The FDA is a criminal organization out to get Pfizer their immunity shield at the cost of killing and maiming many thousands of innocent children with a fake cure for a disease that doesn’t affect them. Here is the true story of how they approved the Pfizer poison for 5-11 year olds:
We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.
-Dr. Ruben, Before Voting to Approve the Pfizer Vaccine for 5-11 Year Olds
On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 the FDA officially abrogated their duty to protect the public by voting 17-0 to approve the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for 5 - 11 year old children, based on the following numbers...
Child Pfizer Vaccine Safety Study:
_______________________________
2 Months Long
2268 Children in Study
16 Infected After Given Placebo
3 Infected After Given Vaccine
Result: 91% Efficacy
_______________________________
This is meaningless statistical noise, AKA lying with statistics.
Then there’s this from the study:
"The study isn’t large enough to detect any extremely rare side effects, such as the heart inflammation that occasionally occurs after the second dose, mostly in young men and teen boys."
And then this:
“FDA analysis calculated … the vaccine would prevent roughly 200 to 250 COVID-19 hospitalizations for every 1 million youngsters vaccinated, with about 58 hospitalizations for the heart inflammation.”
The corruption of the FDA is nothing new. It’s only because of the covid hysteria has it become exposed to a lot more curious people. I blindly gave my kids the childhood vaccine schedule and thought nothing of it. I now feel like a complete fool and basically it appears I just got lucky that neither one has any known side effects. I will advise my now older kids to do serious research before jabbing there newborns with anything required by this corrupt government. Parents need to say no fucking way to this jab in there infants and toddlers. The crappy education most get in government schools isn’t worth the risk.
Yes. My oldest is vaccine injured and autistic. His younger four siblings are beautifully healthy and were kept safe from dangerous vaccines. Almost all "anti-vaxxers" are actually EX-vaxxers.
I did the same, except both of my kids suffer from: 1 has severe food allergies and the other has severe allergies that is causing asthma (he is only 3yo). After all this of the past 2 years and reading and reading and reading I told my husband I will not be involved with completing their childhood vaccine requirements and if he does it he better have done a ton of research to prove to me that it's "safe". They will definitely not be getting the covid vaccine under ANY circumstances and we will homeschool if it comes down to it. I feel so pissed off about all of this. The sickos in CA are currently reviewing a bill to mandate it for school children. I have sent them all nasty letters letting them know that there is a warm place in hell for them...it's absolutely criminal!
If I could do it all over I would not vaccinate at all. I would also homeschool. EVERYTHING is corrupt. We need a parallel society even if mandates go. Plan for the next attack, get off the grid as much as possible. I truly believe parallel is the way.
I agree. My kids went thru Catholic then public schools before all this crap started and I am a stanch Republican and they picked up on that so they are not liberally indoctrinated. Thank God. But if I had little ones today I would absolutely not vax and would get a group of like minded parents to group home school even if it meant renting out a small facility and hiring tutors. Whatever it takes to save our kids from this evil agenda. Find holistic docs for the kids that aren’t vax pushers.
Have the Vitamin D3 blood serum levels of each member of the family checked. In my experience, it's not covered by insurance. It cost me $128 / test (each of 3x) but I checked Quest Diagnostics recently and found that it's just $69 there. When I have it checked again, I'll go there instead of my "usual" clinic.
How come, you ask .... Vitamin D3 at >50 ng/mL* https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3596 is protective against MANY diseases, including auto-immune diseases, which is what allergies are. Test, increase intake for three mths; test again, increase again; test again until desired level is reached.
It's not new news. However, lots more is known now - two years into this mess - about HOW vitamin D3 does what it does than was known before. Do not expect your family doctor to be up-to-speed, though.
*The telemed doc I found on the FLCCC website recommends >65 ng/mL. My goal was >60 ng/mL; as of last summer, I'm at 74 ng/mL. I'll recheck ~once a year.
I take 10k Vitamin D daily. I brought my number up quite a bit over the last 2 years. Both my husband and I are mid 70 range. Both of us had mild Covid so it seemed to work! I usually just ask for it as part of my blood panel.
thank you for this information! I will look into it. I have an apt for the 3yo with an allergist next week and will ask them about it to see what they say. Last time we went, she suggested waiting until 5 yo to start giving him allergy shots....um....How about NEVER!?
Had not read about that ! Can you tell us more ? Where to look ? Another interesting twist to all this . When you say "site", is it skin cancer that is developing ?
I learned when my rescued cat had a lump from the vax the shelter administered. The visiting vet happened to be on the national vet board for vaccine-related sarcomas. Lucky me! She advised never to vax or even microchip my cat. Never did. Lewis lived to 22.5 years!
Have family members who will not give most shots and vaccines to their dog. The community does require rabies no matter what, but other than that, none of worm poisons, etc. etc.
I never did vax my 5 cats over the years. They never went outside so why spend the money. They all lived 13 to 18 years old and did fine. What actually killed one cat was kidney failure which I found out later was from their food. Most pet food is horrible for our fur babies.
Jim, we are on the same page. ... I'm going from full naïve here, I suppose. The FDA/NIH/NIAID/DOJ/Big Pharma corruption is not a unique, terrible development of government failures, but only the most recent instance. The dishonesty is too pervasive.
I did the same thing blindly and stupidity. It was the thing to do to keep our kids safe and recommended by the pediatricians. Who questioned it?? Now, I agree, no fucking way will I vax myself ever again and I informed both my young adult daughters to not even think of vaccinated their future children. I’m already sending info about it to them to reinforce the idea now. Don’t forget we will have to go against their doctors and pediatricians who will only to talk them into it.
Read "Bottle Of Lies" by Katherine Eban if you want to know more about how the FDA can fail so badly at its sole mission, which is protecting the American public. The book is about generic drugs, not vaccines, but I still think it's relevant. I'm nearing the end of this great book, and it has scared the hell out of me.
And there was NO SERIOUS DISEASE in either group. "Infection" was a cold for these children. Why give experimental medical treatment to kids to prevent one of the dozens of colds they will have during their childhood?
Robert Kennedy jr states that having it on the childhood vaccination schedule gives the drug companies further liability protection . I’m curious to see if Pfizer employees vaccinate their children with their jab.
I had delta in Jan and was hospitalized. Thanks to FrankenFauci I was unable to get antibodies. During this time I was vacationing with my 3yo granddaughter, we were off visiting family in WV, while we both reside in Oklahoma. She didn’t have a cough, fever or even a runny nose. That’s all the proof I needed babies and toddlers don’t need this injectable.
Another reason I had trouble with treatment was I would feel fine one day and the next day the bottom would fall out. After 6 days of this, I went to get tested and was told my lungs were clear, that was a Friday. By Tuesday, my sister called an ambulance.
Agreed and while some do get a more serious respiratory infection, it’s always been very treatable. No need for a shot so dangerous and also doesn’t prevent getting it and for now, it appears it’s also a super spreader getting the vaccine.
And if you get a natural infection you get real immunity - not the phony baloney "Impossible Burger" immunity from the jab. And no jab side effects either.
Exactly! And even if you do get reinfected which some have, it’s quite mild. Also, isn’t the common cold a corona virus? There’s never been a cure or vaccine to stop this and so we expect we might get a cold at some point. There’s no escaping it.
Why indeed, that's the question very few actually ask. These jabs are ineffective at best yet they are pushed to the max, even those at near zero risk, why?
Of course this will be labeled a conspiracy theory but I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a Conspiracy Analyst.
Numerous medical people have looked at the contents of various batches of these jabs and they do in many cases contain self assembling nano particles. What do they self assemble into? another good question but it's one that also doesn't get asked. I believe the first 2 shots were an attempt to figure out the dosing needed, that's why they floated the "repeated shots needed" messaging. Are they trying to kill us, possibly, but I think they want complaint serfs mostly. The control will be at first be through self assembling antenna picking up 5G signals. It won't make a individual do a specific act but rather create a general depression or feelings of irritatation among those affected, depending on what they want large numbers of people to do.
The scientific literature is full of what I have outlined above. It all is possible today undoubtedly there's more we can't even imagine.
Many people I encounter are so brainwashed by media that they can't see two inches in front of their noses, and if you ever challenge them on the propaganda they find there, like Pavlov's dog they will call you a conspiracy theorist. They will then turn up their nose and walk away with a heightened sense of superiority.
The term "conspiracy theory" is remarkably adept at turning off all critical thinking like a light switch in a large portion of the people I have personally met.
Conditioning the public to react this way has to have been one of the most effective PSYOPs ever pushed onto the general population.
It is equal parts diabolic and brilliant, and it means that the elites can get away with just about anything with little to no scrutiny because everyone is too afraid to point out that the emperor has no clothes lest they be labeled a "conspiracy theorist".
-JW
This article covers the nano-tech in the jabs and the absurd lengths the media is going to make it seem like children and young adults having heart attacks is and always has been normal, this one is worth a look:
Regarding your comments about Conspiracy theories, I'm reminded of the saying about the Devil, that his greatest trick was to make people believe he didn't exist.
Practically nothing happens without people conspiring with each other. It very simply is how humans interact. To label normal human interactions a "Conspiracy" is a label designed to shut off thought and tells the listener to go back to sleep.
I think its just starting to be the most fabulous time ever to be alive. Because so many are in the process of waking up!
So true, and your linking this to the greatest trick of the devil is sublime. I wish I had thought of that myself. David Collum nails the spirit of your comment:
"I am a "conspiracy theorist". I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot". If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward".
Let’s not forget the rest of the crew featured in this clown show. CDC, NIH, teachers unions, media and our blue state leaders. The critical thinkers have left the room.
