Pfizer told the world 15 people who received the vaccine in its trial had died as of mid-March. Turns out the real number then was 21, compared to only 17 deaths in people who hadn't been vaccinated.
The FDA never protected the public. They protect the pharmaceutical industry and only do what they must to move against the he pharmaceutical industry when the violations are far too egregious to ignore.
That's true. But at least they pretended to protect the public. They no longer even pretend. In 1976 they took the Swine Flu vaccine off the market after 20 unexplained deaths related to the drug. Now they watch 18,000+ deaths and do nothing.
Lest we forget, in 1976 the vaxx makers had no legal immunity for the swine flu vaxx. Because they were looking at financial disaster from death and injury lawsuits, they pulled them from the market and arranged to have it look like the agencies had told them to do so.
Swine flu was a trial run as was aids, zika, ebola and the more recent swine flu. They got their PR campaign wired and all the bills passed and palms greased to make the fear campaign fly this time.
Click on link swine was trial run then when got immunity from any adverse reaction they released this deadly shot to see if it could stop this new lab created Bio- Weapon by U S Government and Chinese communist party. Click on link. NIH Justifies Giving Green Light To Researchers To Boost Viruses Before Flagging Experiments For Gain-Of-Function Review
Took the FDA 5 years to remove Vioxx ,only after up to 60,000 deaths. These ClotShots already have that beat ! It maybe 4 more years before they are pulled!
We'll be well into our next "pandemic" (Marburg? RSV? Ebola?) by then, so the pharmaceutical cartel is assured of a steady revenue stream, no matter what happens with the current poison injections. Covid is probably just a dress rehearsal. From the standpoint of those who created this catastrophe, it's going great. We've already lost almost all of our freedoms, and it seems the vast majority of Americans are just fine with that.
We haven't lost our freedoms we threw them away. We have a chance now to get Fauci for his crimes. We need to stay on our representatives backs about this
Yes, Merck was adept at covering that up long enough to glean some decent profits before the truth got out. Because the internet is more developed now than 20 years ago, hopefully the truth about the covid jabs will penetrate more quickly... and the end result will be gargantuan court cases.
According to Dr. Jessica Rose PhD in computational biology who testified before the FDA's vaccine committee, all VAERS numbers should be multiplied by a factor of 41, which would put the current death toll well over 700,000.
In large populations, 20 or even 18,000 deaths would be acceptable -- IF and it's a big IF -- it could be shown that the vaccine/vaxx actually reduced death or illness caused by the the targeted disease by a greater amount. This is just the traditional risk-reward, cost-benefit calculation. For a relatively mild disease like covid-19, they do claim some harm reduction but it's no big deal in terms of absolute risk reduction. The establishment is strangely silent on the issue of noxious side effects of the vax itself. I suspect this is a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
Other people have thrown around even bigger numbers- up to six figures- than that, depending on how much you believe several agencies have massaged their statistics (the most common example being vaccinated deaths being counted as "unvaccinated" if the shot was within the last two weeks).
Actually and probably before the FDA was funded by the the industry it's supposed to regulate, a woman named Frances Oldham Kelsey, a pharmacologist with the Food & Drug Administration, helped prevent a generation of children born with congenital deformities in the United States by refusing to approve thalidomide. Kelsey rejected the application for thalidomide on the grounds that it lacked sufficient evidence of safety through rigorous clinical trials. You know, just like the "rigorous clinical trials that the mRNA "vaccines" were subjected to. In 1962, President John F. Kennedy honored Kelsey for her work blocking the marketing of thalidomide.
I think at one time they did. The FDA saved Americans from the effects of thalidomide. In Canada, we weren't so lucky. You can thank the late Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey.
Like I said… brought to you by the same people who said opioids were ‘safe and effective.’ How can anyone be surprised by this? It was never about keeping the minions safe. It was about keeping them enslaved. And then there’s the profiteering…
Worse than that, they are free from liability. They can’t be sued for bad “vaccines.” They shouldn’t even be called vaccines. They are therapeutics at best.
The research and technology used to develop them is the same research and technology used to develop bioweapons. Speak truth to power, call them what they really are - bioweapons, used to cull the population. https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/the-criminals-and-their-crimes
Watch Tucker Carlson's Nov. 15th interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on Fox Nation. Kennedy blows the lid off of ALL vaccines since the mid-eighties: NONE have been properly tested for safety, yet we've been injecting them into our children for 40 years. Every one of these FDA and Big Pharma folks who are in on this should HANG.
I just got off the phone with my friend Mary Ellen in Lake Placid (Adirondacks), upstate New York. She told me tgat:
1) Her 75 y.o. boyfriend had a "breakthrough" infection (fever and coughing) and was jabbed with Moderna x 2 shots. Lake Placid, NY, doctor gave him monoclonal antibodies and within12 hours his symptoms cleared up.
2) Her 28 y.o. daughter and boyfriend had a "breakthrough" infection (daughter - fever, earache, exhaustion, ringing in both ears, and cannot hear out of one ear for the past 7 days.) Both daughter and boyfriend were jabbed with Moderna x 2 shots (vaxed about 3-4 months ago).
Mary Ellen is begging me to get vaccinated. I said, "No, no way. Not for me."
I don't think the pharmaceutical companies, or even most doctors, realize what they've done to their reputations. Can we ever trust them again? Probably not.
Most MDs don't stray much from their specialty, so most don't know much about the vaccine other than what handouts they get from salesmen, etc. I doubt that most have ever looked at the VAERS or realize there can be serious side effects. I've confronted one doctor I know about the deaths in the VAERS and her response is that "we can't know that it was the vaccine that killed them". Feels like head in the sand. Granted that vaccines are not her area of specialty, but she doesn't seem to realize that NO ONE AT THE FDA or CDC is looking at what is causing the deaths or seems to even care.
I'm sorry, but if all of us on this substack without medical degrees can take the time to learn the truth about these experimental clot shots and do the research, then there is absolutely no excuse for anyone who makes a living in the healthcare industry.
For real. I have Fine Arts degree! But I found my way here because what I was seeing with my own eyes did not match -- AT ALL -- what I was reading in the news, and certainly didn't correspond to the public health policies. I have spent more time researching the data than on my graduate degree at this point...And I'm grateful for that!
Yes! What sparked my attention was refusal to acknowledge natural immunity. Also seeing Alex in Tucker looking more and more exhausted while dishing out more and more information!!!! God Bless him and his wife for supporting him!!
I agree. There are only a very small handful of people that I know who are educated on what’s going on besides myself. Maybe 5 out of 100. Maybe. The rest absolutely DO NOT CARE. And they are all vaxxed and happy to be. The ones who have had injuries do not see the correlation either.
On another service today, a prior "opponent" renewed an old thread, denying my insinuation that he was a brainwashed CNN viewer; in fact, he asserted he avoided the MSM and read lots of books. Even so, he trotted out the "fact" that 95% of MDs are vaxxed. 🤣 I pointed out to him that such a claim was likely propaganda, as ls most of what the MSM spews. I also mentioned that, while allowing that we right-wingers do have our share of lunatic claims, it didn't take much more than average intelligence to see that most of the MSM's claims simply don't add up.
Well yes and no. As already alluded to just above, any MD or other health care worker who does take a stand incurs a high risk of no longer making a living in the healthcare industry. Goodbye career, income. Hello unpayable and non-dischargeable student loans.
Sure I get it they risk their careers and livelihoods but so do the rest of us that refuse to be jabbed. Despite the financial hardship, is there any excuse for knowingly or unknowingly participating in crimes against humanity? I don’t think so.
Everyone I know in the medical profession (including close family) took these shots with great enthusiasm. They had no doubts and saw no need to question the shots' safety. They got jabbed before the mandates, so not one of them was in fear of losing their jobs. A plastic surgeon friend told me he felt like he had "super powers" after his jab.
He has since changed his mind. Why? He was shocked when the shot was pushed on his pregnant daughter, while at the same time he cannot give his pregnant patients Latisse, or botox or fillers.
True. And they may be busy like everyone else and going through this much information takes time. Plus if they become informed and go against the narrative, they will likely be punished by their hospitals, medical groups, etc. So they choose the ignorance is bliss approach and keep their heads down. We have arrived at a sad and frightening place today in medicine.
That is exactly it. They could do the research but what is the point if they aren't willing to see the truth or to act on it? Going against the vaccine orthodoxy means almost certain loss of job and career. It is a rare doctor who has gone through all it takes to become a doctor who is willing to flush it down the toilet - and put their family at risk - by standing up the vaccine Nazis.
It is true that the VAERS database is not a record of causation. It is only a compilation of reports of events after vaccination. It is clear, however, that the
CDC/FDA/NIH push for vaccination when they admit they don't know whether the events reported were caused by vaccination is grossly negligent.
Most MDs don't know much about anything, including their "specialty."
