538 Comments

Edit: Kasha posted this below and it should be pinned at the top:

Everyone needs to do this: Write to the FDA. The links and some good tips are in this substack. Should take less than a minute.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda

_______________________________________-

The FDA is a criminal organization out to get Pfizer their immunity shield at the cost of killing and maiming many thousands of innocent children with a fake cure for a disease that doesn’t affect them. Here is the true story of how they approved the Pfizer poison for 5-11 year olds:

We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.

-Dr. Ruben, Before Voting to Approve the Pfizer Vaccine for 5-11 Year Olds

FDACommitteeMembersReviewingPfizerVaccineForChildrenHaveWorkedForPfizer

On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 the FDA officially abrogated their duty to protect the public by voting 17-0 to approve the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for 5 - 11 year old children, based on the following numbers...

Child Pfizer Vaccine Safety Study:

_______________________________

2 Months Long

2268 Children in Study

16 Infected After Given Placebo

3 Infected After Given Vaccine

Result: 91% Efficacy

_______________________________

This is meaningless statistical noise, AKA lying with statistics.

Then there’s this from the study:

"The study isn’t large enough to detect any extremely rare side effects, such as the heart inflammation that occasionally occurs after the second dose, mostly in young men and teen boys."

And then this:

“FDA analysis calculated … the vaccine would prevent roughly 200 to 250 COVID-19 hospitalizations for every 1 million youngsters vaccinated, with about 58 hospitalizations for the heart inflammation.”

https://tritorch.com/fda

Expand full comment

I just saw yesterday, Robert Kennedy talking about if they can get it authorized for a childhood vaccine, they cannot be sued. Check out what he said on Telegram yesterday.

Expand full comment

How can parents even consider giving their kids of any age this experimental shot. Even before we knew the issues. . .I would never have allowed this to be given to my kids.

Expand full comment

Because the FDA is not an "advisory board" with the goal of protecting public health. They are politically and financially driven and an arm of whoever is in power. You're not talking about people who have any other goal than their own enrichment and continued employment. Once you understand that, this all makes sense.

Expand full comment

The FDA are a bunch of evil whores. Bought and paid for 100%.

Expand full comment
Feb 9, 2022·edited Feb 9, 2022

Why do I imagine Get Smart in these situations?

Maxwell Smart: " I can tell you two shots will be enough for immunity for your toddler."

Parents: "We don't believe you."

Maxwell Smart: "Will you believe three shots and a booster?"

Expand full comment

This is from a Pediatrician friend who can't post this on FB so he has an email list.

A big concern of mine at present is the pending possible authorization of the Pfizer 3 ug dose mRNA vaccine for babies and children from 6 months to 4 years of age. We have looked at the well documented low burden of disease in this age group, which mirrors my personal experience. And we've discussed possible risks associated with this particular model of vaccine. Not too long ago, we discussed the concept of "Original Antigenic Sin", seen with other viruses, in which the first antigens used to stimulate the host's immune response will determine all subsequent responses. Our fear was that imprinting on the old, now obsolete, Wuhan spike protein configuration, which comprises the current mRNA vaccines, would cause future immune responses to variants with very different spike protein configurations to still be geared to the Wuhan spike, therefore lessening the efficacy and protection.

This has now been shown to be true for SARS-CoV-2. The study is "Immune Imprinting, Breadth of Variant Recognition, and Germ Center Response in Human SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination", from Stanford University, posted on CELL online on 25 January 2022. Here's the link:

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018

Here's some quotes and conclusions:

1) "Antibody breadth against the variants is less after infection compared to all vaccines evaluated, but improves over several months."

2) "By 9 months, spike-specific IgG had decreased approximately 20-fold from the maximum" [for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine]."

3) "We quantify a strong imprinting effect of prior vaccination with Wuhan-H-1 spike antigen on antibody specificities following breakthrough infection with viral variants."

So, the mRNA model, which was ideal as far as the rapidity of development and distribution, elicits a robust, strong IgG response (anti-S antibodies), which saved many vulnerable lives, but the antibodies wane quickly, requiring boosters. Natural immunity elicits a more subdued, broader, less robust response, which strengthens over time, providing long-term protection. That is my argument for awaiting traditional vaccine models which approximate the natural response for the low risk children, given the obvious fact that they are in this for the long-haul. There is no urgency regarding them, for natural infection itself is of low risk (not no risk...low risk).

