Coincidentally, that's where a "phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study on Ivermectin" took place, finding a "a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group"
I'm sure you'll find a reason a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study with this type of endpoint outcome isn't good enough.
I'd feel a little better about all these places that don't have excess deaths if they weren't all middle-income or lower countries that are corrupt, disorganized, and likely have poor data. Though a U.S. citizen, I live part time in Mexico City. There, I've downloaded and analyzed the Mexican covid data myself. You'd be amazed at how far back the previously-reported numbers keep changing whenever the new data set is released. And the revisions to the data of the past couple of months tends to be large. So I'm very skeptical about this data at all.
Though I can't speak to it personally, I'd not be at all surprised if we later found that the data in Africa, and places like Bulgaria were nearly complete BS, or at least of such low quality that you can't really infer anything from them.
This is not to say that Alex is wrong, or that there's not something vax-related going on in first-world, heavily MRNA-vaxxed countries. But we need better comparisons to conclude that.
Kim, what makes you think 1st world American data isn’t equally or more corrupt? Hell, Pfizer tried to keep it hidden for 75 years. For all we know, the real data is sitting in Biden’s garage behind his ‘Vette.
I don't think the PFE data is in his garage, but while we're looking for stuff can we find Epstein's tapes? As a former finance person I'm intrigued by how he made his money.
Where did I say that I thought American data was better? You seem to have hallucinated something that wasn't in my comment. All data is questionable, even this first-world excess death data. The more I learn, the more I realize it's almost impossible to know anything with any degree of certainty.
And you know what you'll never see next to U.S. data? An auditor's attestation that it's credible and correct.
Au contraire, Kim. Because you “published” the post here, it is plain for all to read what their eyes show them, and their brains to interpret . I interpret your post as oozing with “implications” of 1st world reliable, 3rd world not so much. I took (I think) mild issue with that, and pointed to the corruption here in the US.. and I was actually being too kind to the US.
Ok. Maybe my response was abrasive? If so, I really apologize for that. I really do. We are all looking for the truth, and we need all perspectives. We all need all of us. So, again. Sincere apologies.
P.S. When I'm in the USA, I live in Boston. There I have analyzed the Massachusetts data on and off for the duration of the pandemic. One big difference with the Mexican data is that in Massachusetts, the previously reported numbers don't constantly change. In that respect, they are more credible than the Mexican data. Does that mean they are more right? That's a different question, though I tend to think they are likely more correct.
By the way, the Mexicans don't even add commentary to their data along the lines of "Reporting stations continually update numbers, so the current data can also contain revisions of historical data." Nope. They just publish new numbers, and change things that are months old with no warning. So in those two specific examples, Massachusetts and Mexico, I think the MA data is better and more trustworthy. I'd also say that while MA is not corruption-free, the level of corruption here is FAR below Mexian levels. Could I be wrong about my assessment of the quality of the data? Sure. But that's my reasoning.
Sound reasoning... can’t argue with you (and don’t think I wouldn’t :). Hopefully one day we’ll get that audit. I worry about all the excess deaths being tagged as “Covid” instead of “with Covid.” I’m also worried about confirmation bias and “groupthink” within associations. (I love Boston, by the way)
Please stop with comments like this. Literally no one on Earth knows how to count and track both infections/deaths from infectious diseases better than African countries. They’ve dealt with Ebola, malaria and HIV on scales we can’t even imagine. I’d take the advice of an African doctor treating patients in the bush over the bought and paid for “advice” coming out of our Ivy League doctors any day of the damn week.
You mean like Namibia? They understate the HIV infection rate by 15 to 20 percentage points. African doctors follow the same pharmaceutical guidelines and clinical recommendations as they do in the west ... access to the 'treatments' is is the only difference.
Namibia reports a 14% HIV infection rate. Are you seriously trying to contend that their true infection rate is 30-35%? And if that’s the case then how do explain the lack of death since these cases would presumably go untreated? And unequal access to treatments is what drives repurposing old drugs- hence the extensive use of IVM throughout Africa to treat COVID.
There is very little evidence that HIV causes AIDS. Read the real Anthony Fauci by RFK Jr, especially the chapters called the HIV heresies and burning the HIV heretics. Check out what Kary Mullis (Nobel laureate who invented the PCR) said about HIV and AIDS. Even Luc Montagnier (Nobel laureate who discovered HIV) said it might not cause AIDS.
"Namibia reports ..." . Windhoek alone has an infection rate over 50%. I've been there 6 times, it's common knowledge. They DO have access to HIV treatments but I suspect they have a higher than average fatality rate (although I haven't seen a recent statistics on that, but based on my time there, I'd be surprised if it wasn't).
14% is astronomical. A 40-50% infection rate would be over double the rate reported by any other country. And since HIV drugs are donated by the WHO/UN, we’d definitely know if they we’re treating 50% of the pop and just not reporting it.
With due respect, I'd love to see a shred of either evidence or logic for what you state. You've provided neither. Yes, there's plenty of disease and death in Africa. But there's zero evidence that they are particularly good at tracking and reporting on it.
Well, here’s data from a malaria mapping of Kinshasa, DRC, arguably the 3rd poorest region in the poorest country on the planet. Remarkably these doctors can track and trace cases rather well.
Here’s an outline of the cases, deaths & treatments for Ebola from Liberia that covers data from 379 public health facilities throughout the country during the 2014-2016 EVD outbreak. There’s a thorough breakdown of county case numbers, demographics and vaccine coverage for multiple diseases under the results section.
