"The United States has had more than a million deaths from Covid, China has had a only few thousand, almost none since the very beginning of the epidemic."
Says China. I think extreme skepticism is warranted here.
from covid or with covid or a car accident listed as a covid death etc? There was so much corruption and intent in the process of categorizing a wuh-flu death
It was so bad. One analysis by a trio of researchers found that because of the CDC’s overly-inclusive definitions for “case,” “covid hospitalization,” and “covid death,” all of the covid numbers fed to the public should be discounted by a whopping 90%. In other words, key pandemic stats have been exaggerated by about 10-fold.
and follow the money - the medical system could collect with Covid diagnoses and deaths - as could at least some families who applied for FEMA money to pay for funerals/burials of relatives who died from it.
According to the Provider Relief Fund’s FAQ page, the money is given “for individuals with possible or actual cases of COVID-19. HHS broadly views every patient as a possible case of COVID-19.” That same FAQ page notes that “A presumptive case of COVID-19 is a case where a patient’s medical record documentation supports a diagnosis of COVID-19, even if the patient does not have a positive in vitro diagnostic test result in his or her medical record.”
And FEMA does indeed offer financial assistance for covid-related funeral arrangements—up to $9,000. To qualify, the death certificate must “attribute the death directly or indirectly to COVID-19” or “be accompanied by a signed statement from the original certifier of the death certificate or the local medical examiner or coroner from the jurisdiction in which the death occurred listing COVID-19 as a cause or contributing cause of death.”
I think it’s hard work to turn a population of over a billion into obedient slaves........ but Xi is sure doing his best. It’s easier when the population is unarmed and subject to daily social credit scores for survival and controlled by their government masters. It’s easier when these same people get routinely kicked away in isolation.
No deaths from C19 - only a relabeling of co-morbidities as C19. MDs gotta say C19 exists to retain their MDs. See this article in Johns Hopkins student newsletter, blown off after 5 days for misinformation (science and universities NEVER attack scientists with valid hypotheses - proving that Johns Hopkins is totally complicit in this Orwellian scheme). Look at Dr Briand's impartial analysis, ( 11/20, https://web.archive.org/web/20201126171926/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 ) using the CDCs own data (their narrative the opposite of hard data---- believe the data not the cosmic debris narrative and fearporn mainstream media. Herre is how Dr Briand was silenced by Johns Hopkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNHCq699nk4 . Dr Briand is totally qualified in analyzing data, as her Doctor's degree and publications, in the main, are about statistical analysis --- and assuming the data is accurate.
-------------- As far as "testing" is concerned, Dr Peter McCullough, co-inventor of the PCR test -- says PCR test for C19 is invalid.... look up his work (unlikely goo-gle will give you results, as they censor any truths that go against the C19 narrative -- and McCullough, a well-respected research doctor, has been literally tarred and feathered by Fraudxxi and MSM.
Correct. It wasn't a pandemic until they starting 'testing'. The virus was already in Italy in Sep 2019, yet there was no mass deaths until March, when they started testing.
If the USA Government leadership is using the PCR test are not fda approved to detect contagiousness disease period is less than <5% accurate. If you think this article it's sounds very similar to a few months ago here in America. Wait and see what 2024 brings!?
They can try to hide the truth -- but there are leaks... Dr Briand, who is the right one to ask, as she is professor of statistical analysis, written books on such, blows it away in nov 2020, so, they rewarded her by deeming her article "misinformation" ..... never done in science, as the scientific method is strictly about truth, not attacking someone. Which shows that Johns Hopkins U is a puppet for who is propagating these C19 lies --- right to the highest person on the totem pole!!
Regarding 'deaths from the rona', with a PCR test that proved to give 97% false positives then I'd say 3% of a million is about right and they'll all be north of 80. The 4th theory is that Xi is simply as daft as a brush and has a loose screw, ye know like Blackface, Pelosi, Biden, Fauchi, Tam, Johnson, Ardern, Albanese etc... ye get the drift. Food for thought!!!
I think the reverse may be true in both cases. By the CDCs own data, only 6% of US Covid deaths had no comorbidities which raises troubling questions on the validity of the official death count. As for china's numbers I'm very skeptical that their deaths are that low.
The reason China are continuing with lockdowns seems plain to me, I’m not sure why more people aren’t pointing it out. Lockdowns give them a reason to turn off their economy in the short term. They know they’re the engine room of the world, and they think that they’re going to have to fight a war within the next 10 years; so they’re trying to be the straw that broke the camels back and bring the west to its knees - to try and make us as weak an opponent as possible. See also TikTok and fentanyl.
A million deaths in US were not caused by covid, but by covid malpractice. Most were preventable. Many were due to other causes, but misreported for financial benefit. Nothing is what it seems.
Could it be that the lockdowns are keeping the populace from having ‘runs on the bank’ because of their out of control housing and mortgage market? If the bank runs start, what does it end with? Good question for the USA too
Many question the covid narrative as covering up financial meltdowns that were staved off by the covid trillions. Now we have the inflation to prove it.
Last April, Chinese banks unexpectedly froze the accounts of numerous customers without a plausible explanation. Recently, would-be protestors trying to get their money back found their digital covid health apps ‘red’, meaning they lose access to nearly all public services.
This is a perfect real-world example of the tyranny of covid health passes. Obviously these protestors don’t actually have covid. They aren’t a public health threat in the slightest. They are a POLITICAL nuisance — so the ruling class simply turns them off.
And don’t worry, this is coming soon to an area near you. After all, it’s so unseemly to physically confront protestors — much better off to unperson them from a safe distance.
People need to remember much of the WEF 2030 agenda in heavily influenced by these CCP models. Gates and Fauci both have lauded it as the perfect model
The CCP is nuts. Like, so nuts we can't begin to understand why they do the stuff they do.
Just look at the Great Leap Forward. Why did they kill all the birds in China, unleashing an insect plague that devastated their crops? Why did they insist on farmers cultivating their soil to a depth of 6 feet, at gunpoint?
First of all a million Americans did not die of COVID; when the death count was somewhere around the 600K mark, the CDC admitted that 9K died from COVID the rest died with COVID. Second, I was never terrified of COVID.
Alex in China now you can't go into any building without scanning a QR health tracker code, you have to check your cellphone every day to see what your "color status" is, and so on. Nothing China had in terms of social credit systems was anywhere near this all-encompassing prior to covid, and there are not many other pretenses in which this total surveillance state could have been constructed so quickly.
