The New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC would agree with you about Berenson. Fauci and the CDC would also agree with you that Berenson is a fraud. Be careful who you agree with, particularly if you aren't going to bother reading all of the evidence. If you're the kind of person who believes everything you read on social media, mainstream media, our president, or the CDC, then Berenson isn't for you. For instance, in the article you posted it says, Berenson "suggested European excess mortality in 2022 was mostly due to mRNA vaccines; in reality, it was almost entirely due to omicron waves and heat waves." Who said excess European mortality in '22 was due to omicron and heat waves and why should I believe that person over Alex Berenson? This is similar to people saying Trump was a lying about voter integrity because an election commissioner said the election was "the most secure in history." You're basically saying Berenson is a fraud because someone else said something Alex said wasn't true and we should trust the other person and not Alex. You're exactly the type of person who is so gullible to believe that masks work, we need to lockdown, and everyone needs to get vaccinated because Biden said, "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated." So how about this; that article you posted, it's fraudulent... Why? Because I said so. Continue reading Berenson because I've proven the article you referenced to be false.
He's a truth teller. It's the rest of our "Healthcare" system that a fraud. If you think I'm some kind of brainwashed idiot, I am a pharmacist who does her own research. Perhaps you should try it once.
Thank you for your consideration but most of us in here are a bit weird in that we like to find out things for ourselves and not be told what to think by others.
You sound ignorant with statements like that. You sound like the morons without twitter accounts,who were outraged by what the President said on twitter. Did someone write this for you?
Did you actually read the article? It gives a numbered list to posts by Alex with links to his posts. It then has a brief sentence or two with no links that says he was wrong. Huh? Additionally I am not sure the author(s?) understood the posts to which they were referring and mischaracterize some of Alex's points. Near the end they say he is providing points of view that cannot be proven. Ok, but the response did not disprove them either. I do not always agree with Alex, but he is pretty meticulous about providing his data and making clear when he is making a supposition. Also, just like with President Trump, some of his posts are firmly tongue in cheek.
And you feel it's your duty to inform us. Out of the kindness of your heart. Those of us who have followed Berenson for a long time fully appreciate his work. We understand he is human and subject to bias, as we all are. We actually can follow him and disagree about some of his viewpoints and blind spots. We often express ourselves here on his stack.
A blanket statement citing a less than credible report doesn't add to the discussion. So exactly why do you (and others) often try to dismiss Berenson with a blanket statement. Which parts of Berenson's work do you object to?
Then why are you wasting your time reading his work?
The New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC would agree with you about Berenson. Fauci and the CDC would also agree with you that Berenson is a fraud. Be careful who you agree with, particularly if you aren't going to bother reading all of the evidence. If you're the kind of person who believes everything you read on social media, mainstream media, our president, or the CDC, then Berenson isn't for you. For instance, in the article you posted it says, Berenson "suggested European excess mortality in 2022 was mostly due to mRNA vaccines; in reality, it was almost entirely due to omicron waves and heat waves." Who said excess European mortality in '22 was due to omicron and heat waves and why should I believe that person over Alex Berenson? This is similar to people saying Trump was a lying about voter integrity because an election commissioner said the election was "the most secure in history." You're basically saying Berenson is a fraud because someone else said something Alex said wasn't true and we should trust the other person and not Alex. You're exactly the type of person who is so gullible to believe that masks work, we need to lockdown, and everyone needs to get vaccinated because Biden said, "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated." So how about this; that article you posted, it's fraudulent... Why? Because I said so. Continue reading Berenson because I've proven the article you referenced to be false.
He's a truth teller. It's the rest of our "Healthcare" system that a fraud. If you think I'm some kind of brainwashed idiot, I am a pharmacist who does her own research. Perhaps you should try it once.
Did you fill any prescriptions for Ivermectin?
I am retired, though I maintain my license. I wouldn't work though because they would make me get the "vaccine".
Thank you for your consideration but most of us in here are a bit weird in that we like to find out things for ourselves and not be told what to think by others.
Thanks again.
You sound ignorant with statements like that. You sound like the morons without twitter accounts,who were outraged by what the President said on twitter. Did someone write this for you?
Trump was just responding to those attacking him. On the other hand, he did so many wonderful things for our country. I think he still is.
Are you talking to me? I didn't say anything about what Trump said on Twitter.
Did you actually read the article? It gives a numbered list to posts by Alex with links to his posts. It then has a brief sentence or two with no links that says he was wrong. Huh? Additionally I am not sure the author(s?) understood the posts to which they were referring and mischaracterize some of Alex's points. Near the end they say he is providing points of view that cannot be proven. Ok, but the response did not disprove them either. I do not always agree with Alex, but he is pretty meticulous about providing his data and making clear when he is making a supposition. Also, just like with President Trump, some of his posts are firmly tongue in cheek.
Troll
I am so sick of trolls. They need to go back under their bridges.
And you feel it's your duty to inform us. Out of the kindness of your heart. Those of us who have followed Berenson for a long time fully appreciate his work. We understand he is human and subject to bias, as we all are. We actually can follow him and disagree about some of his viewpoints and blind spots. We often express ourselves here on his stack.
A blanket statement citing a less than credible report doesn't add to the discussion. So exactly why do you (and others) often try to dismiss Berenson with a blanket statement. Which parts of Berenson's work do you object to?