114 Comments
author

Working GiveSendGo link here - not sure what is wrong with the link:

https://www.givesendgo.com/G9X98

Expand full comment

Re your headline, "Berenson v Biden now stands alone", I thought there were others too. RFK and also Mike Adams come to mind.

Expand full comment
founding

View it as an opportunity. Get the word out ASAP. I have fired off several emails and text to colleagues, friends and family.

Most didn't even know...but have a sense of how important this is.

It's so important that you have ZERO rights without 1A. They'll use the dilution of 1A to come after our other rights.

WE ARE SLAVES WITHOUT FREE SPEECH.

It's that simple

Expand full comment

Lack of free speech inherently eliminates choices.

Without choices, we cannot exercise free will.

We are indeed, slaves without free speech.

Expand full comment
founding

exactly. if you can't speak freely than you can not defend your other rights

Expand full comment

further: if others cannot speak freely, how can you know that the "truth" being fed to you (via education system, the press, etc.) is the truth?

I spent a lot of time in the former East Germany - free speech was strangled by the government - the lack free speech meant that others could not even fathom that what they were being fed was propaganda.

It made for a compliant, easily controlled population.

Expand full comment
founding

this times 1000

Expand full comment

And slaves we are with J6 making J7 the foundation of rogue federalist tyranny on parade. Proof the elections of 2020 were rigged with the assistance of 12 demon rat AG's and Governors and at least 6 other states that raised the vote count unrelated to the win-loss status so as to build that "huge swing" toward Biden.

Expand full comment
founding

Yes, to lose their Biggest Lie about the "big lie" is a loss so threatening that they must continue to lie or the biggest lie of all will be revealed; that you are so alone you can't speak truth.

Expand full comment

Truth rolling along. Amazing how critical covering up lie after lie can’t be even though most people are so self absorbed in this indoctrination they are more likely to believe the abstract than the common sense logic.

Expand full comment

Amy Comey Barrett is proving herself to be a judicial lightweight. Her arguments in this case were very shallow and she showed little regard for the first amendment, instead she went with a convoluted technical argument about standing. Every American has standing in a case when the government is bullying 3rd parties to suppress speech it does not like.

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

How is that not even a consideration the fact that ALL AMERICANS are harmed by this coerced mafia like censoring. How can she remotely NOT consider this

Expand full comment

I am always amazed that these so called “Constitutionalist” judges forget how they were crucified in their appointment hearings. They are either intimidated, terrified or compromised.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

Political violence and threats work.

If they didnt our commie overlords wouldn't deploy it.

Expand full comment

So predictable. I haven't forced myself to read the decision yet -- I will get to that eventually -- but I have to say I'm pretty darn sick of SCOTUS' standing jurisprudence. I believe they increasingly employ it for their own convenience -- to serve their own political leanings and to avoid rulings they don't have the courage to issue. I wish I didn’t feel that way, but I do.

Expand full comment

I completely agree. This was complete cowardice on the part of the three 'middle' justices who have shown that cowardice is their primary value.

Expand full comment

So now the government has confirmation that they can censor all they want as long as they don’t use a particular person’s name it’s fine. I agree- horrible cowardly decision. I think they’re afraid of what might happen if they go against the government on too many decisions. I think they’re going to give Trump full Presidential immunity and therefore felt they had to give the government a win on this one by saying the plaintiffs had no standing. Sad-

Expand full comment

She let Feinstein bully her and break the law in her confirmation hearing about the dogma of her Catholic religion; I knew then she couldn’t be trusted.

Expand full comment

She probably wore 2 masks! LORDY.

Expand full comment

Yes. Does this ruling mean the government is free to ignore the First Amendment and the Constitution as long as they claim they are not harming anyone by doing so? Then why do we even have a Constitution? It turns the judicial system into a giant tort free-for-all.

Expand full comment

Highly disappointing ruling. May your case restore my faith in our judicial system.

Expand full comment
founding

Yeah well, The Founders would've reduced everything to rubble long ago.