Whatever else the other theories have going for them, theory 1 is right.
Last April, Chinese banks unexpectedly froze the accounts of numerous customers without a plausible explanation. Recently, would-be protestors trying to get their money back found their digital covid health apps ‘red’, meaning they lose access to nearly all public services.
Went to visit a friend in the hospital, when entering, a large sign said that everyone visiting had to wear a mask, any anyone defying would be escorted out. When i got to the room, no one was wearing a mask in the room. Check a few other rooms and all in the rooms were not wearing a mask. All the Dr.s and nurses were mask all the time but working around the patients who were not masked. Asked a nurse about the sign, she just shrugged and walked on with her mask on. The patients are not complying, but the staff is. How strange.
Regarding China having only a "few thousand" Covid deaths - from what I have read, it was probably way, way more than that. In the fall of 2019, I understood that so many students on university campuses were sick, that the campuses were closed to foreign visitors. Months before the pandemic was formally announced. Then there were reports that mysteriously, the number of cell phone users in China had dropped by a million, fairly early in the pandemic, which may have been people who had died who no longer used their phones. And the mobile crematoriums that were seen but explained as just a health measure to burn the trash, keep the cities clean. They claimed few deaths but there were lots of factors, including videos made by Chinese citizens that appeared and were quickly removed from the internet, that seemed to indicate a lot more deaths than what the Chinese were admitting to.
As for Japan - apparently many people have missed the report, that Japan had noticed some metallic bits in the vaccine, decided it must be a contaminant, and they ceased use of the vaccines, opting for Ivermectin (which comes from a micro-organism found in the soil in Japan, apparently only in Japan). Once they gave up the shots and relied on Ivemerctin widely, I have read that the pandemic was over in Japan within about a month.
Today, if you search for this story, you will find numerous, numerous links where fact checkers have checked statement and claimed it is totally false - you can search and find what the fact checkers now say about this matter. BUT - when fact checkers argue so diligently against something, that could be a clue that it is actually the opposite of what the fact checkers say. I do remember seeing this story from multiple news sources, though some of these apparently have been scrubbbed from the internet.
However, this first link below from Sept 1, 2021 is a good one. It discusses the apparent contamination in the Moderna vaccine, and it does say that the vaccines were halted on Aug 26, 2021 - at least at that time. Meanwhile, it also says that "Ivermectin has been approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health as a COVID-19 treatment since at least May 2020, according to Japanese national newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun." Keep in mind, the "fact checkers" today say that Ivermectin was NOT approved by the Japanese government, but here it says was approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health. In addition, the article does explain that Japan tended to keep quiet about Ivermectin possibly to avoid offending the US or US pharma companies, since the US was officially at the government level opposed to Ivermectin, as we know. So, that first link is a good one, and I have quoted several paragraphs, but the entire page may be worthwhile reading. Then I also, after that, included a couple links to the "contaminants" in the vaccine and the two deaths that the Japense govt apparently decided were not actually from the "contaminants" - but I don't have time to dig into this more - you could read this to have an idea, and dig around more to see what may be found on the internet. I didn't actually save the links from the original articles I read - at that time, earlier in the pandemic, I had no idea how many things would be later scrubbed from the internet and no longer findable. But the first link gives some information related to this - though this does not say that they "ended" the pandemic after stopping the vaccines - but it does say that Covid cases had spiked after the vaccines began to be used, so it makes sense, if they stopped using vaccines, plus using Ivermectin, they would have gotten the pandemic under control quickly - they do mention in the article that countries that used Ivermectin had much better control of Covid which I've also read (and seen tables showing this, but I don't know where to find that now).
Japan suspends use of Moderna injections after “metallic particles” found in vials; country continues using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 September 1, 2021
"Japan suspends 2.63 million Moderna doses"
"Japanese public broadcasting outlet NHK reported that 1.63 million Moderna doses were halted on August 26. The Japanese Health Ministry said that metal particles that were “attracted to a magnet” were found in Moderna vials. A total of three lots of Moderna vials (3004667, 3004734 and 3004956) from eight vaccination sites were taken out of circulation. The lots were manufactured in Spain by a company called Rovi Laboratories. Investigators are still determining what exactly the substance is. But the problem worsened this past weekend."
"Another one million Moderna doses were taken out of circulation in Japan on Sunday. Officials in the prefectures (political subdivisions) of Okinawa and Gunma said contaminated vials forced the suspension. At least two men, age 30 and 38, died after receiving the contaminated Moderna injections, according to the Japan Times. Gunma officials found a “black substance” in several Moderna vials. A pink substance was found in the Okinawa vials."
"Dr. Harou Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, held a press conference on February 9, 2021. He pointed out the obvious – countries using Ivermectin for any diseases (not necessarily COVID) had very low COVID numbers. Dr. Ozaki said that COVID-19 patients should be given Ivermectin based on how its presence typically means lower COVID cases and hospitalizations. Ivermection “[has] few side effects. I would like the government to consider treatment at the level of the family doctor,” he said."
"He repeated those sentiments on August 19."
“Ivermectin has the potential to become the “savior” of the corona pandemic. Looking at the clinical trial reports in the world so far, it cannot be said that it does not work at all.”
"But Japan was already using Ivermectin before the presser and reiteration. Clinical trials testing Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 were announced at Kitasato University in May 2020. But it does not appear those trials were ever completed. Ivermectin has been approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health as a COVID-19 treatment since at least May 2020, according to Japanese national newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun."
"Japan doesn’t actively promote or even mention Ivermectin in media because of the obvious potential backlash from big pharma, U.S. and European governments. Further, the Japanese government lacks the logistical necessities (production, distribution networks, etc.) to make Ivermectin the primary COVID-19 treatment in the country."
"There is no denying Japan is and has been an “Ivermectin user country” throughout the so-called pandemic. The only thing that has changed in the last few months that caused the country’s spike in COVID-19 cases is higher vaccination rates. There’s no denying that either."
