The irony with this is that it used to be that doctors told patients not to trust the internet - that they were trained and knew best.
But today, most doctors themselves rely on the internet, the problem is, that reliance is on one source of online information; the NIH protocols. They're like robots. They don't do broad-based research on …
The irony with this is that it used to be that doctors told patients not to trust the internet - that they were trained and knew best.
But today, most doctors themselves rely on the internet, the problem is, that reliance is on one source of online information; the NIH protocols. They're like robots. They don't do broad-based research on their own and even if they did, apparently they can't process the information and apply it to their practice.
While the rest of the professional world tries to keep current in their disciplinary area, it seems like most docs (and nurses) are stuck on their training and the diktats handed down from government agencies. PAs may be the exception - not sure.
Now, trying to find a replacement for one of these NIH drones is nearly impossible.
The irony with this is that it used to be that doctors told patients not to trust the internet - that they were trained and knew best.
But today, most doctors themselves rely on the internet, the problem is, that reliance is on one source of online information; the NIH protocols. They're like robots. They don't do broad-based research on their own and even if they did, apparently they can't process the information and apply it to their practice.
While the rest of the professional world tries to keep current in their disciplinary area, it seems like most docs (and nurses) are stuck on their training and the diktats handed down from government agencies. PAs may be the exception - not sure.
Now, trying to find a replacement for one of these NIH drones is nearly impossible.