct.) I totally agree that Fauci is at the bottom of all of it but if she had been more professional and took what Dr. Atlas had to say, perhaps all of this wouldn’t have happened.

Alex said he didn’t know how far the pardon goes back. According to one source today, it goes back to 2014. That also indicates to me that this goes back to the point at which he re-started the gain of function research that had been outlawed.

Expand full comment

Really? They did not KNOW? All of IT was a planned event

Expand full comment

Birx did what she did because women love to be bossy. if she can't hen peck her husband at home, she'd love to tell you all what to do. she's a bitchy hall monitor

Expand full comment

They were both a PART of the pre planning of the PLANdemic well before 2020

Expand full comment

Amen. Well said

Expand full comment

Excellent, excellent point.

Expand full comment

The House and Senate need to bring Fauci, Brennan, Clapper, and all the J6 committee members in to testify under oath. Since they have pardons, they have no fifth amendment rights. Then they either tell the truth or get slapped with contempt of Congress and jail like Steve Bannon.

Expand full comment

I think Trump should come into office and issue a blanket 4-year pardon for everyone in his administration, just for the hell of it.

Expand full comment

Yes! That's the key positive that emerges from these egregious pardons.

Expand full comment

I have been reading online analyses saying that pardons once issued cannot be reversed. But there is precedent to suggest that pardons not yet effective (because they weren't yet delivered to the intended recipient) can be, I'll say, taken back. I'm not sure what constitutes delivery in today's modern era, but the point is the effectiveness of the pardon. If a pardon is never effective in the first place, there need be no effort to reverse it. And if Joe Biden, as an elderly man with a poor memory, has been judged not competent to stand trial, does he have the capacity to pardon anyone? Is he even the one doing do, as the Constitution requires? But of course who has legal standing to raise this challenge? I'm guessing SCOTUS would effectively say no one -- mindful of the havoc a ruling otherwise would cause. One last thing: state charges. If Hunter didn't pay federal taxes, do we really think he paid his state taxes? But this would likely be of no help with Fauci, who would no doubt argue he was acting under authority of federal law, and that such preempts state law.

Expand full comment

The power of pardon is plenary and unassailable. The fact that he is senile has no bearing on the argument. There was evidence of his senility was plain prior to the 2020 election hence the "basement campaign".

Expand full comment

A question remains whether one can pardon before a crime has been charged.

Expand full comment

Yes, a president can. Many of those pardoned in the Whiskey Rebellion were not charged. Over 12,000 pardons were issued to Confederates after the Civil War who were not charged with a crime. Richard Nixon had not been charged with a crime. The US Constitution has no such restriction on the power of pardon as do state constitutions. The principle to apply is "qui tacet consentit" or silence means assent or that which is not prohibited, is permitted. The Constitution is a document that contains prohibitions on power and not permissions except obviously in the articles that deal with structure and organization.

Expand full comment

SCOTUS bound, no doubt. that's not pardon, that's immunity, and can only be granted by the prosecution.

Expand full comment

Excellent point.

Expand full comment

How is this legal and binding? How do you pardon someone for something they haven’t done and isn’t defined? The new DOJ has to challenge this

Expand full comment

Fauci is guilty of crimes against humanity going back to HIV and even before.

Expand full comment

This isn’t just corruption, this is Biden trying to rewrite history and shield his cronies before Trump walks in to clean house.

Biden, the puppet of leftist elites, has cemented himself as the most pathetic, destructive, and cowardly president in U.S. history. This isn’t leadership - it’s desperation from a man who couldn’t lead a lemonade stand, let alone the greatest nation on Earth.

His presidency ends as it began: a colossal failure for America

Expand full comment

this is exactly what I shrieked. This cannot be legal, this can't stay legal, presidents shouldn't be allowed to do this

Expand full comment

Maybe someone will be incentivized to give him the Luigi Nicholas Mangione treatment.

Expand full comment

Alex - This means they can go after Francis Collins real hard. Give him immunity from jail time if he signs on Fauci. The truth is still required here.

Expand full comment

yes - go after the the guys without a "get out of jail free" card. and make Fauci testify. He cant plead the fifth.