It is the cowardness of the American public that has put us in this position.

It IS the disease. The rest is sequela.

Expand full comment

We have so many immigrants that came from countries far worse, compared to that it's probably still better and won't want to rock the boat.

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

Chris , "Far worse "because Merica caused chaos and a coup in their country!

Or Economic Hitman'd them. From Confessions of an Economic Hitman.

Merica is and was the world wide Mafia.

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

I love that book by Perkins. I read it in the aughts. It, along with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance reporting, formed a foundation for govt skepticism that didn’t fully develop until Epstein’s murder followed by The Lab Leak censorship. Once you change your lens “the inexplicable” makes a lot more sense and there’s no going back to being naive. I don’t know what it will take for other people.

Expand full comment

Sorry Epstein is not dead. He very well could buy his freedom and escape. Livin the Island life.

Simple. Laundry hamper takes him out and brings in the dead guy with the Epstein mask, everybody is wearing masks these days. Even Macron. They forgot to do the ears though so that is a dead give away completely different blue print. Also the mask line is so obvious and the nose is much bigger on the substitute and well… we will leave it at that.

2nd smartest guy in the world has a great substack expose story on it with the evidence laid out pictorially as well. My fave is the Feds ( not EMTs 🤣) have a breathing bag held above his face as they wheel the dead guy out. Don’t the Feds know dead guys don’t breath ? Guess they missed that day in the briefing. Also his arm is hanging off the push stretcher , always a no no if you want all the limbs still attached when pushing through door ways.

Devil is in the details.

Expand full comment

I’ll look into it.

Expand full comment

I totally agree!

Expand full comment

The constitution is designed as one of enumerated powers but now functions as one of enumerated liberties. Reversing that is a difficult task since authoritarians want power.

Expand full comment
founding

Pliers and blowtorches are more efficient than pitch forks...just sayin'

Expand full comment

Lately feels like the Supreme Court is somehow doing me more long-term harm than my Nacho Supremes.

Expand full comment
founding

What are you talking about?!

Anyone that can digest Nacho Supremes is built to last.

They're part of maintaining my sexy core....;]

Expand full comment

DT you always brighten my day with your unique perspective.

Expand full comment

Thanks, well you know, you either have to laugh or cry and all that...

Expand full comment

It appears to me that the SCOTUS relies on frivolous side issues to avoid making decisions on very important issues. Somehow they don't understand things are moving so much faster than the 1800s legal process they employ.

Expand full comment
founding

This is such a good point.

Expand full comment

Where is Antonin Scalia when you need him? Maybe he was murdered after all. I would not find it that hard to believe.

Expand full comment

Remember how many times we HEARD "no standing" post 2020 election

Expand full comment
founding

Your lawsuit just became more crucial than I ever imagined. There's a lot riding on this.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

I know...but that's also what's so distressing.

For the moment our God given and most important RIGHT, for all intents and purposes, does not exist.

I'm so disgusted in the highest court in the land. I have nothing but contempt for them.

They are a disgrace to all this country used to stand for.

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

Probably the most significant ruling in American history all things considered. Like you said without 1st amendment rights what rights do we have...ZERO! Just unreal those 3 so called "constitutionally based" judges just drove this dagger into the American heart

Expand full comment
founding

I wonder how they'd have ruled without Berenson's case in the offing. He most certainly has standing. If they rule against him, well, then we will have a problem.

Expand full comment

That's assuming they know about Berenson's case and will take it.

Expand full comment

I bet they do certainly know about it. But will they take it?

Expand full comment
founding

Basic Con law: they know about this case and they know how they'd rule. It all comes down to a matter of optics and timing.

Expand full comment
founding

True! There's a long way to go.

Expand full comment

good point!

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

… problem…more like a nightmare without 1A. We are reduced to a zombie representative Republic. Although some would strongly argue the country’s already there.

Expand full comment

They are stacked and bribed and extorted.

Most all of them bought and paid for.