Thank you very much for the elaboration. I was particularly interested in their policy on Ivermectin, which I believe is the most vilified medicine in our life time in spite of its proven efficacy/safety and enormous potential. One more thing I would like to know is whether they usually prescribe Ivermectin alone, or in combination with others, as Peter McCullough and other real doctors have been doing. It's intriguing to me because there have been a couple of trials in which Ivermectin alone has failed to show its efficacy. Yes, I know that those trials are inherently, or worse, intentionally defective. Nevertheless, since, presumably, Japan is the only country that has data on the efficacy of Ivermectin, I guess if they usually prescribe it alone for CoVid, it might imply that it does work contrary to the prevailing narrative. Again thank you very much!
Alex is not a medical doctor and has never treated a patient with Covid which is why he has no idea how well it works. After you treat a patient whose oxygen levels are drifting down into the low 80's, who has had a fever and diarrhea for about a week, with a pre-existing auto-immune disease - and they immediately start getting better in the first 24 hours - you see that kind of thing several times and you begin to get the idea that Ivermectin works. The first time I used it, I used only 12 mg, the dose they were giving out in Covid kits in India, because when I checked at US government websites (CDC for one), it said Ivermectin is dangerous, don't use it. But I knew they were using it successfully in India and used their dose. That is less than we typically use in US, but most people in India are smaller than Americans, thinner, so 12 mg. is adequate for many. Since we tend to be larger, more obesity, makes sense to dose by body weight as we do here, as I soon learned.
Well, in that first link that I gave, it did say that the Japanese Health Ministry had approved Ivermectin, so it must have worked, but they were low key about it to avoid offending big pharma and the US. But I will say, I have read most of the Ivermectin research - there have been more than 60 studies worldwide and most of them show safety and efficacy, and seems to me many using Ivermectin as a single agent. However, the unsuccessful trials typically have 1) used too low a dose 2) for way too short a time 3) and / or made people wait past the first week or after at least 5 days to begin treatment, when by that time, the virus has already replicated and it's too late to prevent replication, or 4) do all three things - make everyone wait 5 days after they test +, then treat for only a day or maybe up to 3 days, but use a low dose, and THEN stop treatment - and yeah, if you do it that way, it's way less helpful than it would have been. But I know, in the US typically we use it with other supplements and meds, which I do think is best, but I also think it has some benefit on its own especially if it is started early. Dr. Been had an educational video for health professionals in which he showed that one mechanism of action of Ivermectin was to prevent the virus from being transported into the nucleus of the cell and if it doesn't get into the nucleus, the virus can't replicate - but - if the virus has already replicated extensively, it's too late for that particular mechanism of action to help. But Ivermectin has multiple mechanisms of action and generally helps during all stages of the illness whether early, late, long Covid, etc. As a practical matter, it seems to me there are rather a lot of conditions in medicine where one always uses more than one med. To control seizures, for example, sometimes one med is not enough but you use two meds and you get the seizures to stop, and you thank God they both work together. Or for stomach ulcers caused by H. pylori, the protocl is three antibiotics used together. For Bipolar Disorder in psychiatry (manic depressive illness) it's rare to see patients who are maintained entirely on one med. So - not unusual if Ivermectin works better along with Vitamins and supplements etc., but my opinion is that it has independent benefit even as a single agent. It's been a while since I read all those studies - but I think there are studies that show that though I could not say which ones at the moment. Well, I think in a study in Argentina, now that I think about it, a study of prevention for health care providers, where the health care professionals had a choice to have Ivermectin or not, and one arm of that study looked at Ivermectin alone. No one in the Ivermectin groups got Covid, even though treating Covid patients, but in the no-Ivermectin group, 58% got Covid while treating Covid patients. At that time, it was the original Covid virus that was going around, not the variant, and this was with Ivermectin 0.2 mg. per kg once a week. So, I thought that was pretty impressive.
Thank you very much for the further elucidation and clarification! It deserves to be widely propagated. Would you consider to get together your thought on Ivermectin and publish it on other platforms? I deeply appreciate your commitment and contribution to the Common Good.
Thank you for your comment, Pete. I have at times posted comments at El Gato Malo's substack, and maybe a couple others, and on some email groups. I am pretty busy and my limited because I am still a practicing physician, and I also have responsibilities in a non-profit organization that ends up being pushed to the side when I am online too much. But when Ivermectin comes up or treatment questions arise, I do try to post when I can. I wish I had time to read more, or to watch some of the good videos, it's hard to keep up with all the information. I worry a little because I am aware of physicians who have been investigated or had loss of licensure simply by saying things that didn't match the Pfizer narrative. If you want to find more info on Ivermectin or find a doctor in your state who will prescribe it, and a pharmacy that will fill it, get famliar with the website FLCCC.net There is a treatment protocol for Covid prevention, and another one for early outpatient treatment. The prevention protocol will give recommendations for various supplements, and some people also take Ivermectin once a week, and perhaps keep some on hand in case you got sick anyway. The original prevention protocol included Ivermectin 0.2 mg. per kg once a week (convert your body weight to kg and multiply by 0.2) then about the time of the Delta variant, they decided that you needed to do that twice a week - though since Omicron it is said that once a week seems to be "enough." Anyway, that is a prescription item, so it is really between you and your physician whether you need it or not at any time, and what dose for how long - which is why it is good there are telemed doctors in every state, and a list you can access to get individual medical advice and treatment if needed.
I think I have to say, nothing that I type here in a comment is intended as a specific recommendation for any individual, as one needs to discuss with one's own physician (which can be by telemed, and can be one of numerous physicians on the FLCCC list). But - some general information about items that have been recommended by the FLCCC and by others, and supported by research -
Vitamin D is something everyone needs anyway, aside from Covid issues, we need it for functioning of our immune system. Best thing is to get your doctor to check your Vitamin D level, then you know what it is - the way it is measured, anything from 30 to 100 is supposed to be "normal range" but for protection from severe Covid, many physicians think it needs to be at least 50. At 50, it is said, you might get Covid but you are very unlikely to end up in the hospital, it will not be severe, or it might prevent entirely. But some are saying if your level is 80, you are pretty much bulletproof, and you will probably not even get Covid at all, and not flu, and not a cold or any respiratory virus. However as we know, the government says we all need the vaccine to be protected and it would be a mistake to rely on Vitamin D instead of a vaccine, and doctors have lost their license for saying otherwise - though is the government still saying that this week? When there is so much in the news about lack of efficacy and so much data. And then again, I saw a video in which Fauci admits he takes Vitamin D and he actually said it does help even though he certainly did not make that a talking point - and he said it, hopefully no one will lose their license for saying that Vitamin D does have a role in prevention. There is research showing that Vitamin D is protective against any respiratory infection, not only Covid.
