224 Comments

I can’t tell you how many patients I’ve seen over 65 who have had terrible reactions to these vaccines, from strokes to neurological tremors. I am 75, still practicing, and if told I must vaccinate I would quit. These products are dangerous. How have we become such a gullible society that we literally give up our bodily autonomy and accept these government edicts?

Remember the 1976 swine flu fiasco? There were far fewer deaths from the vaccine, but it was taken off the market; same with anthrax. The bottom line is that in countries with the highest rates of Covid injections, infections are going up. This is the definition of insanity, and now pushing it on school children; that is the definition of criminality. Here comes more myocarditis and pericarditis.

Expand full comment

My understanding is there are zero studies on what this crap

does to the reproductive system.

We have become a nation ruled by idiots

Expand full comment

The "scientists" are now admitting that the vaccine does "something" to women's menstrual cycles. But they don't know if that has any effect on fertility. As if there is any possible way that a woman's menstrual cycle could be disrupted WITHOUT it affecting fertility!!!! They really think we're stupid.

Expand full comment

I know a few women who have had significant “female” problems from the vaccine. My evidence is purely anecdotal, but I have read of others.

Expand full comment

Citation? Medical journal or preprint.

Expand full comment

Richard. I am a RN. I personally know 3 RNs just in my unit at the hospital who had wildly irregular periods after they were vaccinated. Beforehand? Their periods were like clockwork. For years and years. One of the women is still having issues. She is 6 months out from her last shot.

Also this: https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/nih-to-study-how-covid-19-vaccine-impacts-menstrual-cycle/amp/

Expand full comment

Deana,

Richard doesn’t care about what is true and by extension he doesn’t care about what has happened to many women as a result of the injection.

His ilk don’t want women to exist and now have gone to the extent of referring to women as birthing people……. Which infers that the only use for women is to be baby factories.

Expand full comment

Grow up.

Expand full comment

Yes, lots of people are studying menstrual cycles, pregnancy outcomes, etc.

Expand full comment

The problem is they JUST NOW (like a week ago) decided to formally investigate vax and women's cycles. This should have been done BEFORE the vax was rolled out and CERTAINLY BEFORE these dumb mandates came out.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/13/science/vaccines-menstrual-cycle-covid.html

Expand full comment

Nowadays (sadly) it seems one has to have a certain amount of healthy skepticism when reading the "medical journals" or preprints. From March 2020 on, I, personally, have no faith or trust whatsoever anymore in our governmental medical institutions. I put my faith more in anecdotal evidence and reporting by folks like Alex.

Expand full comment

Wouldn’t it have been nice if we knew the answers to those questions BEFORE we started mandating the vaccines? We used to do that you know: Study, collect data, analyze, question again, look at additional data, and then stop and think. THEN we developed policy.

Now it is policy first (must achieve key political goals!) and then, maybe, if the problem is too big to ignore, we study things. And maybe apologize after all the damage is done.

Expand full comment

How about the NIH you pompous jerk

https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/covid-19-vaccines-and-menstrual-cycle

Expand full comment

How is he being a pompous jerk for asking for cites? If we're going to win hearts and minds we need to rise above the rancor. Be courteous and patient with those who are married to the lie -- the only way we'll win them back to sanity.

Expand full comment

The problem is...the "cites" don't always tell the truth.

Expand full comment

Your link says covid affects the menstrual cycle.

Expand full comment

https://www.nejm.org/coronavirus?query=main_nav_lg. Scroll down to where it has 3 articles, one of which mentions spontaneous abortions.

Expand full comment

RebeccaGrrl, I read this article on the spontaneous abortions and it looks like the conclusion was that they weren't any higher in the vaccinated women that in the general population. Did I misunderstand what they were saying? (I don't have any medical background.)

Expand full comment

I don't have a medical background either, but I'm learning to read this stuff for what it lacks or where there are conflicts of interest. The other two articles are one study/data report and a clarification of that report. Again, we can only conclude that data is not there or so limited that more conclusive data is needed.

