(Original, incorrect headline): A new study shows VACCINATED people with blood cancers were four times more likely to die after Covid infections than the unjabbed
The short answer is never or close to never. When you combine politics, money, power, ideology, and propaganda/“narrative” you have created a force nearly impervious to the truth/reality. Any inconvenient facts that come to light can either be buried at the end, as in this case, passed off as not statistically significant, or explained as “requiring further study”….which of course will never be done.
The kind of psychopathic entities who don't give a rip what you think, and will continue doing this because they CAN. They are "allowed" too. ZERO accountability!
Wasn’t the huge red flag that CDC did not announce or emphasize the efficacy of natural immunity? As I recall they dismissed this as ineffective and campaigned for this untested, experimental, legally bullet proofed PRODUCT. Why wasn’t this enough to put people on notice?
I am beginning to believe the "healthy vaccine bias" is exactly the opposite. Those people who use common sense and do a little research and thinking and thereby avoid the vaccines are the ones with the "healthy vaccine bias". Those that I know who have a new surgery every year, load up on pharmaceuticals and take every vaccine known to humankind are the ones with the most health problems. Maybe it could be called the "unhealthy vaccine bias".
How did they (or rather did they even try to) correct for the fact that in order to get boosted you must not have died before you had a chance to get boosted? I.e., the "immortal time" bias?
Covid cases and deaths "plunged" in the spring and summer of 2021 ... Well, those are the warm-weather, non-virus months - - every year, the number of respiratory viruses plunge in the spring and summer - for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
If you remember cancer patients were a high priority for all doses of mRNA shots. And face mask as well. You have said that we have seen an unusual amount of patients with cancer previously before COVID-19 were cancer-free and a high rate of recurrence of cancer in patients who were cancer free
Alex, could you look into POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) following covid vaccination. I was recently diagnosed with POTS after almost two years chasing down “long covid” treatment…. Turns out my symptoms were due to POTS. The treatment is mostly non pharmaceutical, so now I know why its taken me so long to figure it out…. The most recent large scale study on vaccine injuries that was just (headlined in msm) failed to look at POTS as a side effect. They purposely left it out of the study and yet there is an over two year waitlist at Mass General Brigham to get into to the autonomic neurologist to be tested for POTS.
Only more data and time will tell, but I do wonder if there is an insidious link between these “vaccines” and cancer. If it’s out there, I trust you’ll find it.
Thank you for the correction! I came to the comments to ask if anyone else thought you may have interpreted the chart incorrectly. I appreciate your honesty.
Someone with some raw data, should be doing a study. Cochrane Library did a review of all the mask studies. Of course that was completely misinterpreted by the media, but maybe they could do one on the Covid-19 "vaccines" and death rates based on age and comorbidities. Insurance companies have numbers and so do hospitals and morticians.
Why isn't the CDC following up on the jabs?
I think that the answer is pretty clear. The shots were a disaster and a lot of people know it, but if they hide the raw data, they think we won't notice. Unfortunately, it will soon become hard to deny to even the most casual observer. In my own personal circle, I know a woman who developed a rare lymphoma and was dead 2 weeks after her shot. Two neighbors have blood cancer and one now has lung cancer, even though she never smoked. A 49 year old man had a widow maker heart attack. Another young
woman was recently diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer. I think you get my point.
When the hell will we get real science back. It’s just politics now.
The short answer is never or close to never. When you combine politics, money, power, ideology, and propaganda/“narrative” you have created a force nearly impervious to the truth/reality. Any inconvenient facts that come to light can either be buried at the end, as in this case, passed off as not statistically significant, or explained as “requiring further study”….which of course will never be done.
I don’t think we’ll get out back anytime soon. Just like evolution, it’s not about if it’s real or not, but rather, does the populace believe it: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-it-does-matter
At what point will this type of data in these studies no longer be buried in an appendix? Even Jimmy Hoffa wasn't buried this deep.
Can you imagine how deep they’ll bury a really bad study?
I fear they would just jump to burying the scientists that did it.
For the record, Jimmy Hoffa's body has never been discovered.
How on earth could the authors not discuss this datapoint!!? What kind of people are these???
The kind of psychopathic entities who don't give a rip what you think, and will continue doing this because they CAN. They are "allowed" too. ZERO accountability!
They are likely "bought and paid for" researchers.
So it’s apparent that they lied to us about the efficacy of the vaccine right? And guess what? They lie about a lot of stuff.
But here’s the thing though: we don’t need to know WHY they’re lying. We just need to know that THEY ARE LYING and then act accordingly: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/i-dont-know-why-liars-lie-but-they
Because if we don’t, we end up hurting/poisoning ourselves unwittingly
Wasn’t the huge red flag that CDC did not announce or emphasize the efficacy of natural immunity? As I recall they dismissed this as ineffective and campaigned for this untested, experimental, legally bullet proofed PRODUCT. Why wasn’t this enough to put people on notice?
you did the right thing by correcting with the same prominence as your error. If only mainstream news organizations cleaved to this practice.
I am beginning to believe the "healthy vaccine bias" is exactly the opposite. Those people who use common sense and do a little research and thinking and thereby avoid the vaccines are the ones with the "healthy vaccine bias". Those that I know who have a new surgery every year, load up on pharmaceuticals and take every vaccine known to humankind are the ones with the most health problems. Maybe it could be called the "unhealthy vaccine bias".
How did they (or rather did they even try to) correct for the fact that in order to get boosted you must not have died before you had a chance to get boosted? I.e., the "immortal time" bias?
Covid cases and deaths "plunged" in the spring and summer of 2021 ... Well, those are the warm-weather, non-virus months - - every year, the number of respiratory viruses plunge in the spring and summer - for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
If you remember cancer patients were a high priority for all doses of mRNA shots. And face mask as well. You have said that we have seen an unusual amount of patients with cancer previously before COVID-19 were cancer-free and a high rate of recurrence of cancer in patients who were cancer free
Alex, could you look into POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) following covid vaccination. I was recently diagnosed with POTS after almost two years chasing down “long covid” treatment…. Turns out my symptoms were due to POTS. The treatment is mostly non pharmaceutical, so now I know why its taken me so long to figure it out…. The most recent large scale study on vaccine injuries that was just (headlined in msm) failed to look at POTS as a side effect. They purposely left it out of the study and yet there is an over two year waitlist at Mass General Brigham to get into to the autonomic neurologist to be tested for POTS.
Holy Shit. Im incredulous. This must come out.
Only more data and time will tell, but I do wonder if there is an insidious link between these “vaccines” and cancer. If it’s out there, I trust you’ll find it.
Thank you for the correction! I came to the comments to ask if anyone else thought you may have interpreted the chart incorrectly. I appreciate your honesty.
An honest mistake, unlike the elite institutions that are performing statistical yoga to show a benefit.
Someone with some raw data, should be doing a study. Cochrane Library did a review of all the mask studies. Of course that was completely misinterpreted by the media, but maybe they could do one on the Covid-19 "vaccines" and death rates based on age and comorbidities. Insurance companies have numbers and so do hospitals and morticians.
Why isn't the CDC following up on the jabs?
I think that the answer is pretty clear. The shots were a disaster and a lot of people know it, but if they hide the raw data, they think we won't notice. Unfortunately, it will soon become hard to deny to even the most casual observer. In my own personal circle, I know a woman who developed a rare lymphoma and was dead 2 weeks after her shot. Two neighbors have blood cancer and one now has lung cancer, even though she never smoked. A 49 year old man had a widow maker heart attack. Another young
woman was recently diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer. I think you get my point.