But please, tell me more about the primitive, backwards nature of these corrupt countries and why we couldn’t possible trust their data... especially since it appears to directly contradict the data of our own, unimpeachable public health officials 🙄
I am afraid that you may be misunderstanding the nature of these studies you point to... and to the conditions in much of Africa in general. I spent two years living in a very poor country in western Africa (Mauritania), so I do have some experience beyond reading reports/studies. One top level misunderstanding, which most westerners seem to project regularly, is that Africa is a continent, not a country. It is made up of 54 separate countries complete with their own collection of ethnicities, languages, cultures, climates, governments, etc.. They vary widely and to lump them together is tenuous and ignorant.
The first study you point to as evidence of Kinchasa having doctors who do a remarkable job of tracking and tracing cases very well shows nothing of the kind at all, in my opinion. The conclusion sums it up nicely where they state:
"This study provides the first comprehensive risk map of malaria at the level of the health areas in Kinshasa, a mega-city in a highly endemic malarious zone. Overall malaria prevalence has undoubtedly decreased over the last 30 years, but it is impossible to quantify the effect given the lack of representative historical data. As expected, prevalence rates were lower in the central urban districts compared to the more peripheral and more rural districts. The penetration of malaria control measures, especially ITNs, remains insufficient and is less successful in less developed and less accessible HZs on the outskirts of the city. Hopefully, this gap can be closed in the years to come with renewed efforts by the National Malaria Control Programme and its partners. Despite the methodological limitations, the risk map provides a good baseline assessment against which to assess the effect of future control efforts."
Big flags here are: "The first comprehensive risk map", "impossible to quantify the effect given the lack of representative historical data" . This study was not conducted by local doctors or authorities, it was conducted by the Swiss. It was conducted back in 2009 and 2011. It consisted of some blood sampling for two things (malaria and anemia) and was done so with less than 4000 children each of the two years in a city of more than 10 million (at the time of the study and a total estimate since record keeping and census in a place like Kinchasa is, at best, an estimate). This is what goes on. Well meaning Europeans (or Americans, Canadians, westerners) come in with a very small team of researchers (usually a few), team up with someone who is interested at the local level, they spread some money around (probably to the families who participated as well as the various locals who helped out) and get some data. Then they spend years churning the data and extrapolating citywide to generate "the first comprehensive risk map of malaria at the level of the health areas in Kinshasa, a mega-city in a highly endemic malarious zone". Probably part of the Swiss team's doctoral thesis. Often these studies are funded by the WHO/UN as a basis to roll out some sort of vaccine or medical intervention that they are seeking to roll out (see the Fauci book) or otherwise to demonstrate money spent in the developing world. It typically does not require that the money be well spent or that it produce any meaningful result, only that it was spent. This is how things work there.
I know some of how this works because I was in contact with this while I lived in Mauritania. I was there with the Peace Corps. We were focused ostensibly on eradicating a parasitic infection called Guinea Worm. Most of the work to do that really came down to public health education (wash you hands with soap, try to manage the open sewage better so the chickens running about everywhere are not tracking fecal matter to your household compound, use clean drinking water, etc.). This only saw some limited success with good language skills and cultural understanding only obtained through time (years, not days or months) and building relationships. Most NGOs operating across Africa are not investing the time and resources to achieve that basis of language and cultural understanding. They operate on more of a hit and run paradigm. They identify what they see as "the problem" (keeping in mind that this most often not a problem identified locally, but rather in some academic building in Switzerland or the like), throw some money at it, get some well intentioned people to travel to some country or region in fancy new trucks with translators, cooks and a local rep. Race in, do a quick sampling or drop a new well in or run a vaccine drive and then get out. The locals take the money, shrug (sometimes have a good laugh) and go back to what they were doing. Again, I know this because I was there, I watched these efforts and saw the local response after they left. Sometimes I did not even see these hit and runs. I heard about it in the market: "Some white folks were just through a month ago. I think they were German. They rolled in, installed a well, and rolled out. Hardly talked to anyone. The well is broken now, but we don't know how to fix it." This is what goes on. To credit those hit and run studies as evidence of various countries doing a great job of tracking and tracing anything at all is dubious and I would caution you to temper you enthusiasm about such data.
I love your comment, thank you for spending the time to write it. I have only one minor quibble, I'm 60 and have lived all over the US, and I've very rarely (if ever) heard anyone that I've known say they think Africa is a country, and not a continent. But I'm sure you have and you travel
outside the US more than I do (that's a fact, believe me!) Thanks again.
Great. There's data. Did you read the first sentence of the article in the Malaria Journal? "In Kinshasa, malaria remains a major public health problem but its spatial epidemiology has not been assessed for decades now." "Not been assessed for decades now," would suggest poor data collection, no? Certainly it does not suggest that the authorities are exactly on top of what's going on in their countries.
And the second link seems to be full of commentary suggesting that the Liberian health care system is precarious, in need of significant strengthening, and failed to function for nearly 2 years after the ebola outbreak. This doesn't seem to support your point either. Indeed it seems to support mine, namely that data coming out of such places is doubtful at best.
Do you read Eugyppius? He has written an interesting post about a possible cover up of the source of the 2014 ebola outbreak in Guinea and Liberia. TLDR: looks to have been a leak from a lab in Liberia, near the Guinea border. I just read it plus the underlying article that he links to, and none of that struck me as demonstrating anything but what I commented: not good data in such places.
Anyway, I will continue to comment as I see fit. I respect your ability to do the same, but you have not persuaded me at all, and indeed undercut your own case.
There is no incentive for any country to undercount COVID cases or deaths since all forms of aide are tied to disease burden. This goes for all other diseases as well. (There was perhaps a case to be made for undercounting HIV infections in the early 90’s when stigma abounded but that’s not applicable here.)