In all of these reports you have to go to the end to find what conflicts of interests there may be. In the second article "Preliminary Findings" the doctors (absolutely the main one) are from the CDC.

Expand full comment

I would say the data in that specific article (there are three, that one and 2 more next to it) it says "data to inform estimates of the risk of spontaneous abortion after receipt of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine either before conception (30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period through 14 days after) or during pregnancy are limited.". So my conclusion is there is NOT enough data, thus skip the shot if you're pregnant or trying. They go on to sort thru what they've already acknowledged as "limited data" and clearly the risk for spontaneous abortion for up to 12 wk pregnancy is noticeable. Why take a risk when data is limited seems sketchy?

The other thought I would offer, aside from each indiv woman to talk w her doctor or multiple about all these details and her indiv health status, is to wait on the shots and do all she can to avoid the Cov.

Expand full comment

Most of the world has fallen in with this idiocy. Normalky vaccines have been trialed and tested for 7 to 10 years to ensure they are reasonably safe.

Expand full comment

Most vaccines take years to test because there's little interest or money and most vaccine trials are smaller than the Pfizer trial.

Expand full comment

Richard,that’s not true.You must have missed the late 70’s Swine flu fiasco.I participated in those trials.And,the control arm wasn’t allowed to cross over,as was done in the Pfizer and Moderna trials.You are either disingenuous,or you’re lying…

Expand full comment

Swine flu vaccine was a bust. The covid vaccine is pretty good. Not as good as chickenpox, but better than pneumococcus or flu.

Expand full comment

Citation? Medical journal or preprint.

Expand full comment

What do you mean by "pretty good"? That's about as scientific as the JAMA article claiming one shot after surviving covid would give you "bulletproof" protection. Verbiage that rhymes with garbage.

Expand full comment

You seriously think the chickenpox jab is good? In what way? It has a really high failure rate. Or did you mean smallpox?

Expand full comment

There is one study on sperm 60 days after vaccination. The studies on women will be completed in 2023/2024.

Expand full comment

Citation please

Expand full comment

See above. For God’s sake this story has been all over the press in the UK and the US.

Expand full comment

Why don't you search Google Scholar? Instead of sitting and taking lazy potshots.

Expand full comment

Ruled by well educated arrogant elites. Zero commonsense.

Expand full comment

The current crop of elites are not well educated. They are well indoctrinated by Ivy league schools

They have no critical thinking skills. Hell they can’t even tell you the difference between a boy and a girl.

I could go on and on and on about these idiots in Ivory towers pretending to be educated

Expand full comment

I agree. My very conservative 24yo daughter survived the indoctrination at Princeton - she saw through all their bullsh*t. She refuses to get vaxxed because she’s smart (and she wants to be a mom someday). I’m sure there’s more like her but definitely the minority.

Expand full comment

They all have a good resume. I agree with your assessment. It is however their resume that allows them to be seen as leaders. People are very degree bias. The Ivy League schools are seen by the masses as the brightest and best.

Expand full comment

Walensky is a good example. Her list of important research is very thin. She’s was a professor at Harvard; so what?! Fauci’s resume is filled with bureaucratic positions. He hasn’t done any meaningful research in decades. And for any expertise he might have had about immunology, he is clueless about epidemiology. Both are arrogant and both lie without hesitation.

Expand full comment

They have shown their hand. There are many who now understand how uneducated they are and will not allow their children to attend one of their institutions nor will they hire anyone from one of these institutions. By extension, if I needed a lawyer I would think long and and hard about hiring a person who went to Harvard Law. It no longer means they would be the best of the best, it just means they were properly indoctrinated.

Expand full comment

Because they used to be, when critical 'thinking' was more impt than critical 'theory'.

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

Educated but ignorant at the same time.

