127 Comments

There’s still no mandate from the government in regards to private employers that I know of. It seems to me they’re attempting to scare and coerce companies into forcing this Pharma garbage on their employees through sheer ignorance alone. Senile Joe gets up and makes a statement before bedtime, in attempt to terrify HR departments across the country into compliance, yet doesn’t follow up with any specific mandated rules. We’ve still heard zero about remote workers in regards to this nonsense, of which there are millions now. How does OSHA reach to a private residence? This is all a gigantic scam and they’re trying to trick these companies into requiring the clot shots on their employees. There is no mandate, just like there is no FDA approved vaccine right now. It’s all lies, and damned lies.

Expand full comment

Agreed, but I have a relative that works for Amtrak and isn't close to retirement and is looking at walking away from 15 years with them. My suggestion to him is below which is to get pre and post blood work per Dr. Ryan Cole in the unfortunate event he is harmed and sue the crap out of them. If you are in the position of leaving your job, why not put a hot across your employer's bow letting them know they are at risk.

Expand full comment

Nothing helps everyone but Medical Freedom Alliance has a goldmine of legislation and exemption templates to help resist the mandates. https://mfany.org/

Expand full comment

Resistance is one thing, but I think it’s time for people to start getting aggressive with these jerks. Especially if you’ve already decided to bail out. Why not fire a shot across the bow and let them know you’re not putting up with this BS. If they fire you so what, you were leaving anyway.

Expand full comment

This is exactly what I have suggested to my friends. Force the employer to sign a liability form for the jab. They all got exceptions instead.

Expand full comment

That's really great to hear! They think everyone will capitulate, but if enough push back, maybe. Anyone reading this don't forget to send these suggestions using your company wide distribution list. In order to help you fellow co workers of course. (as long as you are ready for them to march you out the door or course)

Expand full comment

Why risk serious bodily injury or death? This thing once done, cannot be undone. Fighting this by asking for a religious exemption is a better route. They have to give him one, whether they like it or not.

Expand full comment

I totally agree. I just have some family that thinks they are boxed in and have no choice. Of course the choices they can walk away but they don’t want to do that. Unfortunately, I think they’re going to be hurt badly. The other reason I think this would work it’s just a bluff with your employer. Get them to realize you’re not playing a game and be prepared for them to fire you but sometime down the road I suspect you’ll be able to burn them pretty badly for what they did by firing you. I really think if you show up to a meeting with a slip for an order for blood work and tell them what you’re doing and why, it might freak them out enough to back off. At least worth a try.

Expand full comment

I see your point, and I've suggested something similar myself. Make them sign an admission of liability in the event of an adverse reaction, which of course they'd never do. But that conversation alone might have their legal department reconsidering things. ( Better yet, have an attorney prepare that agreement and hand deliver it.) Then watch how fast they backpedal.

Still think a religious exemption is a better bet all the way around.

Expand full comment

Re: exemptions

United Airlines “accepted” medical and religious exemptions and offered UNPAID leave for those employees who requested the exemptions. That is what the company called “reasonable accommodations”...

Expand full comment

Yes. It's called constructive firing and is most definitely not a reasonable accommodation. I believe there are several lawsuits filed against UA already, and pretty sure more will follow. Yes, the court system is just as corrupt as every other system in our country right now, but even so, the odds of UA losing on this are very good.

Expand full comment

First, the PREP Act defines a covered person to include (i) the United States; (ii) manufacturers and distributors of covered countermeasures; (iii) “program planners”; and (iv) “qualified persons” who prescribe, administer, or dispense covered countermeasures. Program planners include Indian Tribes, state governments, and local governments who supervise programs that dispense, distribute, or administer covered countermeasures, or provide policy guidance, facilities, and scientific advice on the administration or use of such countermeasures. Qualified persons include licensed health professionals and other individuals authorized to prescribe, administer, or dispense covered countermeasures under state law, as well as other categories of persons identified by the Secretary in a PREP Act declaration. Employees and agents of all these persons and entities are also covered persons.

-------

I don't see anywhere that my employer is a 'covered person'. I DO see where I can't sue the government or any of its cronies. Nice.

Expand full comment

Thinking out loud. I wonder how any of that would hold up against fraud? Seems to be leaking out a bit that these pharms did things that they knew were fraudulent. For example, the jabs induce wildly higher titers that diminish rapidly and don't elicit B Cell memory. Why did they dose so high? The titers look like 10-100x higher than someone who has natural immunity titers that fade away much slowing and DO elicit B cell memory. Did they set the dose so high during the truncated trials of 4 months because they knew setting the dose any lower would have made the trial a failure? Would be interesting if they did which would certainly imply fraud.

