117 Comments

They’re just trying to figure out how to admit they’re wrong without admitting they’re wrong

Expand full comment

How can one expect the truth from a newspaper that at best champions complete moral relativism, and at worst gross immorality? As Jesus said 2000 years ago “you cannot serve God and mammon”. The NYT and the rest of MSM decided long ago who they will serve. The Devil is in the goal, and let the demons take care of the details.

Expand full comment

This is the newspaper that unapologetically shilled for Stalin and then Castro. Nothing published in the Times is to be believed. That doesn't mean everything they publish is false but you just can't take their word on it.

Expand full comment

Like a non-denial denial, but in reverse.

Expand full comment

No they’re not. They refuse to see harm and continue to believe in vax efficacy, all evidence to the contrary.

Expand full comment

The vaxes were effective. The goal is to reduce the population. That's what's happening.

Expand full comment

Last week my 28 year old brother was encouraged (again) by his primary care physician to get the COVID vaccine. He was told "it's extremely safe and far preferable to getting COVID."

It's difficult to trust doctors, even those we have known for years. They pity us for being ideologically captured nitwits without caring the feeling is mutual. Since we don't hold medical degrees we don't matter.

Expand full comment

In my opinion any doctor at this late date who still advocates the Covid vaccine is a worthless dumbass. And I have to question the intelligence of someone who continues to keep a dumbass as his doctor. It’s time to find another doctor.

Expand full comment

I had a doc ask the other day if I’d had the jab. I hadn’t and told him so. “Good”, he said, “That’s one thing we won’t have to be concerned about.”

Expand full comment

Fired my doctor because she was a shot pusher and then insisted I wear a mask in the examination room in May 2022 which was required for everyone. Found new doc whose parting words on initial visit were “You are in good shape and you’re not vaxxed for Covid so you’re ahead of the game.” As I watch my vaxxed friends get sick repeatedly, have cardiac events and surgery, contract shingles and other auto immune diseases, and one friend wake up deaf in one ear, I know I am ahead of the game.

Expand full comment

As they say "Degree doth not the Doctor make" Has never been truer in the aftermath of the plandemic and injection rollout!

Expand full comment

They also say that the ground covers many a doctor's mistakes.

Expand full comment

I've had doctors who asked a few years ago stop asking now. It's been interesting finding out which ones offered and for how long.

Expand full comment

What the everloving fuck? Docs are still getting paid for infecting people with this stuff??

Expand full comment

I finally confronted my doctor this year about Covid shots and had he allowed his own 5 nice-Jewish-sons to get the shots. He actually wasn’t a “true believer” but a pragmatist who didn’t want to lose his practice that A LOT of people depended on. As for his sons, they were pragmatic too about staying in college and suchlike. His real belief was more Great Barrington-ish than shot doc.

Expand full comment

Let's face it. Apoorva is a total jerk. She/he belongs in a jail cell along with Fauci & Daszak. of Health Alliance. again I implore folks to read Robert F. Kennedy's book, it'll open your eyes.

Expand full comment

Yes RFK jr is a great source for truth in regards to Covid-19 and Fauci et al.

Expand full comment

RFK, just released a very good 30-minute campaign video narrated by my man Woody Harrelson!

Of course, it's being censored by Facebook.

https://whoisbobbykennedy.com/?utm_campaign=FB_censorship&utm_medium=email1&utm_source=joinkennedy

Expand full comment

You scope the motivation for the NYT lies to not wanting to freakout their readership and incompetence. How about the advertising dollars?

Expand full comment

NYT now basically a subscription service. Much less reliance on advertisers.

Expand full comment

But they are getting a lot more Big Pharma advertising money than, say, Tucker Carlson is.

Expand full comment

Alex writes the NYT piece is a 'gaslighting masterpiece.' I think it instructive to search for motivations. Are you satisfied by the two Alex raises?

Expand full comment

This is a great article that only you could have written because of your position as a former insider.

However this sentence is not even remotely true:

"The best way to find real connections is to read case reports and studies from physicians worldwide which have been published in peer-reviewed journals."

You know that the gatekeepers are captured and perhaps 1% of the truth gets published through that process. Some journals outside the U.S. occasionally publish the truth. But academic publishing is a global oligopoly and the biggest scientific publishing houses are all captured. So maybe stop genuflecting to that broken system.

Expand full comment

The Shadow Rulers captured the science journals a while back - including the "peer-reviewed" papers.

BTW, who "peer reviews" all those bogus CDC studies?

Expand full comment

The BMJ is the lone exception. At least there’s one out there, thank goodness.

Expand full comment

So what is the best way then?

Expand full comment

I’ve read the Cochrane Review is the gold standard. It’s had a good reputation for many years and takes no money from corporate interests.

Expand full comment

Are you actually advocating for Ozempic here? You think the covid vaccines were causing injury but not Ozempic? - Have you read about the cancers the pancreatic issues the vomiting, the ER visits? The risk reward for these drugs really only applies to morbidly obese and you have skinny heathy college girls on this getting sick a and permanently trashing their health. That influencer 40 year old woman millionaire girl- who died of colon cancer that ravaged her body in 6 months- she was a gla girl, she's dead. Talk about an epidemic...I give it two years for total chaos.

Expand full comment

I was also dismayed to see the plug for this medicine. As for that cancer drug I would go by Prasad’s opinion on it.

Expand full comment

And I would like to see your citation for”The risk reward for these drugs really only applies to morbidly obese...” There is no study that demonstrates that claim. None.

Expand full comment

8 out of 1000 get pancreatitis and 8 out of 1000 get a bowel obstruction both which can be deadly- that is like thousands and thousands of people , there are people who need to lose zero pound on it getting these diseases?