But point 3 is the bigger take-away from this study. They studied the immune response in subjects fully vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine and then infected with either the alpha or delta variants, and found the main antibody response was to the old Wuhan spike protein, not the variant spike protein, which had mutated. This is consistent with Original Antigenic Sin, and this response was not seen in the unvaccinated, who mounted robust antibody responses to the variant's spike protein.

Do you see my concern with subjecting our healthy young children to this vaccine model? We will be priming their immune systems to mount a primary antibody response against an old protein that doesn't even exist anymore, and probably never will again, instead of to the configuration of spike protein they will encounter when confronted with infection. We could be forever limiting their ability to mount a truly protective response that would be broad and durable. This isn't just theory when it comes to SARS-CoV-2 anymore.

I just don't get the rush to push this thing through. I trust the FDA's advisory committee members, who know a lot more than I do about these things, are looking at the big picture...at the long-haul...for that is how we must approach any intervention directed toward the children. Their meeting is on 15 February. It's a big deal.

Expand full comment

A competent FDA would have stopped the whole vax program long ago. There would have been no EUA. They are owned. But they are still murderers.

Expand full comment

As much as I hate it, I've lost ALL respect for the FDA, CDC and NIH. Basically, simply don't feel like I can trust the medical community anymore.

Expand full comment

Any parent that would get their baby or toddler injected in light of this data has to be suffering from mental health issues. I’d say the same applies to parents of healthy children of any age, but really, it’s indisputable for the youngest ages group- all risk for absolutely NO benefit.

Expand full comment

Child sacrifice

Expand full comment

" So Pfizer is in trials to add a third shot "

Pfizer should be on trial and face a firing squad

There i fixed it for you

Expand full comment

Remember the top FDA vaccine officials who stepped down 8/31/21?

Expand full comment

If the FDA will approve Covid shots for children under 5, what won't the FDA approve? Makes one wonder about the efficacy and safety of every drug ever approved by the FDA. I don't even want to take Advil anymore.

Expand full comment

In my view, approving this shot for children is a criminal act.

Expand full comment

I think, unfortunately, that the uptake will be a lot more than 0. So many sheep have been brainwashed and will either vax their young kids out of fear or out of peer pressure & virtue signaling.

Expand full comment

Frankly, parents have had to do the FDAs job for years. They’ve never cared about the artificial colors or flavors added to many foods that are marketed specifically to children. Nor have they cared how many injections or the level of toxins in those injections that are to be given to the most vulnerable and precious of all beings, our newborn babies. They’ve been allowed to run amok for decades and they must be stopped.

Expand full comment

"uptake will likely be near zero". I don't know about that. There are many hysterical Karens out there who think Covid could be deadly for their healthy child (because media told them so) and also "don't want to kill grandma" (pass virus to elders). Media has created a mental illness in people.

Expand full comment

Alex, I think you're wrong that uptake will be near zero. That 30% stuck in the mass psychosis would jump at the chance to inject their young children. I still see 3 and 4 year old children at the pre-K section of my daughter's elementary school IN TEXAS with double masks.

Expand full comment

Near zero, but not zero. There are brainwashed parents who will give their innocent children these jabs.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately Alex, you are wrong about the uptake with parents. In the insane asylum blue states (like here in WA), 95% of parents are lining up their kids for these toxic shots. All while double masked, of course.

Expand full comment

Uptake does not matter. Pfizer needs this to be on the CDC Recommended Childhood Vaccine Schedule so that they can have immunity from prosecution for injuries and illness caused by their toxic shot. Immunity applies to children and adults when it is on the CDC schedule. 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

Expand full comment

Uptake will be about the same % as joe bidens approval percentage

Expand full comment

With big pharma, the FDA, CDC and AMA, we are dealing with purely criminal organizations and agencies. They have sunk lower than the lowest gutter. Big pharma wants these mRNA poisons to be added to the regular vac schedules thus ensuring control and profits. That way they can add more and more horrific injections and nobody will say boo-hoo. And all without a speck of responsibility, culpability or conscience.

Expand full comment

It's irrelevant what uptake is - that is not pharma's end game. Clearance for the babies is the first step to get it on the childhood vaccine schedule which will be the holy grail for them for permanent liability protection. We must hold the line here if there is ever a chance of getting justice for the vaccine injured.