Anyway if you do not know your Vitamin D level, the FLCCC and others recommend that you take 1,000 or 2,000 units per day for prevention (some of the current labels are still in International Units, or it may be in micgrograms, that is, IU vs. mcg, but I always think in terms of IU. So, 1,000 or 2,000 IU for prevention or 5,000 per day (sometimes more) if you have a Covid infection. I recommend that people take this because so many people are deficient in Vitamin D - the majority of Americans are low, and that is true in many countries. Though if you find out what your level is, if you want to get your level higher, there are protocols for increasing your vitamin D intake for a period of time to get where you need to be. If your level is below 30, that is deficient, but even though 30 is supposedly "normal" it doesn't really help greatly in regard to protection from respiratory infections.
Then, if you have some Ivermectin on hand just in case of illness, that can be a good thing, or some are still using it once or twice a week, though if you do not have other risk factors, probably most people don't need to take it every week, just have some on hand in case it is hard to obtain when you need it. At the FLCCC.net webpage, they have lists of phyisicians and other health care professionals who will prescribe ivermectin by telemed, and also lists of pharmacies that will fill and do mail order that will serve your state. Usual dose for the recent variants - if needed - is 0.4 mg. per kg. But then again, with Omicron being so mild, it's possible one would not need medication, though we don't know about whatever variants we might see next.
And there are other vitamins, supplements, and prescription meds that might be used, but it depends on the person, what symptoms they have, what risk factors, what severity etc. But at the FLCCC.net website, you will see lists of items that are good to use for prevention to stay healthy. They do update the protocols as new research emerges, or with new variants, new experience, but they list Vitamin C, probably 500 mg. per day for prevention and twice a day if ill, zinc, 30 or 40 mg. per day for prevention, but 50 mg. twice a day if ill just for a week or two. Quercetin is great for prevention or treatment, and if no Ivermectin is available, 500 mg one or two twice a day for treatment, or perhaps 250 mg. or 500 mg. twice a day for prevention. I have used a higher dose of Quercetin than what FLCCC suggests, based on a paper by Dr. David Moskowitz - Quercetin comes from apples, berries, several fruits and vegetables and is on an FDA list of items that are "generally recognized as safe." Except anyone on blood thinners like Coumadin, in my opinion, or anyone with end stage kidney disease, should not use Quercetin.
This is probably more wordy than it needed to be, but I realized I have to be careful and not make an actual medical recommendation - I'm suggesting you can look at the FLCCC.net protocols which are on the internet for anyone to see, and then ask your own doctor or a telemed doctor if you need to consider any prescription items, or to discuss their individualized recommendations for you since it's not "one size fits all." There is a lot of pressure on physicians not to say anything that would increase vaccine hesitancy as the government still wants a needle in every arm, though it seems to me if one reads the news carefully every day, depending on what news one can find, but there is something new every day, such as, statements from Pfizer or the VAERs data that might give anyone a little hesitance - and truly, if a physician questions The Science, depending on what The Science is this week, one might be investigated or face loss of licensure. No freedom of thought or freedom of speech for physicians. I hope this helps. I am pretty sure at the FLCCC webpage there is a summary of a lot of the Ivermectin research, and then also, the physicians who are leaders in the FLCCC have a webinar once a week on Wed. evenings and you can learn a lot there also. These physicians are brilliant, truly. Dr. Paul Marik has written hundreds of journal articles, book chapters, and textbooks for critical care physicians, and taught in medical schools prior to Covid - these are truly top physicians who have now put their focus on preventing and treating Covid, and they always have good inforamtion.
My theory on China’s COVID policies. 1) They know exactly what the mRNA deathvax will do to the long term health of people - it’s why they didn’t use them. 2) They know exactly what naturally acquired COVID and its toxic spike protein does to the long term health of a nation. 3) They are in an undeclared unconventional war with the US and COVID is a tactic in that war. 4) They must pursue zero COVID long enough for 1) and 2) to give them an unanswerable advantage in 3).
I have another theory. It’s a biological weapon they created and they know the impact. And maybe they want to do everything possible to keep it out of their population for longevity sake.
"The United States has had more than a million deaths from Covid, China has had a only few thousand, almost none since the very beginning of the epidemic."
Says China. I think extreme skepticism is warranted here.
from covid or with covid or a car accident listed as a covid death etc? There was so much corruption and intent in the process of categorizing a wuh-flu death
It was so bad. One analysis by a trio of researchers found that because of the CDC’s overly-inclusive definitions for “case,” “covid hospitalization,” and “covid death,” all of the covid numbers fed to the public should be discounted by a whopping 90%. In other words, key pandemic stats have been exaggerated by about 10-fold.
https://euphoricrecall.substack.com/p/hysteria-is-far-more-deadly-than
WOW! A scamdemic of epic proportions
This fits my seat-of-the-pants estimate too. 10x seems about right.
That was the plan all along. Read "Covid Coup-Rise of the Fourth Reich" by Dr. Leonard Horowitz
That is a great read. It puts in words everything we've been thinking. "We're all in this together" Yea, sure we are.
I was informed of that in 2020 by an ER nurse.
and follow the money - the medical system could collect with Covid diagnoses and deaths - as could at least some families who applied for FEMA money to pay for funerals/burials of relatives who died from it.
Yup, you're absolutely correct.
According to the Provider Relief Fund’s FAQ page, the money is given “for individuals with possible or actual cases of COVID-19. HHS broadly views every patient as a possible case of COVID-19.” That same FAQ page notes that “A presumptive case of COVID-19 is a case where a patient’s medical record documentation supports a diagnosis of COVID-19, even if the patient does not have a positive in vitro diagnostic test result in his or her medical record.”
And FEMA does indeed offer financial assistance for covid-related funeral arrangements—up to $9,000. To qualify, the death certificate must “attribute the death directly or indirectly to COVID-19” or “be accompanied by a signed statement from the original certifier of the death certificate or the local medical examiner or coroner from the jurisdiction in which the death occurred listing COVID-19 as a cause or contributing cause of death.”
https://euphoricrecall.substack.com/p/pandemania
FEMA paid for 400,000 funerals at a cost of $2.5 billion.
Not to mention all the 85 and ups who died. Who were going to die anyway.
Yeah I believe Brandon’s zero inflation numbers more than China’s Covid numbers.