Expand full comment

That is not a scientific citation. We need name of journal, volume, page, and date of publication. Pretty straight forward

Expand full comment

It seems obvious and very simple it's the journal of common sense, I'm sorry you don't understand it. Perhaps do your own research.

Expand full comment

Please, no one is forced to take ozempic and we have railed against fat people for long enough. Easier than surgery.

Most effective therapy will be bariatric surgery with post op ozempic like meds.

The puritanical streak in America is too strong. No one gets upset if people take anti hypertensive drugs. Why flip out over ozempic?

Expand full comment

I have read countless articles about how its hurting and killing people., it was easy enough to find just doing basic research

Expand full comment

“Even assuming they reduced Covid deaths in 2021, the jabs have never been shown to reduce all-cause mortality, and no one claims they do. Nor did they meaningfully reduce the course of the Covid “

Very seldom seen words and the words would destroy the souls of the NYT readers and “The View” watchers.

Scandinavia and Israel suspended use of mRNA vaccines in men under thirty because they recognized the danger. The corporate press

Ignored the dangers and forced the vaccination of college students.

Was it because they wanted to “ help slow the spread “ or because they had the power to force their use?

Expand full comment

Are any universities still requiring the jabs in order to attend? I wonder how many young men (and women, but their vulnerability is lower for some reason) who were forced to take the jab now have cardiac issues and/or have died? That should be very easy to discover and should be studied.

Expand full comment

No, this is not about admitting or figuring out how to admit they are wrong. This is a "point to" article. It will be pointed to some time in the future to say the Times did in fact cover vaccine harm but "little was known at the time." It is used as "evidence" that they did not commit complete journalistic malpractice. "Yeah, but we wrote about this in 2024..." I am sure there is some Times article from like 1938 that says "Hitler has his problems as a leader too..." even while everyone else at the times was covering for him. It was probably pointed to in 1940 to show the Times did in fact have reservations about him.

Expand full comment

In Australia, we had over 95% jab coverage in the 16+ population during mandate season. Now that everyone's not being coerced, only 8% or so are 'up to date'. No one wants them.

https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/australians-abandon-failed-mrna-covid

Expand full comment

One has to wonder just how many of those 16+ aged have sub clinical myocarditis or other lurking damage down the road from initial injections.

Expand full comment

Well, cardiac deaths were up by 15% last time I checked. Of course MSM says that’s because of Covid.

Expand full comment

During "Mandate season." Good one, Rebekah.

.... 95 percent to 8 percent. I want to know who are the crazy fools in the 8 percent.

Expand full comment

Mostly retirees

Expand full comment

Well then, according to science, they should be rounding up 92% of the population there and putting them in camps somewhere.

Expand full comment

Excellent commentary, once again, Alex. Thorough analysis.

Expand full comment

With the large amount of research fraud in drug studies, I wouldn't get too enthusiastic about new "miracle" drugs until we have several years of data to evaluate. It took five years to get the deadly miracle drug Vioxx of the market after at least 50,000 deaths (some think the actual total was much, much higher).

Expand full comment

Looking over the NYT comments to the article (1889, now closed) - there seems to be an opening for pro-vax people to share their adverse experiences in a safe space of "but we believe in science!" Neverthless, I think that folks saying outloud what they otherwise would previously never let themselves even think... this is a breakthrough. One top poster says:

"The only connection I can make is my second COVID shot. The leg tingling and pain, and the nonstop menstrual bleeding, all started in the couple days afterwards. It could be a coincidence, and I've been hesitant to ask directly about it because of all the anti-vax bullshit out there. But for the last three years, I've silently thought all this was caused by that vaccine shot."

Expand full comment

Hey, some people lost their lives to the vaxxines. A little constant pain, tingling and nonstop menstual bleeding are the least one can give for the greater good by being injected with this poison. Suck it up, miss top poster!

Expand full comment

Opinion pieces in MSM are never to inform, only to manipulate. There are too many jab injuries to ignore or gaslight away. This is the first salvo on an all out assault on Trump and "Operation Warp Speed". i.e. your injuries are Trump's fault.

Expand full comment

Could very well be! Had said a lonng time ago just wait for the DEM's to play that OWS card, and they may since nothing else is stopping his WITCH hunt ascension in popularity as the next POTUS

Expand full comment

Agreed. If Trump has anyone smart advising him, they would tell him to get ahead of this as well. An acknowledgement of error and an apology would go a long way…

Expand full comment

It's never been easy to be a free thinker, but today, free thinkers are nearing extinction. I think many, if not most, people today would rather be wrong (and even realize, deep down, that they are wrong) than admit that they hold views that diverge from those "people like us" are supposed to hold.

Expand full comment

It’s called a limited hangout. Classic.

Expand full comment

Exactly!

Expand full comment

Still, this article is a watershed moment. Mandavilli apparently sees that the mountain of evidence of vaccine harm cannot be suppressed forever. And she is trying to get ahead of the story so in the future she can say "See? I was the first to break the story of vaccine harm!" Will they now all start scrambling to position themselves as truth-tellers? Break out the popcorn folks!

Expand full comment

The journal Science (https://www.science.org/content/article/pandemic-propels-global-effort-study-rare-vaccine-side-effects) had published stuff on the adverse events in 2022. She's doing a really bad job at staying ahead of anything, maybe other than covering her ass.

Expand full comment

Readers are told that she worked on this story for "more than a year." How long does it take to get a story published in the NY Times? And the paper's editors assigned ONE reporter to the "vaccine injury" beat 12 months ago. However, the vaccines were rolled out - and began instantly killing and harming people - 40 months ago.

Expand full comment