Conventional western medicine is one enormous fraud, yet they've convinced most of the world that they're superheroes. The sooner the entire system crashes and burns, the better for all of life on earth, including human beings.
I think what's happened in the last 18 months has just opened people's eyes to what's been going on for a while. I've been a medical skeptic for a long time, at least back to my late 20's and I'm 65 now. I know there are good people out there but buyer beware is my modus operendi.
And expensive, far beyond the reach of any but the most wealthy people. $2000 for a first visit, then hundreds of dollars for every subsequent visit. Who can afford that?
I do not trust physicians. Never fully did. All I look for is staff, doctors and patients in masks in the doctors office. If they are wearing masks then I consider it a clown show 🤡
Here in Pennsylvania. I don’t go for appts But have family that I take. So far 100% clown show. My medical plan going forward is… stay healthy. And NO hospitals 😱
As the doctor where I go said, I don't go often because doctors can kill you. Yes he said exactly that. A doctor who knows what is going on. That is why he sees me once every 10 years.
My son, who is an adult now, couldn't walk for 2 days after his MMR. Those few days of a high energy little guy being so lethargic still sends me on a guilt trip when I think of it.
80 kids died and several hundreds were harmed from the measles vaccine. None died from measles. Have not been able to find out how many kids died from measles before the vaccine. I had measles. All in our school had measles and I never heard of anyone dying from it.
Measles deaths had declined by 95 percent in the U.S. before the measles vax was ever introduced. Measles had never been a threat to healthy, well-nourished children. It was always only a threat to immunocompromised and undernourished kids. There's no better cure for hunger than food.
I had already fallen out of love with many doctors before this, so many are useless, have no interest in determining what causes your ailments, just love writing prescriptions or jabbing you. BUT not all, I must make that clear.
DOs (Doctors of Osteopathy) used to be trained to find the root cause of a disease. Listening to a podcast with a DO today, she said that she was actually discouraged from finding the root cause, and told point blank that if people got better, doctors' business would decline.
This. I'm in Canada so I was already dealing with a horrid health system (waited 13 months for a spine surgery, which failed). I'm not going in to see any of my neurosurgeons now, all they want to do is cut me open or inject me with more anti-inflammatories. Protect your spines, friends; I wish I knew how bad my back was going to get by age 27, it's been a struggle ever since.
Never get surgery on your back unless it is literally life or death. Back surgery almost never alleviates the pain. Noninvasive treatment can do more to help in 99% of cases.
Never did. They had an extremely aggressive promotional campaign for the flu shot too which doesn't work either as a well known article in The Atlantic, before it became a pharma cheerleader, showed. Prominent critic Tom Jefferson was isolated and ostracized in the medical/scientific community much as covid vaccine dissenters are today. The flu shot sales campaign boosted participation greatly but that was kid's stuff comparatively. Now they have governments mandating it for them and it's no more effective or safe - less so.
Falsifying data like this got Volkswagen into big time trouble on their Diesel engine emissions issue and they didn't even directly kill anyone. 4 or 5 of them are on trial for Fraud. These clowns need harsher treatment than that.
The same lawyer that tried the VW case and proved fraud against Dutsche Bank, Reiner Fuellmich, is pursuing the C19 frauds as well. He's no dummy. I know as of recently he was looking for evidence of mass manufacturing the glass vials and packaging for the jabs well before they would have had the need to order them. Interesting.
There is another webpage though it seems scrubbed, from World Integrated Trade Systems showing purchases of Covid 19 tests in 2018. Snopes has an alleged debunk ("oh, silly, that's not what 'they' meant!") but the screenshot is for real.
Just my (somewhat educated) opinion but I think there are a few countries that knew well in advance what was happening, planned for it and started production. The usual suspects: China, USA, France, also Canada. Spartacus letter says that the same people that made the virus made the vaxxes. I believe that to be true.
And they’re trying desperately to prop up the natural origins theory so they can sweep this under the rug & keep pursuing massive grants & dual use (biowarfare) research. Their cover is that this work is protecting the public from wacky bat viruses that humans could stupidly contract by going in the wild & disrupting the natural order.
This (probably) isn't quite the smoking gun many think it is. SARS and MERS and probably more were being intensively researched well before COVID, dating back to about 2003. This included vaccine research, of course. It is quite possible, and in fact likely in my opinion, that the COVID-19 pandemic was started by the escape of a virus from a research facility. Of course there is secret research, but there was enough academic research including the infamous "gain of function" with the SARS viruses to make one soil oneself. 😟 Natural origin is unlikely. Could have been a deliberate release, an act of biological warfare, but these are less probable than a simple accident. None of the above rules out more sinister plans (e.g. WEF, great reset, etc.) Whether this was all planned in advance or mere opportunism I leave for others to hash out.
Doubtful if we ever will learn the truth. But a lot of strange coincidences make you wonder. Some conspiracy theories later turned out right. The truth is usually the simplest. In this case I think a lab escape is just that.
prior big pharma lawsuits for fraudulent marketing, note the company names:
• in 2009 “Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing” plus an additional $14.5 million in 2011 to resolve False Claims Act allegations related to its marketing of the drug Detrol;
• “Pfizer Settles a Drug Marketing Case for $491 Million” in 2013;
• Janssen subsidiary of “Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations” in 2013 (a decade after it perpetrated these acts;
• “Pharmaceutical Giant AstraZeneca to Pay $520 Million for Off-label Drug Marketing” in 2010.
Moderna hasn't been around long enough to get caught. Give them time;)
Checking crystal ball..."It's actually a good sign that we're seeing a spike in kids having cardiac issues. It means more kids are returning to vigorous lifestyles!"
This is vaccine “science”. And people still continue to take their children to vaccine visits and pediatricians. This kind of false reporting didn’t begin w Covid injections. 🤦🏻♀️
So true- all vaccinations do this -the trusting and marketing- not as egregious as this or as coercive- they were happy with millions now it has to be billions
Every once in a while, I like to remind everyone I know who is still speaking to me: EVEN IF this was a real pandemic (which it is not); and EVEN IF it killed half the world population (which is will not) rather than the more likely 0.0001%; no theft of liberty will reduce deaths. TYRANNY ALWAYS RESULTS IN MORE INNOCENT DEATHS - ON A SPECTACULAR SCALE - THAN LIBERTY.
You have to factor in how the drug companies "tested" their """vaccines""". As an engineer who has tested thousands of semiconductor parts, and taken billions of points of data in those tests, what was done is not a test.
For a proper test of any vaccine for a respiratory illness, you would have to ensure that the vaccine and placebo recipients were actually fully exposed to the virus. This would mean infected people coughing right in their faces. Yes I mean that literally. When you're dealing with a virus that has a 99.74% (The CDC's estimate late last year.) to 99.9% (The estimate from researchers counting people who had immunity from prior infections to Corona or relatives of Corona.) OVERALL survival rate, you cannot "test" by just seeing how many people get Corona later on by going about their normal lives.
It gets worse when you look at the study groups and see that in the 2 largest out of 4 total groups, all the highest risk people were excluded. In one of the other two, some of the highest risk people were excluded. So now among your test subjects you have a survival rate of 99.9+%, and over half will not even show symptoms when they get infected either. Unless you're using study groups of a few million people, you can NEVER properly test the efficacy of any vaccine when the survival rate is so high, and you're not even ensuring people are directly and fully exposed to that thing which you claims you're immunizing against.
I recall reading that direct viral challenge is considered unethical. That's certainly possible, but I fail to understand why, if volunteers were fully informed of the risks. Apparently there are no ethical problems at all in distributing worldwide products that had at best summary testing, little proof of actual efficacy and virtually no proof of even short-term safety, much less long term. And now we are at the (almost) ultimate level of lunacy, increasingly imposing it by mandate, to include small children, who are at near-zero risk of the disease. The jabs don't even reduce the spread of the disease! It really makes me (and a lot of other folks) wonder if there is some evil agenda afoot; this certainly doesn't have any plausible claim to "public health" that I can understand.
For the reason you mention I am tempted to believe a conspiracy now. Too many coincidences. Too much pressure. The government instead of turning course intensifies the measures taken under Trump. Now I am rethinkingsome of his actions. His defending hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin
Assuring people the virus wad not so bad. Trying to stop who to interfere. Things might have been different if he had been able to do that. Remove faux and gates from the equation.
I stumbled upon articles about this just yesterday. Early on some experts may have supported using human infection challenge studies to more expeditiously get data up front but using far fewer subjects. I actually didn't realize they have done this type of research as much as they have over the past several decades even and for a variety of infectious diseases and not just testing vaccines. One of the ethical considerations is that any pathogen being introduced generally should be self-limiting, have either no or minimal chance for lasting negative effects or have an effective treatment to minimize risk to the participants. With so many unknowns in the beginning maybe they decided it was too risky? But to play devil's advocate, on the other hand, doing this type of research up front would have required that they admit either: 1) that COVID is not as dangerous as they were saying; 2) that they were willing to possibly sacrifice some unknown number of participants for the greater good; or 3) that some effective treatments were available early on, all would have possibly interfered with the way it seems they wanted things to play out?
