The virus botherers and the vaccinators draw in untold millions in grants, count among their ranks some of the most well-compensated mass and social media personalities in the world, they've made billions supporting coercive vaccination programs and selling shitty pharmaceuticals to governments all over the world, they're complicit in all manner of human rights violations and economic destruction – but the gRIfTerS are a few bloggers with relatively modest online readerships.
Balloux cultivates an online following via a careful balancing act that I doubt convinces anyone on any side of this discussion. It always feels like he's self-consciously throwing a bone to one crowd or the other.
Whitney Webb herself couldn’t have said it better. The next contention to consider is whether pharma ran out of useful product rather a long time ago but their “mRNA product line” was so deadly in animal studies that there was no way that pharma could have “brought it to market” without the “extraordinary circumstances” that were concocted over the last three years.
The concern is that, at this stage of the game, pharma’s new offerings will all be net negative and thrust upon us through even deeper pervasive corruption.
Bret Weinstein put it beautifully in a recent podcast. He explained that when he was a professor, he used to require students to learn a new skill. The only requirement was that you had to know if you succeeded or failed without anyone telling you so. So you could play an instrument or learn a construction skill for instance. Those things you can figure out if you succeeded at because you can listen to the music you create or you can see if you built a functional object. Nobody has to tell you if you succeeded because it is obvious from the functionality of what you did. This keeps people from becoming fools. It explains why academia is so filled with fools now. They are never checked by the real world. They can put out ideas and papers and there is no real world check on whether what they propose is functional or not.
PROFESSOR, n. : as regards political science, sociology and history, a scholastic bureaucrat who, finding it impossible to exert any influence among mature adults endeavors instead to wield hisorher imaginary power over teenagers; the students who suffer the professors’ barrage of frequent nonsense quickly regain their grasp on reality once they graduate and enter the marketplace of employment; those who cannot muster the good sense to break free of the trammels of fatuousness, fecklessness and fallacy remain in University where they learn to become professors.
Editor’s note: This is an obvious generalization. There are and have in fact been some professors for whom this definition would be unfairly applied, but the author does not know who they are.
After three years of waking up every morning angry, sad and hopeless, the only person who has consistently made me laugh with his entertaining and sometimes bratty use of adverbs adjectives and nicknames interspersed in his unrelenting exposes on the crimes big Pharma, government and public health officials have committed against us all in the name of Covid, yeah I can forgive Alex for making a good living as a writer.
“and will chase what I think is the truth even if it’s likely to annoy you”
Fact Check true. Alex’s take on Ivermectin is annoying, but I still subscribe for all the other great work he does. He seems to revel in pissing off his supporters, but I’m here for the affliction he inflicts on the comfortable…
I'm also a paid subscriber & decided time to come out of my comfort zone. One can only become a better debater by hearing & analyzing the ideas of those who differ from you. And Alex presents info not found elsewhere.
Speaking for myself, I think he may have his hands full, with Twitter the Corona and the fake Vaccine bullshit .only so much one man can do. and what hes done so far is pretty damn impressive as far as I can tell
But then he should shut his yap on things he *hasn't* done deep dives into, rather than shoot off his mouth with the equivalent of drive-bys.
He hurts his credibility, IMO, when he opines on things he *hasn't* researched sufficiently, because that then casts a cloud over other things he writes. I mean, if he's making insufficiently grounded statements about the three issues I mentioned, why shouldn't people also think his *other* statements are also based on cherry-picked and insufficiently grounded statements?
Once I doubt your honesty or integrity or accuracy on something, I start to doubt it on other things.
A few weeks ago I came across a tweet by Balloux, saying it was now a good time to "take stock" of the effectiveness of the injections he has been avidly championing. Of course he went on to say they have been a huge, massive, overwhelming and unmitigated success etc. But ... the thing is: he never originally professed any doubt about them and always said they were 100% necessary, 100% safe and 100% effective. So ... why "take stock" now? Or at any time? Freudian slip.
Yeah. And what a happy coincidence that Balloux decided to "take stock", and find that everything was just fine and dandy, at around the same time that the "died suddenly" numbers are proving impossible to hide or explain away.