Expand full comment

These are precisely the kinds of distinctions we all need to make and take into consideration whenever someone tells us something is "required" or otherwise "prohibited". In law -- as you obviously know -- words have meaning. Dishonest people use words of art to trick people into compliance with a rule that doesn't exist. The Constitution is still in full force and effect. Thanks for your clarification.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I forgot about that. I guess if he gets hurt, disabled, or killed. He and/or his heirs are screwed. Sucks

Expand full comment

Much like the eviction moratorium, they know it's illegal but they don't care because by the time the courts make them stop it will be too late.

Expand full comment

Problem is companies are running with these scare tactics! What's a person to do? We put our faith in our legal system yet not one case has found a judge for an injunction?? How can the texas abortion case already have an injunction after the supreme court let it stand?? Unbelievable!!!

Expand full comment

You're incorrect about "not one case found an injunction". There have been numerous wins in the courts, especially when it comes to religious exemptions. It's much too early to give up. The fight's just beginning. What you don't want to do is comply because you feel it's hopeless. Compliance only leads to more tyrannical mandates.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely correct. They are counting on employers to pressure their employees even before any official regulation comes out. One resource for people who don't want to rely on corporate employers is exitgroup.us

Expand full comment

I know how you feel. The regulatory process is a long one, so it would take at least a year for a mandate to be ready for enacting via OSHA...if there ever is a mandate. Apparently lots of companies don't understand this and believe they must comply immediately so they're pressuring employees prematurely. Thanks to the vapid threats from the almighty Biden.

Expand full comment

And it's working. After 43 years with the same company my dad is being forced into early retirement.

Expand full comment

See my comment above. If it makes sense and you are already heading out the door, why not let the rest of the company know how they can get bloodwork before and after the jab in case they need to sue for harm. No one's really pushed back yet and if enough do, it might get their attention. You could also hire an attorney to file suit and serve them at their home which would really piss them off. Time to get aggressive.

Expand full comment

Sad indeed! I've got 34 years!

Expand full comment

Terrible, I’m so sorry to hear this.

Expand full comment

He sent out emails to fellow co-workers around the company (it's statewide) that he's worked with over the years and he says about 15% percent responded that they were doing the same. Be interesting to know what it looks like company wide, especially since it's an "essential business."

Expand full comment

I hope you're right, for those in the private sector.

On behalf of those that work in public/military service, please contact your elected representatives.

One possibility is HR 3860, which prohibits mandatory Covid vaccination for military service members: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3860

Section 716 of the National Defense Authorization Act (which has passed the House, but not the Senate) prohibits dishonorable discharges for those that decline the vaccine. The White House has publicly objected to this amendment:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-opposes-ndaa-banning-dishonorable-discharge-covid-19-vaccine-refusal

Expand full comment

Yes indeed

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

Love that in NY, the governor fired unvaxxed healthcare workers and gave herself emergency powers to order in the national guard… who don’t have to be vaxxed until January…. ?!?!?

Expand full comment

One more sign that this has nothing to do with "health". They'd rather have unvaccinated National Guard soldiers (with no antibodies) in hospitals rather than doctors with natural immunity who have better antibodies than the vaccine can offer.

Expand full comment

Its the same story in CT

Expand full comment

This month will be the biggest as far as the legal battles go. Hearing on Oct 15th! Firefighters taking it to Pritzker… thanks for all the support everyone has shown!

Expand full comment

We can only hope. We need an injunction, BAD!!!!!

Expand full comment

Remember, reservists are part time employees at most, many are not paid at all most of the time. Quite a few are serving out an obligation and wouldn't mind being discharged early. I don't think the Army wants to make that situation too apparent.

Expand full comment

I can attest to that. It sounds self-serving and elitist, but after 28 years of service in the Air Force Reserve, I would submit that the Air Force Reserve is much better run than the Army Reserve components, esp the Guard. And with that said, even in the Air Force Reserve, by the time you do all the required paperwork and jump through all the necessary hoops to get someone out (I know that pain as a former squadron commander for 10 years), it STILL takes sometimes YEARS to get it to go through. I can't even imagine having a flood of folks that you need to administratively discharge for COVID ON TOP of all the normal discharge activity.

(Side comment: I don't know what you mean about "many are not paid at all most of the time"?? I was in both the National Guard (5 years) and the Reserves (23 years) and most of those as an officer and commander. I have NEVER heard of people serving and not getting paid in either component. There are rare instances of getting "points no pay" (the points go towards retirement) but that is the utterly rare case.)

Expand full comment

Where are the lawsuits???? Where are the injunctions?? This is so damned important but all I hear are crickets!! Where are the Republicans?????

Expand full comment

They’re looking for their spines as usual.

Expand full comment

The courts won't do squat. If people don't resist, it's over.

https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/a-message-to-covid-vaxx-proselytizers

Expand full comment

I hope a judge somewhere does!

