Six weeks after becoming “fully vaccinated,” kids under 12 are 40 percent MORE likely to be infected Covid than those who never received mRNA shots, a huge New York state database shows.
The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” But it declines rapidly, turns negative by the fifth week, and more sharply negative in the sixth.
“Negative” vaccine efficacy means that vaccinated people are more likely to become infected. It is not clear how high the increased risk may become for young children, since the database only covered six weeks and the trend worsened each week.
The blue bar in the chart below shows the relative odds of unvaccinated and vaccinated children to get Covid. The dashed red line equals a risk ratio of 1 - a 50/50 risk.
See how the blue bar falls each week and drops below the red line after 35 days? At point, unvaccinated children have lower risk. (The orange bar is kids 12-17. They still have some protection six weeks out, although it too is declining.)
The study covered the period from mid-December through the end of January, when the Omicron variant became predominant. Although many other studies have shown the vaccines are largely useless against Omicron infection in adults after four months, this database makes clear they are even more useless even more quickly for children.
Children 5 to 11 receive a smaller mRNA dose than adolescents and adults, 10 micrograms versus 30 for each shot. It is not clear whether the smaller dose is the reason the shots are even less effective in kids than in adults, or whether children’s immune systems react differently to mRNA at any dose.
Vaccine protection against Covid hospitalization in children under 12 also dropped over time. By the final two weeks of the study, vaccines offered no statistically significant protection against hospitalizations from Covid, though the numbers were very small.
The database covered 365,000 vaccinated children in New York state aged 5-11. The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings.
So to summarize, children under 12 who were at no risk from catching Covid, have received a jab that now makes them more susceptible to catching Covid and developing autoimmune diseases or any number of long term health problems if they are lucky enough to live that long. Any one who pushed these gene therapy jabs as safe and effective has blood on their hands. Oh and it's not a defence to say I was just following orders. Leave the kids alone!
Jesus christ, a lame semantics argument over the difference between jail and prison is all you have to respond to the fact that conservatives have never supported anything but the harshest conditions and punishment possible for anyone caught up in the criminal justice system. I'm simply pointing that millions of people have suffered over the years in our jails and prisons, renowned the world over for being barbaric and sadistic, and you guys only noticed it last year for a select set of privileged and generally well off white dudes who thought they could freely commit crimes with no consequences.
Your concern is completely insincere and will be gone the moment they leave the news because you never really cared. And I love that you have the audacity to say all of that beneath a post asking for long, harsh sentences for people based on a graphic that Mr. Berenson very deceptively clipped to hide the footnote (shown below) that contradicted his statement that the authors didn't comment on the negative VE:
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
And deceptively ignored the conclusion of the authors that, "In the Omicron era, the effectiveness against cases of BNT162b2 declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11 years. However, vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease and is recommended."
You guys jump at the thought of sentencing doctors and scientists who saved countless lives to long and cruel prison terms for literally nothing more than a misinterpreted pre-print paper that you guys didn't even bother to read or glance at. So spare me the fake concern.
If you look at the graphic from the source paper, the authors have a footnote for the negative VE values that Mr. Berenson must have accidentally cropped out of his image. It's only right there and directly explains why they might have happened so it's easy to miss.
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
And he forgot to include the conclusion of the authors too.
"In the Omicron era, the effectiveness against cases of BNT162b2 declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11 years. However, vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease and is recommended."
I'm sure it was just a mistake as it doesn't really change any of the conclusions people are drawing from his summary.
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
Given the narrative being pushed by government, the public health establishment, and the media for the last 14 months since these "vaccines" were rolled out, and the censoring, smearing, and cancellation attempts against anyone who dissented (however tentatively), this is about what I would expect the authors to say. Did you happen to notice that it's merely an assertion for which they provided no evidence?
As for their conclusion that "vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease," the data presented simply don't support that. I'm assuming "severe disease" means "hospitalization," given that hospitalizations were one of two outcomes the authors measured; as the paper states, "Two outcomes were assessed: 1) COVID-19 cases, defined as positive NAAT or antigen results reported to ECLRS, 2) New COVID-19 admissions as reported in HERDS."
Notice that their definition of hospitalization is "new COVID-19 admissions." That's important because in the preceding paragraph, when describing the data sources they relied on, they say that "The Health Electronic Response Data System (HERDS) includes a statewide, daily electronic survey of inpatient facilities, including all new admissions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and the primary reason for admission." Going back to the authors' definition of hospitalization, you'll see it does not mention primary reason for admission; it's merely "new COVID-19 admissions," not "new admissions with COVID-19 as the primary reason for admission." Given how easy it would have been to make it clear if they were only counting admissions for which COVID-19 was the primary reason, as opposed to all child admissions in which a COVID-19 test upon admission was positive, we have to assume that they're counting admissions *with* COVID as opposed to only admissions *due to* COVID. And given that we have no way to tell how many admissions fall into which of those two categories, those data are useless for determining vaccine efficacy against severe disease.
