Six weeks after becoming “fully vaccinated,” kids under 12 are 40 percent MORE likely to be infected Covid than those who never received mRNA shots, a huge New York state database shows.
The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” But it declines rapidly, turns negative by the fifth week, and more sharply negative in the sixth.
“Negative” vaccine efficacy means that vaccinated people are more likely to become infected. It is not clear how high the increased risk may become for young children, since the database only covered six weeks and the trend worsened each week.
The blue bar in the chart below shows the relative odds of unvaccinated and vaccinated children to get Covid. The dashed red line equals a risk ratio of 1 - a 50/50 risk.
See how the blue bar falls each week and drops below the red line after 35 days? At point, unvaccinated children have lower risk. (The orange bar is kids 12-17. They still have some protection six weeks out, although it too is declining.)
The study covered the period from mid-December through the end of January, when the Omicron variant became predominant. Although many other studies have shown the vaccines are largely useless against Omicron infection in adults after four months, this database makes clear they are even more useless even more quickly for children.
Children 5 to 11 receive a smaller mRNA dose than adolescents and adults, 10 micrograms versus 30 for each shot. It is not clear whether the smaller dose is the reason the shots are even less effective in kids than in adults, or whether children’s immune systems react differently to mRNA at any dose.
Vaccine protection against Covid hospitalization in children under 12 also dropped over time. By the final two weeks of the study, vaccines offered no statistically significant protection against hospitalizations from Covid, though the numbers were very small.
The database covered 365,000 vaccinated children in New York state aged 5-11. The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings.
So to summarize, children under 12 who were at no risk from catching Covid, have received a jab that now makes them more susceptible to catching Covid and developing autoimmune diseases or any number of long term health problems if they are lucky enough to live that long. Any one who pushed these gene therapy jabs as safe and effective has blood on their hands. Oh and it's not a defence to say I was just following orders. Leave the kids alone!
the biggest medical scam/con in world history...Thanks to the war no one is paying attention, yet !! we will not forget what they did to us - never
From the get-go, Covid was NEVER even a minuscule threat to children! My heart hurts for those young children whose parents are so gullible that they would hand over their kids to be experimented on like lab rats.
I have two 8th-graders in public school and our school system just sent all parents an email saying they were opening 5 'vaccination clinics' in 5 local middle schools.
There are already posters all over the schools telling kids to get the shot for a virus that has zero mortality to them but many possibly serious side effects so don't think for one minute they won't be lobbying and pressuring kids to get the jab. Although a parent is required to be in attendance, the indoctrination has already begun.
Send this to the psychos in California still considering mandating it for all children to attend school
My 15 yo son just had blood work to see if maybe he’d been infected before… zero antibodies , unvaxxed . I don’t know how that’s possible given all his vaxxed friends catching covid . My coworkers vaxxed first grader now testing positive for covid . It’s anecdotal but fascinating . Surely it’s not because his vitamin d levels are very high from mom forcing daily supplements ?
A lot of the problem was making the older, more obese and less healthy segments of the population believe that getting children and younger, healthier people "vaccinated," would serve to protect THEMSELVES. That's what was constantly shouted about the "common good" of mass vaccination. Liberals who fashion themselves more caring, loving, empathetic, etc ended up as complete hypocrites who did not want to hear that that their "greater common good" was sacrificing the young for the old.
Noticed this in my community in Northern California in January - usually a few weeks after the kids were vaccinated. Cause and Effect - The correlation is not a coincidence.
G-d help us all!
Praying that these kids don't develop Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
I just don't understand why any parent would get their child vaccinated for covid at this time. I wish I knew 27 years ago what I know today to question my pedestrian about all the child Vaccines and not follow them blindly!
No kidding, never mind the fact that kids have never, ever been in danger from the covid virus.
I am positive that the demand for this age group to be vaccinated is quite low now.
“We infected some kids”.
This is just an extended late term abortion.
Time for the NY Dbase to be disappeared.
Alex, this post is mis, mal, dis-information. President Biden stated "If you get the vaccine, you won't get Covid" so you must be spreading a conspiracy theory and will be placed on the Homeland Security Terrorist Watchlist. JK - See the point here fellow terrorist watch list folks?
The very lies we are told by leaders are criminalized if you don't cheerfully accept them as truth. Something bad is wrong with this country. Really bad. Pray, plan, prepare and RESIST.
"It is not clear ,,,"
There's a whole LOT about these so-called vaccines that is "not clear," including what on EARTH possessed parents allow their children to be injected with an experimental drug!
And look at the dates: right around Christmas & Hanukkah. So the kids don't contaminate grandparents?
This is so wrong.
The expected CDC response: child boosters every five weeks. Safe & Effective. If you say no, you're a grandma-hating anti-vaxxer. Science!
Truly the End of Empire.
It's the same for all age groups isn't it? More likely to catch Covid with a shot in your arm.
* The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” *
lol, The "protection" is they treat those 2 weeks as unvaccinated.
From the study: "The analysis compared outcomes among fully vaccinated children (defined as series completion+ 14 days) versus unvaccinated children in the age groups 5-11 years and 12 -17 years."