Expand full comment

I understand a "requirement" for children will lead to no liability to the manufacturers. Praying the fraud will be proved.

Expand full comment
founding

We can only hope the uptake will be near zero. The parents of about a quarter of 5-11 yo have revealed themselves to be utterly braindead.

Expand full comment

Just like the flu shot, 50% efficacy or less.

Expand full comment

This is not shocking if you understand the way the FDA and CDC schedule of all childhood immunizations has been created. None of this is new. Start researching the vaccines on that schedule and then get back to me.

Here’s a tidbit… Hep B, only passed thru needles and sex and rarely serious, was added to the schedule for infants simply because at risk teens wouldnt take the shot. It has 250mcg aluminum in it and is given on the day of birth, and 3 more times before the age of 4. Oh and treating the rare hep b positive or at risk mom while pregnant is VERY easy.

If you start researching you’ll find that the case for covid 19 vaccines for under 5s is almost logical in the context of the full

CDC immunization schedule.

Expand full comment

Thanking God every day I don't have school-age kids. And if I did, I'd be homeschooling them.

Expand full comment

The FDA has been a criminal enterprise for decades. It takes tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars and about a decade to "normally" get a drug to market. They have rallied on a massive scale around not only this so-called "vaccine," but that it defies ordinary vaccine methods with the mRNA delivery. All-cause death rates (not just those loosely attributed to COVID) are at record levels since the vax mandates began--and they still double-down on pushing these jabs.

Any type of natural medicine or supplement is taken off market immediately if they even "claim" to help a condition in any way--whether they actually do or not. The reason? It's not putting money in the pockets of Big Pharma, which has OWNED the FDA since the 1960's. Did Alex's research not show clearly that only 16% of the regulators voting to approve "emergency use" of the vaccines did NOT have a financial interest in the vaccines' approval? How about the swift defamatory reactions to--and restrictions on availability--of Ivermectin, an inexpensive treatment that showed early on that it combatted COVID? All to push shots that repeatedly proved they did not actually work longterm, if at all--and with the boosters, actually made those who got jabbed more likely to contract it!

We don't need government agencies run by unelected bureaucrats to be our "parents" for a lifetime! All we really need is a wave of NEW blood in Congress and the Administration--new blood pumping through the veins of people with conscience that will run these bureaucrats, along with the career politicians who've profitably enabled them, straight to Gitmo. (Or the gallows, but I digress.)

Expand full comment

No surprise here -pharma wants it to become part of the "mandatory" childhood vax schedule. They will pay off the regime and its puppets as needed to accomplish the mission.

Expand full comment

Yes, there will be very low uptake of the jabs in very young children. But some parents will get their children jabbed, and some "doctors" will recommend the jabs (do they still get a jab bonus?). Children will be hurt by this. Some may die.

The FDA, CDC, and NIH have to be disbanded.

Expand full comment

Telling you, we need names. Post these people names and addresses on line. See how wise they become once that happens.

Expand full comment

The FDA has been corrupt for far longer than COVID-19 has been around. This is just bringing it to the attention of more of the population.

Expand full comment

So sick of these corrupt fuckers.

Expand full comment

Absolutely disgusting!

Expand full comment

“But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” - Matthew 18:6

Expand full comment

Here is a strategy that Steve Kirsch' is pushing.

*How you can help persuade the FDA committee not to approve Pfizer for kids under 5*

This takes < 42 seconds of your time (John did it in 28 seconds). The more people who do it the better. Even though it will be ignored, we don't want to have them claim that nobody opposed it.

Read the newsletter and follow the instructions. What is being sought is sheer volume of responses, not actual explanations on why the FDA is promoting a bad idea because they are not going to read anything that's written. He asks that this newsletter & instructions be passed onto other just to get the numbers up.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda.

For those who are who don't know why Pfizer & the FDA are pushing to get this passed: Pfizer needs to push this onto children and than declare it a success, not really but the FDA is a captured entity, to get on the regular Children Vaccine schedule which will give them complete liability on the shot forever. The immunity will apply to the current Pfizer once the EUA is lifted because it's covered by the blanket immunity given to shots on the Children's schedule. U.S. Supreme Court removed vaccine product liability in 2011. This is their plan.