Also to Chris' point, over the past months in reviewing SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccine development research, the sentiment has been this:
“Human vaccine effectiveness studies will only be possible in the context of SARS
re-emergence.”
Which as far as I have been able to tell have not been possible because large outbreaks have not occurred for SARS since 2003 and hardly at all for MERS since 2012. Also they must have deemed it unethical to use human infection challenge for any of the very few human clinical trials involving these vaccine candidates.
It just raised even more concerns about motives, like if they entertained the idea of human infection challenge with SARS-CoV-2, what's to stop them from foregoing the small scale and just adapt it to billions of people so they can have their highly lucrative data for "the greater good". They knew they would get their precious challenge data naturally and not have to wait for "re-emergence" because THIS iteration of SARS is far more transmissible and widespread. It could be viewed as taking leaps forward in the coronavirus vaccine body of research since they could overcome that hurdle (Just like Fauci arguing the need for gain-of-function research even if it could result in a pandemic). Very rewarding ends justifying the means to so many pulling these strings. I can't (un)see how these things weren't factored into their plan.
When re-finding articles for my citations, I discovered that in fact they have decided to move forward with human infection challenge studies for COVID as of Feb. 2021 (see citation below).
Thank you for pointing this out. I have been wondering how they could test people without being exposed. If you live secluded like myself, you probably won't come in contact with anyone who is sick during the test period. I remember Boris Johnson saying the same thing in a very clumsy way (He asked volunteers to get infected to see how they would do). I also remember very early on, that a football coach said, let us infect all the boys and get it over with. At the time I was still scared and thought he was crazy. Now I think he was right. If the healthy people all had been infected early on, taken a regular med like Aspirin or Ivermectin, we all would be immune and the virus would be long gone.
Isn't it also a concern that the study was carried out while much of world was in lockdown, which would have reduced exposure of study subjects? Note that this isn't necessarily bad for Pfizer...maybe if more had been exposed we would have seen a clearer gain from vaccination.
Data shows very, very conclusively that lockdowns completely failed to stop spread, so no. Unless Pfizer's test subjects were in some sort of total isolation with everything coming in and out sterilized, they were just like everyone else locked down or not locked down. Which still means they may not have been exposed, and which still means the healthy people among them could have had immune systems so bulletproof that Corona was DOA within minutes of arrival in their airways. Others could have just gotten a small amount of virus such that their immune systems had more warning.
So again, with such a high survival rate and such minor effects in so many healthy people, no way in hell you are able to accurately judge efficacy without presenting a fairly known viral load directly to your test subjects, and your test subjects number in the millions.
I think the Gestapo’s raid on Project Veritas more likely caused by PV digging into Pzifer. Whistleblowers we’re bringing the clot shot shenanigans into the spotlight.
The Biden diary was simply an excuse and redirection; nobody serious cares about it. Biden himself is only a vehicle for Obama’s third term
I don't see how Pfizer and Moderna, at a minimum, won't be indicted and hopefully put out of business on criminal fraud charges. Immunity for injuries, sure, but they have committed fraud which is a different ball of wax.
You would think that a safe & effective vaccine - designed to protect you from severe disease and death from a deadly pandemic - would result in lower all cause mortality in the treatment group vs placebo. But you would be wrong. "More deaths in the treatment group vs placebo just tells you the vaccine is working!" Science!!
21-to-17; more deaths in treatment vs placebo. That just screams "safe & effective" to me.
Beware of products that get propagated so often. Never buy anything that is on TV every five minutes. If it were that good, it would not need this propaganda.
The scariest part is that this was just the first few months after people got the vaccine. During that time, it does seem that there is some protection against Covid, based on overall population data. But then the vaccine effectiveness against infection, illness and death falls off dramatically. But are you left at that point with the same healthy body you would have had if you never got the vaccine? Or did the vaccine alter your immune system forever so that you have a higher likelihood of getting cancer, heart disease, etc.? Those are trials we can never do because they destroyed the control group. So instead we are just going to roll the dice with 300 million American lives and see what happens in 10 years? Did I wake up in The Twilight Zone?
We can still get these numbers. Kaiser has them. So does the VA. So does medicare. We just need brave people from within these orgs to give us the Vaccine Pentagon Papers 2021. Tough spot for the people inside these places though. Would require incredible bravery, given the level of ... coercion happening right now.
My understanding is that these trials were not actually conducted with a true placebo (saline) but with against another vaccine that has, and does still, cause injury and death. Talk about stacking the deck. But the greatest atrocity is running a global **and now mandatory** genetic experiment on such a trivial number of people and in such a short time span. Face-palm.
Welcome to the land of truth. ALL vaccines are tested against another vaccine or the aluminum adjuvant, which causes as many problems as the vaccines themselves. Truth!
I would be interested if this information were documented anywhere in the clinical trial. Trying to convince my healthy significant other not to get another damn booster.
It is true that the clinical trials of other vaccines have not used true placebo for their control group. Most often they have compared the experimental vaccine to that vaccine's adjuvant, which is the most dangerous ingredient in most vaccines. That's how they have hidden the dangers of other vaccines (along with running very short trials - e.g. the trial for Hep B lasted a grand total of 5 days!). However, before the Covid-19 vax trials, the ICAN organization successfully put pressure on the FDA to force the agency to run the treatment arm against saline. So, in that one respect, the Covid vax trials were actually more honest, although everything else about them, apparently, was equally or more dishonest. I wrote about that here:
Darby is right except she forgets to mention that whilst using a non-saline placebo in trials is indeed fraudulent it actually doesn't help to use a saline placebo.
When you use a saline placebo then you get what is called "crusader bias". If I get an injection in the trial it's critical that I don't know if I've received the vaccine or the placebo. This is especially so because as a voluntary participant in a vaccine trial there's a 100% chance I'm a pro-vaccine zealot who desperately wants the vaccine to succeed.
If I can make an educated guess that I received the vaccine rather than placebo then I can, and will, manipulate the results in favor of the vaccine.
If the placebo is pure saline and I get a non-trivial reaction to my injection then I will be pretty sure that I got the vaccine. From there I can manipulate the results by avoiding covid tests and pretending I didn't get covid symptoms and downplaying the reaction that I did get.
So I can, and will, manipulate the data to make it look like the vaccine is safe and effective.
You can't use controlled trials to prove vaccine safety. There's no valid ways to get non-biased data - proper placebo or dangerous placebo.
You have to use "stress testing". Give someone a massive dose and see if there are any reactions.
I saw a doc that said the placebo for the Papilloma (Gardasil) was the same basis as the vaccine one, apart from the vaccine element itself. But that basis was already very bad, so the kids in the control group got sick, too. Then Gardasil was deemed good enough. It causes all kinds of injuries and according to the testimony of a girl, does not protect against the disease either. She had it.
Oversold? Cervical cancer rates haven't fallen in the slightest since its introduction. In Australia, before the vaccine there was a significant fall in cervical cancer but this trend actually stopped after the vaccine (and rates are slightly higher now than before the vaccine). It's a similar story in the US and UK.
When the vaccine was first introduced, I remember reading that there five different strains of cervical cancer, and that the HPV vaccine only protected against two of those five strains. Some scientists were concerned at the time that the vaccine would actually just strengthen the virus, in much the same way that the Covid-19 vaccines are doing. It sounds like that is in fact what happened.
Correct Ingrid. Actually there were three cohorts. Vaccine, aluminum containing controls and saline controls.
The vaccine and Al cohorts were around the same size (10,000 each from memory) but the saline cohort was much smaller (around 1000).
For the non-severe/systemic reactions they separated the three groups and it was clear that the rate of reactions was exactly what you would expect - not many in the saline, and quite a few in the other two cohorts. On this basis it would be clear that the vaccine was not safe.
But for the severe/systemic reactions they added the Al cohort and the saline cohorts together. As the Al cohort was much larger, it was essentially just the Al cohort alone. Because the rate of reactions of the Al/saline cohort was only a little less than the vaccine cohort it was deemed that the vaccine was perfectly safe.
Such amazing science. Obviously rigged but if anybody says "they didn't use a proper saline control" Merck could say "oh yes we did! It says so right there".
This is all vaccine science. Zero to do with truth and everything to do with what you can get away with.
Go back all the way to the smallpox vaccine. This "highly scientific" experiment involved injecting one poor kid with the concoction and observing if he got smallpox upon exposure. Never mind the fact that all throughout history, millions of unvaccinated doctors had treated smallpox patients without succumbing themselves.
It was from this "highly scientific" experiment that the age of vaccination was born.
