I come clean (at least with my bosses) and we address the situation to mitigate the damage. I don't want anyone in the world to be harmed, because that's on me and N Prize be damned at this point, I just set the world on fire. We get the smartest people in America/allies and start trying everything under the son to see what sticks. Early treatment protocol, watch people who have had it and been fine, watch people who struggled but got better, and of course those who did not. I'm a scientist so I science the shit out of this, and pray continually because I'm not stupid, and will take all the help I can get.
What don't I do?
I don't not treat people.
I don't stick them on Remedesivir after seeing it has no effect.
I don't put people on vents when I understand it does more harm than any good.
I don't sabotage HCQ studies by giving lethal does.
I don't try to profit off a disaster.
I don't warp speed an untested potentially dangerous new vaccine technology.
I don't lie to Congress.
I don't lie to the people I just potentially harmed.
I don't tell doctors not to use certain drugs - try them all and report your findings.
I don't use my power to silence people.
I don't ignore VAERS
I don't force people to take a shot that has killed 200,000 plus Americans according to Steve Kirsch and Dr. Rose's calculations and published paper.
I don't do any of those things, because those things are all evil and vile and beneath a intelligent human being with any sort of ethics or conscience would do.
Because Fauci did those things his name should be strike the same feelings as Dr. Mengele, because that's where we're at.
I do what Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and Andy McCabe do. I double down, and know the deep state and media (but I repeat myself) has my back. I'm above the law. Indeed, I am the law. I am science. I am renaming Christmas as Faucimas. That's who I am.
I have a cure for pandemic propaganda. Anyone appearing on TV must be accompanied by a pie chart indicating where their income comes from ie the sources. They do something similar for stock analysts on CNBC
Listen to the frontline Dr's and allow the remedies that are working to be used. Ivermectin, Zinc, HDQ, ect...But wait, if I do no that then everyone will stop getting vaccinated and the money I have made from the stock of Pfizer, J&J, ect.. will crash. No best to continue mandating vaccines and trust the government and the MSM will continue to praise me.
I cannot put myself in Fauci's shoes because i am not an authoritarian douchebag whose first instinct is to push unproven drugs on people in their time of vulnerability.
Was it you or someone else on substack who had the "does fauci have munchausen syndrome by proxy?" piece? i feel like someone else, i'll find and share in a reply.
Thanks for this thought experiment- here's another. What if you encouraged 150 million of your citizens to take a vaccine which then proves not to vaccinate against disease and is showing more cost/harm than benefit and you've now doubled down and mandated the hesitant to get it. How do you stop mandating and save face? (A) everyone who wants it got it and can even get boosters, (B) we acknowledge existing immunity from prior infection and we as a society have herd immunity, or (C) continue the madness indefinitely... Fauci, the feds and Governors need a way to say they've succeeded and not admit failure. What's the way??
Interesting that the actual nobel prize winner for the AIDS virus was Luc Montagnier, and months ago on french national TV he mentioned how the virus was spread manmade from the lab, not from bats, and he said no way he would take this vaccine. When the shocked interviewer asked wasn't he afraid of the reaction/consequences from his controversial statement, his response which I loved was "No, because I have already won my nobel prize". Implying of course that others were too fearful of their careers and advancements and publications and funding to speak the truth. To this day, he is outspoken about advising NOT to take the vaccine (although he doesn't refer to it as a 'vaccine' but rather "gene therapy") and the dangers associated with it. Of course, he is censored, laughingly as 'misinformation' from the most probably non-scientific highschool only educated 'fact checkers', so many of the public unfortunately do not hear from him.
Only truly evil people find themselves at this level of conjuncture, but we sure know what Fauci did when he found himself at this crossroad....and he hasn't stopped digging YET....it's no longer just a hole, he's dug himself a massive crater. Fauci also knows as soon as he stops digging, he's going to get buried in it....I will not mourn his loss.
Like Joe Biden. We've all wondered how these politicians can go to Congress, earn a very modest six figure salary, then emerge 30 years later as multimillionaires even though they didn't inherit a dime from their parents. Joe Biden showed us how it's done. Go to Ukraine and threaten to withhold US taxpayer money unless they stop scrutinizing how his son is fleecing them. Go to China and solicit a billion or so that his friend and buddy (John Kerry's son) can manage.