Expand full comment

A recent article talked about how those working in Washington know very few working class people. Truth is they do not want to know them. I suggested to the elites they take a train ride across the US. I have a few times. I loved it because I saw cities and towns from a different perspective. Tracks do not go through rich neighborhoods. However one realizes quickly that many neighborhoods have their own personality. They have neighborhood bars, cafes, interesting housing, backyards. It is a peak into their world without having to do driving and paying attention, just taking in. Trains are great.

Expand full comment

I don’t live in America, but I have in the past and I still have investments there. I have been to 47 of the 50 states during my lifetime. America really is two separate countries. Southern California and the northeast bear no ressemblence to places like Iowa. You may as well try to reconcile England with Russia. I think America needs a divorce because there are now irreconcilable differences.

Expand full comment

I agree. I wish progressives no harm. I want them to live freely and as they see fit but we need to separate. What we have now is unsustainable. They simply will not leave the rest of us alone. How do we split the country? It will be brutal. I do not see how it can happen peacefully.

Expand full comment

Go here, and scroll down til you see 3 articles about it's affects. Bad. https://www.nejm.org/coronavirus?query=main_nav_lg

Expand full comment

I have read at least 6.

Expand full comment

A friend has a brother who is a doctor. She is just stunned how he is adamant about vaccinations. She refuses. Both are well educated. My sister took jabs. We were raised the same. My parents Christian Scientist. So little medical intervention. She hated I refused cancer treatment. She accepts it, but she is somebody that goes to doctor at least twice a week. I believe in my body. I also look at the odds. It is like vaccinating my horses for rabies . How many cases in county I ask? 2 in one year. I live in horse country. I did not vaccinate for rabies. Friend’s horse died this year after vaccination. Terrible.

Expand full comment

100% agree. How many people get bitten by a horse - let alone a rabid horse - every year? Yup. The Covid jabs have started for zoo animals, tomorrow it will be the cats, dogs, hamsters, etc. Pharma has been encroaching on animals more and more for 20+ years. It's just another market to them. Give your pets a heartworm pill monthly even though they never go outdoors and you are not in a heartworm zone. Been pushing back against the vets for years now, watching the vax requirement list grow and grow. My dad has a phd in biochemistry, my sister-in-law is a pharmacist (from a family of pharmacists). Everyone in my close & extended family has had the jab. The kids are being lined up as we speak. My closest friend from college also (a psychologist) who has always been a free thinking ideologist. It's like they have been brainwashed. And they firmly believe I am the brainwashed one......

Expand full comment

"Remember the 1976 swine flu fiasco?" Exactly.. It took far less than we've seen with the COVID vaxes to get the swine flu vax pulled. On the other hand, my recollection of that time was that there were very few swine flu cases.

But the real question is, why do we have this Federally-sponsored reporting system - VAERS - if the Feds don't take it seriously. We have no idea if there has been 1 true vax-related death or 100,000. They just prattle on about "safe and effective, safe and effective".

Expand full comment

In 1976 we had a better government.

Today we are governed by a consensus of fools

Expand full comment

Fools... and I am afraid murderers. Some are manslaughter, some from the building societal psychosis, but those psychopaths...

Expand full comment

They are everything you have stated and more.

Prepare yourself and your family for the worst.

Expand full comment

Right, as if the faster they chant the more true it might be. The agency spokespeople with the unsupported claims, despite the fact that a little digging, yes even on the CDC site, shows the opposites. 65-70% of the employees at CDC, NIH, NIAID, etc aren't getting jabs...

Expand full comment

Marx, Lenin et all freely stated that if you tell a lie enough times it becomes true

Expand full comment

I heard this once before. Do you have a link to this on their site? I'd love to save that and repurpose it.

Expand full comment

Actually in 1976, there was only one case (a soldier on a military base) suspected of swine flu. The whole vaccination program as based on a projection.