Every single vaccine experiment since then has been rigged as much as possible. Amazingly, many vaccines still get rejected - just think how dangerous they would have to be not to pass FDA approval (anything less than 99 per cent fatalities in the vaccine arm is probably enough to pass).
After the "highly scientific" polio trials were deemed successful, thousands of people got paralysis after the shots. This was all blamed on one lonely laboratory (Cutter) even though they were part of the trials. The vaccine was horrific. It was only because doctors stopped diagnosing polio and instead diagnosed things like aseptic meningitis, Guillain Barre, transverse myelitis etc in those who had had their polio shots did it suddenly look as though the vaccine "worked". In fact, paralysis rates today are vastly higher than in 1950.
No different to Gardasil. Cervical cancer rates have not fallen since the vaccine.
Similarly, in the 40 years since the Hep B vaccine, liver cancer rates have not fallen either. Indeed, they have skyrocketed. An abject failure.
Remember how we were told that we had to get our daughters their rubella vaccine (made from aborted fetuses of course) to stop them giving birth to babies with congenital defects? Well guess what has happened to rates of congenital defects since the rubella vaccine? And remember, this is coinciding with an increase in selective abortions. Congenital defect rates have actually risen since the rubella vaccine. The vaccine (and selective abortions it would seem) are an abject failure (and that's before you even talk about the morality of either of them).
Remember how mumps was the cause of sterility in men so we had to vaccinate for it? I suspect you all know what has happened to rates of sterility in the past few decades.
Invasive disease rates (pneumonia, meningitis, sepsis) since the various meningitis vaccines (Hib/Prevena)? Yes they've increased too. Of course they have.
Two years ago I needed a tetanus vaccine booster, just about the only vaccine I'm still willing to receive. I wanted ONLY the TD version, not the TDAP, which has a high rate of side effects. It took me until this past July to find a location willing and able to give me the TD version. Even Walgreens insisted I get a prescription for it (which fortunately my naturapath was willing to write), and even then was willing to administer it only because it had been required by an active military member who needed it because of allergies to the TDAP. Apparently it can only be ordered in batch of 10 vials, and is VERY expensive. Advocating for your own health is just so ridiculously difficult!
That's actually a very good point. Since I'm a born skeptic and don't trust anyone you mention, I did my own research. According to the data I could find, efficacy lasts somewhere between about 12-20 years. Since I spend a good portion of my life working outside, with lots of contact with soil and sharp tools which can harbor the pathogen, I decided to take the cautious approach and get the booster after 10 years, which ended up being 12 years after all the hassle. I'm well into Medicare age, so I decided this would be my last of these jabs. Don't imagine I'll be at much risk after another decade.
Thank you ! I had no idea of the immense damage. I just ordered a book, Dissolving Illusions, by Suzanne Humphries, about vaccines. Now I am even more eager to start reading !
You may also appreciate “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies-400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers” by Neil Z Miller. Released in 2016, covers various ingredients plus specific vaccines like HPV, measles, polio, etc, including a chapter on conflicts of interest, false studies and industry control.
It is an excellent book, with abundant data and charts, and Dr Humphries paid a price for bringing forth the information. She also has a Telegraph channel worth checking out.
This is only the few willing to testify. God knows how many others have died, have been harmed, have committed suicide, have got the disease even though vaxxed.
The thing that I noticed was that the *only* person to die of Covid pneumonia was in the vaccinated group. The two that died in the placebo group of Covid just died of generic Covid. So how does Covid kill if not from pneumonia? Anyone else wonder this? Or did they die of something else but tested positive and Pfizer counted them like our Smart People do now just to get approval.
Dr. McCullough and colleagues realized that there are three major phases to COVID-19. It starts with virus replication, which then triggers inflammation, or a cytokine storm. This, in turn, leads to blood clotting. If enough micro blood clots form in the lungs, a person can’t get enough oxygen and dies. It’s a complex process, and no single drug is going to work to treat it, which is why McCullough uses a combination of drugs, as is done to treat HIV, staph and other infections.
We will never know the true death toll. All they care about is that the bodies keep piling up.
Hospitals are now counting anyone who isn’t “fully vaccinated” meaning w two shots or now it’s two shots and a booster, as unvaccinated. Anyone w a positive RT PCR test (bogus overinflated cycle thresholds) is also Covid, regardless of what the actual cause of death is. 🙄
If this doesn't get the "health" authorities to pull back on this insanity, nothing will short of a revolution. And that's where we're going if someone in gov't doesn't pull their head out of their a$$ and change course.
Unfortunately, that’s exactly what they want. You don’t think there are thousands of loyal boot-licking sycophant officers and soldiers just ready to crack some “insurrectionists” skulls? If the shooting starts, be ready for life to never be the same in America.
I blame the media and government who TO THIS DAY continue to parrot the phrase "safe and effective". Imagine telling people before they accepted the jab 'From November to March, 15 (21) people in the clinical trial who received the vaccine died, compared to 14 (17) people who did not receive the vaccine'. How many would have rushed in?
Time was when the FDA protected the public from bad drugs. Now the FDA protects bad drug makers from the public.
The FDA never protected the public. They protect the pharmaceutical industry and only do what they must to move against the he pharmaceutical industry when the violations are far too egregious to ignore.
That's true. But at least they pretended to protect the public. They no longer even pretend. In 1976 they took the Swine Flu vaccine off the market after 20 unexplained deaths related to the drug. Now they watch 18,000+ deaths and do nothing.
Lest we forget, in 1976 the vaxx makers had no legal immunity for the swine flu vaxx. Because they were looking at financial disaster from death and injury lawsuits, they pulled them from the market and arranged to have it look like the agencies had told them to do so.
What changed? It is nothing short of mind-blowing to compare the far more cautious swine flu vaccine response to this one.
Swine flu was a trial run as was aids, zika, ebola and the more recent swine flu. They got their PR campaign wired and all the bills passed and palms greased to make the fear campaign fly this time.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/vaccines-or-bioweapons-part-3
With Tony Fauci at the head of most of them.
Click on link swine was trial run then when got immunity from any adverse reaction they released this deadly shot to see if it could stop this new lab created Bio- Weapon by U S Government and Chinese communist party. Click on link. NIH Justifies Giving Green Light To Researchers To Boost Viruses Before Flagging Experiments For Gain-Of-Function Review
Remember the MMR vax courts? Only a few years back large settlements were passed out rather easily. The FDA twisted some numbers, court closed. Hacks
Took the FDA 5 years to remove Vioxx ,only after up to 60,000 deaths. These ClotShots already have that beat ! It maybe 4 more years before they are pulled!
We'll be well into our next "pandemic" (Marburg? RSV? Ebola?) by then, so the pharmaceutical cartel is assured of a steady revenue stream, no matter what happens with the current poison injections. Covid is probably just a dress rehearsal. From the standpoint of those who created this catastrophe, it's going great. We've already lost almost all of our freedoms, and it seems the vast majority of Americans are just fine with that.
We haven't lost our freedoms we threw them away. We have a chance now to get Fauci for his crimes. We need to stay on our representatives backs about this
Yes, Merck was adept at covering that up long enough to glean some decent profits before the truth got out. Because the internet is more developed now than 20 years ago, hopefully the truth about the covid jabs will penetrate more quickly... and the end result will be gargantuan court cases.
I believe the C19 vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability.
Not happening they got full immunity from congress before release of death shot.
Click on link. NIH Justifies Giving Green Light To Researchers To Boost Viruses Before Flagging Experiments For Gain-Of-Function Review
True as reported by 60 Minutes, when the press was kind of on our side.
That’s just what’s reported on VAERS, about 1% of what’s really occurring. Try 50-60k deaths and nearly a million adverse events.
According to Dr. Jessica Rose PhD in computational biology who testified before the FDA's vaccine committee, all VAERS numbers should be multiplied by a factor of 41, which would put the current death toll well over 700,000.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/death-by-covid-jabs-update-12
In large populations, 20 or even 18,000 deaths would be acceptable -- IF and it's a big IF -- it could be shown that the vaccine/vaxx actually reduced death or illness caused by the the targeted disease by a greater amount. This is just the traditional risk-reward, cost-benefit calculation. For a relatively mild disease like covid-19, they do claim some harm reduction but it's no big deal in terms of absolute risk reduction. The establishment is strangely silent on the issue of noxious side effects of the vax itself. I suspect this is a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
Not of nature. Click on link. NIH Justifies Giving Green Light To Researchers To Boost Viruses Before Flagging Experiments For Gain-Of-Function Review
Exactly
Stunning. In my 50s and only now realizing approved by the FDA is actually more of a peril in some cases than the statement "not approved by the FDA."
I'm also will to bet the FDA itself has a low vax rate among its staff. Any takers? I say 60/40.
Dollars - probably only when pressured by the media. That ain't happening anymore.