Thanks for posting! Critical to get comments into the FDA. Super quick and easy. Steve Kirsch's article is excellent and walks you through how to do them. Currently there are 19K comments -- let's get it to 100K! Use Steve Kirsch's article: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda
(1) COMMENT: either type your own comments or copy and paste one or more of the sample comments below. Comments are limited to 5000 characters.
Personal stories are helpful! Know a teen with myocarditis? Blood Clots? Tell their story!
(2) WHAT IS YOUR COMMENT ABOUT: optional
(3) ATTACH FILES: only if you have files that you feel or relevant or want to include
(4) EMAIL ADDRESS & Opt to include email receipt of submission: optional, but recommended so you have a record.
(5) TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF: most likely you will select individual or anonymous. If selecting individual, they will ask for some contact information. You can provide some or all; none is required.
Just knowing so clearly how it effects younger people, i wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole.
Having said that, I would never blame anyone for taking the jab or allowing their kids to take it.
Do not trust anything mainstream media says, including statements from more conservative stations. Research and more research on your own is the only way.
So they cannot claim that they approved poison for babies with unanimous applause and consent. And - assuming you believe you have one - for your soul for when God asks whether you protested this massacre.
I just saw yesterday, Robert Kennedy talking about if they can get it authorized for a childhood vaccine, they cannot be sued. Check out what he said on Telegram yesterday.
This is correct. They are desperate to get these injections on the childhood schedule which then protects them from liability once the EUA runs out.
Two huge problems coming down the pike for Pfizer:
1) They are now legally obligated to release the clinical trial documents at a rate of 55,000 pages for the first two months and I believe 20,000 pages per month thereafter;
2) They WILL NOT be at the table to do "on-site" redactions and must specifically justify through the courts reasonings for each redaction that they ask for.
There is a very high likelihood (near certainty) that there will be fraud discovered in numerous aspects of their trials. If this does turn out to be the case then that means that all manner of public health officials, political officials and administrative officials will have their indemnity erased.
Barring any massive cover-up this is going to make the Phillip Morris and Opioid scandals look like fun time.
The Data Just doesn't justify the EUA..... Follow the science...right?
As of 02/02/2022, CDC's own Data for Provisional Covid 19 deaths in the 0-4 yo group is 87. That's 2 years & 1month...87 deaths....and they want jab millions in this age group...far, far more will die from the vaccine than 87 covid deaths over the next 2 year period..
Congress?!?!? The Republicans are MIA, with the exception of Ron Johnson and the possible exception of Rand Paul. Otherwise, where are the Republicans who should be SCREAMING for investigations and protections for children against these untested, unnecessary poisons?! Lord, Congress is WORTHLESS!!!
When the public health emergency ends, the EUAs expire, and the liability protection afforded under the Prep Act of 2006 goes away.
The pressure appears to be coming from the administration. Pfizer may want to walk away at this point before it gets too dicey, but the White House appears to be scared that the truth will out and they'll be held responsible. They want the liability protection in place so that it never makes it to court.
The FDA is scared. My guess is there's lots of shredding and file burning right now. Their credibility is on the line, it's actually hanging on by a thin thin thread. They're scrambling right now to hide the bodies, literally, before the thread snaps.
They can be reissued at the discretion of the FDA, but the liability protection comes from the Prep Act of 2006. When the public health emergency ends, so does the protection it affords.
This is my understanding, too. Get it on the children's docket of vaccines, and even if the "emergency" is lifted (the only way the vaccines can be used) which currently shields them from lawsuits, they will forever be shielded.
Unless there is provable fraud. The Moderna CEO just deleted his twitter account. Check out Edward Dowd's twitter - he is looking at corroborating vaccine deaths with funeral home and life insurance data.
And the DOD is scrambling to get rid of its "hockey stick" of deaths and illnesses by making up bullshit that the previous 5 years were under counted...data error. Right.
So we now have Vaers, Life Insurance data, Funeral Directors Data, and DOD's DMED data .....all confirming massive death and injuries upon the Covid Shot Roll out. The are NO Coincidences!!
Correct. There will be two winners. One will be the media companies like Alex said. The other will be Pfizer, immune from lawsuits for eternity as the cancer, heart attack, and stroke cases come rolling in and the truth slowly comes out over the next decade or two.
As RFK Jr has pointed out, the CDC has a gaping conflict of interest. Their mandate is to simultaneously:
1) Promote vaccines
2) Regulate vaccines for safety
This is a clear conflict of interest. You can't do #2 effectively while also doing #1. CDC needs to be abolished or its regulatory functions moved elsewhere with a group of people actually committed to protect the public.
How can parents even consider giving their kids of any age this experimental shot. Even before we knew the issues. . .I would never have allowed this to be given to my kids.
How? Nearly 2 years of state-sanctioned brainwashing. They're entrenched in the religious-like dogma of Covidianism.
You can't reason a person out of something he never reasoned himself into in the first place.
Funny too how many Covidians are leftist atheists & mock religion. Ugh. (I'm an atheist, but at least I'm ideologically consistent in dismissing all superstition & dogma.)
Here's a little something to think upon. Many of the atheists or agonists I know that have turned into Covidians, are people who grew up in religious households. As young adults, they couldn't buy into "organize religion", or being told what to do by a man in a robe in Rome. They walked away. But the religious rituals they were exposed to in their childhood, are still in their system. Many of the Covidians I know, seem to be the ones that grew up with a religion that was seeped in rituals, which in some weird way have made them more apt to absorbed the rituals of being a good Covidian. They wear their mask, they social distant, the get their injections, they shame none believers, they like being part of a "club" that excludes others (especially from the communion table, i.e. restaurants). These true Covidians, the ones that won't come to a holiday gathering unless everyone is vaccinated, and wears their masks, are no different than 60 years ago when family wouldn't go to a wedding if their family member was marrying someone outside their faith, or race for that matter. The mind set is the same. And it's damn scary.
I don't agree with your take on rabid Covidians. As a devout Roman Catholic I've found former and lapsed Catholics, who then go in for militant atheism, have issues beyond a nostalgia for ritual. Since the richness of rituals in the RC Church has been largely eliminated since 1969. Many of the rabid Covidians are fiercely anti Catholic at the same time they demand adherence to secularist ideologies. They never understood their former Faith, in any meaningful way, then go in for whatever secularist,fantasy, ersatz ideological faith is at hand. GK Chesterton put it best: "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything."
Religion has nothing to do with this . Lack of critical thinking ,common sense and inquisitive thinking. This is result of their education / indoctrination.
You're kind of making my point, and I don't think you realized it. RC Church still has rituals, maybe not as many, but it's still club Catholic. If you aren't RC you can not take communion at a RC Church, even if you are a professing Christian. Can't be buried in the "Catholic" cemetery, do you want me to go on? Many of the folks I am referring to, actually feel guilty when they don't follow the health rules. Sound familiar? I have lots of friends and family that are Catholic. They love God, and they love people, and they do good works. And maybe it's the ones that didn't fully understand their faith that have gone off the deep end in being anti Catholic, but it's been my experience that Catholics can also go off the deep end and demand adherence to the RC Church to the point of alienating NON CATHOLICS.
I think your emphasis on ritual is quite thin. Of course the RC Church has restrictions , dogma and rules, since it sees itself, not as a sect, as in Protestantism, but as the ordained and one true Church. Club Atheist wouldn't be too happy if I joined up and tried introducing a godhead under the guise of some sort of materialistic life force. The fact that the RC Church is restrictive goes to it's claim to hold the Truth. If you can't accept that then participating in the life of the Church, especially receiving the Eucharist becomes disrespectful. The Irish writer , James Joyce, after rejecting the Church, and adhering to an atheist worldview, always greatly admired the traditional chant and music of the Easter service. He listened to the music every year but out of respect, he would not enter beyond the outer entrance of a RC church. And when asked he stated he could not believe and would not feign belief by entering, nor be a challenge to believers at worship. That's a mark of personal integrity and very admirable.The fact that many Covidians are guilty about lapses in their mask wearing etc, can be as easily traced to neurotic sensibilities arising from fear of social ostracism as any weak link to religious ritual.
LOL! you can think what ever you want, I simply stated that it's something I observed. Maybe he listened outside the walls of the church because he knew he wasn't welcomed in, and he enjoyed the ritual of listening to the Easter Service. Just sayin.
IMO, you're close. It's not that the type you cite abhors religion, it's that they abhor any religion which cedes control to outside parties. Christians, for instance, cede control to God ("thy will be done", etc).
Leftist atheists love Humanism, where Man is in control - if it is MAN in control, why wouldn't they want to be the "Leaders", bullying other Man?
Of course they would. It's endemic to all Leftist ideology.
Including - perhaps especially - Branch COVIDians.
You stated what i know also to be true (i have some slight differences in the clarity of the perspective you give) but it didn't come to mind. The minority of true believers in the true austere Jesus the Christ of the Scriptures indeed cede control to God/Jesus because He's God/Jesus, we're not, He knows best, we do not, He's the only omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent one true God, we are not, only He is sinless perfection, we are not and so on.
There are no atheists on the right in God's universe, the atheist position in His eyes is inescapably always on the left. And yes indeed the atheists love Humanism for it is the worship of self - that's what satan teaches since satan is the ultimate origin of that.
Anyway, i'm glad you pointed out what you did in general.
Yes, I agree, they do love Humanism, where Man is in control. Absolutely. I totally agree with this. Mostly, it's just that I have noticed that the level of ritualistic behavior with COVID/Pandemic measures that were put in place for our "safety", the people who seem deeply "religious" in keeping with those measures, at least in my experience, seem to be ones that grew-up in a household that participated in a religion that was seeped in rituals.