When someone tried to investigate, they tried to impeach him. THAT's how it's done. You run straight at anyone asking questions, call them liars and crazy, and you gaslight them to death.
Same thing here. Twitter/YouTube eliminates anyone who questions the official narrative. "Well," you think, "maybe we'll take our eyeballs to a new App that isn't so censorious." Nope. Apple/Google/Amazon put a stop to that immediately. Some newspaper ran a story about Hunter Biden's laptop?!?! Get it off. Kick them off.
So, the answer isn't simply to lie and evade. The answer is you go for the throat of anyone questioning your narrative -- whether that means pulling their grants, booting them from social media, or villifying them in the Pravda-esque outlets that pass for news these days. You do it all with a straight face, some might even say a sneer. You had good teachers: Comey, Brennan, McCabe and Strzok got away with it. And, heck, they learned it from the Clintons. Tried and (anything but) true.
I've read a lot of the comments, but I'm going to go a different direction with my response. First, my worldview says human nature is not inherently good. "The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick. Who can understand it?" Getting to the place Fauci and others are didn't happen overnight; it happened by degrees and by bad choices made over a long period of time. Some would call the result a seared conscience. It's about lying and rationalizing until you believe the lies and can no longer discern truth or goodness. We all like to think we would not become like this or make these choices, but that is self-deception. We are all capable of the gravest evil. It is why pursuing truth at all costs is so important while at the same time, praying for wisdom and discernment. It is too easy to be deceived.
Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of hope for Fauci, Daszak and some of the others who are deep into the evil of this. But repentance is possible for everyone until their last breath.
Jesus said: Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Mathew 19:24. This comes to mind. So many rich people doing things for their own gain & power, are willing to kill and maim to get richer...
There is some serious cognitive dissonance in the argument for mandatory vaccinations.
I can understand people believing one or the other of these political talking points. What I can’t grasp is so many people simultaneously believing both. These 2 thoughts are the very definition of “mutually exclusive.”
1) There is a “Pandemic of the unvaccinated”
2) “We must protect vaccinated workers from their unvaccinated co-workers”
Do I need to even say it? If the pandemic is limited to the unvaccinated, then what exactly do the vaccinated need protection from? For the record, I know both taking points are pure BS.
The only scientifically literate (yet morally reprehensible) justification for mandatory vaccination would be if unvaccinated people were spreading the virus more readily than their vaccinated counterparts.
The jury is in. Not guilty on all counts.
NBC news: ‘The internal CDC presentation concluded that, "breakthrough infections may be as transmissible as unvaccinated cases."’
NPR: ‘It also found no significant difference in the viral load present in the breakthrough infections occurring in fully vaccinated people and the other cases, suggesting the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the coronavirus is similar.’
So the only scientifically rational argument for mandatory vaccinations has been shredded by none other than the CDC. I guess since NBC news, NPR, and the CDC are all right wing extremist sites, we may need to take this conclusion with a grain of salt…
Last, let’s go over the clinical trials again: Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J only looked at safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Transmissibility was never even considered. Everyone arguing for mandatory vaccinations has the sum total of exactly zero data to support the assertion that unvaccinated people are any threat to them.
Finally, during the time of the clinical trials, the vaccines were given a 95% efficacy rating. During that time, the only people in the entire country who were vaccinated were the participants in the trial who did not get the placebo.
So we’ve gone from “95% efficacy against an entirely unvaccinated population” to “Actually, we need the entire population to be vaccinated for this thing to work” in less than 8 months.
And people ask me why I’ve lost all respect for “public health officials" as well as the overwhelming majority of doctors who damn well know better but are afraid to say anything.
Let's see. What would I do? I'd demand a Big RCT for any repurposed, off-patent treatment. And then I'd refuse to fund such an RCT. Or I'd fund one that would fail to show a benefit. End result: No Treatments for You, Plebes! Two Years to Slow The Spread! Triple masks - because, common sense! This results in - shots in arms - as the only way out. Then mandates! No Jab No Job!
I come clean (at least with my bosses) and we address the situation to mitigate the damage. I don't want anyone in the world to be harmed, because that's on me and N Prize be damned at this point, I just set the world on fire. We get the smartest people in America/allies and start trying everything under the son to see what sticks. Early treatment protocol, watch people who have had it and been fine, watch people who struggled but got better, and of course those who did not. I'm a scientist so I science the shit out of this, and pray continually because I'm not stupid, and will take all the help I can get.