Expand full comment

I've heard it said about Hunter Biden as well that the upside to a pardon is that he can't now plead the fifth. I don't know if that's true, but it does suggest that Congress can still try to get to the truth even if Fauci's only vulnerability is reputational.

Expand full comment

that is my understanding from lawyer friends. No expert myself. But the truth is more important than any punishment and at this point punishing Fauci would make him a sympathetic character to the left.

Expand full comment

IIRC, If Hunter, Fauci, or anyone lies on the record while giving any testimony related to J6/COVID, Russiagate or anything, their pardon is reversed.

Expand full comment

Pardon isn't reversed but the pardon can only be up to the day issued. If you don't appear it is contempt of court/congress, if you lie it is perjury, and these crimes are after the pardon and you can be tried and jailed.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I knew their were some guardrails, but I guess I didn't RC.

Expand full comment

Didn't he make it effective for a long time out? Does that matter?

Expand full comment

No, pardon for a date range, ending today, the date the pardon was issued.

Expand full comment

I expect that the truth will come out on all of these people. Whether via declassified docs, expedited FOIA requests, etc. All of these crimes will become common knowledge shredding any remaining credibility of the mainstream media who are complicit in cover ups. These people are going to need pardons.

Expand full comment

I liked your comment. But you're assuming the Republicans are interested in uncovering the truth. I think that's misguided.

Remember in the next primary, vote for better, more conservative Republicans.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I am under no such illusion with the R congress. I have hope that most of this can be initiated by Trump himself, then devoured by investigative journalist with integrity. Now is their time for vindication.

Expand full comment

We knew this would happen.

The least Trump can do is remove his taxpayer-paid security.

If he's afraid, he can pay for it himself out of his government pension.

Expand full comment

For those Pardoned by Biden, Trump should sign an Executive Order cutting off all federal retirement payments for anyone who received a presidential pardon until the full nature of their crimes against America and the constitution are fully understood.

And then push congress to pass a law that terminates federal retirement payments for anyone found to have committed felonious acts while employed by the federal government as evidence by either a jury conviction, a presidential pardon for such acts, or a refusal to testify before congress asserting 5th amendment protections!

Expand full comment

That's a great idea.

I'm trying to take some comfort in thinking that pardoned or not, these people are forever disgraced.

Sorta like those asterisks in the MLB stats about Pete Rose.

Expand full comment

The difference is Rose only bet on games he played in and only if they won.

These scoundrels bet against America and sold us out to China.

Cheers, Rosie!

Expand full comment

Yes! They will also be pariahs and Saint Tony won’t like that at all. Cowards all.

Expand full comment

Fauci always envisioned himself as becoming someone like Jonas Salk. At least he is disgraced and won't achieve that, for whatever it's worth.

Expand full comment

he always wanted a nobel prize

Expand full comment

great idea!

Expand full comment

I believe that Fauci knew, not guessed but KNEW, that HCQ+Zinc & Ivermectin either wiped out Covid infections or mitigated its severity. But rather than value human life he chose the big money coming down the road with “vaccines”. And for that, he should do time.

Expand full comment

None of us will have KNOWN a more sinister complicit individual in OUR lifetimes. What he has been responsible for over the past 45 years + is truly beyond words, and now we the people are paying him a generous pension until he dies.

Expand full comment

I wonder if Trump can stop that pension. Maybe. Or people can start suing him.

Expand full comment

Well it is called the swamp for a reason, and just when have you seen that sort of thing occur? I have NOT. I still maintain as I always have that the BEST we the people will get which is not good enough for me is another round or three of taxpayer funded verbal scolding's within congressional hearings. There we will see as always intense verbal scolding's by the likes of Paul, Comer, Cruz, Jordan etc, but we all know where those taxpayer funded hearings end up. Some think its entertaining and accountability on some level, but I do NOT. As many have said here and elsewhere is that the accountability for these CRIMES against humanity will come in death or afterlife. Its tragic considering what these criminals are "allowed" and enabled to continually DO in this life within the swamp for sure!

Expand full comment

100%.

Expand full comment

he certainly knew. early in the pandemic, i went to the NIH website and read a paper on IVM which clearly stated that it had known anti-viral properties. the doctors who used it successfully in their ERs, before they were fired for curing people, didn't just pull it out of the air. they used it because it was likely to work

Expand full comment

Sadly not surprising but the fact that Biden is mentally incompetent should be addressed. This new administration has one helluva to do list!