Expand full comment

Make Americans free again check them out

Expand full comment

https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/the-prep-act-and-covid-19-limiting as to lawsuits, as to Republicans, most are in on the scam, they're as fake as the Democrats.

Expand full comment

Courts are the right had of the state and their purpose is to rubber stamp what the state says. They are part of the illusion to keep the peasants content as they think the courts are there to protect them. There is no system within the system to dismantle the system! There is nobody coming to save us - we all must unite, rise and save ourselves.

Expand full comment

The only way this changes politically is to NOT vote for either D or R's , vote Libertarian. This would send shock waves through the establishment. An instant change in the political landscape in 2024? Both Parties are wings of the same bird...always flies in the same direction!!

Expand full comment

Absolutely so true, convincing the sheep will be the challenge

Expand full comment

Ummm, a lot of us are in no position to launch a suit. Poor people, here, just walking away.

Expand full comment

Yeah really I've been wondering why the Republicans have been so passive

Expand full comment

You can't sue the government without the government's consent. This goes doubly so for the military. Up until very recently, it was impossible for a military dependent (civilian) to sue for medical malpractice for care they received in a military hospital or clinic.

Expand full comment

My sons in the Army , he has been informed he has till Dec 20th to make a choice. It will be a dishonorable discharge at this time. I know there are several lawsuits in play so I’m hoping it doesn’t get there. He refuses and I’m proud of him for his integrity. He also feels he’s fighting for his sons freedoms.

Expand full comment

You should be very proud of him.

Expand full comment

I am

Expand full comment

It will be a general under honorable conditions. That's still a problem because although he'll maintain all of his other benefits, he'll lose his GI bill and education benefits. There's a provision in the House of Reps' National Defense Authorization Act for this year that makes it illegal to discharge anybody for vaccination refusal with anything less than a full honorable discharge, and it's got bipartisan support. I'm hoping that goes through. Even if he gets a general under honorable, if that bill passes, he can file to have his characterization of service changed.

Expand full comment

My son is in the Army and didn't resist. He's an officer and back in the spring they gave him the talk about setting an example. I feel sick about it. My other son works for a lab that consults to DoD and other agencies. He may lose his job

Expand full comment

Breaks my heart that this is where we’re at

Expand full comment

Just FYI and for jollies:

I opened my gmail this afternoon and was encouraged by a banner saying "You haven't opened an email from this sender in over a month: Would you like us to unsubscribe you to Unreported Truths?" No matter that I had opened each one, clicked on the links in many, and all of you know how often these emails show up in your inbox. No matter that in 10 years of use, google has never, ever once offered to unsubscribe me to any of the other junk that shows up in my inbox.

Must just be a new feature. Must just be a coincidence.

Keep up the good work Alex. Clearly you are disturbing someone!

Screenshots available for the skeptical...

Expand full comment

Nice, that happened to me for Newegg. Wonder how much Dr. Evil at that other big firm paid ghoulgull to do that?

Expand full comment

Hey Alex,

Just had an aha moment - well maybe.

There was a video posted the other day about a doctor with the patient and altered test results from pre to post vax that I watched regarding possible changes in immunity post jab.

https://rumble.com/vna7jt-my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someones-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab.html

Since then, I just watched Dr. Cole's rumble from AAPS and he made a great suggestion which is to also do pre/post panels, specifically:

D-dimer

Sedimentation Rate

C Reactive protein HS

Troponin

CDC

CMP

That way you have ample evidence of harm done per their coercion to maintain employment. I know, no one in their right mind that is informed will wan to take the jab, but I know a few folks that feel that it's their only choice for whatever reason.

If you get any symptoms post jab, say something like say micro-clotting, make them (corporations) hurt. It might be even a good way to get them to blink first by telling them beforehand???

Dr. Cole's video where I got the idea:

https://rumble.com/vndh8i-covid-19-points-to-ponder-from-a-pathologists-perspective.html

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing this video! It is so powerful. Unfortunately, Dr Cole had to pack it into such a short time frame.

Expand full comment

I hate when I have typos and can’t fix them. &$&?!!

Expand full comment

The number one cause of death in children <18 is drowning not Covid-19 . Why doesn't President Puppet , mandate everyone to wear a life jacket ? We know the science on this it is proven and it works .

Expand full comment

After reading the Affidavit of Ltc. Theresa Long M.d. in Support of A Motion for a Preliminary Injunction Order, where she recommends that no pilot who was vaccinated should fly due to the microscopic blood clots that could and are causing heart attacks, how can we have any of our militaries take it. The evidence she puts forth is shocking. Do we have to have planes falling out of the sky before we acknowledge these vaccines are deadly and maiming our population? I urge you Alex to read the Affidavit and not come to the same conclusion. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AFFIDAVIT_OF_LTC2_Long.pdf

Expand full comment

They'll have to call in the army to replace the army... Hold on a sec😯

Expand full comment

Like replacing the Taliban with the Taliban...

