Your response to yesterday's post about Berenson v Biden has been overwhelming - and heartening. Now, an update on the key facts of the case. Not the law, just what we know happened.
I have told at least 1000 people by now about the importance of this case.
Our government , the radicals,the medical establishment (and insurance companies), and most reporters are among the millions of people who do not want the AMERICAN PEOPLE healthy.
I sent a check to help in your fight ... and I pray GOD continues to give you the strength to continue.
You certainly have the intelligence and the writing skills.
You write: "...at this stage of the case, we do not need the same level of evidence that we will need to convince a judge that a jury should hear our lawsuit, precisely because we have not yet had the chance for discovery. We just need to present reasonable theories supported with specific evidence — “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” in the words of the Supreme Court."
This is absolutely correct. I studied this aspect of the law for my case. The Supreme Court did say as much. HOWEVER, Districts Courts are evading the law using two other Supreme decisions. (Your attorney knows them.) Based on illegitimate legal reasoning, the Courts are denying petitioners a jury trial and are using Rule 12 Motions to Dismiss to justify ad hoc bench trials that DO consider evidentiary issues without you being able to engage in discovery or cross-examination. I was stunned at how corrupt they are. But, unlike me, you probably have the ability to go to appeal, which may keep them in check. Best wishes.
In that mention of August 2021, and the knowing EUA gene therapy medication injection mandates were pending. It reminded me of what a few of us did in a BLUE capital city on a blustery cold April 2020 day protesting along side roughly 500 others. That protest was very early on in plandemic, and about the "essential vs non essential" business coercion going on at that time. The 3 of us KNEW what was really going on, and we said it clearly in the signs we carried in that protest. We said "The END GAME are INJECTION MANDATES" (I for one have NEVER uttered the word V#%%@&E since these injections were never a V). We 3 were the only ones in that crowd with such signs. I firmly believe to this day the WUH FLU was made for the injections and not the other way around. Of course we were all called conspiracists as those like us here were on so many aspects of the great 2020 plandemic
I can't donate right now (STILL out of work thanks to Bidenomics and the HARRIS-Biden administration), but happy to spread the word and to share words of support right here. You are doing God's work, Alex! As Chris Brown said below, GO GET EM!!!
we are either 3 weeks away from kamala packing the supreme court with 7 mentally handicapped, communist (but i repeat myself) judges of various ethnicities and sexualities to permanently shred our constitution like what happened to the snow mexicans up north in canada
- or -
we are 3 weeks from donald trump letting elon fire any government worker who doesn't retweet his memes and rfk forcing the NIH to research ways to make america healthy again
Alex, I love your Substack, and I have been a faithful subscriber for the last couple of years. I bought all your covid chapters as you released them on Amazon, and I bought Pandemia. I think Berenson v Biden is a solid case, and I think you should pursue it as hard as you can to the very end. But I only just recently realized one (not so small) detail. Your case is a civil case. Not sure if you mentioned this before and I missed it, but it raised an eyebrow with regards to fund raising for such a case. I believe you to be an honest and earnest reporter and I don't want that opinion of you to ever change. So maybe you can clarify a few questions I have with regards to this fact...
1) Can you explain if there is likely to be a significant difference between what YOUR ideal victory looks like and what a probable victory will look like within the parameters of a civil lawsuit?
2) Will a victory in a civil lawsuit amount to anything more than a financial settlement in your favor, which would more likely than not be sealed (as it was in your Berenson v Twitter case)? Meaning there may or may not be an admission of guilt from them that they wronged YOU, but that victory will likely not mean anything in terms of policy changes or protections being instituted to protect the masses from similar treatment in future because of your lawsuit.
3) IF the result of this lawsuit is a financial settlement in your favor, do you feel it would’ve been ethical to have raised money from your subscribers to win a case that you stand to solely gain financially? IF not, why do you feel it is okay?
4) I believe you had a financial windfall from your Twitter case, don't you believe the dollars won in that case should be fully exhausted in funding your Berenson v Biden case before requesting any donations for your new case? If not, can you explain why? Is that money currently funding your case? If not, can you explain why?
5) If you were to receive a large settlement because of this case, do you intend to reimburse those who donated to fund your legal fees for you to present your case? Possibly even their original donation + a percentage proportional to the amount gained from the lawsuit? If not, why do you feel that would not be the right thing to do?
Hopefully none of my concerns have any validity to them and the questions have quick and reasonable answers, so I hope you will take some time to address them. The last thing I would like to think is you are fund raising for your legal fees from your faithful subscribers so you can financially benefit yourself, because I don't believe that to be ethical. I believe you were wronged by our government, and they should be held accountable. But if your goal is to prove that in court so as to prevent it from happening again to anyone else, I need your help convincing me civil court is the right venue to make that happen. What am I missing?
This is OT (Off Topic) but worth paying attention to if you wonder about and/or are concerned about the Covid jab: check out this interview with Dr. Naomi Wolf:
All to create a few billionaires. What the hell is wrong with these people? By banning you, Twitter made Substack, no doubt. Just bad business all around. Get these bastards and make them pay!
I have told at least 1000 people by now about the importance of this case.
Our government , the radicals,the medical establishment (and insurance companies), and most reporters are among the millions of people who do not want the AMERICAN PEOPLE healthy.
I sent a check to help in your fight ... and I pray GOD continues to give you the strength to continue.
You certainly have the intelligence and the writing skills.
T H A N K Y O U
They are scared shitless because free speech is the only cure for The Bluebonic Plague.