Regardless, these countries have demonstrated a remarkable ability to collect and report data on disease burden and despite having every incentive to over report, we’re still seeing COVID cases/deaths far below heavily vaccinated countries. This should not be dismissed as “poor record keeping.”
The best line was “no connection has been proven yet”. As Ayn Rand confidently predicted, we have reached that stage where the evidence of ones senses no longer determines reality. God help us.
My husband was Bulgarian, and my children hold Bulgarian citizenship as well as others...both live in NYC now, both healthy, and happily un-jabbed, like their mother! Bulgaria is supposed to be beautiful....I've never been...my husband grew up in Israel. We are kind of a multi-country family. Kids were born in Munich, Germany and also raised there, and in Switzerland. I'm Canadian, living still in Switzerland (thank God!) Thanks Alex always for keeping the pedal to the metal....we appreciate you more than you know!...and way to go Bulgaria!
Will we be here 1,3 5 20 years from now STILL reading about what we already know and yet no one responsible for it all and intentionally being held remotely accountable in any way? Its truly the definition of insanity now. I mean its almost Feb now 2023 and STILL not ONE person on the entire planet responsible for orchestrating all of this upon humanity is the least bit concerned of facing accountability. Not ONE on the entire planet. Just this morning a plethora of DHHS (taxpayer funded) ads on radio and TV STILL touting the "safe and effective" messaging and why you should take the improved injections to best protect you and you loved ones. It's 3 years plus now since Fauci funded gain of function wuh flu lab release in CHINA now and the PERPS are more brazen than ever. Just sayin
I couldn’t agree with you more. I’ve also lost patience with the practice of pointing at the problem instead of tackling it. We should be writing these comments to our elected officials, not just posting them in this forum.
The amount of times I have called and left messages with elected officials, written or signed petitions has never led anywhere in my experience. Its always the same. They tell you they are listening, but act differently almost always. Until we actually "get" them to sign off on how they will in reality move-vote on issues we the people" truly" want them to do nothing changes. Wouldn't it be great to have citizen audit boards that monthly monitor our servants of the people making certain they do what we elect them to do and NOT do what a specials interest pays them off to do or other forms of selling their souls. These servants have to realize they will in fact be held accountable and I do not mean simply by voting them in or out
To those on this site there is no doubt about the cause of excess mortality. To the minds that have been compromised and there are probably billions, they will likely never make the connection. If something does not seem right, then its not right, plain and simple.
And still we are assaulted on TV with ads from the government, CVS, Walgreens, Pfizer, etc to get a booster, and that vaccines “save lives!”
While yet another professional athlete, age 35, was found dead, in Australia, no doubt of “coincidence.”
No, no, hell no!
I admitted my first patient in MONTHS with COVID pneumonia yesterday, and only for observation. He did not have a fever, elevated white count, or low oxygen levels, just felt bad due to some significant co-morbidities. This is not a major threat, and does not justify taking this dangerous shot.
Data, schmata. Complex and incomprehensible studies are for the medicine men/women/its and other scientists who rely on government grants. Healthy young athletes dropping dead daily is data enough for me. But as I have said, the fact that the government in the U.S. and other wealthy countries demanded that every living being get shot up with a voodoo drug was all I needed to know. Pied Pipers are real, and it’s really astounding just how gullible people are. But that’s why bureaucrats invented fear. Fear works.
MAJORITY, n. : a mob of self-righteousness to be avoided at all costs — DDR
And the excess deaths aren't just falling in the 80 and older demo. They are occurring across all age demos. Many of the people who are dying would have lived decades longer.
I really think RFK, Jr. could go down as a more significant historic figure than his uncle and father. He is helping change the narrative regarding the entire science/medical complex.
P.S. I listened to the entire podcast. It's excellent. The professor's arguments make tremendous sense.
I agree. He is such a good man doing good works for humanity. And he does his best every day with grace towards those that impugn him and doesn't get despondent, just moves the ball forward. Very inspirational.
He deserves one of those "Profile in Courage" awards named for his uncle. The irony is that most of his family is embarrassed by his work and would never nominate him for such an award.
Yep, but the plandemic, mail-in balloting and 2020 CNN daily death counter made sure that wouldn't happen. I see it and I'm not even a Trump fan. Although he is funny sometimes.
Annual arsenic or asbestos booster. New requirement from government! I am thinking that at least half the population would ask where they could get one. And 25% would make fun of the “anti-vaxers” for not lining up to get their own asbestos booster 🤪
It better come from the pharma company, not the fed govt. I’m done paying for these jabs. And they better give people the choice. If there is any coercion, the sheep better become lions.
Anyone else find it interesting Israel has not released any data since 2019.... Once toted as the country to emulate with early access to pfizer mRNA.
At around 90% vax'd i will be curious if the data is released, if it is similar to Englands results. As I believe most of the entire pop. had the Pfizer mRNA....
Deaths have not much to do with Covid itself, it’s the shots. We know it, people just need to accept it. I suppose I’d be in denial also if I’d taken them. I’d rather see statistics on the massive increase in breast cancer and brain tumors. I now know of two women in their early 40’s with stage 4 breast cancer, and one in her late 40’s with an inoperable brain tumor. She has a one year old. My sister in law is also dying from a brain tumor. It’s all pretty obvious to me. 🤷🏻♀️
I know of someone that had a mammogram (all clear) one month before taking Jab 1. At the end of month 2 she was diagnosed with 2 different forms of breast cancer - a different form in each breast. Has anyone heard of such a thing????
Incredible and even still does not correspond with my personal observations of my group of friends and acquaintances. Hard to remember the time when an aggressive cancer or a sudden death was a blue moon occurrence versus today when it's a sad commonality. Here's your kicker:
Once again the data supports the observations of people around the world. We have a serious, dire problem. And it's getting worse.