Agreed. The media is a wholly owned subsidiary of pharmaceutical and the government now.
Advertising dollars.
It's worse than that. Even the journalism schools are owned by the same powers that own the government and the media.
any good source of the 18k or you have to really parse thru data to find that? Don't doubt you but that's big info.
The Medicare database alone has over 46k by itself that attorney Thomas Renz filed a lawsuit over. Whistleblower came forward.
Probably talking about VAERS
Other people have thrown around even bigger numbers- up to six figures- than that, depending on how much you believe several agencies have massaged their statistics (the most common example being vaccinated deaths being counted as "unvaccinated" if the shot was within the last two weeks).
Use Open VAERS, Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Paul Alexander, Dr Risch, et al. All the ones being heavily censored.
https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Thank you for link. My anger & anxiety just picked up a notch. Why the hell isn't this info next to CNN death watch? I know, but dam.
Needless deaths will irk me every time.
What’s 18000 deaths when there are billions of dollars to be made? Got to get the priorities straight!
Actually and probably before the FDA was funded by the the industry it's supposed to regulate, a woman named Frances Oldham Kelsey, a pharmacologist with the Food & Drug Administration, helped prevent a generation of children born with congenital deformities in the United States by refusing to approve thalidomide. Kelsey rejected the application for thalidomide on the grounds that it lacked sufficient evidence of safety through rigorous clinical trials. You know, just like the "rigorous clinical trials that the mRNA "vaccines" were subjected to. In 1962, President John F. Kennedy honored Kelsey for her work blocking the marketing of thalidomide.
I think at one time they did. The FDA saved Americans from the effects of thalidomide. In Canada, we weren't so lucky. You can thank the late Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey.
Click on link. NIH Justifies Giving Green Light To Researchers To Boost Viruses Before Flagging Experiments For Gain-Of-Function Review
You give them way too much credit! They're not doing what you say they do right now, are they?
Take away the legal immunity granted to the vaxx makers and watch this house of card come falling down overnight.
Just like they’ll never vote on term limits, they’ll never end the cash flow to their pockets.
That will never happen. Congress works for Big Pharma not We the People.
Change is coming. I can feel it. It may not be pretty.
Like I said… brought to you by the same people who said opioids were ‘safe and effective.’ How can anyone be surprised by this? It was never about keeping the minions safe. It was about keeping them enslaved. And then there’s the profiteering…
So the opioid epidemic was phase 1
No. More like phase 11 or 12
Worse than that, they are free from liability. They can’t be sued for bad “vaccines.” They shouldn’t even be called vaccines. They are therapeutics at best.
The research and technology used to develop them is the same research and technology used to develop bioweapons. Speak truth to power, call them what they really are - bioweapons, used to cull the population. https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/the-criminals-and-their-crimes
Watch Tucker Carlson's Nov. 15th interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on Fox Nation. Kennedy blows the lid off of ALL vaccines since the mid-eighties: NONE have been properly tested for safety, yet we've been injecting them into our children for 40 years. Every one of these FDA and Big Pharma folks who are in on this should HANG.
The "Vax" is so effective......8 DEAD
https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/coronavirus/8-dead-dozens-infected-with-covid-19-due-to-outbreak-at-connecticut-nursing-home/2652161/
87 of 89 infections were FULLY "Vaxxed"
I just got off the phone with my friend Mary Ellen in Lake Placid (Adirondacks), upstate New York. She told me tgat:
1) Her 75 y.o. boyfriend had a "breakthrough" infection (fever and coughing) and was jabbed with Moderna x 2 shots. Lake Placid, NY, doctor gave him monoclonal antibodies and within12 hours his symptoms cleared up.
2) Her 28 y.o. daughter and boyfriend had a "breakthrough" infection (daughter - fever, earache, exhaustion, ringing in both ears, and cannot hear out of one ear for the past 7 days.) Both daughter and boyfriend were jabbed with Moderna x 2 shots (vaxed about 3-4 months ago).
Mary Ellen is begging me to get vaccinated. I said, "No, no way. Not for me."
Beautifully put😊
Right on!
ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY
The Revolving Door Club and We ain't in it.
It’s similar to the Military Industrial Complex where DOD bureaucrats end up working for weapons manufacturers.
And executed.
I don't think the pharmaceutical companies, or even most doctors, realize what they've done to their reputations. Can we ever trust them again? Probably not.
I seriously dread needing medical care for anything now.
Most MDs don't stray much from their specialty, so most don't know much about the vaccine other than what handouts they get from salesmen, etc. I doubt that most have ever looked at the VAERS or realize there can be serious side effects. I've confronted one doctor I know about the deaths in the VAERS and her response is that "we can't know that it was the vaccine that killed them". Feels like head in the sand. Granted that vaccines are not her area of specialty, but she doesn't seem to realize that NO ONE AT THE FDA or CDC is looking at what is causing the deaths or seems to even care.
I'm sorry, but if all of us on this substack without medical degrees can take the time to learn the truth about these experimental clot shots and do the research, then there is absolutely no excuse for anyone who makes a living in the healthcare industry.
For real. I have Fine Arts degree! But I found my way here because what I was seeing with my own eyes did not match -- AT ALL -- what I was reading in the news, and certainly didn't correspond to the public health policies. I have spent more time researching the data than on my graduate degree at this point...And I'm grateful for that!
Yes! What sparked my attention was refusal to acknowledge natural immunity. Also seeing Alex in Tucker looking more and more exhausted while dishing out more and more information!!!! God Bless him and his wife for supporting him!!
I agree. There are only a very small handful of people that I know who are educated on what’s going on besides myself. Maybe 5 out of 100. Maybe. The rest absolutely DO NOT CARE. And they are all vaxxed and happy to be. The ones who have had injuries do not see the correlation either.
On another service today, a prior "opponent" renewed an old thread, denying my insinuation that he was a brainwashed CNN viewer; in fact, he asserted he avoided the MSM and read lots of books. Even so, he trotted out the "fact" that 95% of MDs are vaxxed. 🤣 I pointed out to him that such a claim was likely propaganda, as ls most of what the MSM spews. I also mentioned that, while allowing that we right-wingers do have our share of lunatic claims, it didn't take much more than average intelligence to see that most of the MSM's claims simply don't add up.
They actively refuse to see the connection between their post-vax sicknesses and injuries to the vax.
Well yes and no. As already alluded to just above, any MD or other health care worker who does take a stand incurs a high risk of no longer making a living in the healthcare industry. Goodbye career, income. Hello unpayable and non-dischargeable student loans.
Sure I get it they risk their careers and livelihoods but so do the rest of us that refuse to be jabbed. Despite the financial hardship, is there any excuse for knowingly or unknowingly participating in crimes against humanity? I don’t think so.
Everyone I know in the medical profession (including close family) took these shots with great enthusiasm. They had no doubts and saw no need to question the shots' safety. They got jabbed before the mandates, so not one of them was in fear of losing their jobs. A plastic surgeon friend told me he felt like he had "super powers" after his jab.
He has since changed his mind. Why? He was shocked when the shot was pushed on his pregnant daughter, while at the same time he cannot give his pregnant patients Latisse, or botox or fillers.
Absolutely!!!
True. And they may be busy like everyone else and going through this much information takes time. Plus if they become informed and go against the narrative, they will likely be punished by their hospitals, medical groups, etc. So they choose the ignorance is bliss approach and keep their heads down. We have arrived at a sad and frightening place today in medicine.
That is exactly it. They could do the research but what is the point if they aren't willing to see the truth or to act on it? Going against the vaccine orthodoxy means almost certain loss of job and career. It is a rare doctor who has gone through all it takes to become a doctor who is willing to flush it down the toilet - and put their family at risk - by standing up the vaccine Nazis.
It is true that the VAERS database is not a record of causation. It is only a compilation of reports of events after vaccination. It is clear, however, that the
CDC/FDA/NIH push for vaccination when they admit they don't know whether the events reported were caused by vaccination is grossly negligent.
Most MDs are nervous people-pleasers that hide their deep-rooted insecurities by agreeing with anyone they think has power and status.
That description probably applies to most people, regardless of their profession, or lack thereof.
Most MDs don't know much about anything, including their "specialty."
Conventional western medicine is one enormous fraud, yet they've convinced most of the world that they're superheroes. The sooner the entire system crashes and burns, the better for all of life on earth, including human beings.
I agree. The overall distrust that has been built is something that I wonder if can ever be repaired.
I think what's happened in the last 18 months has just opened people's eyes to what's been going on for a while. I've been a medical skeptic for a long time, at least back to my late 20's and I'm 65 now. I know there are good people out there but buyer beware is my modus operendi.
Yup I agree! The medical world revolves around 1 thing and they've all received their orders. I almost trust car salesmen more these days.
Almost? I totally do.
At least in the hospital. Some docs, especially independent ones, might still have a few scruples left. They are hard to find tho.