Specifically, tearing down the edifice of lies that camoflauge ideological uniformity with cultural diversity.
GO GET EM ALEX
You write: "...at this stage of the case, we do not need the same level of evidence that we will need to convince a judge that a jury should hear our lawsuit, precisely because we have not yet had the chance for discovery. We just need to present reasonable theories supported with specific evidence — “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” in the words of the Supreme Court."
This is absolutely correct. I studied this aspect of the law for my case. The Supreme Court did say as much. HOWEVER, Districts Courts are evading the law using two other Supreme decisions. (Your attorney knows them.) Based on illegitimate legal reasoning, the Courts are denying petitioners a jury trial and are using Rule 12 Motions to Dismiss to justify ad hoc bench trials that DO consider evidentiary issues without you being able to engage in discovery or cross-examination. I was stunned at how corrupt they are. But, unlike me, you probably have the ability to go to appeal, which may keep them in check. Best wishes.
In that mention of August 2021, and the knowing EUA gene therapy medication injection mandates were pending. It reminded me of what a few of us did in a BLUE capital city on a blustery cold April 2020 day protesting along side roughly 500 others. That protest was very early on in plandemic, and about the "essential vs non essential" business coercion going on at that time. The 3 of us KNEW what was really going on, and we said it clearly in the signs we carried in that protest. We said "The END GAME are INJECTION MANDATES" (I for one have NEVER uttered the word V#%%@&E since these injections were never a V). We 3 were the only ones in that crowd with such signs. I firmly believe to this day the WUH FLU was made for the injections and not the other way around. Of course we were all called conspiracists as those like us here were on so many aspects of the great 2020 plandemic
I can't donate right now (STILL out of work thanks to Bidenomics and the HARRIS-Biden administration), but happy to spread the word and to share words of support right here. You are doing God's work, Alex! As Chris Brown said below, GO GET EM!!!
strange times
we are either 3 weeks away from kamala packing the supreme court with 7 mentally handicapped, communist (but i repeat myself) judges of various ethnicities and sexualities to permanently shred our constitution like what happened to the snow mexicans up north in canada
- or -
we are 3 weeks from donald trump letting elon fire any government worker who doesn't retweet his memes and rfk forcing the NIH to research ways to make america healthy again
I am on your side, in your camp, on your team! Go Alex go!!!!
I'm with you all the way, Alex - go get them.
You continue to give me hope, lots and lots of hope! Power on!
Alex, I love your Substack, and I have been a faithful subscriber for the last couple of years. I bought all your covid chapters as you released them on Amazon, and I bought Pandemia. I think Berenson v Biden is a solid case, and I think you should pursue it as hard as you can to the very end. But I only just recently realized one (not so small) detail. Your case is a civil case. Not sure if you mentioned this before and I missed it, but it raised an eyebrow with regards to fund raising for such a case. I believe you to be an honest and earnest reporter and I don't want that opinion of you to ever change. So maybe you can clarify a few questions I have with regards to this fact...
1) Can you explain if there is likely to be a significant difference between what YOUR ideal victory looks like and what a probable victory will look like within the parameters of a civil lawsuit?
2) Will a victory in a civil lawsuit amount to anything more than a financial settlement in your favor, which would more likely than not be sealed (as it was in your Berenson v Twitter case)? Meaning there may or may not be an admission of guilt from them that they wronged YOU, but that victory will likely not mean anything in terms of policy changes or protections being instituted to protect the masses from similar treatment in future because of your lawsuit.
3) IF the result of this lawsuit is a financial settlement in your favor, do you feel it would’ve been ethical to have raised money from your subscribers to win a case that you stand to solely gain financially? IF not, why do you feel it is okay?
4) I believe you had a financial windfall from your Twitter case, don't you believe the dollars won in that case should be fully exhausted in funding your Berenson v Biden case before requesting any donations for your new case? If not, can you explain why? Is that money currently funding your case? If not, can you explain why?
5) If you were to receive a large settlement because of this case, do you intend to reimburse those who donated to fund your legal fees for you to present your case? Possibly even their original donation + a percentage proportional to the amount gained from the lawsuit? If not, why do you feel that would not be the right thing to do?
Hopefully none of my concerns have any validity to them and the questions have quick and reasonable answers, so I hope you will take some time to address them. The last thing I would like to think is you are fund raising for your legal fees from your faithful subscribers so you can financially benefit yourself, because I don't believe that to be ethical. I believe you were wronged by our government, and they should be held accountable. But if your goal is to prove that in court so as to prevent it from happening again to anyone else, I need your help convincing me civil court is the right venue to make that happen. What am I missing?
Excellent
I have asked in the past if I will be paid back from any settlement.
I did not receive an answer.
You have presented a much better set of questions than my one. Hopefully AB won't ignore your questions.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Just donated to your go fund me by the way.
This is OT (Off Topic) but worth paying attention to if you wonder about and/or are concerned about the Covid jab: check out this interview with Dr. Naomi Wolf:
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/dr-naomi-wolf-reveals-shocking-details-in-the-pfizer-papers-2/
The greatest "allowed" CON and CRIME against humanity in the history of time is NEVER off topic.
Thank you
I hope your stubbornness reaps much.
I won't fund the fight, just as I won't share the spoils.
I will fund those that are trying to defeat the censorship cabals.
All to create a few billionaires. What the hell is wrong with these people? By banning you, Twitter made Substack, no doubt. Just bad business all around. Get these bastards and make them pay!
I'm looking forward to the victory celebration!