Expand full comment

Ely,

I’m a hematologist.I’m 69,and still working everyday.I’ve been looking for a case of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis for 40 years,and I’ve seen 2 cases in the past 6 months,both in older women who had received the Pfizer vaccine some weeks before presenting to hospital,one of whom died.Your instincts are sound!I had Covid,recovered,and I’m not taking the vaccine.No way!

Expand full comment

Thank you Theophilus. I don’t know if you’v seen Dr Jessica Rose’s presentation on her research about the vaccines. She really assesses the data about the vaccines. Here is the link https://youtu.be/Y4MViwU3XOo

Expand full comment

Ely, thanks for posting this. It was fascinating.

Expand full comment

How many cases of covid at your hospital?

Expand full comment

42 listed as hospitalized as of yesterday.

Expand full comment

So, an order of magnitude higher than the histiocytic phagocytosis cases you are concerned about. It's always a numbers gain. The simplest example is the polio vaccine. It causes most polio cases seen in the U.S. However, it also prevents a much larger number of polio cases that would occur were kids not given vaccine induced immunity.

Expand full comment

No,you’re missing the point.HLH is extraordinarily rare,I haven’t seen a case in 40 years,and I saw 2 last month in recently vaccinated elderly women.HLH is just the sort of thrombotic complication being seen with these vaccines.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the truth, Theophilus. I think Richard may have his mind made up though.

Expand full comment

It is so horrifying that the media is completely covering up and the government is completely silencing all information about adverse effects of the Covid vaccine. It's scaring people into getting the shots and now the boosters.

Expand full comment

Absolutely Elizabeth. Most people don’t do their due diligence. If I damage a patient, I can be sued, but the pharmaceutical companies can’t, for these injections. Why? Of course we knowthe answer. They’ve blackmailed governments and the goverare willing partners. The hell with the public.

Expand full comment

Media suppression of truth. The war to be won: toppling corporate media and/or starting an entirely new communication system. The current one is not tenable.

Expand full comment

Anybody have suggestions for an antidote to the vaccine? I feel like i have some slight arrhythmia...felt it just the last 2-3 weeks and it comes and goes (had second dose of pfizer in may). Maybe I'm imagining it...but maybe not?

Expand full comment

Check out FLCCC.net for ideas to discuss with your personal doctor. If you feel it, you aren't imagining it. Keep well - eat well, get outside but don't overdo it. Get some sunshine! Check your supplements, depending on your diet... etc etc

Expand full comment

A number of doctors in Australia have been treating some vaccinated patients with symptoms with the same protocol for treating Covid; that is using Ivermectin, etc. Of course it's now banned in Australia for usage with Covid (absolute insanity), but if in the states or other countries, you should be able to find doctors who will prescribe it for you. Contact either America's Frontline Doctors or the FLCCC.

Expand full comment

Please get the arrhythmia checked out. Maybe the vax caused it but at this point treat the arrhythmia if possible.

Expand full comment

Probably not. ☹️

Expand full comment

Myocarditis is much more common with covid than with the vaccine.

Expand full comment

I suggest you watch this video by researcher Dr Jessica Rose. https://youtu.be/Y4MViwU3XOo Your argument doesn’t make sense. Since the vaccines are ineffectual and the safety record is appalling, whether you get myocarditis from Covid is irrelevant. You are taking young healthy people (at very low risk from Covid) and injecting them with a product from which they no longer have a choice in reversing; the injection is 100% penetration. You do have a choice in minimizing your risk from Covid.

But, look if you believe in the injections go for it. We are free to choose. I choose not to, and I am strongly discouraging anyone in my family from going down that route,

Expand full comment

Crane isn’t interest in anything that is true.

His type believe their own lies. Their only useful purpose in existence is to keep the rest of us sharp and on our feet.

Tragic not to be able to tell the difference between truth and lies.

Expand full comment

Your argument is specious. Covid is not common either. Looking at absolute risk reduction from these bad vaccines, I think you're safer without them

Expand full comment

How many have gotten myocarditis from the vaccine and not from covid?

