you might want to check out both Yuri and Steve Kirsch's posts.
Here is yet another article - Epoch times
A scientific journal is rejecting a request to retract a study that found people who received a COVID-19 booster were more likely to become infected when compared to unvaccinated people.
Analyzing numbers from California's prison system, a research group found that those who received one of the bivalent boosters had a higher infection rate than people who have never received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
Their study was published by the journal Cureus following peer review.
Memento, your comment above had questions that many of us have been asking for more than two years, and not only were they not answered by anyone in any official capacity, the mere attempt to ask these questions in mainstream outlets were systematically, efficiently, and quickly banned, censored, and the questioner ridiculed. Yet you were very quick to write that Ingrid's post is "nonsense". Again, answers have been missing for years now, and you'd (apparently) be surprised how often some easy quick research turns up the word "depopulation"; when I saw it coming from a few vaccine zealots like Bill Gates (during a Ted Talk), I quit my knee jerk response of "nonsense" and began thinking "Hmm, this might explain some of these stone cold sociopaths who have been fascinated with all things vaccine and mass populations for years. Or not? Too bad we never get ANY answers".
Thanks RK&TW, but you are more articulate than me, so I'll keep being polite and you keep posting your great articulate comments, and maybe one day my (still unconvinced) friends will also be hitting the "likes".
Actually Fred, although I am no fan WHATSOEVER of Bill Gates and his "health agenda," I watched that TED talk by Gates the other day and here's what I heard: Gates did say population control using vaccines but in context I think he was verbally "short-handing" something like this --
women (presumably in the developing world) who are having a lot of children will have less children if they use birth control and vaccinate the children that they do have so that presumably those children will live longer and maybe women won't continue having more
Look, I know that sounds like a lot of words to put in his mouth, but in fairness, I think people often speak "in lists" and assume that their audience understands the general message. I think getting "overly literal" here is really to misconstrue what he was communicating at the time.
Frankly it could be that Bill just isn't all that bright. He just has a lot of money and a huge ego to sway things in very bad directions. To me he seems mainly about 1) worldwide population reduction through birth control and 2) a "true believer" in every form of vaccination proven or not.
But if he really cared about health, he would have used his wealth to make sure that every village in Africa had clean water. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
So bottomline, we agree Gates does want less people on the planet, but not, I think, by killing them with a vaccine.
Sorry but I think that is nonsense.
you might want to check out both Yuri and Steve Kirsch's posts.
Here is yet another article - Epoch times
A scientific journal is rejecting a request to retract a study that found people who received a COVID-19 booster were more likely to become infected when compared to unvaccinated people.
Analyzing numbers from California's prison system, a research group found that those who received one of the bivalent boosters had a higher infection rate than people who have never received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
Their study was published by the journal Cureus following peer review.
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/17/nurse-sarah-choujounian-lighting-up-dark-corners/
here is the testimony of a Canadian nurse, with Dr. Trozzi, of how the elderly in retirement homes faired.
https://hatchardreport.com/the-new-zealand-health-debate-fact-checking-ayesha-verrall-vs-shane-reti/
here are the numbers for New Zealand, and there is a site with those from Australia as well, for which I do not have a link
And here's another important Epoch Times article. US Govt essentially bribed/threatened OB-GYNs into promoting shots for pregnant women.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/government-gave-millions-to-american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists-to-promote-covid-19-vaccines-to-pregnant-women-5486432?utm_source=Health_vaccine&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=vaccine-2023-09-11&src_src=Health_vaccine&src_cmp=vaccine-2023-09-11&est=sFKZGBNiuBLGZDR1JFJwoBG1eD6mSSFKlH4err7vpcQky0Jt5k0rXJAUFJEQKIc6ZQ%3D%3D
Memento, your comment above had questions that many of us have been asking for more than two years, and not only were they not answered by anyone in any official capacity, the mere attempt to ask these questions in mainstream outlets were systematically, efficiently, and quickly banned, censored, and the questioner ridiculed. Yet you were very quick to write that Ingrid's post is "nonsense". Again, answers have been missing for years now, and you'd (apparently) be surprised how often some easy quick research turns up the word "depopulation"; when I saw it coming from a few vaccine zealots like Bill Gates (during a Ted Talk), I quit my knee jerk response of "nonsense" and began thinking "Hmm, this might explain some of these stone cold sociopaths who have been fascinated with all things vaccine and mass populations for years. Or not? Too bad we never get ANY answers".
Your reply to the above mentioned is much more polite than mine wouldтАЩve beenтАжthank you.
Thanks RK&TW, but you are more articulate than me, so I'll keep being polite and you keep posting your great articulate comments, and maybe one day my (still unconvinced) friends will also be hitting the "likes".
Actually Fred, although I am no fan WHATSOEVER of Bill Gates and his "health agenda," I watched that TED talk by Gates the other day and here's what I heard: Gates did say population control using vaccines but in context I think he was verbally "short-handing" something like this --
women (presumably in the developing world) who are having a lot of children will have less children if they use birth control and vaccinate the children that they do have so that presumably those children will live longer and maybe women won't continue having more
Look, I know that sounds like a lot of words to put in his mouth, but in fairness, I think people often speak "in lists" and assume that their audience understands the general message. I think getting "overly literal" here is really to misconstrue what he was communicating at the time.
Frankly it could be that Bill just isn't all that bright. He just has a lot of money and a huge ego to sway things in very bad directions. To me he seems mainly about 1) worldwide population reduction through birth control and 2) a "true believer" in every form of vaccination proven or not.
But if he really cared about health, he would have used his wealth to make sure that every village in Africa had clean water. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
So bottomline, we agree Gates does want less people on the planet, but not, I think, by killing them with a vaccine.