They are one in the same...both bold faced lying pony soldiers
😆
I think it’s hard work to turn a population of over a billion into obedient slaves........ but Xi is sure doing his best. It’s easier when the population is unarmed and subject to daily social credit scores for survival and controlled by their government masters. It’s easier when these same people get routinely kicked away in isolation.
If they had 2nd amendment right it would not be China as it is now that is for certain
There have been nowhere NEAR a million deaths from Covid in the United States or anywhere else.
No deaths from C19 - only a relabeling of co-morbidities as C19. MDs gotta say C19 exists to retain their MDs. See this article in Johns Hopkins student newsletter, blown off after 5 days for misinformation (science and universities NEVER attack scientists with valid hypotheses - proving that Johns Hopkins is totally complicit in this Orwellian scheme). Look at Dr Briand's impartial analysis, ( 11/20, https://web.archive.org/web/20201126171926/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 ) using the CDCs own data (their narrative the opposite of hard data---- believe the data not the cosmic debris narrative and fearporn mainstream media. Herre is how Dr Briand was silenced by Johns Hopkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNHCq699nk4 . Dr Briand is totally qualified in analyzing data, as her Doctor's degree and publications, in the main, are about statistical analysis --- and assuming the data is accurate.
-------------- As far as "testing" is concerned, Dr Peter McCullough, co-inventor of the PCR test -- says PCR test for C19 is invalid.... look up his work (unlikely goo-gle will give you results, as they censor any truths that go against the C19 narrative -- and McCullough, a well-respected research doctor, has been literally tarred and feathered by Fraudxxi and MSM.
Correct. It wasn't a pandemic until they starting 'testing'. The virus was already in Italy in Sep 2019, yet there was no mass deaths until March, when they started testing.
There is NO WAY the PRC has only has a few thousand deaths from the Wuhan Red Death. They've only acknowledged that amount in public.
Yes. Both figures are products of fraud: the China figure manipulated down (for "national pride"), the US figure manipulated up (for "fear-porn").
As I posted/commented elsewhere, if there is no unique C19, then there are no deaths from
C19. Original articles in Jan & March 2020 by Dr Li and Dr Fraudxxi tell it all.. as they had a dry run on coronavirus in 2019, Bill Gates heavily involved. Then the NEJM articles -- which show the whole show is a show. Here are the articles: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001316 . and Fraudxxi's: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejme2002387
If the USA Government leadership is using the PCR test are not fda approved to detect contagiousness disease period is less than <5% accurate. If you think this article it's sounds very similar to a few months ago here in America. Wait and see what 2024 brings!?
Or, how many people really died of Covid in the US?
Were/are Chinese hospitals incentivised to report covid "cases" and "deaths"?
Zero
"Of covid" - much, much less than "with covid."
See my comment above. Dr Briand's article is worthy of looking at -- as she demonstrates that the C19 deaths are not from C19, but from a relabeling of comorbidity deaths from all other causes as C19 https://web.archive.org/web/20201126171926/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19
Yes, extreme skepticism!
Many thanks - love that they cannot hide the truth, even when called 'misinformation'.
They can try to hide the truth -- but there are leaks... Dr Briand, who is the right one to ask, as she is professor of statistical analysis, written books on such, blows it away in nov 2020, so, they rewarded her by deeming her article "misinformation" ..... never done in science, as the scientific method is strictly about truth, not attacking someone. Which shows that Johns Hopkins U is a puppet for who is propagating these C19 lies --- right to the highest person on the totem pole!!
Regarding 'deaths from the rona', with a PCR test that proved to give 97% false positives then I'd say 3% of a million is about right and they'll all be north of 80. The 4th theory is that Xi is simply as daft as a brush and has a loose screw, ye know like Blackface, Pelosi, Biden, Fauchi, Tam, Johnson, Ardern, Albanese etc... ye get the drift. Food for thought!!!
On both sides. The U.S. number and also the China number.
I think the reverse may be true in both cases. By the CDCs own data, only 6% of US Covid deaths had no comorbidities which raises troubling questions on the validity of the official death count. As for china's numbers I'm very skeptical that their deaths are that low.
Says the US. I think extreme skepticism is warranted here
Silly Alex! Xi hasn't failed, it is THE PEOPLE who have failed to live up to his glorious plans!
Do you even communism?
The reason China are continuing with lockdowns seems plain to me, I’m not sure why more people aren’t pointing it out. Lockdowns give them a reason to turn off their economy in the short term. They know they’re the engine room of the world, and they think that they’re going to have to fight a war within the next 10 years; so they’re trying to be the straw that broke the camels back and bring the west to its knees - to try and make us as weak an opponent as possible. See also TikTok and fentanyl.
A million deaths in US were not caused by covid, but by covid malpractice. Most were preventable. Many were due to other causes, but misreported for financial benefit. Nothing is what it seems.
Agree 💯%
Could it be that the lockdowns are keeping the populace from having ‘runs on the bank’ because of their out of control housing and mortgage market? If the bank runs start, what does it end with? Good question for the USA too
Many question the covid narrative as covering up financial meltdowns that were staved off by the covid trillions. Now we have the inflation to prove it.
They're using covid as an excuse to crack down on protestors.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/chinese-covid-protocols-used-to-stifle
Last April, Chinese banks unexpectedly froze the accounts of numerous customers without a plausible explanation. Recently, would-be protestors trying to get their money back found their digital covid health apps ‘red’, meaning they lose access to nearly all public services.
This is a perfect real-world example of the tyranny of covid health passes. Obviously these protestors don’t actually have covid. They aren’t a public health threat in the slightest. They are a POLITICAL nuisance — so the ruling class simply turns them off.
And don’t worry, this is coming soon to an area near you. After all, it’s so unseemly to physically confront protestors — much better off to unperson them from a safe distance.
People need to remember much of the WEF 2030 agenda in heavily influenced by these CCP models. Gates and Fauci both have lauded it as the perfect model
Too big to fail bailouts? Seems like a great reset
Does feel overtly intentional doesn't it
I have a different theory.
The CCP is nuts. Like, so nuts we can't begin to understand why they do the stuff they do.
Just look at the Great Leap Forward. Why did they kill all the birds in China, unleashing an insect plague that devastated their crops? Why did they insist on farmers cultivating their soil to a depth of 6 feet, at gunpoint?