Expand full comment

A reminder that this article serves as a rebuttal to the 'Collapse of Team Apocalypse' article. Team Apocalypse is not nearly collapsed yet. Every hopeful sign is contradicted by two new pieces of evidence that the madness is not retreating anytime soon.

Expand full comment

They are going after the kids because kids can't say no to the boosters like adults can.

https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/the-proper-role-of-science

The proper role of the experts is to honestly inform everybody of their actual risks, and ways to mitigate said risks. In the case of covid, we know that other than age (which we can’t do anything about), obesity and vitamin D deficiency are the best indicators of bad outcomes. Thus, the proper role of government here would have been to encourage people to eat healthy, lose weight, and get out in the sunshine.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT KEEPING YOU HEALTHY. This is about overriding your personal preferences with that of unaccountable ‘experts’. This is about you giving up your autonomy for the collective. And if you happen to be one of the eggs who gets broken, perhaps via vaccine injury or your child regressing in school, the collective will shrug and say you’re simply the cost of making the omelet.

Expand full comment

I saw a poll that said 39 percent of parents of children under five are going to rush right out and get the Covid-19 vaccine for their children as soon as it is available. In fact, this is what Pfizer and the FDA are banking on. They know there are millions of parents who will not wait for evidence that the third shot does the trick. They've been sufficiently scared out of their minds into believing that their children are in mortal danger from Covid.

So, unfortunately, uptake will not be near zero. And there will be deaths -- not from the virus, from the vaccine.

Expand full comment

Disgusting move by big pharma and even bigger government to grift the world out of money big government will turn around and loan into existence. I'm done with anyone telling me what to do and how to live. The U.S. is doomed. We need a major black swan event to clear the slate and start over. The great reset needs to be 50 free and independent States with no federal overlord. D.C. can become a camp for former "leaders" to serve time until they are hung in the public square for crimes against humanity. RESIST.

Expand full comment
Feb 9, 2022·edited Feb 9, 2022

Great email to printout and send to the paediatric practice of your choice in a nice big No Myocarditis Heart Valentine.

Expand full comment

Because TPTB own the FDA via Big Pharma $$$. "The “approval” by the FDA, the agency owned by the elites, is just a show to deceive the masses. In the next few months, we can expect Pfizer to “seek” FDA approval to vaccinate newborns" :

The Real Face Of Evil: 17-Year-Old Sean Hartman Was Killed By The Pfizer Jab. Twitter Removed His Dad's Account For Speaking The Truth

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-real-face-of-evil-17-year-old

Expand full comment

The same way they recommend HepB vaccine at birth, 4 months and 6 months. The only chance an infant has of contracting HepB is if Mom is HepB positive. Hep B is contracted through IV drug use. Just test Mom.....but no. Every baby is given HepB vaccine despite the fact, FDA and CDC know that by age 18, only 1% of population maintains immunity. That's all risk and no benefit.

Expand full comment

Genuine question- if a 6 month old baby experiences chest pain after the shot, how the fuck is it supposed to articulate that to its parents?

Expand full comment

Steve Kirsch posted how you can send an email saying you oppose:

Open the Online Form - https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2022-N-0082-0001

Complete the Online Form -

(1) COMMENT: Limit of 5000 characters. May I suggest you just write “oppose.” It’s not like anyone will read 100,000 comments anyway, so we are just going for numbers. Feel free if you write something longer but I don’t think it is going to make a difference.

(2) WHAT IS YOUR COMMENT ABOUT: pick “INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER”

(4) EMAIL ADDRESS Optional - if you want an email receipt from them for a record of your submission.

(5) TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF: most likely “INDIVIDUAL”[they’ll ask for contact information] or “ANONYMOUS” [no contact info.] Your identifying information is NOT required.

(6) SELECT – “I am not a robot”. However, if you are a Robot, don’t check the box. You don’t want to lie.

(7) SUBMIT comment.

Expand full comment

What about the half million kids in foster care? Does the state make them take the jab?

Expand full comment

Many people are waking up to vaccine scam. Yes, all of them are a scam. Check out this 6 min video I recorded over the weekend.

https://rumble.com/vub1ub-do-vaccine-safety-studies-use-valid-control-groups.html

Expand full comment