There are those too. There are all kinds. I would only add that those who claim to be 'deeply religious' (in the Judeo-Christian sense) and still hold to zealous Branch COVIDianism are woefully misled/easily swayed/have false faith in God/some other dysfunction.
I think in this subset of people, we can safely and rather accurately segregate them by political ideology: I think those who are ostensibly "deeply religious" and also zealot COVIDians are also very much on the Left spectrum of political ideology - and that was central to my earlier point: the Left spectrum demands control.
In other words: while they claim to be deeply religious, they're in fact practicing an entirely different religion while wearing the trappings of a belief which contradicts them.
I would like to add one more thing, in response to your observation of prior history of participating in religion seeped with ritual:
1. Nearly all religions possess this trait.
2. I think you're confusing causation/correlation: rituals spring from the need to regiment (read: CONTROL). In that sense, what Discepolo wrote is absolutely accurate: Jesus didn't give us 'structured/organized religion', because adherence to such a paradigm cedes CONTROL to MAN (who, after all, created such rituals?). This is why I call myself a Christian, but do not consider myself part of any Christian 'religion'.
3. The need/want for ritual is endemic to human nature, which is why so many (on the Left, IMO), are susceptible to it. These do not WANT to be responsible for themselves, and themselves alone. They want RULES/GUIDELINES/ADHERENCE/COMPLIANCE/PUNISHMENT for those who fail to adhere to their version of what is right. They, therefore, find themselves the perfect home in forced compliance of Branch COVIDianism.
TL;DR: people don't become COVIDians because they have a history of ritualistic religious belief, they become COVIDians because they haven't REPLACED their need for ritualistic religious belief with faith in God and ceding outcomes to His Will.
I like your reasoning here. I understand the Mass Formation reasoning, but you have just added another layer that makes a lot of sense to me. Thank you for helping me understand the Covidians better.
I can't buy that. Most of the Covidians I know grew up with little or no religion at all. The government is their religion. I grew up Catholic, consider myself Christian, but no longer Catholic, and many of the people in my church (more than in the the general population) think the closures, masks, and vaccines are all personal choices, not something the government should force upon people. From what I see, most religious people have put their trust in God over the government.
Interesting. I def see your parallels with Covidians & the ultra-religious.
But it doesn't align with my experience. My husband & I were raised Roman Catholic, walked away from religion, & have been team reality for a long time.
One of the most devout Covidians I know was raised mostly atheist. But he's also passionately pro-Democrats. A devoted tribe member of the left & sufferer of TDS. Loves to get riled up at, "Look how awful right-wingers are!!"
Obv these are far from statistically significant sample sizes. ;)
I should mention, that there are a few others I encountered that did walk away from the Roman Catholic religion, and are "practicing" Christians, these too seem to grab onto the COVIDIAN rituals. It's that exposure to ritualistic behavior when they are young and impressionable that seems to leave a void that they need to fill. It's just a thought from some observations. None of us walk in each other's shoes, so we'll all have different experiences. This was just mine.
I'm a former catholic (universalist) also. You state "team reality", correct reading of the New Covenant/Testament in the proper historical contextual exegesis of the life and times of Jesus (God) and His Apostles shows that true reality one lives in only when they humble themselves before God/Jesus and submit to Him fully to become a true John 3:3-16 adopted child of the true Lord. Roman Catholicism, ever so sadly, is the biggest counterfeit of what the austere genuine Jesus the Christ taught, it pains me to no end how well satan has deceived the majority of the world in so many ways into so many religions, not the one and only faith that Jesus offers mankind were only He can grant salvation by His finished work at the cross which He paid in full in His blood for the sins of mankind which no man could ever do for we all have sinned, Jesus never did for He was the God-man after all and the only spotless lamb who could pay such a price for the sins of mankind.
I think there are degrees of anything, including this. We can only discuss this with anecdote and in generality. Curious: when you walked away from religion, did you walk away from belief in a Higher Power?
If the answer is no - and I'm guessing it is (as I am similar), then the point I was making still holds.
I think you have to hold - generally - a belief in a Supernatural power greater than Man in order to - generally - reject COVIDianism.
The Romans coined the word "religio" (a re-binding), a term they used to describe the cretin worship of their 'gods' of the tribes they would conquer (I'm giving you a Cliff Notes version). In essence it meant "something a man must do for a god or gods to gain salvation" .. in other words, works-based, and thus the tragic false belief that man can save himself, when no man can, hence why God manifested in the flesh (1Timothy3:16) and died for the sins of mankind for only He was worthy and the sinless lamb, so you see, if you read the Scriptures with proper exegesis, you learn that God/Jesus brought man the one and only faith, and when it is corrupted by satan, it became religion, man's utterly futile attempt to save himself by his works.
I'm in a blue state where schools stayed entirely closed over a year (then opened only 2 days a week.) I was able to get my kids into a Christian school & the passionate gratitude I feel towards this organization is powerful.
If they need me, I'm there.
I've actually debated attending services too!
As for "former dems," I'm debating staying registered Dem so I can vote in primaries & hopefully get out incumbents!! That way if Dems win, at least it won't be the same ones.
You make a good point about religion (hence why God/Jesus never gave man religion, but the one and only faith) but when you get to the "i'm an atheist, but at least i'm ideologically consistent in dismissing all superstition & dogma." part, such a position is not ideologically consistent when atheism is its own several thousand year old pagan religion - its the religion of self and of what God declares in Psalm 14, see the following video from a former hardcore atheist who became an ex-atheist after a trip to jail for attempted murder of his own father who tried to murder his father with a hammer to the head and jail-time gave him a reality check;
It just hit me that you're way off base with this statement, "dismissing all superstition & dogma.... is not ideologically consistent with atheism"
Dogma = belief in something you aren't allowed to question. Must accept on faith and believe fully.
Not only do I "question" my atheism, I ENJOY doing so! Ha!
As to superstition, belief that 1 thing or action is a "cause" when there's no logical basis. I can't see how atheists have any at all. I don't have rituals, or idols or symbolism of any kind. There's literally nothing superstitious.
"It just hit me that you're way off base with this statement, "dismissing all superstition & dogma.... is not ideologically consistent with atheism"
Obviously you did not understand the video if you watched it, for if you undestood the video if you watched it, you'd concede that i'm not way off base.
"Dogma = belief in something you aren't allowed to question. Must accept on faith and believe fully. "
That's your definition which contains truth mixed with error, not the factual etymological definition. Questioning is allowed, for if you do not ask, how will you know better?
If you truly questioned your atheism, you would not be an atheist hence why the video i linked for you, which does not seem you watched it, or if you did, clearly did not understand how your position is a walking contradiction.
"As to superstition, belief that 1 thing or action is a "cause" when there's no logical basis. I can't see how atheists have any at all. I don't have rituals, or idols or symbolism of any kind. There's literally nothing superstitious."
The video i linked already refutes your position on what you state and claim above, the fact you do not see it, is expected, because being an atheist is not about and evidence issue, it's about a heart issue, they worship self, they are their own "God" thus humanism, thus the religion of self, which the Devil is the originator of.
I define it as simply, "NOT having a belief in God." ABSENCE of belief. That's not a religion.
I remember Joe Rogan saying it's arrogant to say, "I'm convinced there's no God!" Because we can't prove it.
Yeah... OK, but from what I know NOW, I'm quite confident that there's no all-powerful & all loving god.
Just like I don't currently "believe" in unicorns & dragons. Give me new evidence, I might change my mind.
As of now, I don't believe. So I think it makes sense to refer to my self as "atheist" even though Rogan shares my same beliefs & chooses to refer to himself as "Agnostic."
I don't see the need to split hairs like that. Esp since the idea of "God" as it is now in the USA equals "all powerful & all loving," so when I use the term atheist, I'm clarifying that I don't believe in that.
Depends how you define it? I'm a language custodian and purist and a linguist, if we actually used the factual definition/etymology of a word that has not been corrupted, there would be far less confusion. I define a-theism by the factual Greek to English definition. Must be real convenient to have a custom definition for atheism eh? This is what God declares in Psalm 14 (one of many places in His Holy Writ);
"(To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.) The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."
God does not lie, He created mankind, He knows best, He knows all men's hearts (that includes women's hearts), only He is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, omni-benevolent, omni-judex, omni-dimensional and omni-omni, not man.
"I define it as simply, "NOT having a belief in God." ABSENCE of belief. That's not a religion."
God calls the atheist a liar for claiming they do not believe in God since He has put knowledge of His existence into the very core of their being so that it is inescapable, so that to deny it is why He calls them a fool because He knows you know He exists, but like His Spirit declared through Paul in Romans 1:18-32, the atheist suppresses that eternal truth in unrighteousness;
[Romans 1:18-26]
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Therefore, atheists do have a religion, it's the religion of self, they have their high priests, their sacred book (Charles Darwin's " On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life" - take special notice of that "favoured races" part and read this short article to further comprehend what the atheist position is actually worshipping also = http://mwilliams.info/archive/2008/02/the-full-title-of-darwins-on-the-origin-of-species.php) and extra-sacred books, their assemblies, their rituals etc.
"I remember Joe Rogan saying it's arrogant to say, "I'm convinced there's no God!" Because we can't prove it."
He's actually correct there, he's being kind, it's actually quite arrogant/proud/prideful/vanity/haughty/hubristic. As the Scriptural verses i pasted above affirm, proof for God's existence is all around us so much so that it is inescapable, that to deny it, make one a true fool in God's eyes. Hence why i linked you that video "Argument from Reason" which you clearly you have not grasped if you did actually watch it.