And expensive, far beyond the reach of any but the most wealthy people. $2000 for a first visit, then hundreds of dollars for every subsequent visit. Who can afford that?
I do not trust physicians. Never fully did. All I look for is staff, doctors and patients in masks in the doctors office. If they are wearing masks then I consider it a clown show 🤡
Here in Pennsylvania. I don’t go for appts But have family that I take. So far 100% clown show. My medical plan going forward is… stay healthy. And NO hospitals 😱
As the doctor where I go said, I don't go often because doctors can kill you. Yes he said exactly that. A doctor who knows what is going on. That is why he sees me once every 10 years.
they know.
a lot of people stopped taking kids in for measles vaccinations because people are questioning pharma on this for the first time in a generation.
https://bronx.news12.com/who-cdc-warn-measles-is-a-renewed-threat-after-22-million-infants-missed-vaccines-in-2020
That's the best news I've seen all day. Most kids don't need a measles shot, and the MMR is very dangerous.
Vaccines MIGHT prevent childhood diseases…but then the question has to be asked… and answered…what ELSE do the vaccine ingredients do to them?
My son, who is an adult now, couldn't walk for 2 days after his MMR. Those few days of a high energy little guy being so lethargic still sends me on a guilt trip when I think of it.
80 kids died and several hundreds were harmed from the measles vaccine. None died from measles. Have not been able to find out how many kids died from measles before the vaccine. I had measles. All in our school had measles and I never heard of anyone dying from it.
Measles deaths had declined by 95 percent in the U.S. before the measles vax was ever introduced. Measles had never been a threat to healthy, well-nourished children. It was always only a threat to immunocompromised and undernourished kids. There's no better cure for hunger than food.
Make Measles a Routine Childhood Illness Again!
💥BAM !
Read this. Possibly the most important article you will ever read.
To summarize though.
Measles death numbers are completely made up before vaccine programs and then made up again after the vax program.
https://australiansceptics.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/measles-deaths-in-africa/
Thank you for this link.
🎯
GOOD
They do know. That is why these BigPharma insist on the no liablity clause. They should not be tried as fraudulent but as murderers. Premeditated.
This.
I had already fallen out of love with many doctors before this, so many are useless, have no interest in determining what causes your ailments, just love writing prescriptions or jabbing you. BUT not all, I must make that clear.
DOs (Doctors of Osteopathy) used to be trained to find the root cause of a disease. Listening to a podcast with a DO today, she said that she was actually discouraged from finding the root cause, and told point blank that if people got better, doctors' business would decline.
I trust my Botox shots. And that is it. I won't let a PCP give me an injection of anything ever again.
Hahaha! Yep, agree with you on this one, can't drop those. But the others? I've lost (almost) all faith in doctors.
Me too. Lol.
This. I'm in Canada so I was already dealing with a horrid health system (waited 13 months for a spine surgery, which failed). I'm not going in to see any of my neurosurgeons now, all they want to do is cut me open or inject me with more anti-inflammatories. Protect your spines, friends; I wish I knew how bad my back was going to get by age 27, it's been a struggle ever since.
Never get surgery on your back unless it is literally life or death. Back surgery almost never alleviates the pain. Noninvasive treatment can do more to help in 99% of cases.
I learned the same lesson the hard way. Good luck to you and to your future health.
Never did. They had an extremely aggressive promotional campaign for the flu shot too which doesn't work either as a well known article in The Atlantic, before it became a pharma cheerleader, showed. Prominent critic Tom Jefferson was isolated and ostracized in the medical/scientific community much as covid vaccine dissenters are today. The flu shot sales campaign boosted participation greatly but that was kid's stuff comparatively. Now they have governments mandating it for them and it's no more effective or safe - less so.
Something is wrong when meds and vaccines have commercials on television.
Not me. I'm done with them.
Falsifying data like this got Volkswagen into big time trouble on their Diesel engine emissions issue and they didn't even directly kill anyone. 4 or 5 of them are on trial for Fraud. These clowns need harsher treatment than that.
The same lawyer that tried the VW case and proved fraud against Dutsche Bank, Reiner Fuellmich, is pursuing the C19 frauds as well. He's no dummy. I know as of recently he was looking for evidence of mass manufacturing the glass vials and packaging for the jabs well before they would have had the need to order them. Interesting.
That could become quite interesting. It is well known by now that the vaccines were in the make before the virus 'escaped'
Yes as were the tests. https://www.newsweek.com/china-purchased-mass-quantity-pcr-tests-months-before-first-reported-case-covid-1635505
There is another webpage though it seems scrubbed, from World Integrated Trade Systems showing purchases of Covid 19 tests in 2018. Snopes has an alleged debunk ("oh, silly, that's not what 'they' meant!") but the screenshot is for real.
If Snopes denies it, it's probably true.
eggggzactly :)
Michele - ethical skeptic has a (new) expose of sorts on how long they've known.....
Just my (somewhat educated) opinion but I think there are a few countries that knew well in advance what was happening, planned for it and started production. The usual suspects: China, USA, France, also Canada. Spartacus letter says that the same people that made the virus made the vaxxes. I believe that to be true.
And they’re trying desperately to prop up the natural origins theory so they can sweep this under the rug & keep pursuing massive grants & dual use (biowarfare) research. Their cover is that this work is protecting the public from wacky bat viruses that humans could stupidly contract by going in the wild & disrupting the natural order.
Ooh looks good will read, thanks!
This (probably) isn't quite the smoking gun many think it is. SARS and MERS and probably more were being intensively researched well before COVID, dating back to about 2003. This included vaccine research, of course. It is quite possible, and in fact likely in my opinion, that the COVID-19 pandemic was started by the escape of a virus from a research facility. Of course there is secret research, but there was enough academic research including the infamous "gain of function" with the SARS viruses to make one soil oneself. 😟 Natural origin is unlikely. Could have been a deliberate release, an act of biological warfare, but these are less probable than a simple accident. None of the above rules out more sinister plans (e.g. WEF, great reset, etc.) Whether this was all planned in advance or mere opportunism I leave for others to hash out.
Doubtful if we ever will learn the truth. But a lot of strange coincidences make you wonder. Some conspiracy theories later turned out right. The truth is usually the simplest. In this case I think a lab escape is just that.
It just goes to show that integrity can be bought (or paid off ?).
speaking of Fraud...
prior big pharma lawsuits for fraudulent marketing, note the company names:
• in 2009 “Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing” plus an additional $14.5 million in 2011 to resolve False Claims Act allegations related to its marketing of the drug Detrol;
• “Pfizer Settles a Drug Marketing Case for $491 Million” in 2013;
• Janssen subsidiary of “Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations” in 2013 (a decade after it perpetrated these acts;
• “Pharmaceutical Giant AstraZeneca to Pay $520 Million for Off-label Drug Marketing” in 2010.
Moderna hasn't been around long enough to get caught. Give them time;)
Checking crystal ball..."It's actually a good sign that we're seeing a spike in kids having cardiac issues. It means more kids are returning to vigorous lifestyles!"
🤮 the whole thing makes me feel want to vomit.
You are not alone Kali.
^^^ I can hear Psaki saying those exact words now
“A fresh look”? There needs to be criminal trials! C’mon, man!
This is vaccine “science”. And people still continue to take their children to vaccine visits and pediatricians. This kind of false reporting didn’t begin w Covid injections. 🤦🏻♀️
Vaccine science is tobacco science
So true- all vaccinations do this -the trusting and marketing- not as egregious as this or as coercive- they were happy with millions now it has to be billions
Every once in a while, I like to remind everyone I know who is still speaking to me: EVEN IF this was a real pandemic (which it is not); and EVEN IF it killed half the world population (which is will not) rather than the more likely 0.0001%; no theft of liberty will reduce deaths. TYRANNY ALWAYS RESULTS IN MORE INNOCENT DEATHS - ON A SPECTACULAR SCALE - THAN LIBERTY.
You have to factor in how the drug companies "tested" their """vaccines""". As an engineer who has tested thousands of semiconductor parts, and taken billions of points of data in those tests, what was done is not a test.
For a proper test of any vaccine for a respiratory illness, you would have to ensure that the vaccine and placebo recipients were actually fully exposed to the virus. This would mean infected people coughing right in their faces. Yes I mean that literally. When you're dealing with a virus that has a 99.74% (The CDC's estimate late last year.) to 99.9% (The estimate from researchers counting people who had immunity from prior infections to Corona or relatives of Corona.) OVERALL survival rate, you cannot "test" by just seeing how many people get Corona later on by going about their normal lives.
It gets worse when you look at the study groups and see that in the 2 largest out of 4 total groups, all the highest risk people were excluded. In one of the other two, some of the highest risk people were excluded. So now among your test subjects you have a survival rate of 99.9+%, and over half will not even show symptoms when they get infected either. Unless you're using study groups of a few million people, you can NEVER properly test the efficacy of any vaccine when the survival rate is so high, and you're not even ensuring people are directly and fully exposed to that thing which you claims you're immunizing against.