That's not even the only way the hospital admissions data are worthless. Another is in how it says nothing about whether the children admitted were otherwise healthy or had comorbidities like obesity or diabetes. Of the tiny numbers of children who are hospitalized due to COVID, the overwhelming majority have at least one comorbidity. There might, maybe, possibly, be a valid argument for vaccinating those kids in some cases (I still wouldn't), but that argument decidedly does not apply to healthy children.
This all smacks of an attempt to find evidence to support a pre-determined conclusion. Recall that Pfizer's own trial for the 5-11 year old cohort showed no clinical benefit from the vaccines (severe illnesses and deaths from COVID are so rare in that age group that no one in either the vaccine group or control group had a significant COVID illness during the trial; in their EUA application for that cohort, Pfizer immunobridged with their results in the 12-17 year old cohort to conjure a clinical benefit to the 5-11 year olds).
Finally, the last sentence of the papers reads: "Given rapid loss of protection against infections, these results highlight the continued importance of layered protections, including mask wearing, for children to prevent infection and transmission." Of course, the results highlight no such thing. Given how little risk COVID poses to children and how rarely they transmit it to adults (see: schools everywhere in the world), and given that we know masks don't do a damn thing, both the authors' conclusion and the footnote to the negative VE table look an awful lot like an attempt to dishonestly explain away what the data actually show, either to deflect accusations of "misinformation" or because they actually support the "everyone needs to be jabbed" narrative.
From the get-go, Covid was NEVER even a minuscule threat to children! My heart hurts for those young children whose parents are so gullible that they would hand over their kids to be experimented on like lab rats.
At the risk of being a 'bad winner'... somebody's gotta be 'that guy' so I'll step up.
People who demanded that their children be injected with Pfizer Magic Jizz, are doing society a favour - because fewer of their children will make it to adulthood. It's only a slight tilt to propabilities, but I'll gladly accept anything that gets their sludge DNA out of the gene pool.
Western societies have been subsidising reproduction of the Imbecile Classes for 3 generations, and it has been profoundly dysgenic.
The entire Magic Spooge Festival has basically been a gigantic test of applied IQ - and nobody should be surprised that a very large number of imbeciles have failed it.
There will be fewer of them as time passes: this is an unalloyed mitzvah, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a dill.
I have two 8th-graders in public school and our school system just sent all parents an email saying they were opening 5 'vaccination clinics' in 5 local middle schools.
There are already posters all over the schools telling kids to get the shot for a virus that has zero mortality to them but many possibly serious side effects so don't think for one minute they won't be lobbying and pressuring kids to get the jab. Although a parent is required to be in attendance, the indoctrination has already begun.
I’m surprised they waited this long to run clinics. My school in suburban Pittsburgh had clinics the day after each age group EUA with 2nd dose right on time.
I am so sorry for all that you, your family and all others like you are going through and I pray continued strength for you. I thank God my children are in their thirties and that (I'm so sad to say) I have no grandchildren at present. I'm afraid I would be sick with worry otherwise. My son has been threatened with loss of employment over his unvaxxed status. However, as serious as that is, in my opinion, it pales in comparison to what the teachers unions and school boards are doing to school age children and their parents.
We're gonna be ok because we've taught our children to be critical thinkers. All the people who advocated for others to lose their jobs, not be able to travel or even worse, be quarantined or even arrested think we'll forgive and forget but they have another thing coming. They should be ashamed but they are not capable of shame I'm afraid.
My 15 yo son just had blood work to see if maybe he’d been infected before… zero antibodies , unvaxxed . I don’t know how that’s possible given all his vaxxed friends catching covid . My coworkers vaxxed first grader now testing positive for covid . It’s anecdotal but fascinating . Surely it’s not because his vitamin d levels are very high from mom forcing daily supplements ?
You can be immune to an infection without ever having gotten infected previously. In every population, there are always a number of individuals who have innate immunity. Not post-infection immunity. Innate immunity.
This might be my family . My son and husband were at a gathering a few weeks ago when several people caught presumed omicron. Nothing . Both of them unvaxxed .
It is possible. I also have been in direct contact with all the strains of Covid at one point or another in the past 2 years. I never got sick. I am also unvaxxed and staying that way. I wouldn't presume to be immune to the degree that I would voluntarily come into contact with Covid but I just live my normal life. No mask. No vax. Just normal life. I take lots of supplements and I try to be healthy but that is just the usual. I've been taking Vitamin D supplements for many years.
I've been so blackpilled that I am not signing up for any tests. The CDC admits that they have been using Covid swabs to sequence DNA. I don't trust anyone. I don't have any clue what is going on in Ukraine either because unless I am there and see it with my own eyes, who knows? The media and the government lie all the time.