I don’t know the answer but it now seems to be a reasonable point for discussion?

Expand full comment

He’s just here to troll and spout the leftist talking points. Which he could have done for free, but he paid Alex instead. That’s the level of intelligence we’re dealing with.

Expand full comment

"Which he could have done for free, but he paid Alex instead." LOL! The left never did have a lot of common sense, did they?

Expand full comment

Those like him will be taken by surprise when the shit hits the fan and they will be incapable of taking care of themselves and their families.

Tragic to be so deceived.

Expand full comment

Check out OpenVaers Project weekly. They keep what's called a "red box" page. That page shows aggregate totals for all the different maladies that people report after receiving one of the jabs. You can also read individual reports submitted by people...including the reports of death.

Expand full comment

If ivermectin cures Covid, and it does see India and there latest numbers with a near zero infection rate because of ivermectin. The question I have Alex is why is the emergency usage that is being used to force these shots legitimate? If there’s a treatment then the emergency usage is null and void. Lies are not good medical policy.

Expand full comment

I’m not Alex but I’ll answer your question. It’s NOT legitimate but they’ll roll right past that hoping we don’t catch on to something which is so obvious.

Expand full comment

Why is Alex so silent on Ivermectin. There's mountains of data on its effectiveness.

Expand full comment

Lies are not good for anything, except for the sociopath, especially when it’s relentless and just builds and builds without any attention to the prior lie.

That’s why I keep warning your folks, evil, the first element is the relentless lying, followed by other things but, read up on it yourself at other threads…

Expand full comment

If Ivermectin is ultimately shown to be effective, what will be the standing of the technolocratic elite? We could have a "regime change" away from the fourth branch of government. I read the latest vote by the FDA as evidence of concern, bordering on fear.

Expand full comment

Why did anyone ever think it was a good idea to be injected...twice...with billions of copies of the "instructions" to make billions of SCV2 spikes...the very protein that makes the virus so dangerous, that the Salk says can damage the endothelial cells that line all lymph and blood vessels...in an uncontrolled manner for an unknown period of time?

I always thought it was a really bad idea. I'm at a loss to explain why so many others did not.

Expand full comment

That is what I have read as well which explains some of the bad side effects. The fear of dying is so great for most. It makes them incapable of remaining calm and doing research and push back against irrational behavior. I can only understand this as well as when the doctor tells a patient they have cancer. Immediately everybody assumes instant death.

Expand full comment

I agree that many were broken by fear and had an overwrought sense of risk from the virus...but the spike is C19 disease. Allowing yourself to be injected with the disease to protect against the disease is counter-intuitive.

Expand full comment

As a cancer patient, I have sat many times at our cancer center. I have seen patients burned to a crisp by radiation. I have seen skin ulcers from chemo, men and women lined up looking like death warmed over. It was so hard on me, I would sit in the car until until minutes before I was called. I just could not stand it. Most of these people quit elderly. This was their last years? Family and doctors convince people often to do things they do not want to do, just to live maybe a few months more. People tend to be herd influenced. Few want to buck the system. It is the lonely road. What if ai am wrong? So with virus, what if I reject vaccine and get sick and die? Same with chemo? I rejected it all. If I get sick again, family, friends, and doctors will believe chemo could have saved me. Alex talks about risk. Every decision has risks.

Expand full comment

Cancer is awful. I'm sorry.

I'm risk averse, so I was more likely to question. I never understood the need for the mRNA technology. For a time, I thought I'd get the Novavax jab but changed my mind after the Salk study came out and I realized that the virus was not as dangerous as I feared.

My brother's small office just closed because of an outbreak. Everyone is double-vaxxed. Three people (and counting) are sick.

I've been watching the data from England and Israel for months. It was clear that the jabs were failing to prevent infection and, imo, to mitigate disease. But so many of the vaxxed believe they are safe from the virus. They can't catch the 'ro...but, if they do, it won't be as bad. The media psy-op convinced them to get the vaxx and now it's convinced them they are safe. They aren't. People are going to get sick. People are going to die.