EDIT: Looks like the chart with the 2 week says: Incidence rate ratios, comparing cases during January 3 - January 30, 2022 for unvaccinated versus children newly fully-vaccinated December 13, 2021-January 2, 2022, by Time Since Full Vaccination
So assuming that the 14 days is excluded from full vaccination start, it just means that the "protection" is an artifact of having made it through the 1st 2 high risk weeks without infection. Don't see where they say how the cases are handled in that time period, could have missed it.
The authors did mention negative effectiveness in a footnote: "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated.
"The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings." Well, they wanted it to get published, after all. And counting on the media to not actually look at the study, just read the "discussion".
Sadly, per your attacks on ivermectin, this study is worthless since it's not a "well designed randomized controlled trial."
And just like that, Covid Vanishes from all Main Stream Media: Covid Out/ Bombs In
I previously commented on this exact situation in an earlier post: my sixth grade grand-daughter had the child seated next to her, then her best friend contract Rona in January. Both of those students were vexxed. My unvexxed grand-daughter was never ill, despite having two close contacts become ill. (I do not know of any other children in the class becoming ill.) NY data appears to confirm her experience was not unusual.
Orange(man) bar bad‼️
Yeah but Mr. Alex the nice lady in the white coat on TV said that vaccines are "proven" safe and effective for children.
How dare you talk about negative efficacy? The government specifically said you are only allowed to use the data to show positive efficacy. -Kevin Roche and other Big Pharma shills
How has this happened? How could they jab children, or most people for that matter, against a disease that wasn't a serious threat to them?
It's absolutely incredible that this has happened, this insane plan to jab the entire planet, which has been led by Bill Gates...yes, it's not a conspiracy theory, Bill Gates is indeed dominating international vaccination policy, and has been for years via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Gavi Alliance, the WHO, CDC etc.
In regards to Covid, see his GatesNotes published on 30 April 2020: What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine: https://www.gatesnotes.com/health/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine
Who has been really missing in action during this Covid debacle over the past two years?
I suggest it was the doctors...how did the doctors let this happen, let literally billions of people be jabbed unnecessarily, particularly children?
Sure, there are some exceptions fighting to be heard such as Peter McCullough, Roger Hodkinson and others, but the doctors' professional organisations and regulators have been fully behind the Covid jab rollout, and regulators have actually threatened to penalise doctors who speak out.
I'm challenging the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners about the failure to obtain valid voluntary consent before the Covid jabs, I suggest no-one has been properly informed about these fast-tracked experimental jabs - see my email to RACGP President Karen Price: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding 'valid voluntary consent': https://bit.ly/3ssSNx0
Are there really that many insane parents in New York who would allow their precious children to be injected with this crap? Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy.
This dataset is only for 2 doses. It is really a 3 dose ("boosted") vaccine. Those data look much better for symptomatic disease.
They kept waiting/hoping that children's infection rates would increase so they could justify their insane policies and the teachers unions could keep teachers home. Well, they found a way to increase infection rates in kids. You have to hand it to them, they delivered!
The profession of journalism largely no longer exists. It has been replaced by a new profession - useful idiocy. Most 'journalists' have morphed into becoming propaganda or narrative agents. Only a few have survived. Thank you Alex.
IMO the first clue of pharma vaxx criminality was AstraZeneca's absurd claim last year that their C19 vaxx offered 100% efficacy. 100% ! You had to read way past the headline to learn that this claim was for a vague hospitalization rate, but the brainwashing and fear mongering was done. Yet within 4-5 months more than a dozen countries had BANNED the AZ vaccine due to injuries. How many millions of people were denied the treatment they really needed because of these lies and the media that covered them up? How many died?
The side effects I have observed in some children are horrifying. I'm angry that parents don't research more and that they trust the medical professionals as much as they do. It's frigging experimental! 2 students I work with have terrible neurological side effects and are in pain. My heart breaks every time I see them.
Always using the "protective against severe disease" antic when kids are at the tiniest of risk. The benefits do not outweigh the risk of long-term immune system destruction.
And yet in CA, the governor and assembly continue to push for vaccine mandates for all children in order to attend school. The amount of ignorance or evil, or a combination thereof by our elected representatives hasn't been witnessed like this...ever? This is a new low.
There you go ‘misinterpreting’ data again.
Btw a return to Covid specific content is good.
I do not have the data, but I am pretty sure that Spain is a very good example of this. Kids started to get vaxxed and cases boosted (pun, lol).
There is also Omi, more contagious. But toddlers have not experienced that. And they are all tested as hell.
Is it more correct to use the 95th CI or mean here when discussing vaccine effectiveness? Even using the mean shows it's only 12% effective
Only two posible answers:
- Booster them now!
- The dose is too low. More mRNA!!
The “science” has changed.
They mention that negative effectiveness may be due to some data artifacts… some pretty stable and continuous looking artifacts…
“Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-
increased risk for those vaccinated.”
I suspect we'll see health care systems filing for bankruptcy because they have no cover pushing EUA drugs compared to big pharma. And then people should go to jail!!
Can someone who understands statistics explain the footnote below the chart? "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated."
Looking at that Figure 2, the greatest effectiveness of the vaccines vs. not being vaccinated comes in days 0-13 after getting the shot, then the effectiveness ratio starts declining steadily. And yet, according to the health experts, people are not considered "vaccinated" until 14 days after the shot. Hmmm...
Please!!!! Parents!!! Do not
Vaccinate your children against this !!!
This isn't a case anymore, it's reality.