What don't I do?
I don't not treat people.
I don't stick them on Remedesivir after seeing it has no effect.
I don't put people on vents when I understand it does more harm than any good.
I don't sabotage HCQ studies by giving lethal does.
I don't try to profit off a disaster.
I don't warp speed an untested potentially dangerous new vaccine technology.
I don't lie to Congress.
I don't lie to the people I just potentially harmed.
I don't tell doctors not to use certain drugs - try them all and report your findings.
I don't use my power to silence people.
I don't ignore VAERS
I don't force people to take a shot that has killed 200,000 plus Americans according to Steve Kirsch and Dr. Rose's calculations and published paper.
I don't do any of those things, because those things are all evil and vile and beneath a intelligent human being with any sort of ethics or conscience would do.
Because Fauci did those things his name should be strike the same feelings as Dr. Mengele, because that's where we're at.
I do what Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and Andy McCabe do. I double down, and know the deep state and media (but I repeat myself) has my back. I'm above the law. Indeed, I am the law. I am science. I am renaming Christmas as Faucimas. That's who I am.
Go away little ankle biter.
I have a cure for pandemic propaganda. Anyone appearing on TV must be accompanied by a pie chart indicating where their income comes from ie the sources. They do something similar for stock analysts on CNBC
Listen to the frontline Dr's and allow the remedies that are working to be used. Ivermectin, Zinc, HDQ, ect...But wait, if I do no that then everyone will stop getting vaccinated and the money I have made from the stock of Pfizer, J&J, ect.. will crash. No best to continue mandating vaccines and trust the government and the MSM will continue to praise me.
I cannot put myself in Fauci's shoes because i am not an authoritarian douchebag whose first instinct is to push unproven drugs on people in their time of vulnerability.
Was it you or someone else on substack who had the "does fauci have munchausen syndrome by proxy?" piece? i feel like someone else, i'll find and share in a reply.
Thanks for this thought experiment- here's another. What if you encouraged 150 million of your citizens to take a vaccine which then proves not to vaccinate against disease and is showing more cost/harm than benefit and you've now doubled down and mandated the hesitant to get it. How do you stop mandating and save face? (A) everyone who wants it got it and can even get boosters, (B) we acknowledge existing immunity from prior infection and we as a society have herd immunity, or (C) continue the madness indefinitely... Fauci, the feds and Governors need a way to say they've succeeded and not admit failure. What's the way??
Interesting that the actual nobel prize winner for the AIDS virus was Luc Montagnier, and months ago on french national TV he mentioned how the virus was spread manmade from the lab, not from bats, and he said no way he would take this vaccine. When the shocked interviewer asked wasn't he afraid of the reaction/consequences from his controversial statement, his response which I loved was "No, because I have already won my nobel prize". Implying of course that others were too fearful of their careers and advancements and publications and funding to speak the truth. To this day, he is outspoken about advising NOT to take the vaccine (although he doesn't refer to it as a 'vaccine' but rather "gene therapy") and the dangers associated with it. Of course, he is censored, laughingly as 'misinformation' from the most probably non-scientific highschool only educated 'fact checkers', so many of the public unfortunately do not hear from him.
YOU, Alex Berenson, do what YOU do best.....you truthfully write about it. The human race deserves that.
In bureaucracies, malice follows incompetence, always.
Only truly evil people find themselves at this level of conjuncture, but we sure know what Fauci did when he found himself at this crossroad....and he hasn't stopped digging YET....it's no longer just a hole, he's dug himself a massive crater. Fauci also knows as soon as he stops digging, he's going to get buried in it....I will not mourn his loss.
Yeah, this is how it's done.
Like Joe Biden. We've all wondered how these politicians can go to Congress, earn a very modest six figure salary, then emerge 30 years later as multimillionaires even though they didn't inherit a dime from their parents. Joe Biden showed us how it's done. Go to Ukraine and threaten to withhold US taxpayer money unless they stop scrutinizing how his son is fleecing them. Go to China and solicit a billion or so that his friend and buddy (John Kerry's son) can manage.
When someone tried to investigate, they tried to impeach him. THAT's how it's done. You run straight at anyone asking questions, call them liars and crazy, and you gaslight them to death.