It’s like $219.00. I took one last year before vaccine rollout bc I’m sure my oldest had original strain covid and I was around him and never got sick . Nothing . Zero .
A lot of the problem was making the older, more obese and less healthy segments of the population believe that getting children and younger, healthier people "vaccinated," would serve to protect THEMSELVES. That's what was constantly shouted about the "common good" of mass vaccination. Liberals who fashion themselves more caring, loving, empathetic, etc ended up as complete hypocrites who did not want to hear that that their "greater common good" was sacrificing the young for the old.
Noticed this in my community in Northern California in January - usually a few weeks after the kids were vaccinated. Cause and Effect - The correlation is not a coincidence.
Prayers for all the kids who got these jabs. They might end up with a lifetime of health problems - or a shortened lifespan. The truth is that nobody knows what the long term consequences might be. If Covid were killing large numbers of children - and if the jabs prevented Covid - then maybe that is a risk worth taking. But we have a situation where Covid kills zero healthy children. Zero. And the jabs don't prevent Covid anyway. Sometimes, I have to wonder how I ended up in this timeline.
I just don't understand why any parent would get their child vaccinated for covid at this time. I wish I knew 27 years ago what I know today to question my pedestrian about all the child Vaccines and not follow them blindly!
Me too! I didn’t question a thing. Never again. I did tell my young adult daughters that if I had to do it all over again, I would never have vaccinated them. And that I hope they don’t succumb with any children they may have. I’m going to keep pushing that thought so maybe it will sink in!
Not so much here in NY if the NYS legislature and our psycho governor have their way and require that ALL children be jabbed in order to go to school. Yes, all those pushing these things on anyone, but especially children, no matter where they are situated--health authorities and workers, doctors, politicians, bureaucrats, media shills--have blood dripping from their hands. And if they keep this up, their's will eventually be flowing in the streets.
Depending on the country. Spain, parents still post pictures of their kids playing the myocarditis-pericarditis-neurological disorders-cancer-death lottery.
Alex, this post is mis, mal, dis-information. President Biden stated "If you get the vaccine, you won't get Covid" so you must be spreading a conspiracy theory and will be placed on the Homeland Security Terrorist Watchlist. JK - See the point here fellow terrorist watch list folks?
The very lies we are told by leaders are criminalized if you don't cheerfully accept them as truth. Something bad is wrong with this country. Really bad. Pray, plan, prepare and RESIST.
There's a whole LOT about these so-called vaccines that is "not clear," including what on EARTH possessed parents allow their children to be injected with an experimental drug!
And look at the dates: right around Christmas & Hanukkah. So the kids don't contaminate grandparents?
* The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” *
lol, The "protection" is they treat those 2 weeks as unvaccinated.
From the study: "The analysis compared outcomes among fully vaccinated children (defined as series completion+ 14 days) versus unvaccinated children in the age groups 5-11 years and 12 -17 years."
EDIT: Looks like the chart with the 2 week says: Incidence rate ratios, comparing cases during January 3 - January 30, 2022 for unvaccinated versus children newly fully-vaccinated December 13, 2021-January 2, 2022, by Time Since Full Vaccination
So assuming that the 14 days is excluded from full vaccination start, it just means that the "protection" is an artifact of having made it through the 1st 2 high risk weeks without infection. Don't see where they say how the cases are handled in that time period, could have missed it.
What's weird is he accidentally cropped out this footnote that is directly below the graphic that says:
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
He even chopped a bit of the bottom numbers off like he was trying to avoid it, but I'm sure that he'd have no reason to chop off the one piece of information that totally undermines the entire premise of his article and its final sentence which seems relevant:
"The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings."
The authors also recommended that those kids should still get vaccinated and wear masks but it's not like he disagrees with those things in general so it's fine that he didn't mention them in this article. All very fine, all very cool.
The authors did mention negative effectiveness in a footnote: "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated.
"The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings." Well, they wanted it to get published, after all. And counting on the media to not actually look at the study, just read the "discussion".
I previously commented on this exact situation in an earlier post: my sixth grade grand-daughter had the child seated next to her, then her best friend contract Rona in January. Both of those students were vexxed. My unvexxed grand-daughter was never ill, despite having two close contacts become ill. (I do not know of any other children in the class becoming ill.) NY data appears to confirm her experience was not unusual.
How dare you talk about negative efficacy? The government specifically said you are only allowed to use the data to show positive efficacy. -Kevin Roche and other Big Pharma shills
How has this happened? How could they jab children, or most people for that matter, against a disease that wasn't a serious threat to them?
It's absolutely incredible that this has happened, this insane plan to jab the entire planet, which has been led by Bill Gates...yes, it's not a conspiracy theory, Bill Gates is indeed dominating international vaccination policy, and has been for years via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Gavi Alliance, the WHO, CDC etc.