Alex, I think you are one of the few people in the world that kept America from descending into a tyrannical nightmare of draconian medical responses to the Plandemic.
Without you shouting from the rooftop about the virus scam, the mask scam, the PCR scam, the vaxx scam, the Twitter scam, I'm pretty sure not many people would have questioned the government and resisted the Covidmania that almost completely wrecked the US.
This is a true comparison:
Mask salesmen-grifters
PCR salesmen-grifters
Alex Berenson-Patriot
I don't agree with you on everything, but you will always have my respect and thanks for what you have done.
At first I was not a paid subscriber of Unreported Truths. The turning point for me was when Alex decided to sue Twitter. The results were well worth the subscription fee.
Heck, I give you money even though you are wealthier than I am, and you annoy the crap out of me because you refuse to admit that Ivermectin (which, if you recall, saved my life) is an effective treatment against the Rona. And yes, I part with my $$ voluntarily because I believe in Unreported Truths and want you to have a voice. Mostly, my support is meant as a big middle finger to all the Branch Covidians.
I'm a paying subscriber and bought all your Unreported Truths booklets and Pandemia. I agree with you on virtually everything but I think you shat the bed with the tweet about that woman with the tremors.
I agree with you. I was shocked when I heard that on the highwire. Could it have been a bot? They also claimed he attacked Pierre Kory, and last year he took a jab at Robert Malone. I will continue to read Alex, but he has lost some credibility unless he fesses up
Not a bot. It was Alex on his Twitter account. He went off half-cocked without knowing this woman's story, which it turns out is quite convincing. I mean, if Alex is talking about all of the adverse effects that people are having from the jabs, why be so skeptical when someone actually comes forward?
I was tracking closely the data from Ontario Canada (pop-15M) until it was pulled when the hospitalization/deaths of vaxed/unvaxed per population inverted. Average age of death was 85Y, hospitalization was 72Y.
But over 80% were obese. That's a heck of a VENN diagram. And this is why the US/UK were hit so hard. Obesity in China is around 10% (mostly in the cities) and in the USA was at 41%., UK it's 31%. France is 20%, and Germany is the fattest at 25%.
And we are told it is genetic - so why are our European and African relatives so much thinner?
"For every complex problem, there's a solution that's simple, neat, and dead wrong" -- Mencken
"I have been taking care of patients for more than fifty years" -- Fauci
"If you get vaccinated, you will not catch Covid" -- Sleepy Joe Biden
"We are checking our processes" -- buzzword-spewing hospital administration PR functionary in Minnesota after baby killed by huge overdose of concentrated heparin solution
"This virus will be all gone in a week" -- Donald Trump
Trump was closest to the truth (if that's an accurate quote). Without the hype or the media push nobody would have ever known anything was up. We'd vaguely remember that bad flu year in '19-'20.
I'd wager that 75% of the subscribers here could expose the inconsistencies in Francois Balloux's Covid positions in about 5 minutes... that's how bad it's gotten. They can't maintain even a minimum amount of credibility if they admit how wrong they have been and how unwilling they were to look at things objectively so it's a real catch 22. They have two bad choices.... continue to live in an alternate universe where the jabs work, lockdowns work, natural immunity doesn't exist, remdesivir is effective and healthy young people are at risk from covid -or- look like a complete incompetent fool by admitting the truth. Almost 100% choose the first option.
The virus botherers and the vaccinators draw in untold millions in grants, count among their ranks some of the most well-compensated mass and social media personalities in the world, they've made billions supporting coercive vaccination programs and selling shitty pharmaceuticals to governments all over the world, they're complicit in all manner of human rights violations and economic destruction – but the gRIfTerS are a few bloggers with relatively modest online readerships.
Balloux cultivates an online following via a careful balancing act that I doubt convinces anyone on any side of this discussion. It always feels like he's self-consciously throwing a bone to one crowd or the other.
Whitney Webb herself couldn’t have said it better. The next contention to consider is whether pharma ran out of useful product rather a long time ago but their “mRNA product line” was so deadly in animal studies that there was no way that pharma could have “brought it to market” without the “extraordinary circumstances” that were concocted over the last three years.