Why is it that even doctors who questioned the CDC/NIH narrative, like Dr. Marty Makary at Johns Hopkins, appear to see some value in boosters. Based on this column and other Substacks, I concluded long ago that the Covid shots have been a tragic mistake or worse.
That is most people these days...no backbone, no courage. I think it starts to happen in the younger grades.....I teach young children, and these days, they are afraid to say what they think, and no teacher asks them also...they learn not to trust themselves, they learn how to follow. I teach now on my own terms, not in a school, and we all have a voice, and every one of those voices matters. That's how it should be. I learn so much from them. They are my students, but also my teachers. Eileen
Look at it this way, in approximately 5 years we'll stop including deaths at the pre-shot normal rate and it'll only be a 5 year average of excessive shot deaths thus smoothing out what was a remarkably high average. While excessive now, in 5 years it'll only be a little excessive.
From a 2016 article about Moderna: "Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years." https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
I have no doubt the narcissistic psychopaths at the CDC/NIH/FDA will continue to gaslight the public with the "safe and effective" Covid booster narrative while the excess deaths continue to pile up. They will never publicly admit any culpability for the excess deaths and ruining so many people's lives.
and how many times a day when the TV is on do we hear 'brought to you by Pfizer'.... with happy little ads showing a pregnant mom with a kid in tow smiling as she gets her booster along with a cheerful colorful bandaid...its all so wonderful and happy and virtuous
...going on 30 years also....best decision I ever made! Both of my kids grew up without one. ...and both live on their own now, and also don't have one.
Has the life insurance industry (and their actuaries) adjusted to what should be a change in life expectancy? Until they do it will be hard to know what to believe and not believe.
Edward Dowd has some startling info about excess deaths and insurance companies in one of this week’s FLCCC interviews. If insurance companies - along with the medical profession and others - weren’t so frightened of the backlash over getting the truth out there, people’s hair would be on fire about this.
Karen Murphy— I would be willing to bet it will become a discrimination issue. Legislation will be passed to make it illegal to ask for vax status on life insurance applications. Voila. Problem solved. We all pay one rate!
As with anything in government it will be backwards and clown world like.
People would just say they weren’t jabbed. How could you prove they were? I was on a cruise recently and they asked jab status... even though they didn’t require it. I said YeS because I was afraid they’d put snakes in my bed or something if I wasn’t jabbed.
There may not be enough data out yet for them to change their models. It does seem that life insurance rates are up (I check every year) but obviously that is anecdotal and I am aging too!
Interesting you mention Bulgaria, Alex.
Coincidentally, that's where a "phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study on Ivermectin" took place, finding a "a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group"
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230105005896/en/MedinCell-Announces-Positive-Results-for-the-SAIVE-Clinical-Study-in-Prevention-of-Covid-19-Infection-in-a-Contact-Based-Population
I'm sure you'll find a reason a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study with this type of endpoint outcome isn't good enough.
I'd feel a little better about all these places that don't have excess deaths if they weren't all middle-income or lower countries that are corrupt, disorganized, and likely have poor data. Though a U.S. citizen, I live part time in Mexico City. There, I've downloaded and analyzed the Mexican covid data myself. You'd be amazed at how far back the previously-reported numbers keep changing whenever the new data set is released. And the revisions to the data of the past couple of months tends to be large. So I'm very skeptical about this data at all.
Though I can't speak to it personally, I'd not be at all surprised if we later found that the data in Africa, and places like Bulgaria were nearly complete BS, or at least of such low quality that you can't really infer anything from them.
This is not to say that Alex is wrong, or that there's not something vax-related going on in first-world, heavily MRNA-vaxxed countries. But we need better comparisons to conclude that.
Cheers,
Kim G
Boston, MA (for now)
Roma Sur, CDMX (for later)
Kim, what makes you think 1st world American data isn’t equally or more corrupt? Hell, Pfizer tried to keep it hidden for 75 years. For all we know, the real data is sitting in Biden’s garage behind his ‘Vette.
Exactly.
I personally believe USA data has been thoroughly corrupted.
Made to fit a predetermined narrative.
Same for Canada. Officially only 400 dead due to vaxx. In fact only about 1% of vaxx victims officially admitted.
Excellent point. I'm drawing more and more comparisons to third world countries with the US every day.
I don't think the PFE data is in his garage, but while we're looking for stuff can we find Epstein's tapes? As a former finance person I'm intrigued by how he made his money.
Actually, the classified documents were found on a shelf at Walmart. Of course ChiComMart is all Chinese anyway.
Where did I say that I thought American data was better? You seem to have hallucinated something that wasn't in my comment. All data is questionable, even this first-world excess death data. The more I learn, the more I realize it's almost impossible to know anything with any degree of certainty.
And you know what you'll never see next to U.S. data? An auditor's attestation that it's credible and correct.
Cheers,
Kim G
Au contraire, Kim. Because you “published” the post here, it is plain for all to read what their eyes show them, and their brains to interpret . I interpret your post as oozing with “implications” of 1st world reliable, 3rd world not so much. I took (I think) mild issue with that, and pointed to the corruption here in the US.. and I was actually being too kind to the US.
Ok. Maybe my response was abrasive? If so, I really apologize for that. I really do. We are all looking for the truth, and we need all perspectives. We all need all of us. So, again. Sincere apologies.
P.S. When I'm in the USA, I live in Boston. There I have analyzed the Massachusetts data on and off for the duration of the pandemic. One big difference with the Mexican data is that in Massachusetts, the previously reported numbers don't constantly change. In that respect, they are more credible than the Mexican data. Does that mean they are more right? That's a different question, though I tend to think they are likely more correct.