Expand full comment
founding

And they're chicken shits

Expand full comment

True. But most human beings are just as cowardly as these disgusting specimens of our species are.

Expand full comment
founding

Never truer words

Expand full comment

So you think the justices are as compromised as the politicians and media? I hope you are wrong but it doesn't look good. I do believe the people we 'see' are not the ones actually running the show. But I am hoping that somehow the highest court of the land is an exception.

Expand full comment
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

would that it be true

I regretfully think it is not. I think the compromise is centered on The Chief Justice himself. See my comment below.

Expand full comment

See also Epstein’s “guest list” …oh wait, we can’t see it. I wonder why, Justice Roberts?

Expand full comment

From the news reports, it sounds like Justice Alito's dissent was quite powerful. If Alex can overcome the standing issue - which it seems he's on top of - he ought to have at least three justices strongly against government censorship by proxy.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

This court must have the lowest combined intelligence in the history of America.

Sotomayor thought 100k children died from c19 and KBG can't even identify her own sex.

And don't get me started on Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett.

Expand full comment

Yes...he went OFF!

Expand full comment
founding

His dissent is a masterpiece

Expand full comment

And like the Republicans “sternly worded letters”: useless.

Expand full comment
founding

Oh goodness...don't get me started on that!...:]

Expand full comment

Alex I have been with you since early 2020 and have subscribed since you started here and will NOT let up my support sir. GIVE THESE CLOWNS ALL THE HELL YOU CAN. THE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL.

Expand full comment

Exactly!

Expand full comment

Come on SCOTUS. Grow a backbone!

Expand full comment

“No Standing” = No Backbone!!

Expand full comment

Punting...non confronting for sure

Expand full comment

As you point out, standing is key. My reading was this wasn’t decided on the merits which helps you. The fact that the feds can even get involved in the enumerated powers vs enumerated liberties issue.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

Nah. This doesn't help.

Do your rights not have standing?

This was the easiest call all time.

If your voice is shutdown then another 1000 can not hear.

Expand full comment

Agreed. This should have been a simple ruling against government removing free speech. Everyone is harmed when Constitutional rights are denied. The SCOTUS allowed government tyranny, and it will continue.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 27·edited Jun 27

Can you imagine the government ruling in favor of the government?!..........SHOCKING

Expand full comment

I read Justice ACB’s brief and was thinking about your case and how you have proof of them specifically naming you. Go Alex! I think this decision helped your case as well. I think it was a horrible cowardly punt of a decision, a political move, but regardless, I agree that this will help your case.

Expand full comment

Once again, the Supreme bozos shirk their duty, hiding behind “standing”. It’s almost as if they don’t understand what is at stake. I’m praying they do the right thing with Alex, but feel less confident every day.

Expand full comment

Or they.do understand what is at stake.and want to eliminate our most important right via technicalities.

Expand full comment
founding

Bingo. They are elites.

And they know better than us....

Shits gettin reaaaaal!

Expand full comment

They're threatened by the Deep State to do their bidding. Remember what Chuck Schumer said? "You really don't want to get on the bad side of the 'intelligence' agencies. They have six ways from Sunday to get back at you if you dare go against them in any way."

Expand full comment
founding

Yes. They are telegraphing at this point.

Some would call it mockery?.....

Expand full comment

They ARE the Deep State. Otherwise would they get nominated? They played the game real well. It’s all BS.

Expand full comment

Hope you’re right, Alex, but the message of today’s ruling is that the fix is in. You will almost certainly be the victim of the same fix, if worded differently.

Expand full comment

Your reading on the standing issue is correct. As long as you have a judge who follows the law, (so not Engron, Merchan, Chutkin, or Emett Sullivan types who should face disbarment hearings), YOU WILL PREVAIL. Think of it as going through a storm at sea and you must cling tightly to the mast, which is your faith.

Expand full comment

"a judge who follows the law" Has anyone seen one lately?

Expand full comment

We all have a lot riding on your lawsuit, Alex. It might be our last glimmer of hope.

Expand full comment