The concern is that, at this stage of the game, pharma’s new offerings will all be net negative and thrust upon us through even deeper pervasive corruption.
It’s not just a shitty pharmaceutical. It’s a malfunctioning bio-weapon, brought to you by US tax dollars.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/broken-bioweapon
This "professor" is a perfect example why the gap between a person's intelligence and their education level is growing ever wider.
The gap between intelligence and academia in general is already HUGE!
YUGE I tell you YUGE
Bret Weinstein put it beautifully in a recent podcast. He explained that when he was a professor, he used to require students to learn a new skill. The only requirement was that you had to know if you succeeded or failed without anyone telling you so. So you could play an instrument or learn a construction skill for instance. Those things you can figure out if you succeeded at because you can listen to the music you create or you can see if you built a functional object. Nobody has to tell you if you succeeded because it is obvious from the functionality of what you did. This keeps people from becoming fools. It explains why academia is so filled with fools now. They are never checked by the real world. They can put out ideas and papers and there is no real world check on whether what they propose is functional or not.
Great point!
PROFESSOR, n. : as regards political science, sociology and history, a scholastic bureaucrat who, finding it impossible to exert any influence among mature adults endeavors instead to wield hisorher imaginary power over teenagers; the students who suffer the professors’ barrage of frequent nonsense quickly regain their grasp on reality once they graduate and enter the marketplace of employment; those who cannot muster the good sense to break free of the trammels of fatuousness, fecklessness and fallacy remain in University where they learn to become professors.
Editor’s note: This is an obvious generalization. There are and have in fact been some professors for whom this definition would be unfairly applied, but the author does not know who they are.
— DDR
After three years of waking up every morning angry, sad and hopeless, the only person who has consistently made me laugh with his entertaining and sometimes bratty use of adverbs adjectives and nicknames interspersed in his unrelenting exposes on the crimes big Pharma, government and public health officials have committed against us all in the name of Covid, yeah I can forgive Alex for making a good living as a writer.
Me too!!!
“and will chase what I think is the truth even if it’s likely to annoy you”
Fact Check true. Alex’s take on Ivermectin is annoying, but I still subscribe for all the other great work he does. He seems to revel in pissing off his supporters, but I’m here for the affliction he inflicts on the comfortable…
I'm also a paid subscriber & decided time to come out of my comfort zone. One can only become a better debater by hearing & analyzing the ideas of those who differ from you. And Alex presents info not found elsewhere.
True Alex, you certainly are annoying.
The facts can be an annoyance sometimes.
As can be *avoiding* the facts.
When will he do deep-dives into:
1. 2020 election fraud in MI, WI, PA, GA?
2. IVM?
3. Paxlovid?
He shoots from the lip on these subjects, but hasn't yet done anywhere near the kind of analyses he's done on the Chinese virus and the clot shots.
Speaking for myself, I think he may have his hands full, with Twitter the Corona and the fake Vaccine bullshit .only so much one man can do. and what hes done so far is pretty damn impressive as far as I can tell
I don't doubt that.
But then he should shut his yap on things he *hasn't* done deep dives into, rather than shoot off his mouth with the equivalent of drive-bys.
He hurts his credibility, IMO, when he opines on things he *hasn't* researched sufficiently, because that then casts a cloud over other things he writes. I mean, if he's making insufficiently grounded statements about the three issues I mentioned, why shouldn't people also think his *other* statements are also based on cherry-picked and insufficiently grounded statements?
Once I doubt your honesty or integrity or accuracy on something, I start to doubt it on other things.
But Alex is good enough, smart enough and doggone it people like him. Channeling my best Stuart Smalley
Yes but it’s good to be annoyed sometimes.
That’s part of his charm😉
A few weeks ago I came across a tweet by Balloux, saying it was now a good time to "take stock" of the effectiveness of the injections he has been avidly championing. Of course he went on to say they have been a huge, massive, overwhelming and unmitigated success etc. But ... the thing is: he never originally professed any doubt about them and always said they were 100% necessary, 100% safe and 100% effective. So ... why "take stock" now? Or at any time? Freudian slip.