By the way, the Mexicans don't even add commentary to their data along the lines of "Reporting stations continually update numbers, so the current data can also contain revisions of historical data." Nope. They just publish new numbers, and change things that are months old with no warning. So in those two specific examples, Massachusetts and Mexico, I think the MA data is better and more trustworthy. I'd also say that while MA is not corruption-free, the level of corruption here is FAR below Mexian levels. Could I be wrong about my assessment of the quality of the data? Sure. But that's my reasoning.
Sound reasoning... can’t argue with you (and don’t think I wouldn’t :). Hopefully one day we’ll get that audit. I worry about all the excess deaths being tagged as “Covid” instead of “with Covid.” I’m also worried about confirmation bias and “groupthink” within associations. (I love Boston, by the way)
No worries. You are a good man. I can see why you imagined what you did, but I didn't state it.
Please stop with comments like this. Literally no one on Earth knows how to count and track both infections/deaths from infectious diseases better than African countries. They’ve dealt with Ebola, malaria and HIV on scales we can’t even imagine. I’d take the advice of an African doctor treating patients in the bush over the bought and paid for “advice” coming out of our Ivy League doctors any day of the damn week.
You mean like Namibia? They understate the HIV infection rate by 15 to 20 percentage points. African doctors follow the same pharmaceutical guidelines and clinical recommendations as they do in the west ... access to the 'treatments' is is the only difference.
I do not believe HIV numbers any more than Covid and PCR test results. Fauci and his mafia are behind all.
Amen
Namibia reports a 14% HIV infection rate. Are you seriously trying to contend that their true infection rate is 30-35%? And if that’s the case then how do explain the lack of death since these cases would presumably go untreated? And unequal access to treatments is what drives repurposing old drugs- hence the extensive use of IVM throughout Africa to treat COVID.
There is very little evidence that HIV causes AIDS. Read the real Anthony Fauci by RFK Jr, especially the chapters called the HIV heresies and burning the HIV heretics. Check out what Kary Mullis (Nobel laureate who invented the PCR) said about HIV and AIDS. Even Luc Montagnier (Nobel laureate who discovered HIV) said it might not cause AIDS.
"Namibia reports ..." . Windhoek alone has an infection rate over 50%. I've been there 6 times, it's common knowledge. They DO have access to HIV treatments but I suspect they have a higher than average fatality rate (although I haven't seen a recent statistics on that, but based on my time there, I'd be surprised if it wasn't).
14% is astronomical. A 40-50% infection rate would be over double the rate reported by any other country. And since HIV drugs are donated by the WHO/UN, we’d definitely know if they we’re treating 50% of the pop and just not reporting it.
With due respect, I'd love to see a shred of either evidence or logic for what you state. You've provided neither. Yes, there's plenty of disease and death in Africa. But there's zero evidence that they are particularly good at tracking and reporting on it.
Cheers,
Kim G
Well, here’s data from a malaria mapping of Kinshasa, DRC, arguably the 3rd poorest region in the poorest country on the planet. Remarkably these doctors can track and trace cases rather well.
https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12936-015-1074-8
Here’s an outline of the cases, deaths & treatments for Ebola from Liberia that covers data from 379 public health facilities throughout the country during the 2014-2016 EVD outbreak. There’s a thorough breakdown of county case numbers, demographics and vaccine coverage for multiple diseases under the results section.
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002508
But please, tell me more about the primitive, backwards nature of these corrupt countries and why we couldn’t possible trust their data... especially since it appears to directly contradict the data of our own, unimpeachable public health officials 🙄
I am afraid that you may be misunderstanding the nature of these studies you point to... and to the conditions in much of Africa in general. I spent two years living in a very poor country in western Africa (Mauritania), so I do have some experience beyond reading reports/studies. One top level misunderstanding, which most westerners seem to project regularly, is that Africa is a continent, not a country. It is made up of 54 separate countries complete with their own collection of ethnicities, languages, cultures, climates, governments, etc.. They vary widely and to lump them together is tenuous and ignorant.
The first study you point to as evidence of Kinchasa having doctors who do a remarkable job of tracking and tracing cases very well shows nothing of the kind at all, in my opinion. The conclusion sums it up nicely where they state:
"This study provides the first comprehensive risk map of malaria at the level of the health areas in Kinshasa, a mega-city in a highly endemic malarious zone. Overall malaria prevalence has undoubtedly decreased over the last 30 years, but it is impossible to quantify the effect given the lack of representative historical data. As expected, prevalence rates were lower in the central urban districts compared to the more peripheral and more rural districts. The penetration of malaria control measures, especially ITNs, remains insufficient and is less successful in less developed and less accessible HZs on the outskirts of the city. Hopefully, this gap can be closed in the years to come with renewed efforts by the National Malaria Control Programme and its partners. Despite the methodological limitations, the risk map provides a good baseline assessment against which to assess the effect of future control efforts."
Big flags here are: "The first comprehensive risk map", "impossible to quantify the effect given the lack of representative historical data" . This study was not conducted by local doctors or authorities, it was conducted by the Swiss. It was conducted back in 2009 and 2011. It consisted of some blood sampling for two things (malaria and anemia) and was done so with less than 4000 children each of the two years in a city of more than 10 million (at the time of the study and a total estimate since record keeping and census in a place like Kinchasa is, at best, an estimate). This is what goes on. Well meaning Europeans (or Americans, Canadians, westerners) come in with a very small team of researchers (usually a few), team up with someone who is interested at the local level, they spread some money around (probably to the families who participated as well as the various locals who helped out) and get some data. Then they spend years churning the data and extrapolating citywide to generate "the first comprehensive risk map of malaria at the level of the health areas in Kinshasa, a mega-city in a highly endemic malarious zone". Probably part of the Swiss team's doctoral thesis. Often these studies are funded by the WHO/UN as a basis to roll out some sort of vaccine or medical intervention that they are seeking to roll out (see the Fauci book) or otherwise to demonstrate money spent in the developing world. It typically does not require that the money be well spent or that it produce any meaningful result, only that it was spent. This is how things work there.