First of all a million Americans did not die of COVID; when the death count was somewhere around the 600K mark, the CDC admitted that 9K died from COVID the rest died with COVID. Second, I was never terrified of COVID.
Alex in China now you can't go into any building without scanning a QR health tracker code, you have to check your cellphone every day to see what your "color status" is, and so on. Nothing China had in terms of social credit systems was anywhere near this all-encompassing prior to covid, and there are not many other pretenses in which this total surveillance state could have been constructed so quickly.
Whatever else the other theories have going for them, theory 1 is right.
And when you are a political problem, they just turn you red.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/chinese-covid-protocols-used-to-stifle
Last April, Chinese banks unexpectedly froze the accounts of numerous customers without a plausible explanation. Recently, would-be protestors trying to get their money back found their digital covid health apps ‘red’, meaning they lose access to nearly all public services.
Uncle Xi is using Fentanyl to his advantage and this needs to be stopped now.
Went to visit a friend in the hospital, when entering, a large sign said that everyone visiting had to wear a mask, any anyone defying would be escorted out. When i got to the room, no one was wearing a mask in the room. Check a few other rooms and all in the rooms were not wearing a mask. All the Dr.s and nurses were mask all the time but working around the patients who were not masked. Asked a nurse about the sign, she just shrugged and walked on with her mask on. The patients are not complying, but the staff is. How strange.
Regarding China having only a "few thousand" Covid deaths - from what I have read, it was probably way, way more than that. In the fall of 2019, I understood that so many students on university campuses were sick, that the campuses were closed to foreign visitors. Months before the pandemic was formally announced. Then there were reports that mysteriously, the number of cell phone users in China had dropped by a million, fairly early in the pandemic, which may have been people who had died who no longer used their phones. And the mobile crematoriums that were seen but explained as just a health measure to burn the trash, keep the cities clean. They claimed few deaths but there were lots of factors, including videos made by Chinese citizens that appeared and were quickly removed from the internet, that seemed to indicate a lot more deaths than what the Chinese were admitting to.
As for Japan - apparently many people have missed the report, that Japan had noticed some metallic bits in the vaccine, decided it must be a contaminant, and they ceased use of the vaccines, opting for Ivermectin (which comes from a micro-organism found in the soil in Japan, apparently only in Japan). Once they gave up the shots and relied on Ivemerctin widely, I have read that the pandemic was over in Japan within about a month.
Could you please provide a little more about your story on Japan? It is very intriguing to say the least. Thanks in advance!
Here's a good read: https://www.theepochtimes.com/foreign-metal-like-objects-some-appearing-as-graphene-family-superstructures-found-in-94-percent-of-people-who-took-mrna-vaccines-italian-doctors_4702330.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2022-09-07&utm_medium=email&est=HTaOFmb%2FX0urJBaVaSEpuHVqEJRP7dXAUyaEQYCr%2Boz2QyIjPIBxTaGLTry5Coc0nXPXv%2B3sqg%3D%3D
Today, if you search for this story, you will find numerous, numerous links where fact checkers have checked statement and claimed it is totally false - you can search and find what the fact checkers now say about this matter. BUT - when fact checkers argue so diligently against something, that could be a clue that it is actually the opposite of what the fact checkers say. I do remember seeing this story from multiple news sources, though some of these apparently have been scrubbbed from the internet.
However, this first link below from Sept 1, 2021 is a good one. It discusses the apparent contamination in the Moderna vaccine, and it does say that the vaccines were halted on Aug 26, 2021 - at least at that time. Meanwhile, it also says that "Ivermectin has been approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health as a COVID-19 treatment since at least May 2020, according to Japanese national newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun." Keep in mind, the "fact checkers" today say that Ivermectin was NOT approved by the Japanese government, but here it says was approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health. In addition, the article does explain that Japan tended to keep quiet about Ivermectin possibly to avoid offending the US or US pharma companies, since the US was officially at the government level opposed to Ivermectin, as we know. So, that first link is a good one, and I have quoted several paragraphs, but the entire page may be worthwhile reading. Then I also, after that, included a couple links to the "contaminants" in the vaccine and the two deaths that the Japense govt apparently decided were not actually from the "contaminants" - but I don't have time to dig into this more - you could read this to have an idea, and dig around more to see what may be found on the internet. I didn't actually save the links from the original articles I read - at that time, earlier in the pandemic, I had no idea how many things would be later scrubbed from the internet and no longer findable. But the first link gives some information related to this - though this does not say that they "ended" the pandemic after stopping the vaccines - but it does say that Covid cases had spiked after the vaccines began to be used, so it makes sense, if they stopped using vaccines, plus using Ivermectin, they would have gotten the pandemic under control quickly - they do mention in the article that countries that used Ivermectin had much better control of Covid which I've also read (and seen tables showing this, but I don't know where to find that now).
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/09/01/japan-suspends-use-of-moderna-injections-after-metallic-particles-found-in-vials-country-continues-using-ivermectin-to-treat-covid-19/
Japan suspends use of Moderna injections after “metallic particles” found in vials; country continues using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 September 1, 2021
"Japan suspends 2.63 million Moderna doses"
"Japanese public broadcasting outlet NHK reported that 1.63 million Moderna doses were halted on August 26. The Japanese Health Ministry said that metal particles that were “attracted to a magnet” were found in Moderna vials. A total of three lots of Moderna vials (3004667, 3004734 and 3004956) from eight vaccination sites were taken out of circulation. The lots were manufactured in Spain by a company called Rovi Laboratories. Investigators are still determining what exactly the substance is. But the problem worsened this past weekend."
"Another one million Moderna doses were taken out of circulation in Japan on Sunday. Officials in the prefectures (political subdivisions) of Okinawa and Gunma said contaminated vials forced the suspension. At least two men, age 30 and 38, died after receiving the contaminated Moderna injections, according to the Japan Times. Gunma officials found a “black substance” in several Moderna vials. A pink substance was found in the Okinawa vials."
"Dr. Harou Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, held a press conference on February 9, 2021. He pointed out the obvious – countries using Ivermectin for any diseases (not necessarily COVID) had very low COVID numbers. Dr. Ozaki said that COVID-19 patients should be given Ivermectin based on how its presence typically means lower COVID cases and hospitalizations. Ivermection “[has] few side effects. I would like the government to consider treatment at the level of the family doctor,” he said."
"He repeated those sentiments on August 19."