He is a devout covidian. The first of their commandments is thou shall never admit thou were wrong.
Yeah. And what a happy coincidence that Balloux decided to "take stock", and find that everything was just fine and dandy, at around the same time that the "died suddenly" numbers are proving impossible to hide or explain away.
Indeed
You're not a grifter, your TDS turns you into an idiot sometimes, but you're not alone with that ailment.
The entire Left has that sickness.
I’m a paid subscriber, but find you to be one of the more generous well-read Substackers out there!
I paid too
Alex, I think you are one of the few people in the world that kept America from descending into a tyrannical nightmare of draconian medical responses to the Plandemic.
Without you shouting from the rooftop about the virus scam, the mask scam, the PCR scam, the vaxx scam, the Twitter scam, I'm pretty sure not many people would have questioned the government and resisted the Covidmania that almost completely wrecked the US.
This is a true comparison:
Mask salesmen-grifters
PCR salesmen-grifters
Alex Berenson-Patriot
I don't agree with you on everything, but you will always have my respect and thanks for what you have done.
At first I was not a paid subscriber of Unreported Truths. The turning point for me was when Alex decided to sue Twitter. The results were well worth the subscription fee.
You can take the boy out of NYT, but you can't take NYT out of the boy...
Heck, I give you money even though you are wealthier than I am, and you annoy the crap out of me because you refuse to admit that Ivermectin (which, if you recall, saved my life) is an effective treatment against the Rona. And yes, I part with my $$ voluntarily because I believe in Unreported Truths and want you to have a voice. Mostly, my support is meant as a big middle finger to all the Branch Covidians.
I'm a paying subscriber and bought all your Unreported Truths booklets and Pandemia. I agree with you on virtually everything but I think you shat the bed with the tweet about that woman with the tremors.
I agree with you, but I don't know what "shat the bed" means.
It's an expression for screwing something up in a spectacularly bad manner.
I agree with you. I was shocked when I heard that on the highwire. Could it have been a bot? They also claimed he attacked Pierre Kory, and last year he took a jab at Robert Malone. I will continue to read Alex, but he has lost some credibility unless he fesses up
Not a bot. It was Alex on his Twitter account. He went off half-cocked without knowing this woman's story, which it turns out is quite convincing. I mean, if Alex is talking about all of the adverse effects that people are having from the jabs, why be so skeptical when someone actually comes forward?
I was tracking closely the data from Ontario Canada (pop-15M) until it was pulled when the hospitalization/deaths of vaxed/unvaxed per population inverted. Average age of death was 85Y, hospitalization was 72Y.
But over 80% were obese. That's a heck of a VENN diagram. And this is why the US/UK were hit so hard. Obesity in China is around 10% (mostly in the cities) and in the USA was at 41%., UK it's 31%. France is 20%, and Germany is the fattest at 25%.
And we are told it is genetic - so why are our European and African relatives so much thinner?
"There is no such thing as a free lunch" -- Anon.
"For every complex problem, there's a solution that's simple, neat, and dead wrong" -- Mencken
"I have been taking care of patients for more than fifty years" -- Fauci
"If you get vaccinated, you will not catch Covid" -- Sleepy Joe Biden
"We are checking our processes" -- buzzword-spewing hospital administration PR functionary in Minnesota after baby killed by huge overdose of concentrated heparin solution
"This virus will be all gone in a week" -- Donald Trump
Trump was closest to the truth (if that's an accurate quote). Without the hype or the media push nobody would have ever known anything was up. We'd vaguely remember that bad flu year in '19-'20.
Trump... the hysteria won't be.
I'd wager that 75% of the subscribers here could expose the inconsistencies in Francois Balloux's Covid positions in about 5 minutes... that's how bad it's gotten. They can't maintain even a minimum amount of credibility if they admit how wrong they have been and how unwilling they were to look at things objectively so it's a real catch 22. They have two bad choices.... continue to live in an alternate universe where the jabs work, lockdowns work, natural immunity doesn't exist, remdesivir is effective and healthy young people are at risk from covid -or- look like a complete incompetent fool by admitting the truth. Almost 100% choose the first option.