I know some of how this works because I was in contact with this while I lived in Mauritania. I was there with the Peace Corps. We were focused ostensibly on eradicating a parasitic infection called Guinea Worm. Most of the work to do that really came down to public health education (wash you hands with soap, try to manage the open sewage better so the chickens running about everywhere are not tracking fecal matter to your household compound, use clean drinking water, etc.). This only saw some limited success with good language skills and cultural understanding only obtained through time (years, not days or months) and building relationships. Most NGOs operating across Africa are not investing the time and resources to achieve that basis of language and cultural understanding. They operate on more of a hit and run paradigm. They identify what they see as "the problem" (keeping in mind that this most often not a problem identified locally, but rather in some academic building in Switzerland or the like), throw some money at it, get some well intentioned people to travel to some country or region in fancy new trucks with translators, cooks and a local rep. Race in, do a quick sampling or drop a new well in or run a vaccine drive and then get out. The locals take the money, shrug (sometimes have a good laugh) and go back to what they were doing. Again, I know this because I was there, I watched these efforts and saw the local response after they left. Sometimes I did not even see these hit and runs. I heard about it in the market: "Some white folks were just through a month ago. I think they were German. They rolled in, installed a well, and rolled out. Hardly talked to anyone. The well is broken now, but we don't know how to fix it." This is what goes on. To credit those hit and run studies as evidence of various countries doing a great job of tracking and tracing anything at all is dubious and I would caution you to temper you enthusiasm about such data.
I love your comment, thank you for spending the time to write it. I have only one minor quibble, I'm 60 and have lived all over the US, and I've very rarely (if ever) heard anyone that I've known say they think Africa is a country, and not a continent. But I'm sure you have and you travel
outside the US more than I do (that's a fact, believe me!) Thanks again.
Thank you for that much needed dose of reality.
Great. There's data. Did you read the first sentence of the article in the Malaria Journal? "In Kinshasa, malaria remains a major public health problem but its spatial epidemiology has not been assessed for decades now." "Not been assessed for decades now," would suggest poor data collection, no? Certainly it does not suggest that the authorities are exactly on top of what's going on in their countries.
And the second link seems to be full of commentary suggesting that the Liberian health care system is precarious, in need of significant strengthening, and failed to function for nearly 2 years after the ebola outbreak. This doesn't seem to support your point either. Indeed it seems to support mine, namely that data coming out of such places is doubtful at best.
Do you read Eugyppius? He has written an interesting post about a possible cover up of the source of the 2014 ebola outbreak in Guinea and Liberia. TLDR: looks to have been a leak from a lab in Liberia, near the Guinea border. I just read it plus the underlying article that he links to, and none of that struck me as demonstrating anything but what I commented: not good data in such places.
Anyway, I will continue to comment as I see fit. I respect your ability to do the same, but you have not persuaded me at all, and indeed undercut your own case.
Cheers,
Kim G
There is no incentive for any country to undercount COVID cases or deaths since all forms of aide are tied to disease burden. This goes for all other diseases as well. (There was perhaps a case to be made for undercounting HIV infections in the early 90’s when stigma abounded but that’s not applicable here.)
Regardless, these countries have demonstrated a remarkable ability to collect and report data on disease burden and despite having every incentive to over report, we’re still seeing COVID cases/deaths far below heavily vaccinated countries. This should not be dismissed as “poor record keeping.”
Ethical Skeptic has been watching US data changes. Worst example was changing the cause of death from (turbo) cancer to Covid.
VAERS entries are routinely disappearing as well.
The data in the US is definitely complete BS so the bar is pretty low.
John Campbell, who I follow closely, is convinced of the effectiveness of Ivermectin. That's good enough for me.
He is also all over the excess-deaths-in-mRNA-vaccinated countries story. So much so that I'd already seen the chart used in today's A.B. article.
The best line was “no connection has been proven yet”. As Ayn Rand confidently predicted, we have reached that stage where the evidence of ones senses no longer determines reality. God help us.
But the silver lining is that we can plan our summer vacations to Bulgaria!
Do they have Bulgarian mail order brides? They might be in demand soon.
I've been to Bulgaria and the women are beautiful. BTW, I have 3 sons of marrying age. Just to be clear....
Thanks for info. Beautiful and unvaxxed. Sounds like paradise.
Sounds like the Florida of Europe.
My husband was Bulgarian, and my children hold Bulgarian citizenship as well as others...both live in NYC now, both healthy, and happily un-jabbed, like their mother! Bulgaria is supposed to be beautiful....I've never been...my husband grew up in Israel. We are kind of a multi-country family. Kids were born in Munich, Germany and also raised there, and in Switzerland. I'm Canadian, living still in Switzerland (thank God!) Thanks Alex always for keeping the pedal to the metal....we appreciate you more than you know!...and way to go Bulgaria!
And no connection will ever be proven, because none will EVER be looked for.
Bill's Maxim: "Don't investigate that which you don't want to confirm."