Expand full comment

my friend's father was at home under hospice care this spring...just a few weeks to live. A distant cousin-doctor stopped and recommended surgery--just to possibly reduce pain. They scheduled it that afternoon, but at the last minute his wife and daughter said no. He wanted to stay at home. The cousin doctor called elder care services on the wife and daughter for refusing to put the dying husband/father in the hospital for surgery. Elder services luckily took one look and dismissed the whole thing with disgust.

Expand full comment

I had the same impression of cardiac patients. Sitting in the waiting room looking at them I thought they all looked like they'd lost all their fight and were going to take any old crap the disinterested doctors prescribed. Made me sick. I fought back and found a real doctor at a university hospital, not settling for some self satisfied small town hack. Feel sorry for the ones that don't realize they're able to defend themselves from bad doctors.

Expand full comment

Alex, your analysis of the farce that is playing out in real time is a breath of fresh air. There's no doubt in my mind that there are many of us out here who have recovered from COVID and didn't know we had it. If the government would admit that they would then have to admit that a huge percentage of the nation has some sort of natural immunity, making this biologic unnecessary. The absolute refusal of MSM to acknowledge injuries related to the use of this product borders on the criminal. Keep shining your bright light on the truth...

Expand full comment

The other part to this is the federal government limiting the Regon to "Red" states to force the jab. Meanwhile over 50% of the people receiving the monoclonal shots are people who where vaccinated.

Expand full comment

Thanks Alex! Just say no to drugs!

I’m old enough to remember death panels for the elderly being discussed with Obamacare. I guess the lab leak didn’t kill enough dry tinder so they’re going in for round two. Sick bastards.

Expand full comment

Anyayell - as an elderly person, I object to being called "dry tinder." I'm not dry; I go to the bathroom several times a night to prove that too. That specific issue to the side, great point!!!

Expand full comment

I think he was referring to how they canal of eugenicists looks at people

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

Nancy Reagan lives!!!

But, in 2021, it’s “just say no to thugs!”

Expand full comment

This is an admission that the peanut butter 2-jab vaccination was the wrong approach. So the question is what about Joe's recent mandates?

Joe and Fauci knew what the likely outcome of today's panel was going to be. Large organizations "socialize" and "preview" big decisions before the final reveal often weeks in advance. This was not new information for the people at the top.

Basically, today's panel was "we don't know enough about the vaccines."

Expand full comment

Does anyone know if Fauci has stock in Pfizer, Moderna or J&J?? Maybe Tucker could investigate. Two things are at play...money and submission.

Expand full comment

He faked it! Couple days later, after the public event when he was administered the shot, Fauci was accosted in a hallway, by a reporter with a camera man. The reporter asked him how his arm was. He sort of shook an arm out, laughed and said "it's a little sore." As Fauci walked away, the reporter said to the camera, that he got the shot in the OTHER arm. I wish I had that video, if I find it I will post it here.

Expand full comment

I remember it too

Expand full comment

Potatodots - I love it when "they" get caught. Of course, at their ages, he and Biden can forget a lot of things such as which arm is which. I should know. I'm a bit behind but approaching that level.

Rather than challenging Biden (or Fauci) to a pushup contest, I'd like to see someone challenge them to a Hokey Pokey Contest. Remember the lyrics to the old nursery school rhyme ? It might be a cruel challenge, but it would be funny as all get-out. ==>

You put your right foot in

You take your right foot out

You put your right foot in

And you shake it all about

You do the hokey pokey

And you turn yourself around

That's what it's all about

Expand full comment

Fauci's name is on the patent, because the NIH actually funded this vax, and "they needed a NIH name" on the patent. There was a video where Fauci talks about this, and claims he donates the royalties. I cannot for the life of me find this video online anymore......

https://www.axios.com/moderna-nih-coronavirus-vaccine-ownership-agreements-22051c42-2dee-4b19-938d-099afd71f6a0.html. Mercola.com gave all the patent lists a year ago, but they no longer keep posts up for more than 48 hours.