Expand full comment

Yup. There's nothing that screams guilty for people pardoned for shit they supposedly didn't do.

Minority Report Blanket Pardons.

Fucking scumbags.

Pardon my French.

Expand full comment

Sometimes polite language just won't do!

Expand full comment

Sickening. There’s got to be a way around this. Civil suits maybe? Not surprising but so slimy and lacking in any sense of justice or ethics. I’m guessing Trump’s team has a plan in place for this scenario as they, like many of us, could see the writing on the wall as the saying goes. Hang in there. I just read a short article on some of the 200 executive orders he will sign today and they all sound terrific.

Expand full comment

If there is a pattern of underlying crimes, a federal civil RICO suit. Also, Fauci is a retired officer in the USPHS Commissioned Corps. He could be recalled to active duty by the President and sent somewhere...

Expand full comment

Somewhere far away

Expand full comment

in a galaxy far, far away.

Expand full comment

I like the way you think…Antarctica or…?

Expand full comment

I think whoever really thought this up DOES know Fauci broke the law. An awful side-stepping of justice for all of us. Keep up the good fight, Alex, you may be our last hope.

Expand full comment

I have a suggestion for a new law.

All presidential pardons must be finalized and publicized at least 4 weeks prior to the preceding presidential election.

This way everyone can see what scoundrels are being pardoned and can factor those decisions into their vote.

This sneaky pardoning done in the final days of an administration is garbage.

Also, the president must take a mental competency test before being allowed to pardon anyone.

Expand full comment

How about no pardons in the last year of presidency?

Expand full comment

GatoMalo suggests congressional subpoena of everyone pardoned & extensive questioning under oath. The pardons don't cover any new perjury. Maybe they can't be prosecuted, but they be shamed in front of the whole world

Expand full comment

How about a mental competency test to hold the office in the first place? But yes, I agree with you. It's infuriating.

Expand full comment

There is no such thing as a preemptive pardon so Fauci should be prosecuted for his crimes. That no such concept exists can be illustrated by the following example: A POTUS enters the White House and once all of his personnel have been ensconced in their respective offices, the POTUS issues a preemptive pardon to everyone who is working for him which means that no matter what they may have done in the past, they have each been issued a 'Never Enter A Jail Free Card.' What Biden has done is a sick joke perpetrated on the public which should not be allowed to stand. And the way to do that is to expose this sick joke in a court of law by indicting Fauci. Time for Fauci to spend all that swag he has accumulated on legal fees.

Expand full comment

We knew this would happen.

The least Trump can do is remove Fauci's taxpayer-paid security.

Let Fauci pay for it himself, if he's so afraid/worried.

Expand full comment

That should be done immediately.

Expand full comment

Alex, what party would have legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the proactive pardons given out today?

Expand full comment

None. The power is plenary.

Expand full comment

Does this pardon mean that he can be called to testify & would be unable to assert any 5th Amendment refusal to answer questions? Those could be some interesting Q&A... and lying to Congress in THOSE hearings would be outside the scope of the pardons.

Expand full comment

But he could just say he doesn't remember ...

Expand full comment

Ugh.

Where have we heard that before?

Expand full comment

True, but a good lawyer will obtain copies of emails and texts and force Fauci to read them aloud in open court. That will help jog his memory. Can't wait to witness the spectacle of Fauci reading aloud such items that are absolute admissions against interest.

Expand full comment

Your lawsuit has just gone from necessary to crucial!!

Expand full comment

To massively discredit Fauci, for him to be globally recognized as an instigator and cause of deliberate death in the millions will help. That must happen. Your suit is important. And perhaps a congressional committee should be created just to investigate covid, Gates, WHO, Fauci, NIH & their financial associations.

Expand full comment

Especially go after Fauci's underlings at NIAID. There have to be lots of younger minions who were helping him do his dirty work. Go after them with prosecutions, and watch them sing about Fauci in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

Expand full comment

I believe they can still prosecuted at the State level and also have a subpoena issued to them.

Expand full comment