To wit:
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/how-do-you-miss-the-most-blatant
"how do you miss the most blatant safety signal in vaccine history?
the trick, it would appear, is to ignore your own guidelines and never even look for it"
Will we be here 1,3 5 20 years from now STILL reading about what we already know and yet no one responsible for it all and intentionally being held remotely accountable in any way? Its truly the definition of insanity now. I mean its almost Feb now 2023 and STILL not ONE person on the entire planet responsible for orchestrating all of this upon humanity is the least bit concerned of facing accountability. Not ONE on the entire planet. Just this morning a plethora of DHHS (taxpayer funded) ads on radio and TV STILL touting the "safe and effective" messaging and why you should take the improved injections to best protect you and you loved ones. It's 3 years plus now since Fauci funded gain of function wuh flu lab release in CHINA now and the PERPS are more brazen than ever. Just sayin
I couldn’t agree with you more. I’ve also lost patience with the practice of pointing at the problem instead of tackling it. We should be writing these comments to our elected officials, not just posting them in this forum.
The amount of times I have called and left messages with elected officials, written or signed petitions has never led anywhere in my experience. Its always the same. They tell you they are listening, but act differently almost always. Until we actually "get" them to sign off on how they will in reality move-vote on issues we the people" truly" want them to do nothing changes. Wouldn't it be great to have citizen audit boards that monthly monitor our servants of the people making certain they do what we elect them to do and NOT do what a specials interest pays them off to do or other forms of selling their souls. These servants have to realize they will in fact be held accountable and I do not mean simply by voting them in or out
To those on this site there is no doubt about the cause of excess mortality. To the minds that have been compromised and there are probably billions, they will likely never make the connection. If something does not seem right, then its not right, plain and simple.
I suspect the “powers that be” will do two things about this information. 1) Diddly and 2) Squat.
Or Jack shit.
That’s what happens when Jack squats. 😜
Thanks for the chuckle. You really caught me off-guard. It took me awhile to stop laughing. It is a good thing that laughter is good for ones mood.
And still we are assaulted on TV with ads from the government, CVS, Walgreens, Pfizer, etc to get a booster, and that vaccines “save lives!”
While yet another professional athlete, age 35, was found dead, in Australia, no doubt of “coincidence.”
No, no, hell no!
I admitted my first patient in MONTHS with COVID pneumonia yesterday, and only for observation. He did not have a fever, elevated white count, or low oxygen levels, just felt bad due to some significant co-morbidities. This is not a major threat, and does not justify taking this dangerous shot.
Agreed. Good on you.
Data, schmata. Complex and incomprehensible studies are for the medicine men/women/its and other scientists who rely on government grants. Healthy young athletes dropping dead daily is data enough for me. But as I have said, the fact that the government in the U.S. and other wealthy countries demanded that every living being get shot up with a voodoo drug was all I needed to know. Pied Pipers are real, and it’s really astounding just how gullible people are. But that’s why bureaucrats invented fear. Fear works.
MAJORITY, n. : a mob of self-righteousness to be avoided at all costs — DDR
3,000 excess deaths in the UK would be about 14,400 excess deaths in the US. And yet, no daily death counter on CNN.
And the excess deaths aren't just falling in the 80 and older demo. They are occurring across all age demos. Many of the people who are dying would have lived decades longer.
RFK Jr's latest podcast is very interesting. Yes, a lot of older people are dying from hospital protocols, but the reduction in population life expectancy can only happen if a significant portion of younger people are dying. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rfk-jr-the-defender-podcast/id1552000243?i=1000595890555
I really think RFK, Jr. could go down as a more significant historic figure than his uncle and father. He is helping change the narrative regarding the entire science/medical complex.
P.S. I listened to the entire podcast. It's excellent. The professor's arguments make tremendous sense.
I agree. He is such a good man doing good works for humanity. And he does his best every day with grace towards those that impugn him and doesn't get despondent, just moves the ball forward. Very inspirational.
He deserves one of those "Profile in Courage" awards named for his uncle. The irony is that most of his family is embarrassed by his work and would never nominate him for such an award.
His family are uninformed or ill-informed. And yet, he is gracious and kind towards them. He is a model human being.
It's like a Vietnam every month.
And just like Viet Nam the blood is on the hands of the same tyrants in government.
The wrong political party holds the presidency for that. Had Trump won a second term, you can be sure that CNN would have a daily death counter.
Yep, but the plandemic, mail-in balloting and 2020 CNN daily death counter made sure that wouldn't happen. I see it and I'm not even a Trump fan. Although he is funny sometimes.
You mean there are people that actually watch CNN? God help us.
Regrettably. Lol
That’s sad. Actually, watching any television is sad. It’s 2023, not 1960’s, the 70’s or the 80’s.
That’s when television was GOOD. No one got offended and there were (is) two sexes: a man and a woman. Period
Yes, exactly!
The news out today is that the US government is considering an annual mRNA booster shot program just like for the flu. Sickening.
all they have to do for sheeple to comply is offer a $5 gift certificate for a donut (I am being so mean today)
Unfortunately, you are 100% correct. Many people have definitely failed the IQ TEST.
Throw on a large coffee and I’ll accept the offer👍
Annual arsenic or asbestos booster. New requirement from government! I am thinking that at least half the population would ask where they could get one. And 25% would make fun of the “anti-vaxers” for not lining up to get their own asbestos booster 🤪
It better come from the pharma company, not the fed govt. I’m done paying for these jabs. And they better give people the choice. If there is any coercion, the sheep better become lions.
The Federal Government and Big Pharma are one and the same = A big cartel and you ain’t in it.
Hate to say this, but I’d love them to try with me:)
Anyone else find it interesting Israel has not released any data since 2019.... Once toted as the country to emulate with early access to pfizer mRNA.
At around 90% vax'd i will be curious if the data is released, if it is similar to Englands results. As I believe most of the entire pop. had the Pfizer mRNA....