Who has been really missing in action during this Covid debacle over the past two years?
I suggest it was the doctors...how did the doctors let this happen, let literally billions of people be jabbed unnecessarily, particularly children?
Sure, there are some exceptions fighting to be heard such as Peter McCullough, Roger Hodkinson and others, but the doctors' professional organisations and regulators have been fully behind the Covid jab rollout, and regulators have actually threatened to penalise doctors who speak out.
I'm challenging the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners about the failure to obtain valid voluntary consent before the Covid jabs, I suggest no-one has been properly informed about these fast-tracked experimental jabs - see my email to RACGP President Karen Price: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding 'valid voluntary consent': https://bit.ly/3ssSNx0
Are there really that many insane parents in New York who would allow their precious children to be injected with this crap? Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy.
Well played! I almost thought you were serious. As you can see, the only reason it's not working, according to the paper, is that the little ones haven't had enough of it. It seems like it might be time for a serious discussion about the risk/benefit calculus for 5-11s (i.e., no longer pretending side effects don't exist) since the only solution (in the short term) to making the vaccines more effective seems to be more vaccine.
They kept waiting/hoping that children's infection rates would increase so they could justify their insane policies and the teachers unions could keep teachers home. Well, they found a way to increase infection rates in kids. You have to hand it to them, they delivered!
The profession of journalism largely no longer exists. It has been replaced by a new profession - useful idiocy. Most 'journalists' have morphed into becoming propaganda or narrative agents. Only a few have survived. Thank you Alex.
IMO the first clue of pharma vaxx criminality was AstraZeneca's absurd claim last year that their C19 vaxx offered 100% efficacy. 100% ! You had to read way past the headline to learn that this claim was for a vague hospitalization rate, but the brainwashing and fear mongering was done. Yet within 4-5 months more than a dozen countries had BANNED the AZ vaccine due to injuries. How many millions of people were denied the treatment they really needed because of these lies and the media that covered them up? How many died?
The side effects I have observed in some children are horrifying. I'm angry that parents don't research more and that they trust the medical professionals as much as they do. It's frigging experimental! 2 students I work with have terrible neurological side effects and are in pain. My heart breaks every time I see them.
Always using the "protective against severe disease" antic when kids are at the tiniest of risk. The benefits do not outweigh the risk of long-term immune system destruction.
And yet in CA, the governor and assembly continue to push for vaccine mandates for all children in order to attend school. The amount of ignorance or evil, or a combination thereof by our elected representatives hasn't been witnessed like this...ever? This is a new low.
I suspect we'll see health care systems filing for bankruptcy because they have no cover pushing EUA drugs compared to big pharma. And then people should go to jail!!
Can someone who understands statistics explain the footnote below the chart? "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated."
Looking at that Figure 2, the greatest effectiveness of the vaccines vs. not being vaccinated comes in days 0-13 after getting the shot, then the effectiveness ratio starts declining steadily. And yet, according to the health experts, people are not considered "vaccinated" until 14 days after the shot. Hmmm...
So to summarize, children under 12 who were at no risk from catching Covid, have received a jab that now makes them more susceptible to catching Covid and developing autoimmune diseases or any number of long term health problems if they are lucky enough to live that long. Any one who pushed these gene therapy jabs as safe and effective has blood on their hands. Oh and it's not a defence to say I was just following orders. Leave the kids alone!
People need to go to jail for this.
For a long time, in very harsh conditions.
https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/adult-kids-rosa-parks-the-clash-and?utm_source=url
I thought the right was all about prison reform what with the Jan 6 folks apparently finding it to be less than pleasant.
Jesus christ, a lame semantics argument over the difference between jail and prison is all you have to respond to the fact that conservatives have never supported anything but the harshest conditions and punishment possible for anyone caught up in the criminal justice system. I'm simply pointing that millions of people have suffered over the years in our jails and prisons, renowned the world over for being barbaric and sadistic, and you guys only noticed it last year for a select set of privileged and generally well off white dudes who thought they could freely commit crimes with no consequences.
Your concern is completely insincere and will be gone the moment they leave the news because you never really cared. And I love that you have the audacity to say all of that beneath a post asking for long, harsh sentences for people based on a graphic that Mr. Berenson very deceptively clipped to hide the footnote (shown below) that contradicted his statement that the authors didn't comment on the negative VE:
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
And deceptively ignored the conclusion of the authors that, "In the Omicron era, the effectiveness against cases of BNT162b2 declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11 years. However, vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease and is recommended."
You guys jump at the thought of sentencing doctors and scientists who saved countless lives to long and cruel prison terms for literally nothing more than a misinterpreted pre-print paper that you guys didn't even bother to read or glance at. So spare me the fake concern.