"Yeah... OK, but from what I know NOW, I'm quite confident that there's no all-powerful & all loving god."
You're claiming to have omniscience, which no man or woman has, only one being does = God/Jesus. You do not know everything there is to know, how do you know God doesn't exist in the parts you do not know? Therefore once again, you keep demonstrating how atheism is ideologically inconsistent, tremendously, so to claim God does not exist, is instant self-refutation and thus indeed stark arrogance which is why atheism is madness/profound delusion. They are so spiritually blinded by satan, that they do not even see (yet) that the moment they discuss the existence of God, they have already acknowledged His existence (hence why i linked you the video Argument from Reason so you can learn why your position is inherently a walking contradiction.)
"Just like I don't currently "believe" in unicorns & dragons."
Uni-corn means "one-horn".. in the Bible it was the description for a Rhinoceros like creature that actually existed since we have fossils of it. As for 'dragons';
The word “Dinosauria/Dinosaur” was coined in 1841 by Sir Richard Owens *(Paleontologist, biologist, comparative anatomist) *and the word is from two Greek words “*deinos”* "terrible" + *“sauros”* "lizard". “Great / Terrible Lizard.” If you spend the time to diligently look into *(meaning taking much time than doing a 20 second search engine query)* what word(s) were used in English literature before the word “Dinosaur” was coined, you will find the most common word was **Dragons. ** I know this to be true for i spent much time investigating historical English literature in relation to these matters and truly before 1841, you always see more than anything this creatures referred to as Dragons. See following links for further review;
There is increasingly mountains of evidence of one horned Rhinocerous'and dinosaurs.
"As of now, I don't believe."
God/Jesus declares otherwise.
"So I think it makes sense to refer to my self as "atheist" even though Rogan shares my same beliefs & chooses to refer to himself as "Agnostic.""
More inconsistency (the inherent incontrovertible position of the atheist, 24/7 self-contradiction). He obviously does not share your world-view, to think he does, is just more evidence of not "sense" and how it must be real convenient to have such an inconsistent world-view where it's guided by animalistic proclivities and situational morality/ethics where you can justify whatever you want because you make the rules, if it feels good do it.
"I don't see the need to split hairs like that."
Of course you do not, because it's the worship of self, you do what feels good and is "right" in your eyes, not God's/Jesus', that's what the Devil teaches.
"..Esp since the idea of "God" as it is now in the USA equals "all powerful & all loving," so when I use the term atheist, I'm clarifying that I don't believe in that."
God/Jesus doesn't believe in atheists since He knows they do not exist, He's the omniscient one, not us.
I told my daughter that from now on, when her kids need vaccinations, that she must insist on witnessing the drawing up of each vial, so she can see EXACTLY what they are getting. No more walking in with a tray of syringes. You cannot trust, that they won't slip in the clot shot.
I still think MOST nurses & docs are honest & wouldn't deceive, but yes, it's possible. There have been cases. IIRC, one hungry kid was told he could have some pizza at school if he agreed to the shot.
There are definitely evil Covidians in this world, & some work in healthcare.
Because the FDA is not an "advisory board" with the goal of protecting public health. They are politically and financially driven and an arm of whoever is in power. You're not talking about people who have any other goal than their own enrichment and continued employment. Once you understand that, this all makes sense.
I am contemplating whether or not I will watch the advisory board meeting on the 15th. Know thy enemy thinking suggests I should, but I don't know if I can take another hit to my confidence in humanity after watching the 5-11 years meeting.
Exactly. It was rough. Especially the pediatrician member who admittedly states his own comorbidities all of the time and puts that bias toward recommendations for children.
It's rough. They all walk lock step towards the cliff. It's just disgusting. No questions. No comments. Just keep walking down the path to destruction.
This is from a Pediatrician friend who can't post this on FB so he has an email list.
A big concern of mine at present is the pending possible authorization of the Pfizer 3 ug dose mRNA vaccine for babies and children from 6 months to 4 years of age. We have looked at the well documented low burden of disease in this age group, which mirrors my personal experience. And we've discussed possible risks associated with this particular model of vaccine. Not too long ago, we discussed the concept of "Original Antigenic Sin", seen with other viruses, in which the first antigens used to stimulate the host's immune response will determine all subsequent responses. Our fear was that imprinting on the old, now obsolete, Wuhan spike protein configuration, which comprises the current mRNA vaccines, would cause future immune responses to variants with very different spike protein configurations to still be geared to the Wuhan spike, therefore lessening the efficacy and protection.
This has now been shown to be true for SARS-CoV-2. The study is "Immune Imprinting, Breadth of Variant Recognition, and Germ Center Response in Human SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination", from Stanford University, posted on CELL online on 25 January 2022. Here's the link:
1) "Antibody breadth against the variants is less after infection compared to all vaccines evaluated, but improves over several months."
2) "By 9 months, spike-specific IgG had decreased approximately 20-fold from the maximum" [for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine]."
3) "We quantify a strong imprinting effect of prior vaccination with Wuhan-H-1 spike antigen on antibody specificities following breakthrough infection with viral variants."
So, the mRNA model, which was ideal as far as the rapidity of development and distribution, elicits a robust, strong IgG response (anti-S antibodies), which saved many vulnerable lives, but the antibodies wane quickly, requiring boosters. Natural immunity elicits a more subdued, broader, less robust response, which strengthens over time, providing long-term protection. That is my argument for awaiting traditional vaccine models which approximate the natural response for the low risk children, given the obvious fact that they are in this for the long-haul. There is no urgency regarding them, for natural infection itself is of low risk (not no risk...low risk).
But point 3 is the bigger take-away from this study. They studied the immune response in subjects fully vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine and then infected with either the alpha or delta variants, and found the main antibody response was to the old Wuhan spike protein, not the variant spike protein, which had mutated. This is consistent with Original Antigenic Sin, and this response was not seen in the unvaccinated, who mounted robust antibody responses to the variant's spike protein.
Do you see my concern with subjecting our healthy young children to this vaccine model? We will be priming their immune systems to mount a primary antibody response against an old protein that doesn't even exist anymore, and probably never will again, instead of to the configuration of spike protein they will encounter when confronted with infection. We could be forever limiting their ability to mount a truly protective response that would be broad and durable. This isn't just theory when it comes to SARS-CoV-2 anymore.
I just don't get the rush to push this thing through. I trust the FDA's advisory committee members, who know a lot more than I do about these things, are looking at the big picture...at the long-haul...for that is how we must approach any intervention directed toward the children. Their meeting is on 15 February. It's a big deal.
An since their immune system are not fully trained the suppression on their immune systems will be greater than an adult who's immune sysem is more trained.
So based on the most recent judge ruling on FDA FOIA on Pfizer - they have until or before March 1 to produce the first 20-50, 000 pages of documents. How convenient that VRBPAC for EUA for 6mo-4 yrs just happens to be scheduled before then?
The only thing I disagree with here is the last paragaph - "I trust the FDA's advisory committee members.. are looking at the big picture." Only if the big picture includes their future giant salaries at big Pharma.
Does that make it resemble what happens with the current flu vaccine?? The shot you get this year is for last years version of the flu. The jab may lessen the effects but does not prevent contracting the current version. I am open to correction.
Yes and no. They guess four Strains based on what’s circulating. The Who admits this shouldn’t be given to everyone. It has very low efficacy (often well below 50%), and protection drops quickly (3-4 months). Cochrane collaboration has a great summary. In essence, immunocompromised and older folks might benefit (and that’s a big might). As far as I know the USA is the only country that wants all citizens six months and older to get this (and many folks don’t do this).
I could not agree more! After cancer, I realized that medical "care" is reduced to drugs and knives. For cancer, they throw in burning via radiation. It's all destructive and as an industry, they never seriously talk about proper nutrition and won't even consider non-pharmaceutical solutions. If I were to break a leg, I'd be more inclined to find an old eagle scout to set it than go to the hospital.
Any parent that would get their baby or toddler injected in light of this data has to be suffering from mental health issues. I’d say the same applies to parents of healthy children of any age, but really, it’s indisputable for the youngest ages group- all risk for absolutely NO benefit.
We think that because even though we’re not medical experts, our common sense and reading everything we can get our hands on about this issue has given us reason to pause…ask questions…and follow the money.
I think many people follow doctors’ orders. Other people have been absolutely terrified by the scare tactics of Fauci & Friends and the media. But there are many (like those giving their toddlers and children the jab) who think they’re smarter, know better and so go ahead. A friend’s daughter is in brain research and she said she and her friends have “looked at the vaxes and found them to be safe”…and her friends are offering up their young children as guinea pigs. Huge problem. They don’t know what they don’t know.
I agree. It’s frightening to me also that anyone could make this decision.
Yes. Living in San Francisco it’s like everyone turned into a zombie. Scared to death of Covid and ‘anti vaxxers’. Can’t wait to inject babies because they’re convinced they’ll die from it. It truly is some sort of mass hypnosis or neurosis.
I guess the Branch Covidians must have mental health issues anyway, so no doubt they will be lining their kids up. Canada has been vaccinating the 5 - 11 year age group since last summer. Don't even think about trying to find follow-up data. It's all buried.
If the FDA will approve Covid shots for children under 5, what won't the FDA approve? Makes one wonder about the efficacy and safety of every drug ever approved by the FDA. I don't even want to take Advil anymore.
I think, unfortunately, that the uptake will be a lot more than 0. So many sheep have been brainwashed and will either vax their young kids out of fear or out of peer pressure & virtue signaling.