Same thing here. Twitter/YouTube eliminates anyone who questions the official narrative. "Well," you think, "maybe we'll take our eyeballs to a new App that isn't so censorious." Nope. Apple/Google/Amazon put a stop to that immediately. Some newspaper ran a story about Hunter Biden's laptop?!?! Get it off. Kick them off.
So, the answer isn't simply to lie and evade. The answer is you go for the throat of anyone questioning your narrative -- whether that means pulling their grants, booting them from social media, or villifying them in the Pravda-esque outlets that pass for news these days. You do it all with a straight face, some might even say a sneer. You had good teachers: Comey, Brennan, McCabe and Strzok got away with it. And, heck, they learned it from the Clintons. Tried and (anything but) true.
I've read a lot of the comments, but I'm going to go a different direction with my response. First, my worldview says human nature is not inherently good. "The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick. Who can understand it?" Getting to the place Fauci and others are didn't happen overnight; it happened by degrees and by bad choices made over a long period of time. Some would call the result a seared conscience. It's about lying and rationalizing until you believe the lies and can no longer discern truth or goodness. We all like to think we would not become like this or make these choices, but that is self-deception. We are all capable of the gravest evil. It is why pursuing truth at all costs is so important while at the same time, praying for wisdom and discernment. It is too easy to be deceived.
Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of hope for Fauci, Daszak and some of the others who are deep into the evil of this. But repentance is possible for everyone until their last breath.
Jesus said: Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Mathew 19:24. This comes to mind. So many rich people doing things for their own gain & power, are willing to kill and maim to get richer...
There is some serious cognitive dissonance in the argument for mandatory vaccinations.
I can understand people believing one or the other of these political talking points. What I can’t grasp is so many people simultaneously believing both. These 2 thoughts are the very definition of “mutually exclusive.”
1) There is a “Pandemic of the unvaccinated”
2) “We must protect vaccinated workers from their unvaccinated co-workers”
Do I need to even say it? If the pandemic is limited to the unvaccinated, then what exactly do the vaccinated need protection from? For the record, I know both taking points are pure BS.
The only scientifically literate (yet morally reprehensible) justification for mandatory vaccination would be if unvaccinated people were spreading the virus more readily than their vaccinated counterparts.
The jury is in. Not guilty on all counts.
NBC news: ‘The internal CDC presentation concluded that, "breakthrough infections may be as transmissible as unvaccinated cases."’
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/delta-variant-viral-load-scientists-are-watching-covid-pandemic-rcna1604
NPR: ‘It also found no significant difference in the viral load present in the breakthrough infections occurring in fully vaccinated people and the other cases, suggesting the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the coronavirus is similar.’
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/30/1022867219/cdc-study-provincetown-delta-vaccinated-breakthrough-mask-guidance
See Figure 2: the CDC's box and whisker chart for yourselves (hope I’m not banned for sharing CDC “misinformation”)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w
So the only scientifically rational argument for mandatory vaccinations has been shredded by none other than the CDC. I guess since NBC news, NPR, and the CDC are all right wing extremist sites, we may need to take this conclusion with a grain of salt…
Last, let’s go over the clinical trials again: Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J only looked at safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Transmissibility was never even considered. Everyone arguing for mandatory vaccinations has the sum total of exactly zero data to support the assertion that unvaccinated people are any threat to them.
Finally, during the time of the clinical trials, the vaccines were given a 95% efficacy rating. During that time, the only people in the entire country who were vaccinated were the participants in the trial who did not get the placebo.
So we’ve gone from “95% efficacy against an entirely unvaccinated population” to “Actually, we need the entire population to be vaccinated for this thing to work” in less than 8 months.
And people ask me why I’ve lost all respect for “public health officials" as well as the overwhelming majority of doctors who damn well know better but are afraid to say anything.
Deny and then invest in the cure and sell it! Morals aside...
Let's see. What would I do? I'd demand a Big RCT for any repurposed, off-patent treatment. And then I'd refuse to fund such an RCT. Or I'd fund one that would fail to show a benefit. End result: No Treatments for You, Plebes! Two Years to Slow The Spread! Triple masks - because, common sense! This results in - shots in arms - as the only way out. Then mandates! No Jab No Job!
How close did I get?