If you look at the graphic from the source paper, the authors have a footnote for the negative VE values that Mr. Berenson must have accidentally cropped out of his image. It's only right there and directly explains why they might have happened so it's easy to miss.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271454v1
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
And he forgot to include the conclusion of the authors too.
"In the Omicron era, the effectiveness against cases of BNT162b2 declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11 years. However, vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease and is recommended."
I'm sure it was just a mistake as it doesn't really change any of the conclusions people are drawing from his summary.
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
Given the narrative being pushed by government, the public health establishment, and the media for the last 14 months since these "vaccines" were rolled out, and the censoring, smearing, and cancellation attempts against anyone who dissented (however tentatively), this is about what I would expect the authors to say. Did you happen to notice that it's merely an assertion for which they provided no evidence?
As for their conclusion that "vaccination of children 5-11 years was protective against severe disease," the data presented simply don't support that. I'm assuming "severe disease" means "hospitalization," given that hospitalizations were one of two outcomes the authors measured; as the paper states, "Two outcomes were assessed: 1) COVID-19 cases, defined as positive NAAT or antigen results reported to ECLRS, 2) New COVID-19 admissions as reported in HERDS."
Notice that their definition of hospitalization is "new COVID-19 admissions." That's important because in the preceding paragraph, when describing the data sources they relied on, they say that "The Health Electronic Response Data System (HERDS) includes a statewide, daily electronic survey of inpatient facilities, including all new admissions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and the primary reason for admission." Going back to the authors' definition of hospitalization, you'll see it does not mention primary reason for admission; it's merely "new COVID-19 admissions," not "new admissions with COVID-19 as the primary reason for admission." Given how easy it would have been to make it clear if they were only counting admissions for which COVID-19 was the primary reason, as opposed to all child admissions in which a COVID-19 test upon admission was positive, we have to assume that they're counting admissions *with* COVID as opposed to only admissions *due to* COVID. And given that we have no way to tell how many admissions fall into which of those two categories, those data are useless for determining vaccine efficacy against severe disease.
That's not even the only way the hospital admissions data are worthless. Another is in how it says nothing about whether the children admitted were otherwise healthy or had comorbidities like obesity or diabetes. Of the tiny numbers of children who are hospitalized due to COVID, the overwhelming majority have at least one comorbidity. There might, maybe, possibly, be a valid argument for vaccinating those kids in some cases (I still wouldn't), but that argument decidedly does not apply to healthy children.
This all smacks of an attempt to find evidence to support a pre-determined conclusion. Recall that Pfizer's own trial for the 5-11 year old cohort showed no clinical benefit from the vaccines (severe illnesses and deaths from COVID are so rare in that age group that no one in either the vaccine group or control group had a significant COVID illness during the trial; in their EUA application for that cohort, Pfizer immunobridged with their results in the 12-17 year old cohort to conjure a clinical benefit to the 5-11 year olds).
Finally, the last sentence of the papers reads: "Given rapid loss of protection against infections, these results highlight the continued importance of layered protections, including mask wearing, for children to prevent infection and transmission." Of course, the results highlight no such thing. Given how little risk COVID poses to children and how rarely they transmit it to adults (see: schools everywhere in the world), and given that we know masks don't do a damn thing, both the authors' conclusion and the footnote to the negative VE table look an awful lot like an attempt to dishonestly explain away what the data actually show, either to deflect accusations of "misinformation" or because they actually support the "everyone needs to be jabbed" narrative.
the biggest medical scam/con in world history...Thanks to the war no one is paying attention, yet !! we will not forget what they did to us - never
From the get-go, Covid was NEVER even a minuscule threat to children! My heart hurts for those young children whose parents are so gullible that they would hand over their kids to be experimented on like lab rats.
60% of 5-11 year olds and 90% of 12-18 year olds in my woke Bay Area county were subjected to this crap.
This is sad, & I can't begin to understand why parents would allow their children to be experiments!
Brainwashed Millennial parents destroying not only their generation but the next one too.
At the risk of being a 'bad winner'... somebody's gotta be 'that guy' so I'll step up.
People who demanded that their children be injected with Pfizer Magic Jizz, are doing society a favour - because fewer of their children will make it to adulthood. It's only a slight tilt to propabilities, but I'll gladly accept anything that gets their sludge DNA out of the gene pool.
Western societies have been subsidising reproduction of the Imbecile Classes for 3 generations, and it has been profoundly dysgenic.
The entire Magic Spooge Festival has basically been a gigantic test of applied IQ - and nobody should be surprised that a very large number of imbeciles have failed it.
There will be fewer of them as time passes: this is an unalloyed mitzvah, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a dill.
I have two 8th-graders in public school and our school system just sent all parents an email saying they were opening 5 'vaccination clinics' in 5 local middle schools.