You got that right. Here in Northern VA and MD, the uptake is thru the roof. My high end kids private HS - middle school is reporting 95% uptake on the covid dashboard. 95%!!
Frankly, parents have had to do the FDAs job for years. They’ve never cared about the artificial colors or flavors added to many foods that are marketed specifically to children. Nor have they cared how many injections or the level of toxins in those injections that are to be given to the most vulnerable and precious of all beings, our newborn babies. They’ve been allowed to run amok for decades and they must be stopped.
On a similar note, check with the FDA regarding the % of insect parts and rodent droppings permissible in ground pepper. Makes one want to buy whole peppercorns and grind their own.
"uptake will likely be near zero". I don't know about that. There are many hysterical Karens out there who think Covid could be deadly for their healthy child (because media told them so) and also "don't want to kill grandma" (pass virus to elders). Media has created a mental illness in people.
Alex, I think you're wrong that uptake will be near zero. That 30% stuck in the mass psychosis would jump at the chance to inject their young children. I still see 3 and 4 year old children at the pre-K section of my daughter's elementary school IN TEXAS with double masks.
And adults who lied about having a condition that would qualify them to get the booster during the first round. Don't get me started on how we let people walk up to a Walmart pharmacy and get a jab without any review by a physician, antibody test for recent infection, etc. Oh how many ways they've failed us!
Don't count on the uptake being near ZERO, I know of Kool-aid induced madness in a Young mother with two toddlers. I'm praying she sees the light and says no.
Unfortunately Alex, you are wrong about the uptake with parents. In the insane asylum blue states (like here in WA), 95% of parents are lining up their kids for these toxic shots. All while double masked, of course.
Uptake does not matter. Pfizer needs this to be on the CDC Recommended Childhood Vaccine Schedule so that they can have immunity from prosecution for injuries and illness caused by their toxic shot. Immunity applies to children and adults when it is on the CDC schedule. 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
With big pharma, the FDA, CDC and AMA, we are dealing with purely criminal organizations and agencies. They have sunk lower than the lowest gutter. Big pharma wants these mRNA poisons to be added to the regular vac schedules thus ensuring control and profits. That way they can add more and more horrific injections and nobody will say boo-hoo. And all without a speck of responsibility, culpability or conscience.
It's irrelevant what uptake is - that is not pharma's end game. Clearance for the babies is the first step to get it on the childhood vaccine schedule which will be the holy grail for them for permanent liability protection. We must hold the line here if there is ever a chance of getting justice for the vaccine injured.
This is not shocking if you understand the way the FDA and CDC schedule of all childhood immunizations has been created. None of this is new. Start researching the vaccines on that schedule and then get back to me.
Here’s a tidbit… Hep B, only passed thru needles and sex and rarely serious, was added to the schedule for infants simply because at risk teens wouldnt take the shot. It has 250mcg aluminum in it and is given on the day of birth, and 3 more times before the age of 4. Oh and treating the rare hep b positive or at risk mom while pregnant is VERY easy.
If you start researching you’ll find that the case for covid 19 vaccines for under 5s is almost logical in the context of the full
I did not allow my daughter to take the Hep B vaccine as an infant, but since they were required for kindergarten, she needed to take them in the months leading up to the start of school. There was no reason whatsoever for her to take multiple doses of this vaccine as a healthy 5 year old. I sincerely regret allowing her to take them. The childhood vaccine schedule is designed to generate profit for the pharmaceutical companies, not to promote children's health.
My children had 3 of their Hep B shots before I woke up. They will never have another shot after I thoroughly read every single insert and researched every illness. It takes a lot to stand against the tide, especially when schools require them and states with zero ways to get exemptions. Youre 100% right, all for profit, just like Covid.
Yes, yes! People who are skeptical of the Clot Shot need to further awaken to the terrible reality of the childhood vaxxes. Too many think all was well until COVID came to town.
I never allowed it. Coming from Europe I knew this was crazy (it’s not given at birth there).
We can go on with craziness - injected vitamin K vs oral (oral the norm in Europe) - why inject if you can ingest? Less harsh. Or antibiotic eye ointment. Again only offered back home if mom has a history of STDs. American health policies aim to shoot at the largest possible crowd for the smallest potential effect. I suspect strongly now after the Covid mess Pharma is behind all of this.
The FDA has been a criminal enterprise for decades. It takes tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars and about a decade to "normally" get a drug to market. They have rallied on a massive scale around not only this so-called "vaccine," but that it defies ordinary vaccine methods with the mRNA delivery. All-cause death rates (not just those loosely attributed to COVID) are at record levels since the vax mandates began--and they still double-down on pushing these jabs.
Any type of natural medicine or supplement is taken off market immediately if they even "claim" to help a condition in any way--whether they actually do or not. The reason? It's not putting money in the pockets of Big Pharma, which has OWNED the FDA since the 1960's. Did Alex's research not show clearly that only 16% of the regulators voting to approve "emergency use" of the vaccines did NOT have a financial interest in the vaccines' approval? How about the swift defamatory reactions to--and restrictions on availability--of Ivermectin, an inexpensive treatment that showed early on that it combatted COVID? All to push shots that repeatedly proved they did not actually work longterm, if at all--and with the boosters, actually made those who got jabbed more likely to contract it!
We don't need government agencies run by unelected bureaucrats to be our "parents" for a lifetime! All we really need is a wave of NEW blood in Congress and the Administration--new blood pumping through the veins of people with conscience that will run these bureaucrats, along with the career politicians who've profitably enabled them, straight to Gitmo. (Or the gallows, but I digress.)
No surprise here -pharma wants it to become part of the "mandatory" childhood vax schedule. They will pay off the regime and its puppets as needed to accomplish the mission.
Yes, there will be very low uptake of the jabs in very young children. But some parents will get their children jabbed, and some "doctors" will recommend the jabs (do they still get a jab bonus?). Children will be hurt by this. Some may die.
There was a news story in Germany that some parents got pediatricians to give the 5-11 vax to their toddlers because ‘they were in agony to get their toddlers protected’. 🤮
Corruption in govt agencies doesn't surprise me and shouldn't surprise anyone but I have to admit it wasn't until Covid-19 that I started to realize the extent of the corruption and the relatively small group with so much centralized power. But even a lot of corruption isn't the worst problem.. the worst problem is when you mix in a few people that have enough ego to believe they are smart enough to figure out how to dramatically change the world.
“But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” - Matthew 18:6
*How you can help persuade the FDA committee not to approve Pfizer for kids under 5*
This takes < 42 seconds of your time (John did it in 28 seconds). The more people who do it the better. Even though it will be ignored, we don't want to have them claim that nobody opposed it.
Read the newsletter and follow the instructions. What is being sought is sheer volume of responses, not actual explanations on why the FDA is promoting a bad idea because they are not going to read anything that's written. He asks that this newsletter & instructions be passed onto other just to get the numbers up.
For those who are who don't know why Pfizer & the FDA are pushing to get this passed: Pfizer needs to push this onto children and than declare it a success, not really but the FDA is a captured entity, to get on the regular Children Vaccine schedule which will give them complete liability on the shot forever. The immunity will apply to the current Pfizer once the EUA is lifted because it's covered by the blanket immunity given to shots on the Children's schedule. U.S. Supreme Court removed vaccine product liability in 2011. This is their plan.
A reminder that this article serves as a rebuttal to the 'Collapse of Team Apocalypse' article. Team Apocalypse is not nearly collapsed yet. Every hopeful sign is contradicted by two new pieces of evidence that the madness is not retreating anytime soon.
The proper role of the experts is to honestly inform everybody of their actual risks, and ways to mitigate said risks. In the case of covid, we know that other than age (which we can’t do anything about), obesity and vitamin D deficiency are the best indicators of bad outcomes. Thus, the proper role of government here would have been to encourage people to eat healthy, lose weight, and get out in the sunshine.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT KEEPING YOU HEALTHY. This is about overriding your personal preferences with that of unaccountable ‘experts’. This is about you giving up your autonomy for the collective. And if you happen to be one of the eggs who gets broken, perhaps via vaccine injury or your child regressing in school, the collective will shrug and say you’re simply the cost of making the omelet.
I saw a poll that said 39 percent of parents of children under five are going to rush right out and get the Covid-19 vaccine for their children as soon as it is available. In fact, this is what Pfizer and the FDA are banking on. They know there are millions of parents who will not wait for evidence that the third shot does the trick. They've been sufficiently scared out of their minds into believing that their children are in mortal danger from Covid.
So, unfortunately, uptake will not be near zero. And there will be deaths -- not from the virus, from the vaccine.
Disgusting move by big pharma and even bigger government to grift the world out of money big government will turn around and loan into existence. I'm done with anyone telling me what to do and how to live. The U.S. is doomed. We need a major black swan event to clear the slate and start over. The great reset needs to be 50 free and independent States with no federal overlord. D.C. can become a camp for former "leaders" to serve time until they are hung in the public square for crimes against humanity. RESIST.
If someone knows an influential social media person I actually think starting a campaign to send Valentines to doctors and Children’s Hospitals is a fantastic idea, if I do say do myself 😉
Because TPTB own the FDA via Big Pharma $$$. "The “approval” by the FDA, the agency owned by the elites, is just a show to deceive the masses. In the next few months, we can expect Pfizer to “seek” FDA approval to vaccinate newborns" :
The Real Face Of Evil: 17-Year-Old Sean Hartman Was Killed By The Pfizer Jab. Twitter Removed His Dad's Account For Speaking The Truth
The same way they recommend HepB vaccine at birth, 4 months and 6 months. The only chance an infant has of contracting HepB is if Mom is HepB positive. Hep B is contracted through IV drug use. Just test Mom.....but no. Every baby is given HepB vaccine despite the fact, FDA and CDC know that by age 18, only 1% of population maintains immunity. That's all risk and no benefit.