Expand full comment

Dr. David Martin has 200 page document he has been putting together over 20 years as he was watching all this horrible plotting unfold. I have a copy, it has everything. How Fauci managed to get the Patent office to patent the SARS in his and NIH's names, etc. , so that he controls who gets access to the SARS to research it further. As you all know, a "natural" molecule, thing, what have you, cannot be patented. My opinion over the years, by the time MERS showed up, is that each of these were created with the technology available at the time. When you look at the research, you find things like when HIV was successfully spliced into various chimeras, etc. Shi Zhengli has a paper about doing it. Who helped on that paper? Baric, who trained her in Chapel Hill, NC. I'll see if I can find it on his website. It is very thorough. I can only read it a few pages at a time. Yes, it's dense reading and all, but it is going through it, the level of EVIL that slows me down. I look up all the papers, too, as I go along.

Expand full comment

Oops. That was inteleukin-2. My bad. I think. Could have sworn Fauci was questioned on the Moderna vax. https://ahrp.org/nih-scientists-caught-concealing-millions-in-royalties-for-experimental-treatments-ap/. This has been rotten to the core for many years. I remember poor kids in the Bronx being treated with "experimental therapies" that their bewildered and desperate parents agreed to - because it was free. These experiments (funded by taxpayers!) conducted by pharma companies (and you probably donated to this "research"!) went on to market eventually, at prohibitive costs, unless you had insurance. And if you didn't have insurance, they could offer you placement in an "experimental therapy" study. These types of studies are still ongoing. Follow the money. When you are asked to donate to research - ask, research, just don't donate. This whole system is a circle smirk.

Expand full comment

From somewhere, I understood this to be a 'patent' issue (forgive the pun) since somewhere in the 80s when fed rules were changed.. Maybe someone can dig.

Expand full comment

If he doesn't own stock, which would certainly be a smoking gun, he may have a blind trust. It's probably impossible to trace corruption if so, but it's still possible. Another angle tho, is for him to have some sort of 501c3 org or similar org where 'donations' can be made

Expand full comment

... or a placebo?

Expand full comment

I believe Dr. Malone said Fauci receives a stipend from Moderna as does 6 other NIH employees in one of his interviews. Not sure if I heard correctly or accuracy of what I heard but worth an investigation.

Expand full comment

I believe they each get a royalty but it's "limited" to $150,000 per year. Nice little bonus. Way more than most Americans' salary, forget a bonus.

Expand full comment

I’ve got to call it a night, but leave you with a simple perspective:

Resentment and a sense of being controlled are never building blocks to creating a productive therapeutic relationship with a healthcare provider.

It’s bad enough that politicians have no clue to that basic premise, but lately, physicians and other healthcare providers, have seemed to have completely forgotten that point of view.

Have a good night, have a good weekend, be safe and be well, and most of all, zero tolerance of tyranny.

👍, 😃, good 🎵, and enjoy 🏉?!

Expand full comment

Team Vaccine will blame the unvax'd for the dismal months ahead as the vaccines fail and hospitalizations soar during the winter peak. As long as there are unvax'd they have a perfect excuse for their ineptitude. The wise should begin to prepare for another locked-down kinda' Christmas.

Expand full comment

I'm NOT quibbling but something has bothered me from the beginning.

Alex said: "That said, people over 65 - and certainly 75 - are at much, much higher risk of death from Covid than younger people. " ... and Alex is merely quoting a lot of sources saying the same thing.

I'll say duh! As a person over 65 **I'm** at a much higher risk of death from Covid19 -- or the Flu -- or Pneumonia -- or from riding horseback than younger people are. From that perspective, it's just statistics and age.