There are already posters all over the schools telling kids to get the shot for a virus that has zero mortality to them but many possibly serious side effects so don't think for one minute they won't be lobbying and pressuring kids to get the jab. Although a parent is required to be in attendance, the indoctrination has already begun.
And don’t forget it’s based on the Wuhan strain which is no longer in circulation. So tell me why they need the current jab?
The only reason is because they are making money: blood money!
🎯
Thank God you are a parent who will not allow your child to be a guinea pig. Bless you & your children.
Thank you Janice.
I’m surprised they waited this long to run clinics. My school in suburban Pittsburgh had clinics the day after each age group EUA with 2nd dose right on time.
We're living an Orwell novel.
I am so sorry for all that you, your family and all others like you are going through and I pray continued strength for you. I thank God my children are in their thirties and that (I'm so sad to say) I have no grandchildren at present. I'm afraid I would be sick with worry otherwise. My son has been threatened with loss of employment over his unvaxxed status. However, as serious as that is, in my opinion, it pales in comparison to what the teachers unions and school boards are doing to school age children and their parents.
We're gonna be ok because we've taught our children to be critical thinkers. All the people who advocated for others to lose their jobs, not be able to travel or even worse, be quarantined or even arrested think we'll forgive and forget but they have another thing coming. They should be ashamed but they are not capable of shame I'm afraid.
We’ve had them the second they got EUA here in the Bay Area. 🤮
May I ask where the school is located?
Dubuque, Iowa.
Thought you guys had a good Gov???
She's been excellent through all this but as in all states, she's battling the teachers unions which as you know control our schools.
Send this to the psychos in California still considering mandating it for all children to attend school
🎯🎯🎯
Unfortunately, it wouldn't be do any good!
My 15 yo son just had blood work to see if maybe he’d been infected before… zero antibodies , unvaxxed . I don’t know how that’s possible given all his vaxxed friends catching covid . My coworkers vaxxed first grader now testing positive for covid . It’s anecdotal but fascinating . Surely it’s not because his vitamin d levels are very high from mom forcing daily supplements ?
You can be immune to an infection without ever having gotten infected previously. In every population, there are always a number of individuals who have innate immunity. Not post-infection immunity. Innate immunity.
This might be my family . My son and husband were at a gathering a few weeks ago when several people caught presumed omicron. Nothing . Both of them unvaxxed .
It is possible. I also have been in direct contact with all the strains of Covid at one point or another in the past 2 years. I never got sick. I am also unvaxxed and staying that way. I wouldn't presume to be immune to the degree that I would voluntarily come into contact with Covid but I just live my normal life. No mask. No vax. Just normal life. I take lots of supplements and I try to be healthy but that is just the usual. I've been taking Vitamin D supplements for many years.
A test for natural immunity would be useful (and most likely non-injurious and non-lethal unlike the mRNA jabs.) How about we warp speed that. . .
I've been so blackpilled that I am not signing up for any tests. The CDC admits that they have been using Covid swabs to sequence DNA. I don't trust anyone. I don't have any clue what is going on in Ukraine either because unless I am there and see it with my own eyes, who knows? The media and the government lie all the time.
I totally agree.🤔😞😢
We can test for nucleocapsid antobibodies and t cells
Might want to take a T-Cell test though I am not a Dr. and I do not play one on TV.
It’s like $219.00. I took one last year before vaccine rollout bc I’m sure my oldest had original strain covid and I was around him and never got sick . Nothing . Zero .
I also was exposed to covid-positive son/husband and did not get sick.
Way to be a great mom. Your son is one of the lucky ones.
A lot of the problem was making the older, more obese and less healthy segments of the population believe that getting children and younger, healthier people "vaccinated," would serve to protect THEMSELVES. That's what was constantly shouted about the "common good" of mass vaccination. Liberals who fashion themselves more caring, loving, empathetic, etc ended up as complete hypocrites who did not want to hear that that their "greater common good" was sacrificing the young for the old.
Being obese apparently isn't a lifestyle choice anymore.... Whole world gone to shit
Noticed this in my community in Northern California in January - usually a few weeks after the kids were vaccinated. Cause and Effect - The correlation is not a coincidence.
My daily Covid alerts from school were nuts in January. 😂
G-d help us all!
Praying that these kids don't develop Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
Prayers for all the kids who got these jabs. They might end up with a lifetime of health problems - or a shortened lifespan. The truth is that nobody knows what the long term consequences might be. If Covid were killing large numbers of children - and if the jabs prevented Covid - then maybe that is a risk worth taking. But we have a situation where Covid kills zero healthy children. Zero. And the jabs don't prevent Covid anyway. Sometimes, I have to wonder how I ended up in this timeline.
Your last sentence is profound, and I suspect many of us feel the same way.
I just don't understand why any parent would get their child vaccinated for covid at this time. I wish I knew 27 years ago what I know today to question my pedestrian about all the child Vaccines and not follow them blindly!