(1) COMMENT: Limit of 5000 characters. May I suggest you just write “oppose.” It’s not like anyone will read 100,000 comments anyway, so we are just going for numbers. Feel free if you write something longer but I don’t think it is going to make a difference.
(2) WHAT IS YOUR COMMENT ABOUT: pick “INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER”
(4) EMAIL ADDRESS Optional - if you want an email receipt from them for a record of your submission.
(5) TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF: most likely “INDIVIDUAL”[they’ll ask for contact information] or “ANONYMOUS” [no contact info.] Your identifying information is NOT required.
(6) SELECT – “I am not a robot”. However, if you are a Robot, don’t check the box. You don’t want to lie.
Soon enough The Bag of bones in the white house the Delusional mannequin is going to be sending you a brand new Crack pipe. I am sure that was FDA CDC NIH Fauci and Collins approved warp Mach one speed.
Edit: Kasha posted this below and it should be pinned at the top:
Everyone needs to do this: Write to the FDA. The links and some good tips are in this substack. Should take less than a minute.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda
_______________________________________-
The FDA is a criminal organization out to get Pfizer their immunity shield at the cost of killing and maiming many thousands of innocent children with a fake cure for a disease that doesn’t affect them. Here is the true story of how they approved the Pfizer poison for 5-11 year olds:
We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.
-Dr. Ruben, Before Voting to Approve the Pfizer Vaccine for 5-11 Year Olds
FDACommitteeMembersReviewingPfizerVaccineForChildrenHaveWorkedForPfizer
On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 the FDA officially abrogated their duty to protect the public by voting 17-0 to approve the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for 5 - 11 year old children, based on the following numbers...
Child Pfizer Vaccine Safety Study:
_______________________________
2 Months Long
2268 Children in Study
16 Infected After Given Placebo
3 Infected After Given Vaccine
Result: 91% Efficacy
_______________________________
This is meaningless statistical noise, AKA lying with statistics.
Then there’s this from the study:
"The study isn’t large enough to detect any extremely rare side effects, such as the heart inflammation that occasionally occurs after the second dose, mostly in young men and teen boys."
And then this:
“FDA analysis calculated … the vaccine would prevent roughly 200 to 250 COVID-19 hospitalizations for every 1 million youngsters vaccinated, with about 58 hospitalizations for the heart inflammation.”
https://tritorch.com/fda
The corruption of the FDA is nothing new. It’s only because of the covid hysteria has it become exposed to a lot more curious people. I blindly gave my kids the childhood vaccine schedule and thought nothing of it. I now feel like a complete fool and basically it appears I just got lucky that neither one has any known side effects. I will advise my now older kids to do serious research before jabbing there newborns with anything required by this corrupt government. Parents need to say no fucking way to this jab in there infants and toddlers. The crappy education most get in government schools isn’t worth the risk.
26 years ago, when I was pregnant with our son, my husband demanded we not vaccinate. I was shocked.
For 7 months, he inundated me with articles and data. I was still scared. But ultimately, decided that a “no” over-ruled my “yes.”
2 children later… great decision. Healthy like bulls.
Wise man - sometimes the oldest pays the price for the younger sibling to have good health
Yes. My oldest is vaccine injured and autistic. His younger four siblings are beautifully healthy and were kept safe from dangerous vaccines. Almost all "anti-vaxxers" are actually EX-vaxxers.
Ditto here. Two healthy teen boys who never get sick. They rarely get colds, no ear infections, nothing.
I did the same, except both of my kids suffer from: 1 has severe food allergies and the other has severe allergies that is causing asthma (he is only 3yo). After all this of the past 2 years and reading and reading and reading I told my husband I will not be involved with completing their childhood vaccine requirements and if he does it he better have done a ton of research to prove to me that it's "safe". They will definitely not be getting the covid vaccine under ANY circumstances and we will homeschool if it comes down to it. I feel so pissed off about all of this. The sickos in CA are currently reviewing a bill to mandate it for school children. I have sent them all nasty letters letting them know that there is a warm place in hell for them...it's absolutely criminal!
If I could do it all over I would not vaccinate at all. I would also homeschool. EVERYTHING is corrupt. We need a parallel society even if mandates go. Plan for the next attack, get off the grid as much as possible. I truly believe parallel is the way.
I agree. My kids went thru Catholic then public schools before all this crap started and I am a stanch Republican and they picked up on that so they are not liberally indoctrinated. Thank God. But if I had little ones today I would absolutely not vax and would get a group of like minded parents to group home school even if it meant renting out a small facility and hiring tutors. Whatever it takes to save our kids from this evil agenda. Find holistic docs for the kids that aren’t vax pushers.
Stick to your guns. Your kids life and well being depend on it!! Good luck!
Have the Vitamin D3 blood serum levels of each member of the family checked. In my experience, it's not covered by insurance. It cost me $128 / test (each of 3x) but I checked Quest Diagnostics recently and found that it's just $69 there. When I have it checked again, I'll go there instead of my "usual" clinic.
How come, you ask .... Vitamin D3 at >50 ng/mL* https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3596 is protective against MANY diseases, including auto-immune diseases, which is what allergies are. Test, increase intake for three mths; test again, increase again; test again until desired level is reached.
It's not new news. However, lots more is known now - two years into this mess - about HOW vitamin D3 does what it does than was known before. Do not expect your family doctor to be up-to-speed, though.
*The telemed doc I found on the FLCCC website recommends >65 ng/mL. My goal was >60 ng/mL; as of last summer, I'm at 74 ng/mL. I'll recheck ~once a year.
I take 10k Vitamin D daily. I brought my number up quite a bit over the last 2 years. Both my husband and I are mid 70 range. Both of us had mild Covid so it seemed to work! I usually just ask for it as part of my blood panel.
Excellent!
thank you for this information! I will look into it. I have an apt for the 3yo with an allergist next week and will ask them about it to see what they say. Last time we went, she suggested waiting until 5 yo to start giving him allergy shots....um....How about NEVER!?
After all I’ve learned, I’m not even going to vax my cats in the future!
I have a dog who only has his rabies shot. He’s 13 going on 3
Good! So many with cancer developing at the vaccine site! People have gotta wake up!
Had not read about that ! Can you tell us more ? Where to look ? Another interesting twist to all this . When you say "site", is it skin cancer that is developing ?
I learned when my rescued cat had a lump from the vax the shelter administered. The visiting vet happened to be on the national vet board for vaccine-related sarcomas. Lucky me! She advised never to vax or even microchip my cat. Never did. Lewis lived to 22.5 years!
Have family members who will not give most shots and vaccines to their dog. The community does require rabies no matter what, but other than that, none of worm poisons, etc. etc.
I've read of many whose cancer started at the site of the chip injection..
Pfizer's CEO is a veterinarian.
🤣🤣🤣there you go
I never did vax my 5 cats over the years. They never went outside so why spend the money. They all lived 13 to 18 years old and did fine. What actually killed one cat was kidney failure which I found out later was from their food. Most pet food is horrible for our fur babies.
Ditto!
Jim, we are on the same page. ... I'm going from full naïve here, I suppose. The FDA/NIH/NIAID/DOJ/Big Pharma corruption is not a unique, terrible development of government failures, but only the most recent instance. The dishonesty is too pervasive.
Agree. Here is quite a bit of proof of their criminality for your reference, Lawrence:
https://tritorch.com/criminal
So glad covid woke you up to the rest of the BS, and the inconscionable free ride the 1986 Act has given to pharma. May covid awaken many more..
Yes!
I did the same thing blindly and stupidity. It was the thing to do to keep our kids safe and recommended by the pediatricians. Who questioned it?? Now, I agree, no fucking way will I vax myself ever again and I informed both my young adult daughters to not even think of vaccinated their future children. I’m already sending info about it to them to reinforce the idea now. Don’t forget we will have to go against their doctors and pediatricians who will only to talk them into it.
Read "Bottle Of Lies" by Katherine Eban if you want to know more about how the FDA can fail so badly at its sole mission, which is protecting the American public. The book is about generic drugs, not vaccines, but I still think it's relevant. I'm nearing the end of this great book, and it has scared the hell out of me.
Also read “Bad Pharma” if you want to know the truth about the pharmaceutical industry.
I feel exactly the same Jim
Same here. This whole charade has opened my eyes and my children will no longer be receiving any vaccines.
And there was NO SERIOUS DISEASE in either group. "Infection" was a cold for these children. Why give experimental medical treatment to kids to prevent one of the dozens of colds they will have during their childhood?
Robert Kennedy jr states that having it on the childhood vaccination schedule gives the drug companies further liability protection . I’m curious to see if Pfizer employees vaccinate their children with their jab.
I had delta in Jan and was hospitalized. Thanks to FrankenFauci I was unable to get antibodies. During this time I was vacationing with my 3yo granddaughter, we were off visiting family in WV, while we both reside in Oklahoma. She didn’t have a cough, fever or even a runny nose. That’s all the proof I needed babies and toddlers don’t need this injectable.
I’m sorry you were hospitalized and didn’t get early treatment but glad you made it. Frankenfauci. 🤣. I call him Fraud-xi
Another reason I had trouble with treatment was I would feel fine one day and the next day the bottom would fall out. After 6 days of this, I went to get tested and was told my lungs were clear, that was a Friday. By Tuesday, my sister called an ambulance.
Agreed and while some do get a more serious respiratory infection, it’s always been very treatable. No need for a shot so dangerous and also doesn’t prevent getting it and for now, it appears it’s also a super spreader getting the vaccine.