🤔
Here is their all cause mortality (2022 partial)
2019 - 45,813
2020 - 49,531
2021 - 50,661
2022 - 51,126 - extrapolated using 49 weeks reported
source mortality.org
Deaths have not much to do with Covid itself, it’s the shots. We know it, people just need to accept it. I suppose I’d be in denial also if I’d taken them. I’d rather see statistics on the massive increase in breast cancer and brain tumors. I now know of two women in their early 40’s with stage 4 breast cancer, and one in her late 40’s with an inoperable brain tumor. She has a one year old. My sister in law is also dying from a brain tumor. It’s all pretty obvious to me. 🤷🏻♀️
I know of someone that had a mammogram (all clear) one month before taking Jab 1. At the end of month 2 she was diagnosed with 2 different forms of breast cancer - a different form in each breast. Has anyone heard of such a thing????
Not until these shots! Same with all of the people in my comment.
Not to mention my 66 year old brother now has myocarditis!
Incredible and even still does not correspond with my personal observations of my group of friends and acquaintances. Hard to remember the time when an aggressive cancer or a sudden death was a blue moon occurrence versus today when it's a sad commonality. Here's your kicker:
Once again the data supports the observations of people around the world. We have a serious, dire problem. And it's getting worse.
Why is it that even doctors who questioned the CDC/NIH narrative, like Dr. Marty Makary at Johns Hopkins, appear to see some value in boosters. Based on this column and other Substacks, I concluded long ago that the Covid shots have been a tragic mistake or worse.
Don’t question the narrative in CA! Our Dr’s can no longer have their own medical opinion. They lose their licenses!
Oh yes...AB 2098...the gift that keeps on giving.
I trust no doctors or nurses in Commifornia.
That ship has sailed.
Nearly every doctor and nurse that went along to get along should be ashamed. BRUTALLY ASHAMED!
That is most people these days...no backbone, no courage. I think it starts to happen in the younger grades.....I teach young children, and these days, they are afraid to say what they think, and no teacher asks them also...they learn not to trust themselves, they learn how to follow. I teach now on my own terms, not in a school, and we all have a voice, and every one of those voices matters. That's how it should be. I learn so much from them. They are my students, but also my teachers. Eileen
Hence the population moves to TX and FL.
Any other options? Just a NYer workin on an escape plan.
you and snake plissken...
I thought he was dead :)
Tough to kill off snake :)
Freedom vs tyranny right. People must choose a side
I like Marty Makary but he also defends Leana Wen because he 'knows her' so he cuts her all kinds of slack
How can ANYone defend Wen with how exposed she is...crazzzzy
Wen is a CCP operative. Isn’t that obvious?
No doubt
Look at it this way, in approximately 5 years we'll stop including deaths at the pre-shot normal rate and it'll only be a 5 year average of excessive shot deaths thus smoothing out what was a remarkably high average. While excessive now, in 5 years it'll only be a little excessive.
You’re forgetting the fertility problem. How many humans does that “take care of”?
good, no great point
From a 2016 article about Moderna: "Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years." https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
Wow, better screenshot that before it's wiped. Truly incredible.
The Davos Engines are revved 🆙 y’know the CDC scientists can’t hear you over that 🇨🇭 roar •
"I normally try to end these pieces with a clever kicker, ..."
--Kicked the bucket?
--Kicked through the goal posts of Life?
--How about kicking the "experts" and mandaters out of office?
I have no doubt the narcissistic psychopaths at the CDC/NIH/FDA will continue to gaslight the public with the "safe and effective" Covid booster narrative while the excess deaths continue to pile up. They will never publicly admit any culpability for the excess deaths and ruining so many people's lives.
and how many times a day when the TV is on do we hear 'brought to you by Pfizer'.... with happy little ads showing a pregnant mom with a kid in tow smiling as she gets her booster along with a cheerful colorful bandaid...its all so wonderful and happy and virtuous
I suggest you turn off the television. That’s part of the problem.
I threw my boob tube out 20 years ago. It’s an insult to my intelligence that God gave me.
...going on 30 years also....best decision I ever made! Both of my kids grew up without one. ...and both live on their own now, and also don't have one.
Smart mom!
If you are so out of touch, what are you doing here?
I’m not out of touch at all Mr. Nietzsche.
But how can you be in touch without MSNBC?
I haven’t owned a television in 20 years. I don’t watch prop-a-ganda, Mr. Nietzsche.
Has the life insurance industry (and their actuaries) adjusted to what should be a change in life expectancy? Until they do it will be hard to know what to believe and not believe.
No. But rest assured there will be new legislation to subsidize the life/health insurance companies.
Guess how they'll justify it and expect us to be happy paying for it.
We're all in it together to fight Looooong covid
The best revenge is staying healthy!
Edward Dowd has some startling info about excess deaths and insurance companies in one of this week’s FLCCC interviews. If insurance companies - along with the medical profession and others - weren’t so frightened of the backlash over getting the truth out there, people’s hair would be on fire about this.
https://rumble.com/v26b5tc-the-epidemic-of-sudden-death-flccc-weekly-update-april-27-2022.html
It will be interesting to see how the rates go up: higher for the vaxed, lower for the unvaxed..?
Karen Murphy— I would be willing to bet it will become a discrimination issue. Legislation will be passed to make it illegal to ask for vax status on life insurance applications. Voila. Problem solved. We all pay one rate!
As with anything in government it will be backwards and clown world like.
People would just say they weren’t jabbed. How could you prove they were? I was on a cruise recently and they asked jab status... even though they didn’t require it. I said YeS because I was afraid they’d put snakes in my bed or something if I wasn’t jabbed.
That won’t happen.
There may not be enough data out yet for them to change their models. It does seem that life insurance rates are up (I check every year) but obviously that is anecdotal and I am aging too!