Me too! I didn’t question a thing. Never again. I did tell my young adult daughters that if I had to do it all over again, I would never have vaccinated them. And that I hope they don’t succumb with any children they may have. I’m going to keep pushing that thought so maybe it will sink in!
No kidding, never mind the fact that kids have never, ever been in danger from the covid virus.
I am positive that the demand for this age group to be vaccinated is quite low now.
Not so much here in NY if the NYS legislature and our psycho governor have their way and require that ALL children be jabbed in order to go to school. Yes, all those pushing these things on anyone, but especially children, no matter where they are situated--health authorities and workers, doctors, politicians, bureaucrats, media shills--have blood dripping from their hands. And if they keep this up, their's will eventually be flowing in the streets.
You would hope so but the covidiots in the Bay Area still believe mRNA vaccines are the holy grail.
Depending on the country. Spain, parents still post pictures of their kids playing the myocarditis-pericarditis-neurological disorders-cancer-death lottery.
“We infected some kids”.
This is just an extended late term abortion.
Time for the NY Dbase to be disappeared.
Or modified, like the 2016-2020 DoD database
Or go the way of the Scotland data.
Alex, this post is mis, mal, dis-information. President Biden stated "If you get the vaccine, you won't get Covid" so you must be spreading a conspiracy theory and will be placed on the Homeland Security Terrorist Watchlist. JK - See the point here fellow terrorist watch list folks?
The very lies we are told by leaders are criminalized if you don't cheerfully accept them as truth. Something bad is wrong with this country. Really bad. Pray, plan, prepare and RESIST.
"It is not clear ,,,"
There's a whole LOT about these so-called vaccines that is "not clear," including what on EARTH possessed parents allow their children to be injected with an experimental drug!
And look at the dates: right around Christmas & Hanukkah. So the kids don't contaminate grandparents?
This is so wrong.
The expected CDC response: child boosters every five weeks. Safe & Effective. If you say no, you're a grandma-hating anti-vaxxer. Science!
Truly the End of Empire.
Don't forget "domestic terrorist"
One day I hope to be a grandma and I will be pushing no vaxs at all!! I prefer my kids to be grandma loving anti vaxxers!
We all love Grandma. That is why using Grandma in this way is so very evil.
It's the same for all age groups isn't it? More likely to catch Covid with a shot in your arm.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/
* The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” *
lol, The "protection" is they treat those 2 weeks as unvaccinated.
From the study: "The analysis compared outcomes among fully vaccinated children (defined as series completion+ 14 days) versus unvaccinated children in the age groups 5-11 years and 12 -17 years."
EDIT: Looks like the chart with the 2 week says: Incidence rate ratios, comparing cases during January 3 - January 30, 2022 for unvaccinated versus children newly fully-vaccinated December 13, 2021-January 2, 2022, by Time Since Full Vaccination
So assuming that the 14 days is excluded from full vaccination start, it just means that the "protection" is an artifact of having made it through the 1st 2 high risk weeks without infection. Don't see where they say how the cases are handled in that time period, could have missed it.
What's weird is he accidentally cropped out this footnote that is directly below the graphic that says:
"Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated."
He even chopped a bit of the bottom numbers off like he was trying to avoid it, but I'm sure that he'd have no reason to chop off the one piece of information that totally undermines the entire premise of his article and its final sentence which seems relevant:
"The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings."
The authors also recommended that those kids should still get vaccinated and wear masks but it's not like he disagrees with those things in general so it's fine that he didn't mention them in this article. All very fine, all very cool.
The authors did mention negative effectiveness in a footnote: "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated.
there's always something isn't there when 'whatever' needs to be explained away
Lol hahaha CYa
"The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings." Well, they wanted it to get published, after all. And counting on the media to not actually look at the study, just read the "discussion".
Sadly, per your attacks on ivermectin, this study is worthless since it's not a "well designed randomized controlled trial."
Seen this? Excellent review.
What Shingles and Covid Have in Common, And Why Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch says Alex Berenson is Wrong
Darby Shaw, Feb 24, 2022
https://darbyshaw.substack.com/p/i-hope-alex-berenson-never-gets-shingles
And just like that, Covid Vanishes from all Main Stream Media: Covid Out/ Bombs In
I previously commented on this exact situation in an earlier post: my sixth grade grand-daughter had the child seated next to her, then her best friend contract Rona in January. Both of those students were vexxed. My unvexxed grand-daughter was never ill, despite having two close contacts become ill. (I do not know of any other children in the class becoming ill.) NY data appears to confirm her experience was not unusual.
Orange(man) bar bad‼️
Yeah but Mr. Alex the nice lady in the white coat on TV said that vaccines are "proven" safe and effective for children.