“Ivermectin has the potential to become the “savior” of the corona pandemic. Looking at the clinical trial reports in the world so far, it cannot be said that it does not work at all.”
"But Japan was already using Ivermectin before the presser and reiteration. Clinical trials testing Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 were announced at Kitasato University in May 2020. But it does not appear those trials were ever completed. Ivermectin has been approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health as a COVID-19 treatment since at least May 2020, according to Japanese national newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun."
"Japan doesn’t actively promote or even mention Ivermectin in media because of the obvious potential backlash from big pharma, U.S. and European governments. Further, the Japanese government lacks the logistical necessities (production, distribution networks, etc.) to make Ivermectin the primary COVID-19 treatment in the country."
"There is no denying Japan is and has been an “Ivermectin user country” throughout the so-called pandemic. The only thing that has changed in the last few months that caused the country’s spike in COVID-19 cases is higher vaccination rates. There’s no denying that either."
https://news.yahoo.com/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-135634842.html
Moderna to recall COVID-19 doses in Japan after stainless steel contaminants found
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/amid-another-report-contaminants-japan-moderna-s-covid-19-vaccine-faces-increased-scrutiny
Moderna reveals source of COVID-19 vaccine contamination as Japan finds yet another suspect vial By Kevin DunleavySep 1, 2021 09:23am
Thank you very much for the elaboration. I was particularly interested in their policy on Ivermectin, which I believe is the most vilified medicine in our life time in spite of its proven efficacy/safety and enormous potential. One more thing I would like to know is whether they usually prescribe Ivermectin alone, or in combination with others, as Peter McCullough and other real doctors have been doing. It's intriguing to me because there have been a couple of trials in which Ivermectin alone has failed to show its efficacy. Yes, I know that those trials are inherently, or worse, intentionally defective. Nevertheless, since, presumably, Japan is the only country that has data on the efficacy of Ivermectin, I guess if they usually prescribe it alone for CoVid, it might imply that it does work contrary to the prevailing narrative. Again thank you very much!
Alex of course, is an anti-ivermectinist. I think he has even refused to write about it.
Alex is not a medical doctor and has never treated a patient with Covid which is why he has no idea how well it works. After you treat a patient whose oxygen levels are drifting down into the low 80's, who has had a fever and diarrhea for about a week, with a pre-existing auto-immune disease - and they immediately start getting better in the first 24 hours - you see that kind of thing several times and you begin to get the idea that Ivermectin works. The first time I used it, I used only 12 mg, the dose they were giving out in Covid kits in India, because when I checked at US government websites (CDC for one), it said Ivermectin is dangerous, don't use it. But I knew they were using it successfully in India and used their dose. That is less than we typically use in US, but most people in India are smaller than Americans, thinner, so 12 mg. is adequate for many. Since we tend to be larger, more obesity, makes sense to dose by body weight as we do here, as I soon learned.
Well, in that first link that I gave, it did say that the Japanese Health Ministry had approved Ivermectin, so it must have worked, but they were low key about it to avoid offending big pharma and the US. But I will say, I have read most of the Ivermectin research - there have been more than 60 studies worldwide and most of them show safety and efficacy, and seems to me many using Ivermectin as a single agent. However, the unsuccessful trials typically have 1) used too low a dose 2) for way too short a time 3) and / or made people wait past the first week or after at least 5 days to begin treatment, when by that time, the virus has already replicated and it's too late to prevent replication, or 4) do all three things - make everyone wait 5 days after they test +, then treat for only a day or maybe up to 3 days, but use a low dose, and THEN stop treatment - and yeah, if you do it that way, it's way less helpful than it would have been. But I know, in the US typically we use it with other supplements and meds, which I do think is best, but I also think it has some benefit on its own especially if it is started early. Dr. Been had an educational video for health professionals in which he showed that one mechanism of action of Ivermectin was to prevent the virus from being transported into the nucleus of the cell and if it doesn't get into the nucleus, the virus can't replicate - but - if the virus has already replicated extensively, it's too late for that particular mechanism of action to help. But Ivermectin has multiple mechanisms of action and generally helps during all stages of the illness whether early, late, long Covid, etc. As a practical matter, it seems to me there are rather a lot of conditions in medicine where one always uses more than one med. To control seizures, for example, sometimes one med is not enough but you use two meds and you get the seizures to stop, and you thank God they both work together. Or for stomach ulcers caused by H. pylori, the protocl is three antibiotics used together. For Bipolar Disorder in psychiatry (manic depressive illness) it's rare to see patients who are maintained entirely on one med. So - not unusual if Ivermectin works better along with Vitamins and supplements etc., but my opinion is that it has independent benefit even as a single agent. It's been a while since I read all those studies - but I think there are studies that show that though I could not say which ones at the moment. Well, I think in a study in Argentina, now that I think about it, a study of prevention for health care providers, where the health care professionals had a choice to have Ivermectin or not, and one arm of that study looked at Ivermectin alone. No one in the Ivermectin groups got Covid, even though treating Covid patients, but in the no-Ivermectin group, 58% got Covid while treating Covid patients. At that time, it was the original Covid virus that was going around, not the variant, and this was with Ivermectin 0.2 mg. per kg once a week. So, I thought that was pretty impressive.
Thank you very much for the further elucidation and clarification! It deserves to be widely propagated. Would you consider to get together your thought on Ivermectin and publish it on other platforms? I deeply appreciate your commitment and contribution to the Common Good.
Thank you for your comment, Pete. I have at times posted comments at El Gato Malo's substack, and maybe a couple others, and on some email groups. I am pretty busy and my limited because I am still a practicing physician, and I also have responsibilities in a non-profit organization that ends up being pushed to the side when I am online too much. But when Ivermectin comes up or treatment questions arise, I do try to post when I can. I wish I had time to read more, or to watch some of the good videos, it's hard to keep up with all the information. I worry a little because I am aware of physicians who have been investigated or had loss of licensure simply by saying things that didn't match the Pfizer narrative. If you want to find more info on Ivermectin or find a doctor in your state who will prescribe it, and a pharmacy that will fill it, get famliar with the website FLCCC.net There is a treatment protocol for Covid prevention, and another one for early outpatient treatment. The prevention protocol will give recommendations for various supplements, and some people also take Ivermectin once a week, and perhaps keep some on hand in case you got sick anyway. The original prevention protocol included Ivermectin 0.2 mg. per kg once a week (convert your body weight to kg and multiply by 0.2) then about the time of the Delta variant, they decided that you needed to do that twice a week - though since Omicron it is said that once a week seems to be "enough." Anyway, that is a prescription item, so it is really between you and your physician whether you need it or not at any time, and what dose for how long - which is why it is good there are telemed doctors in every state, and a list you can access to get individual medical advice and treatment if needed.