I recall reading that direct viral challenge is considered unethical. That's certainly possible, but I fail to understand why, if volunteers were fully informed of the risks. Apparently there are no ethical problems at all in distributing worldwide products that had at best summary testing, little proof of actual efficacy and virtually no proof of even short-term safety, much less long term. And now we are at the (almost) ultimate level of lunacy, increasingly imposing it by mandate, to include small children, who are at near-zero risk of the disease. The jabs don't even reduce the spread of the disease! It really makes me (and a lot of other folks) wonder if there is some evil agenda afoot; this certainly doesn't have any plausible claim to "public health" that I can understand.
For the reason you mention I am tempted to believe a conspiracy now. Too many coincidences. Too much pressure. The government instead of turning course intensifies the measures taken under Trump. Now I am rethinkingsome of his actions. His defending hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin
Assuring people the virus wad not so bad. Trying to stop who to interfere. Things might have been different if he had been able to do that. Remove faux and gates from the equation.
I stumbled upon articles about this just yesterday. Early on some experts may have supported using human infection challenge studies to more expeditiously get data up front but using far fewer subjects. I actually didn't realize they have done this type of research as much as they have over the past several decades even and for a variety of infectious diseases and not just testing vaccines. One of the ethical considerations is that any pathogen being introduced generally should be self-limiting, have either no or minimal chance for lasting negative effects or have an effective treatment to minimize risk to the participants. With so many unknowns in the beginning maybe they decided it was too risky? But to play devil's advocate, on the other hand, doing this type of research up front would have required that they admit either: 1) that COVID is not as dangerous as they were saying; 2) that they were willing to possibly sacrifice some unknown number of participants for the greater good; or 3) that some effective treatments were available early on, all would have possibly interfered with the way it seems they wanted things to play out?
Also to Chris' point, over the past months in reviewing SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccine development research, the sentiment has been this:
“Human vaccine effectiveness studies will only be possible in the context of SARS
re-emergence.”
Which as far as I have been able to tell have not been possible because large outbreaks have not occurred for SARS since 2003 and hardly at all for MERS since 2012. Also they must have deemed it unethical to use human infection challenge for any of the very few human clinical trials involving these vaccine candidates.
It just raised even more concerns about motives, like if they entertained the idea of human infection challenge with SARS-CoV-2, what's to stop them from foregoing the small scale and just adapt it to billions of people so they can have their highly lucrative data for "the greater good". They knew they would get their precious challenge data naturally and not have to wait for "re-emergence" because THIS iteration of SARS is far more transmissible and widespread. It could be viewed as taking leaps forward in the coronavirus vaccine body of research since they could overcome that hurdle (Just like Fauci arguing the need for gain-of-function research even if it could result in a pandemic). Very rewarding ends justifying the means to so many pulling these strings. I can't (un)see how these things weren't factored into their plan.
When re-finding articles for my citations, I discovered that in fact they have decided to move forward with human infection challenge studies for COVID as of Feb. 2021 (see citation below).
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/41732/2021_Book_HumanChallengeStudiesInEndemic.pdf?sequence=1
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30438-2/fulltext
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.med.56.091103.134135?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-56097088
Thank you for pointing this out. I have been wondering how they could test people without being exposed. If you live secluded like myself, you probably won't come in contact with anyone who is sick during the test period. I remember Boris Johnson saying the same thing in a very clumsy way (He asked volunteers to get infected to see how they would do). I also remember very early on, that a football coach said, let us infect all the boys and get it over with. At the time I was still scared and thought he was crazy. Now I think he was right. If the healthy people all had been infected early on, taken a regular med like Aspirin or Ivermectin, we all would be immune and the virus would be long gone.
Isn't it also a concern that the study was carried out while much of world was in lockdown, which would have reduced exposure of study subjects? Note that this isn't necessarily bad for Pfizer...maybe if more had been exposed we would have seen a clearer gain from vaccination.
Data shows very, very conclusively that lockdowns completely failed to stop spread, so no. Unless Pfizer's test subjects were in some sort of total isolation with everything coming in and out sterilized, they were just like everyone else locked down or not locked down. Which still means they may not have been exposed, and which still means the healthy people among them could have had immune systems so bulletproof that Corona was DOA within minutes of arrival in their airways. Others could have just gotten a small amount of virus such that their immune systems had more warning.
So again, with such a high survival rate and such minor effects in so many healthy people, no way in hell you are able to accurately judge efficacy without presenting a fairly known viral load directly to your test subjects, and your test subjects number in the millions.
I think the Gestapo’s raid on Project Veritas more likely caused by PV digging into Pzifer. Whistleblowers we’re bringing the clot shot shenanigans into the spotlight.
The Biden diary was simply an excuse and redirection; nobody serious cares about it. Biden himself is only a vehicle for Obama’s third term
I don't see how Pfizer and Moderna, at a minimum, won't be indicted and hopefully put out of business on criminal fraud charges. Immunity for injuries, sure, but they have committed fraud which is a different ball of wax.
That is if their heads don't end up on pikes
They've just committed history's greatest crime and so too have the politicians who gave them immunity.
Laws won't protect either of them when the people finally wake up.
If the people wake up. Most of them will end up dead, as planned.
You would think that a safe & effective vaccine - designed to protect you from severe disease and death from a deadly pandemic - would result in lower all cause mortality in the treatment group vs placebo. But you would be wrong. "More deaths in the treatment group vs placebo just tells you the vaccine is working!" Science!!
21-to-17; more deaths in treatment vs placebo. That just screams "safe & effective" to me.
You would think a safe and effective vaccine would sell itself and not require coercion or constant propaganda.
Beware of products that get propagated so often. Never buy anything that is on TV every five minutes. If it were that good, it would not need this propaganda.
If it’s free, you’re what’s for sale.
Exactly!
The scariest part is that this was just the first few months after people got the vaccine. During that time, it does seem that there is some protection against Covid, based on overall population data. But then the vaccine effectiveness against infection, illness and death falls off dramatically. But are you left at that point with the same healthy body you would have had if you never got the vaccine? Or did the vaccine alter your immune system forever so that you have a higher likelihood of getting cancer, heart disease, etc.? Those are trials we can never do because they destroyed the control group. So instead we are just going to roll the dice with 300 million American lives and see what happens in 10 years? Did I wake up in The Twilight Zone?
We can still get these numbers. Kaiser has them. So does the VA. So does medicare. We just need brave people from within these orgs to give us the Vaccine Pentagon Papers 2021. Tough spot for the people inside these places though. Would require incredible bravery, given the level of ... coercion happening right now.
Yes, you did.
[Speculation, I'm not an expert!] The study size is too small to draw any conclusions. See my rant elsewhere in this stack.
My understanding is that these trials were not actually conducted with a true placebo (saline) but with against another vaccine that has, and does still, cause injury and death. Talk about stacking the deck. But the greatest atrocity is running a global **and now mandatory** genetic experiment on such a trivial number of people and in such a short time span. Face-palm.
Welcome to the land of truth. ALL vaccines are tested against another vaccine or the aluminum adjuvant, which causes as many problems as the vaccines themselves. Truth!
I would be interested if this information were documented anywhere in the clinical trial. Trying to convince my healthy significant other not to get another damn booster.
Yes I’ve heard from friends who study this that the placebo is never saline - it’s some other vaccine.
It is true that the clinical trials of other vaccines have not used true placebo for their control group. Most often they have compared the experimental vaccine to that vaccine's adjuvant, which is the most dangerous ingredient in most vaccines. That's how they have hidden the dangers of other vaccines (along with running very short trials - e.g. the trial for Hep B lasted a grand total of 5 days!). However, before the Covid-19 vax trials, the ICAN organization successfully put pressure on the FDA to force the agency to run the treatment arm against saline. So, in that one respect, the Covid vax trials were actually more honest, although everything else about them, apparently, was equally or more dishonest. I wrote about that here:
https://darbyshaw.substack.com/p/drug-companies-hide-covid-19-vaccine
Darby (Julia), 😊 - You are a wealth of information!
Thank you!!
Darby is right except she forgets to mention that whilst using a non-saline placebo in trials is indeed fraudulent it actually doesn't help to use a saline placebo.
When you use a saline placebo then you get what is called "crusader bias". If I get an injection in the trial it's critical that I don't know if I've received the vaccine or the placebo. This is especially so because as a voluntary participant in a vaccine trial there's a 100% chance I'm a pro-vaccine zealot who desperately wants the vaccine to succeed.
If I can make an educated guess that I received the vaccine rather than placebo then I can, and will, manipulate the results in favor of the vaccine.