How dare you talk about negative efficacy? The government specifically said you are only allowed to use the data to show positive efficacy. -Kevin Roche and other Big Pharma shills
How has this happened? How could they jab children, or most people for that matter, against a disease that wasn't a serious threat to them?
It's absolutely incredible that this has happened, this insane plan to jab the entire planet, which has been led by Bill Gates...yes, it's not a conspiracy theory, Bill Gates is indeed dominating international vaccination policy, and has been for years via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Gavi Alliance, the WHO, CDC etc.
In regards to Covid, see his GatesNotes published on 30 April 2020: What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine: https://www.gatesnotes.com/health/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine
Who has been really missing in action during this Covid debacle over the past two years?
I suggest it was the doctors...how did the doctors let this happen, let literally billions of people be jabbed unnecessarily, particularly children?
Sure, there are some exceptions fighting to be heard such as Peter McCullough, Roger Hodkinson and others, but the doctors' professional organisations and regulators have been fully behind the Covid jab rollout, and regulators have actually threatened to penalise doctors who speak out.
I'm challenging the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners about the failure to obtain valid voluntary consent before the Covid jabs, I suggest no-one has been properly informed about these fast-tracked experimental jabs - see my email to RACGP President Karen Price: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding 'valid voluntary consent': https://bit.ly/3ssSNx0
Are there really that many insane parents in New York who would allow their precious children to be injected with this crap? Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy.
This dataset is only for 2 doses. It is really a 3 dose ("boosted") vaccine. Those data look much better for symptomatic disease.
Well played! I almost thought you were serious. As you can see, the only reason it's not working, according to the paper, is that the little ones haven't had enough of it. It seems like it might be time for a serious discussion about the risk/benefit calculus for 5-11s (i.e., no longer pretending side effects don't exist) since the only solution (in the short term) to making the vaccines more effective seems to be more vaccine.
They kept waiting/hoping that children's infection rates would increase so they could justify their insane policies and the teachers unions could keep teachers home. Well, they found a way to increase infection rates in kids. You have to hand it to them, they delivered!
The profession of journalism largely no longer exists. It has been replaced by a new profession - useful idiocy. Most 'journalists' have morphed into becoming propaganda or narrative agents. Only a few have survived. Thank you Alex.
Well let's be realistic 90% of journalists are liberals....
IMO the first clue of pharma vaxx criminality was AstraZeneca's absurd claim last year that their C19 vaxx offered 100% efficacy. 100% ! You had to read way past the headline to learn that this claim was for a vague hospitalization rate, but the brainwashing and fear mongering was done. Yet within 4-5 months more than a dozen countries had BANNED the AZ vaccine due to injuries. How many millions of people were denied the treatment they really needed because of these lies and the media that covered them up? How many died?
The side effects I have observed in some children are horrifying. I'm angry that parents don't research more and that they trust the medical professionals as much as they do. It's frigging experimental! 2 students I work with have terrible neurological side effects and are in pain. My heart breaks every time I see them.
Always using the "protective against severe disease" antic when kids are at the tiniest of risk. The benefits do not outweigh the risk of long-term immune system destruction.
Not "always" using that line. It's just their latest and greatest lie.
And, agree, the benefits don't even come close to outweighing the risk (in, my guess, 95%+ of the population).
And yet in CA, the governor and assembly continue to push for vaccine mandates for all children in order to attend school. The amount of ignorance or evil, or a combination thereof by our elected representatives hasn't been witnessed like this...ever? This is a new low.
There you go ‘misinterpreting’ data again.
Btw a return to Covid specific content is good.
I do not have the data, but I am pretty sure that Spain is a very good example of this. Kids started to get vaxxed and cases boosted (pun, lol).
There is also Omi, more contagious. But toddlers have not experienced that. And they are all tested as hell.
Is it more correct to use the 95th CI or mean here when discussing vaccine effectiveness? Even using the mean shows it's only 12% effective
Only two posible answers:
- Booster them now!
- The dose is too low. More mRNA!!
The “science” has changed.
Hi Alex,
They mention that negative effectiveness may be due to some data artifacts… some pretty stable and continuous looking artifacts…
“Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-
increased risk for those vaccinated.”
I suspect we'll see health care systems filing for bankruptcy because they have no cover pushing EUA drugs compared to big pharma. And then people should go to jail!!
Can someone who understands statistics explain the footnote below the chart? "Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-increased risk for those vaccinated."
Looking at that Figure 2, the greatest effectiveness of the vaccines vs. not being vaccinated comes in days 0-13 after getting the shot, then the effectiveness ratio starts declining steadily. And yet, according to the health experts, people are not considered "vaccinated" until 14 days after the shot. Hmmm...
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/allegations-of-genetic-harm-to-newborn
Please!!!! Parents!!! Do not
Vaccinate your children against this !!!
This isn't a case anymore, it's reality.
https://worldedge.substack.com/p/the-case-for-reverse-mareks?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web