And if you get a natural infection you get real immunity - not the phony baloney "Impossible Burger" immunity from the jab. And no jab side effects either.
Exactly! And even if you do get reinfected which some have, it’s quite mild. Also, isn’t the common cold a corona virus? There’s never been a cure or vaccine to stop this and so we expect we might get a cold at some point. There’s no escaping it.
The common cold is indeed a coronavirus.
Why indeed, that's the question very few actually ask. These jabs are ineffective at best yet they are pushed to the max, even those at near zero risk, why?
Of course this will be labeled a conspiracy theory but I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a Conspiracy Analyst.
Numerous medical people have looked at the contents of various batches of these jabs and they do in many cases contain self assembling nano particles. What do they self assemble into? another good question but it's one that also doesn't get asked. I believe the first 2 shots were an attempt to figure out the dosing needed, that's why they floated the "repeated shots needed" messaging. Are they trying to kill us, possibly, but I think they want complaint serfs mostly. The control will be at first be through self assembling antenna picking up 5G signals. It won't make a individual do a specific act but rather create a general depression or feelings of irritatation among those affected, depending on what they want large numbers of people to do.
The scientific literature is full of what I have outlined above. It all is possible today undoubtedly there's more we can't even imagine.
Many people I encounter are so brainwashed by media that they can't see two inches in front of their noses, and if you ever challenge them on the propaganda they find there, like Pavlov's dog they will call you a conspiracy theorist. They will then turn up their nose and walk away with a heightened sense of superiority.
The term "conspiracy theory" is remarkably adept at turning off all critical thinking like a light switch in a large portion of the people I have personally met.
Conditioning the public to react this way has to have been one of the most effective PSYOPs ever pushed onto the general population.
It is equal parts diabolic and brilliant, and it means that the elites can get away with just about anything with little to no scrutiny because everyone is too afraid to point out that the emperor has no clothes lest they be labeled a "conspiracy theorist".
-JW
This article covers the nano-tech in the jabs and the absurd lengths the media is going to make it seem like children and young adults having heart attacks is and always has been normal, this one is worth a look:
https://tritorch.com/newnormal
I'll have to look at your link, thanks for it.
Regarding your comments about Conspiracy theories, I'm reminded of the saying about the Devil, that his greatest trick was to make people believe he didn't exist.
Practically nothing happens without people conspiring with each other. It very simply is how humans interact. To label normal human interactions a "Conspiracy" is a label designed to shut off thought and tells the listener to go back to sleep.
I think its just starting to be the most fabulous time ever to be alive. Because so many are in the process of waking up!
So true, and your linking this to the greatest trick of the devil is sublime. I wish I had thought of that myself. David Collum nails the spirit of your comment:
"I am a "conspiracy theorist". I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot". If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward".
-David Cullum
Let’s not forget the rest of the crew featured in this clown show. CDC, NIH, teachers unions, media and our blue state leaders. The critical thinkers have left the room.
Go truckers!!! ❤️
Truckers need to have burner phones, our government is already reading their emails and texts.
And many in the medical profession !
The article you linked is an even BETTER version of your excellent comment. Bravo to tritorch and fortiori!
Thank you Ice Ninety-Nine, we are always writing and researching.
There is a ton more content we've dug up that very few ever see here, in our degradation library:
https://tritorch.com/degradation
Thank you for all this information and linking it here!
Thanks for posting! Critical to get comments into the FDA. Super quick and easy. Steve Kirsch's article is excellent and walks you through how to do them. Currently there are 19K comments -- let's get it to 100K! Use Steve Kirsch's article: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda
Or this Telegram: https://t.me/stmta (Has some suggested comments)
Or these instructions:
• Copy and paste to your browser:
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2022-N-0082-0001
(1) COMMENT: either type your own comments or copy and paste one or more of the sample comments below. Comments are limited to 5000 characters.
Personal stories are helpful! Know a teen with myocarditis? Blood Clots? Tell their story!
(2) WHAT IS YOUR COMMENT ABOUT: optional
(3) ATTACH FILES: only if you have files that you feel or relevant or want to include
(4) EMAIL ADDRESS & Opt to include email receipt of submission: optional, but recommended so you have a record.
(5) TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF: most likely you will select individual or anonymous. If selecting individual, they will ask for some contact information. You can provide some or all; none is required.
(6) SELECT – “I am not a robot”
(7) SUBMIT comment.
Thank you for posting the steps Karen!!!
Excellent, thank you for that
Just knowing so clearly how it effects younger people, i wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole.
Having said that, I would never blame anyone for taking the jab or allowing their kids to take it.
Do not trust anything mainstream media says, including statements from more conservative stations. Research and more research on your own is the only way.
Then decide for yourself.
Thank-you Dr Mccullough.
Thank you Ikeprop!
Why should I even bother writing to an entity which is completely corrupted?
So they cannot claim that they approved poison for babies with unanimous applause and consent. And - assuming you believe you have one - for your soul for when God asks whether you protested this massacre.
What will you answer Him?
Okay. But no preaching religion, please.
Religion is to spirituality what hot-dogs are to nutrition. There was exactly zero religion in my original comment. =)
Thanks for the link. I just submitted my objection.
I just saw yesterday, Robert Kennedy talking about if they can get it authorized for a childhood vaccine, they cannot be sued. Check out what he said on Telegram yesterday.
This is correct. They are desperate to get these injections on the childhood schedule which then protects them from liability once the EUA runs out.
Two huge problems coming down the pike for Pfizer:
1) They are now legally obligated to release the clinical trial documents at a rate of 55,000 pages for the first two months and I believe 20,000 pages per month thereafter;
2) They WILL NOT be at the table to do "on-site" redactions and must specifically justify through the courts reasonings for each redaction that they ask for.
There is a very high likelihood (near certainty) that there will be fraud discovered in numerous aspects of their trials. If this does turn out to be the case then that means that all manner of public health officials, political officials and administrative officials will have their indemnity erased.
Barring any massive cover-up this is going to make the Phillip Morris and Opioid scandals look like fun time.
Hope for the best. A thorough house cleaning is definitely prescribed.
🙏🙏🙏
I hope all that was hidden or obfuscated will come to the light.
I hope so…..
Congress needs pressured into changing this law....it's legalized slaughter.
The Data Just doesn't justify the EUA..... Follow the science...right?
As of 02/02/2022, CDC's own Data for Provisional Covid 19 deaths in the 0-4 yo group is 87. That's 2 years & 1month...87 deaths....and they want jab millions in this age group...far, far more will die from the vaccine than 87 covid deaths over the next 2 year period..
Just how many IN congress are beholden to big Pharma?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2013/08/07/is-the-fda-being-compromised-by-pharma-payments/?sh=d464adf28306
We know the agencies are owned by Pharma for sure! FDA, NIH CDC
Well, I thought this would give a broad idea of it. Excuse me!
Congress is absolutely worthless - they sold their souls in 1986 to the depraved vaxxcene “industry”. The USSC sold their souls in 2022.
The executive branch - they are not even cognizant of what a soul is anymore.
Parents are the last bastion against this onslaught of our precious littles.
Corruptliticians
Congress?!?!? The Republicans are MIA, with the exception of Ron Johnson and the possible exception of Rand Paul. Otherwise, where are the Republicans who should be SCREAMING for investigations and protections for children against these untested, unnecessary poisons?! Lord, Congress is WORTHLESS!!!
Amen. What a bunch of limp wrists.
Again, 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Pressure Congress, do you folks actually think about what you write before you put it onto the screen?
Fuck the Democrats, but, the Republicans don’t do shit either, sheesh, the public really does suck!!!
This is what it is about.
When the public health emergency ends, the EUAs expire, and the liability protection afforded under the Prep Act of 2006 goes away.
The pressure appears to be coming from the administration. Pfizer may want to walk away at this point before it gets too dicey, but the White House appears to be scared that the truth will out and they'll be held responsible. They want the liability protection in place so that it never makes it to court.
Fraudxi has learned many things while directing NIAID and others. None of it concerns medicine. All political.
we need to remove the word political. The word infers some sort of justification or reasoning. How about corruptlitics!
and call those elected corrupliticians
I can't even pronounce that. hahah
Corrupt-li-tics Corrupt-li-tician
I would also add an impressive talent for manipulating people.
The FDA is scared. My guess is there's lots of shredding and file burning right now. Their credibility is on the line, it's actually hanging on by a thin thin thread. They're scrambling right now to hide the bodies, literally, before the thread snaps.
They still have a chance to restore their integrity if they do the right thing … problem is they are captured by big pharma
I certainly hope so!
When does the EUA expire?
They can be reissued at the discretion of the FDA, but the liability protection comes from the Prep Act of 2006. When the public health emergency ends, so does the protection it affords.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10443
Which is precisely why the government is dragging its feet on “ending” the pandemic.
This is my understanding, too. Get it on the children's docket of vaccines, and even if the "emergency" is lifted (the only way the vaccines can be used) which currently shields them from lawsuits, they will forever be shielded.
Forced shots on children at no risk to covide, purely to provide legal cover to big pharma. Quite a system of incentives we have built.
“We” built?
No, Congress built - and “I” did NOT vote for those who have sold out their souls to the devil’s cohorts.
God Knows, now we know.
Unless there is provable fraud. The Moderna CEO just deleted his twitter account. Check out Edward Dowd's twitter - he is looking at corroborating vaccine deaths with funeral home and life insurance data.
And the DOD is scrambling to get rid of its "hockey stick" of deaths and illnesses by making up bullshit that the previous 5 years were under counted...data error. Right.