So, why is that a criterion for subdividing the necessity / appropriateness for giving a vaccine?

Expand full comment

Plus, if you're over 65 or 75 and in good health, your odds of death or hospitalization drop dramatically. So while overall, the age statistic is true, there are significant differences between people in those age brackets.

Expand full comment

Rob - yup; exactly! As they say: "statistics don't lie, but the folks that use statistics frequently do."

I'll add that my comment does NOT apply to Alex Berenson. I've not come across any other writer as meticulous as he is in both his research and in his correcting any errors that he might make along the way.

Expand full comment

Obesity is the main risk factor.

Expand full comment

Well, as another over 65 person, I read Alex's comments to mean that the benefit of taking a vaccine, whether for Covid or flu or anything else, is greater for people like myself who are more at risk. Simply that the risk benefit ratio is different for those of us that are over 65 as compared to those under 65. Of course, even within the over 65 group there's a variety of risk levels based on other factors. My biggest question has to do with a potential downside of the Covid vaccine. If there's a big enough downside, then even the increased risk would not overcome it. I'm someone who has traditionally taken the flu shot and the pneumonia shot but this Covid shot scares me.

Expand full comment

Yes. And it is IF you get it, then IF you are treated correctly. So many stories of even 85+ year olds being on ventilators, and how if they get the IVM etc. they are often off the vent within 24 hours. The odds are quite good.

Expand full comment

You are correct. I now know 4 elderly people that got COVID recently. Two are 89, one is 90 and one is 94 (all relatively healthy). All of them came through it fine, fortunately they didn't require hospitalization or special treatment. I know 5 people that died from COVID. Two were over 65, one was 65 and two were under 65. The common denominator, was that they all had serious, multiple pre existing conditions.

Expand full comment

That's all true, but covid is more age selective than most bugs.

Expand full comment

That's not a true statement. If you look at cases/deaths by other diseases, like influenza and pneumonia the statistics are almost identical. If you're over 65 you are more prone to any disease. This is what Randy said in his first post. Having said that your overall health still plays a larger role in beating any of them.

Expand full comment

It's actually fat selective. The virus likes ectopic fat and sheds from it more easily. Not a popular fact.

Expand full comment

Jabs for jobs is the only reason. It’s sickening.

Expand full comment

It's a Hobson's choice. Get this [maybe fatal] shot or lose your job, your house, your car and live in a tent on Santa Monica Boulevard.

Expand full comment

True. But that Hobson's choice is a choice fabricated at the whim of politicians and loonies at the CDC. If it was a true Hobson's choice of my own making, I'd research it as best I could, pray about it a bit, and step into the fray in Faith; but it's not of my own making.

Expand full comment

Alex, come Monday, the FDA will be relegated to being irrelevant inconsequential and disposable, just like the population that the Democrats want to rid itself of.

Sociopaths, if you don’t echo and genuflect to their agenda, you are initially useless, then an annoyance, and then a detriment….

That needs to be painfully and completely eradicated…

Again, underestimate the sociopath at your own peril, they want you to be clueless, inattentive, and most of all, abjectly subservient…

Expand full comment

Addendum: you honestly do not see Tony Faux-i saying in so many words next week, “the FDA is clueless, they are being manipulated, don’t listen to them, just focus on me you stupid bastards!“

Faux-i is another one, keep pissing him off and he’ll slip and reveal his true self…

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

Great article Alex! Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

"...if you are under 65, not at high risk for severe Covid, and have not yet been vaccinated, why on earth would you be?"

Exactly...

Yet in Australia, we're all under intense pressure to submit to these injections...why?

I'm challenging the coercive 'vaccination' regime here, because who is actually giving authentic 'informed consent' to these experimental medical interventions?

See for example my recent email to the regulator of health practitioners, and other emails in this thread: Covid-19 injections and 'informed consent': https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/covid-19-injections-and-informed-consent.pdf

Expand full comment