I think I have to say, nothing that I type here in a comment is intended as a specific recommendation for any individual, as one needs to discuss with one's own physician (which can be by telemed, and can be one of numerous physicians on the FLCCC list). But - some general information about items that have been recommended by the FLCCC and by others, and supported by research -
Vitamin D is something everyone needs anyway, aside from Covid issues, we need it for functioning of our immune system. Best thing is to get your doctor to check your Vitamin D level, then you know what it is - the way it is measured, anything from 30 to 100 is supposed to be "normal range" but for protection from severe Covid, many physicians think it needs to be at least 50. At 50, it is said, you might get Covid but you are very unlikely to end up in the hospital, it will not be severe, or it might prevent entirely. But some are saying if your level is 80, you are pretty much bulletproof, and you will probably not even get Covid at all, and not flu, and not a cold or any respiratory virus. However as we know, the government says we all need the vaccine to be protected and it would be a mistake to rely on Vitamin D instead of a vaccine, and doctors have lost their license for saying otherwise - though is the government still saying that this week? When there is so much in the news about lack of efficacy and so much data. And then again, I saw a video in which Fauci admits he takes Vitamin D and he actually said it does help even though he certainly did not make that a talking point - and he said it, hopefully no one will lose their license for saying that Vitamin D does have a role in prevention. There is research showing that Vitamin D is protective against any respiratory infection, not only Covid.
Anyway if you do not know your Vitamin D level, the FLCCC and others recommend that you take 1,000 or 2,000 units per day for prevention (some of the current labels are still in International Units, or it may be in micgrograms, that is, IU vs. mcg, but I always think in terms of IU. So, 1,000 or 2,000 IU for prevention or 5,000 per day (sometimes more) if you have a Covid infection. I recommend that people take this because so many people are deficient in Vitamin D - the majority of Americans are low, and that is true in many countries. Though if you find out what your level is, if you want to get your level higher, there are protocols for increasing your vitamin D intake for a period of time to get where you need to be. If your level is below 30, that is deficient, but even though 30 is supposedly "normal" it doesn't really help greatly in regard to protection from respiratory infections.
Then, if you have some Ivermectin on hand just in case of illness, that can be a good thing, or some are still using it once or twice a week, though if you do not have other risk factors, probably most people don't need to take it every week, just have some on hand in case it is hard to obtain when you need it. At the FLCCC.net webpage, they have lists of phyisicians and other health care professionals who will prescribe ivermectin by telemed, and also lists of pharmacies that will fill and do mail order that will serve your state. Usual dose for the recent variants - if needed - is 0.4 mg. per kg. But then again, with Omicron being so mild, it's possible one would not need medication, though we don't know about whatever variants we might see next.
And there are other vitamins, supplements, and prescription meds that might be used, but it depends on the person, what symptoms they have, what risk factors, what severity etc. But at the FLCCC.net website, you will see lists of items that are good to use for prevention to stay healthy. They do update the protocols as new research emerges, or with new variants, new experience, but they list Vitamin C, probably 500 mg. per day for prevention and twice a day if ill, zinc, 30 or 40 mg. per day for prevention, but 50 mg. twice a day if ill just for a week or two. Quercetin is great for prevention or treatment, and if no Ivermectin is available, 500 mg one or two twice a day for treatment, or perhaps 250 mg. or 500 mg. twice a day for prevention. I have used a higher dose of Quercetin than what FLCCC suggests, based on a paper by Dr. David Moskowitz - Quercetin comes from apples, berries, several fruits and vegetables and is on an FDA list of items that are "generally recognized as safe." Except anyone on blood thinners like Coumadin, in my opinion, or anyone with end stage kidney disease, should not use Quercetin.
This is probably more wordy than it needed to be, but I realized I have to be careful and not make an actual medical recommendation - I'm suggesting you can look at the FLCCC.net protocols which are on the internet for anyone to see, and then ask your own doctor or a telemed doctor if you need to consider any prescription items, or to discuss their individualized recommendations for you since it's not "one size fits all." There is a lot of pressure on physicians not to say anything that would increase vaccine hesitancy as the government still wants a needle in every arm, though it seems to me if one reads the news carefully every day, depending on what news one can find, but there is something new every day, such as, statements from Pfizer or the VAERs data that might give anyone a little hesitance - and truly, if a physician questions The Science, depending on what The Science is this week, one might be investigated or face loss of licensure. No freedom of thought or freedom of speech for physicians. I hope this helps. I am pretty sure at the FLCCC webpage there is a summary of a lot of the Ivermectin research, and then also, the physicians who are leaders in the FLCCC have a webinar once a week on Wed. evenings and you can learn a lot there also. These physicians are brilliant, truly. Dr. Paul Marik has written hundreds of journal articles, book chapters, and textbooks for critical care physicians, and taught in medical schools prior to Covid - these are truly top physicians who have now put their focus on preventing and treating Covid, and they always have good inforamtion.
I read the report. The metal was Graphine.
My theory on China’s COVID policies. 1) They know exactly what the mRNA deathvax will do to the long term health of people - it’s why they didn’t use them. 2) They know exactly what naturally acquired COVID and its toxic spike protein does to the long term health of a nation. 3) They are in an undeclared unconventional war with the US and COVID is a tactic in that war. 4) They must pursue zero COVID long enough for 1) and 2) to give them an unanswerable advantage in 3).
I have another theory. It’s a biological weapon they created and they know the impact. And maybe they want to do everything possible to keep it out of their population for longevity sake.
Change the name to PM Justin Trudeau and the story can almost be applied to Canada.
The only way out is to manufacture tests only capable of a negative result and declare victory
Weirdly, I actually love that idea
yeah, well my family has a saying passed down from generations long past, "You can go far in life if you do the opposite of Joe Biden"
🛎🛎🛎
In the US, the bus crash of covid positives would have been recorded as covid deaths.
You seriously believe China only has a few thousand COVID deaths? If so Alex I have a social media site for you to buy.