Expand full comment

Like replacing Joe with a sock puppet. Wait - already been done. Let's go Brandon!

Expand full comment

And the nurses

Expand full comment

Alex, have you seen the military physician LTC Theresa Long’s affidavit for an injunction against mandate—if so, can you verify and comment? Her affidavit and her position is so important. I was a USAF spouse and lived through a little of this with anthrax and GWS. Thanks for all that you do! Can’t wait to see your latest with Rogan. It’s going to be our living room date night this weekend, since we are not allowed in restaurants without papers.

Expand full comment

Folks - go back and read AB's post on substacker Eugyppius and the two predictions. My daily scouring of the data tells me Eugyppius is right, we will have a massive wave of infections this fall/winter among the vaccinated. The Harvard B School story was a lead indicator. I am now picking up signs of this anecdotally. I don't have a huge social/biz circle and I know 3 fully vaxed ppl just now hit w a recent case of covid. If I know 3, there are thousands. This is in a southern state where our late summer viral mini-season just ended. Seasonality now moves north, so watch states like NY, MA, VT and CT very closely. This phenomenon plus the high vax rates (plus the high self-righteous level up north - I'm orig from there and lived there my first 40 yrs so I can say that) are going to cause some serious wrestling with the notion of the vaccine. Some will be obedient drones and line up for a booster, but the vast majority are going to wonder what the hell is up and it's going to through a spanner into the works with employers that mandate.

Expand full comment

Also in the South here. My double-vaxxed parents both got COVID in August and were very sick. I feel certain COVID rates in the winter will be higher than last year, and it's going to be mostly vaxxed folks, and they're going to get very sick, due to the ADE effect. Numbers from UK, which is being way more transparent than US, show 63% of those dying in recent months were fully vaxxed.

Expand full comment

From Michigan, last 3 weeks I know 5 fully vaccinated individuals who now have Covid, 1 is now deceased. COD=Covid-19. 2020, out of the 40+ individuals who had Covid, 1 died, elderly (80), lots of underlying health issues. Vaccinated person that died, average healthy 70 year old. I believe it’s going to get worse.

Expand full comment

I certainly hope you're right about the late wake up call on the vaccine, but isn't the narrative of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" at least in part intended to head that off by blaming those of us who have refused to submit?

Expand full comment

Resist

Expand full comment

I’m in the Army Reserves. We received an urgent request about 2 weeks ago to notify whether or not we planned to get vaccinated or seek an exemption. Make of that what you will, but they are definitely taking it slow and feeling things out.

Expand full comment

Slower* I mean, at least with Reservists.

Expand full comment

I work in software for one of the FANG companies. I asked HR about applying for a religious exemption several weeks ago but only got a boilerplate response.

I scheduled a meeting with HR recently, and the lady’s response was that there is no process for applying for a religious exemption. They’re working on it.

It’s October and very late.

I’m afraid that I’ll be working from home indefinitely, something I do not want to do and something that my colleagues, all vaccinated, will not be doing.

Please write about the software industry if you have any knowledge about it.

Expand full comment

I'm working from home indefinitely. On the plus side, no commute!

Expand full comment

Same situation as you. Not a FANG, but close enough.

I don't particularly want to be remote, either, but I'm grateful I have the option, at least for now. The last update we got about all this was that the Federal gov't had said there's a mandate for large companies, but it's not clear what that means for remote work.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that these lunatics will at least leave me to work remotely, in peace. But, it's hard to rationalize the behavior of lunatics.

Expand full comment

You don’t need to rationalize their behavior because that’s an impossible task. Worry about saying ‘no’ every way you can

Expand full comment

Ask for a religious exemption and a reasonable accommodation, which in all likelihood be you working from home as you have been. And the Federal government has said, indeed, but they have taken no steps to put that mandate into place. the companies are jumping the gun, which is what the Xiden administration wanted in the first place. Can't actually write this mandate, which is why they aren't doing it.

Expand full comment

Better to sit at home with a normal immune system then get blasted with this experimental gene therapy, no?

Expand full comment

alex, any chance you could dig in on what's happening in Japan? I am seeing a lot of people saying they read Japan went with Ivermectin, i do not recall seeing that but naturally no mention is made of it in this story.

whether you can or not let me add to the people saying thabks for what you are doing, i am suffering terribly with post covid recovery and your bastion of sanity on the approach to this is a life raft i need. that is a terrible mixed metaphor, i am sure you get it anyway.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/28/japan-to-end-state-of-emergency-as-covid-cases-plummet

Expand full comment

PLEASE do this Alex…..Japan news is disappeared but you can find it!

Expand full comment