If the placebo is pure saline and I get a non-trivial reaction to my injection then I will be pretty sure that I got the vaccine. From there I can manipulate the results by avoiding covid tests and pretending I didn't get covid symptoms and downplaying the reaction that I did get.
So I can, and will, manipulate the data to make it look like the vaccine is safe and effective.
You can't use controlled trials to prove vaccine safety. There's no valid ways to get non-biased data - proper placebo or dangerous placebo.
You have to use "stress testing". Give someone a massive dose and see if there are any reactions.
I saw a doc that said the placebo for the Papilloma (Gardasil) was the same basis as the vaccine one, apart from the vaccine element itself. But that basis was already very bad, so the kids in the control group got sick, too. Then Gardasil was deemed good enough. It causes all kinds of injuries and according to the testimony of a girl, does not protect against the disease either. She had it.
Yes, the Gardasil vaccine is another very dangerous vaccine. Its efficacy has also been way oversold.
Oversold? Cervical cancer rates haven't fallen in the slightest since its introduction. In Australia, before the vaccine there was a significant fall in cervical cancer but this trend actually stopped after the vaccine (and rates are slightly higher now than before the vaccine). It's a similar story in the US and UK.
There's literally nothing to sell.
When the vaccine was first introduced, I remember reading that there five different strains of cervical cancer, and that the HPV vaccine only protected against two of those five strains. Some scientists were concerned at the time that the vaccine would actually just strengthen the virus, in much the same way that the Covid-19 vaccines are doing. It sounds like that is in fact what happened.
Correct Ingrid. Actually there were three cohorts. Vaccine, aluminum containing controls and saline controls.
The vaccine and Al cohorts were around the same size (10,000 each from memory) but the saline cohort was much smaller (around 1000).
For the non-severe/systemic reactions they separated the three groups and it was clear that the rate of reactions was exactly what you would expect - not many in the saline, and quite a few in the other two cohorts. On this basis it would be clear that the vaccine was not safe.
But for the severe/systemic reactions they added the Al cohort and the saline cohorts together. As the Al cohort was much larger, it was essentially just the Al cohort alone. Because the rate of reactions of the Al/saline cohort was only a little less than the vaccine cohort it was deemed that the vaccine was perfectly safe.
Such amazing science. Obviously rigged but if anybody says "they didn't use a proper saline control" Merck could say "oh yes we did! It says so right there".
This is all vaccine science. Zero to do with truth and everything to do with what you can get away with.
Go back all the way to the smallpox vaccine. This "highly scientific" experiment involved injecting one poor kid with the concoction and observing if he got smallpox upon exposure. Never mind the fact that all throughout history, millions of unvaccinated doctors had treated smallpox patients without succumbing themselves.
It was from this "highly scientific" experiment that the age of vaccination was born.
Every single vaccine experiment since then has been rigged as much as possible. Amazingly, many vaccines still get rejected - just think how dangerous they would have to be not to pass FDA approval (anything less than 99 per cent fatalities in the vaccine arm is probably enough to pass).
After the "highly scientific" polio trials were deemed successful, thousands of people got paralysis after the shots. This was all blamed on one lonely laboratory (Cutter) even though they were part of the trials. The vaccine was horrific. It was only because doctors stopped diagnosing polio and instead diagnosed things like aseptic meningitis, Guillain Barre, transverse myelitis etc in those who had had their polio shots did it suddenly look as though the vaccine "worked". In fact, paralysis rates today are vastly higher than in 1950.
No different to Gardasil. Cervical cancer rates have not fallen since the vaccine.
Similarly, in the 40 years since the Hep B vaccine, liver cancer rates have not fallen either. Indeed, they have skyrocketed. An abject failure.
Remember how we were told that we had to get our daughters their rubella vaccine (made from aborted fetuses of course) to stop them giving birth to babies with congenital defects? Well guess what has happened to rates of congenital defects since the rubella vaccine? And remember, this is coinciding with an increase in selective abortions. Congenital defect rates have actually risen since the rubella vaccine. The vaccine (and selective abortions it would seem) are an abject failure (and that's before you even talk about the morality of either of them).
Remember how mumps was the cause of sterility in men so we had to vaccinate for it? I suspect you all know what has happened to rates of sterility in the past few decades.
Invasive disease rates (pneumonia, meningitis, sepsis) since the various meningitis vaccines (Hib/Prevena)? Yes they've increased too. Of course they have.
Every single last vaccine.
I repeat.
Every. Single. Vaccine.
Completely and utterly worthless.
Two years ago I needed a tetanus vaccine booster, just about the only vaccine I'm still willing to receive. I wanted ONLY the TD version, not the TDAP, which has a high rate of side effects. It took me until this past July to find a location willing and able to give me the TD version. Even Walgreens insisted I get a prescription for it (which fortunately my naturapath was willing to write), and even then was willing to administer it only because it had been required by an active military member who needed it because of allergies to the TDAP. Apparently it can only be ordered in batch of 10 vials, and is VERY expensive. Advocating for your own health is just so ridiculously difficult!
Who says you needed a tetanus booster? Your doctor? Your HMO? Big Pharma? Why would you believe them?
That's actually a very good point. Since I'm a born skeptic and don't trust anyone you mention, I did my own research. According to the data I could find, efficacy lasts somewhere between about 12-20 years. Since I spend a good portion of my life working outside, with lots of contact with soil and sharp tools which can harbor the pathogen, I decided to take the cautious approach and get the booster after 10 years, which ended up being 12 years after all the hassle. I'm well into Medicare age, so I decided this would be my last of these jabs. Don't imagine I'll be at much risk after another decade.
Thank you ! I had no idea of the immense damage. I just ordered a book, Dissolving Illusions, by Suzanne Humphries, about vaccines. Now I am even more eager to start reading !
You may also appreciate “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies-400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers” by Neil Z Miller. Released in 2016, covers various ingredients plus specific vaccines like HPV, measles, polio, etc, including a chapter on conflicts of interest, false studies and industry control.
Love that book. They’ve all paid a steep price for being outspoken w the truth.
Thanks for the tip. I saw it available on Kindle and immediately bought it. Easy to take notes and review !
It is an excellent book, with abundant data and charts, and Dr Humphries paid a price for bringing forth the information. She also has a Telegraph channel worth checking out.
Thanks for the tip !
You’ll love it and probably be shocked when you realize the depths of deception. Sickening lies!
💯 accurate!
Many kids and young adults who had the HPV shots have become severely injured and/sterile or dead.
It is heartbreaking what is done to kids with Gardisil
I saw where 3 young people had committed suicide after being severely damaged
Sadly, I’m sure that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
This is only the few willing to testify. God knows how many others have died, have been harmed, have committed suicide, have got the disease even though vaxxed.
YEs, the HPV shots are bad news.
Ingrid - and they try to give that vax to my BOYS. what a bunch of freaking psycopaths.
The thing that I noticed was that the *only* person to die of Covid pneumonia was in the vaccinated group. The two that died in the placebo group of Covid just died of generic Covid. So how does Covid kill if not from pneumonia? Anyone else wonder this? Or did they die of something else but tested positive and Pfizer counted them like our Smart People do now just to get approval.
Lillia - me me yes I noticed this and it bugs me.
Dr. McCullough and colleagues realized that there are three major phases to COVID-19. It starts with virus replication, which then triggers inflammation, or a cytokine storm. This, in turn, leads to blood clotting. If enough micro blood clots form in the lungs, a person can’t get enough oxygen and dies. It’s a complex process, and no single drug is going to work to treat it, which is why McCullough uses a combination of drugs, as is done to treat HIV, staph and other infections.
We will never know the true death toll. All they care about is that the bodies keep piling up.
Hospitals are now counting anyone who isn’t “fully vaccinated” meaning w two shots or now it’s two shots and a booster, as unvaccinated. Anyone w a positive RT PCR test (bogus overinflated cycle thresholds) is also Covid, regardless of what the actual cause of death is. 🙄
If this doesn't get the "health" authorities to pull back on this insanity, nothing will short of a revolution. And that's where we're going if someone in gov't doesn't pull their head out of their a$$ and change course.
Unfortunately, that’s exactly what they want. You don’t think there are thousands of loyal boot-licking sycophant officers and soldiers just ready to crack some “insurrectionists” skulls? If the shooting starts, be ready for life to never be the same in America.
It’s time for another (hopefully longer) appearance on Tucker!
Kennedy is going to be on Fauci book is out THAT is a good start
Really?! That is awesome!
Yeah alex should go on tuckers long form show
Yes, please .
I blame the media and government who TO THIS DAY continue to parrot the phrase "safe and effective". Imagine telling people before they accepted the jab 'From November to March, 15 (21) people in the clinical trial who received the vaccine died, compared to 14 (17) people who did not receive the vaccine'. How many would have rushed in?
Fewer - but virtue signalers going to virtue signal
Glazed over obedience after letting fear overtake them.