So we now have Vaers, Life Insurance data, Funeral Directors Data, and DOD's DMED data .....all confirming massive death and injuries upon the Covid Shot Roll out. The are NO Coincidences!!
There are now reports from embalmers that they are finding so many clots in the deceased that the process is becoming considerably more difficult.
Correct. There will be two winners. One will be the media companies like Alex said. The other will be Pfizer, immune from lawsuits for eternity as the cancer, heart attack, and stroke cases come rolling in and the truth slowly comes out over the next decade or two.
That has been the goal all along
As RFK Jr has pointed out, the CDC has a gaping conflict of interest. Their mandate is to simultaneously:
1) Promote vaccines
2) Regulate vaccines for safety
This is a clear conflict of interest. You can't do #2 effectively while also doing #1. CDC needs to be abolished or its regulatory functions moved elsewhere with a group of people actually committed to protect the public.
And that is why the FDA toadies will approve it.
How can parents even consider giving their kids of any age this experimental shot. Even before we knew the issues. . .I would never have allowed this to be given to my kids.
How? Nearly 2 years of state-sanctioned brainwashing. They're entrenched in the religious-like dogma of Covidianism.
You can't reason a person out of something he never reasoned himself into in the first place.
Funny too how many Covidians are leftist atheists & mock religion. Ugh. (I'm an atheist, but at least I'm ideologically consistent in dismissing all superstition & dogma.)
Here's a little something to think upon. Many of the atheists or agonists I know that have turned into Covidians, are people who grew up in religious households. As young adults, they couldn't buy into "organize religion", or being told what to do by a man in a robe in Rome. They walked away. But the religious rituals they were exposed to in their childhood, are still in their system. Many of the Covidians I know, seem to be the ones that grew up with a religion that was seeped in rituals, which in some weird way have made them more apt to absorbed the rituals of being a good Covidian. They wear their mask, they social distant, the get their injections, they shame none believers, they like being part of a "club" that excludes others (especially from the communion table, i.e. restaurants). These true Covidians, the ones that won't come to a holiday gathering unless everyone is vaccinated, and wears their masks, are no different than 60 years ago when family wouldn't go to a wedding if their family member was marrying someone outside their faith, or race for that matter. The mind set is the same. And it's damn scary.
I don't agree with your take on rabid Covidians. As a devout Roman Catholic I've found former and lapsed Catholics, who then go in for militant atheism, have issues beyond a nostalgia for ritual. Since the richness of rituals in the RC Church has been largely eliminated since 1969. Many of the rabid Covidians are fiercely anti Catholic at the same time they demand adherence to secularist ideologies. They never understood their former Faith, in any meaningful way, then go in for whatever secularist,fantasy, ersatz ideological faith is at hand. GK Chesterton put it best: "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything."
Religion has nothing to do with this . Lack of critical thinking ,common sense and inquisitive thinking. This is result of their education / indoctrination.
You're kind of making my point, and I don't think you realized it. RC Church still has rituals, maybe not as many, but it's still club Catholic. If you aren't RC you can not take communion at a RC Church, even if you are a professing Christian. Can't be buried in the "Catholic" cemetery, do you want me to go on? Many of the folks I am referring to, actually feel guilty when they don't follow the health rules. Sound familiar? I have lots of friends and family that are Catholic. They love God, and they love people, and they do good works. And maybe it's the ones that didn't fully understand their faith that have gone off the deep end in being anti Catholic, but it's been my experience that Catholics can also go off the deep end and demand adherence to the RC Church to the point of alienating NON CATHOLICS.
I think your emphasis on ritual is quite thin. Of course the RC Church has restrictions , dogma and rules, since it sees itself, not as a sect, as in Protestantism, but as the ordained and one true Church. Club Atheist wouldn't be too happy if I joined up and tried introducing a godhead under the guise of some sort of materialistic life force. The fact that the RC Church is restrictive goes to it's claim to hold the Truth. If you can't accept that then participating in the life of the Church, especially receiving the Eucharist becomes disrespectful. The Irish writer , James Joyce, after rejecting the Church, and adhering to an atheist worldview, always greatly admired the traditional chant and music of the Easter service. He listened to the music every year but out of respect, he would not enter beyond the outer entrance of a RC church. And when asked he stated he could not believe and would not feign belief by entering, nor be a challenge to believers at worship. That's a mark of personal integrity and very admirable.The fact that many Covidians are guilty about lapses in their mask wearing etc, can be as easily traced to neurotic sensibilities arising from fear of social ostracism as any weak link to religious ritual.
LOL! you can think what ever you want, I simply stated that it's something I observed. Maybe he listened outside the walls of the church because he knew he wasn't welcomed in, and he enjoyed the ritual of listening to the Easter Service. Just sayin.
Omg you are describing my extended family!!!!
IMO, you're close. It's not that the type you cite abhors religion, it's that they abhor any religion which cedes control to outside parties. Christians, for instance, cede control to God ("thy will be done", etc).
Leftist atheists love Humanism, where Man is in control - if it is MAN in control, why wouldn't they want to be the "Leaders", bullying other Man?
Of course they would. It's endemic to all Leftist ideology.
Including - perhaps especially - Branch COVIDians.
You stated what i know also to be true (i have some slight differences in the clarity of the perspective you give) but it didn't come to mind. The minority of true believers in the true austere Jesus the Christ of the Scriptures indeed cede control to God/Jesus because He's God/Jesus, we're not, He knows best, we do not, He's the only omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent one true God, we are not, only He is sinless perfection, we are not and so on.
There are no atheists on the right in God's universe, the atheist position in His eyes is inescapably always on the left. And yes indeed the atheists love Humanism for it is the worship of self - that's what satan teaches since satan is the ultimate origin of that.
Anyway, i'm glad you pointed out what you did in general.
Yes, I agree, they do love Humanism, where Man is in control. Absolutely. I totally agree with this. Mostly, it's just that I have noticed that the level of ritualistic behavior with COVID/Pandemic measures that were put in place for our "safety", the people who seem deeply "religious" in keeping with those measures, at least in my experience, seem to be ones that grew-up in a household that participated in a religion that was seeped in rituals.
There are those too. There are all kinds. I would only add that those who claim to be 'deeply religious' (in the Judeo-Christian sense) and still hold to zealous Branch COVIDianism are woefully misled/easily swayed/have false faith in God/some other dysfunction.
I think in this subset of people, we can safely and rather accurately segregate them by political ideology: I think those who are ostensibly "deeply religious" and also zealot COVIDians are also very much on the Left spectrum of political ideology - and that was central to my earlier point: the Left spectrum demands control.
In other words: while they claim to be deeply religious, they're in fact practicing an entirely different religion while wearing the trappings of a belief which contradicts them.
again, I agree completely.
I would like to add one more thing, in response to your observation of prior history of participating in religion seeped with ritual:
1. Nearly all religions possess this trait.
2. I think you're confusing causation/correlation: rituals spring from the need to regiment (read: CONTROL). In that sense, what Discepolo wrote is absolutely accurate: Jesus didn't give us 'structured/organized religion', because adherence to such a paradigm cedes CONTROL to MAN (who, after all, created such rituals?). This is why I call myself a Christian, but do not consider myself part of any Christian 'religion'.
3. The need/want for ritual is endemic to human nature, which is why so many (on the Left, IMO), are susceptible to it. These do not WANT to be responsible for themselves, and themselves alone. They want RULES/GUIDELINES/ADHERENCE/COMPLIANCE/PUNISHMENT for those who fail to adhere to their version of what is right. They, therefore, find themselves the perfect home in forced compliance of Branch COVIDianism.
TL;DR: people don't become COVIDians because they have a history of ritualistic religious belief, they become COVIDians because they haven't REPLACED their need for ritualistic religious belief with faith in God and ceding outcomes to His Will.
agreed.
I like your reasoning here. I understand the Mass Formation reasoning, but you have just added another layer that makes a lot of sense to me. Thank you for helping me understand the Covidians better.
I can't buy that. Most of the Covidians I know grew up with little or no religion at all. The government is their religion. I grew up Catholic, consider myself Christian, but no longer Catholic, and many of the people in my church (more than in the the general population) think the closures, masks, and vaccines are all personal choices, not something the government should force upon people. From what I see, most religious people have put their trust in God over the government.
Interesting. I def see your parallels with Covidians & the ultra-religious.
But it doesn't align with my experience. My husband & I were raised Roman Catholic, walked away from religion, & have been team reality for a long time.
One of the most devout Covidians I know was raised mostly atheist. But he's also passionately pro-Democrats. A devoted tribe member of the left & sufferer of TDS. Loves to get riled up at, "Look how awful right-wingers are!!"
Obv these are far from statistically significant sample sizes. ;)
I should mention, that there are a few others I encountered that did walk away from the Roman Catholic religion, and are "practicing" Christians, these too seem to grab onto the COVIDIAN rituals. It's that exposure to ritualistic behavior when they are young and impressionable that seems to leave a void that they need to fill. It's just a thought from some observations. None of us walk in each other's shoes, so we'll all have different experiences. This was just mine.
Also true.
In the same way, IMO, that Fauci "practices" medicine.
I'm a former catholic (universalist) also. You state "team reality", correct reading of the New Covenant/Testament in the proper historical contextual exegesis of the life and times of Jesus (God) and His Apostles shows that true reality one lives in only when they humble themselves before God/Jesus and submit to Him fully to become a true John 3:3-16 adopted child of the true Lord. Roman Catholicism, ever so sadly, is the biggest counterfeit of what the austere genuine Jesus the Christ taught, it pains me to no end how well satan has deceived the majority of the world in so many ways into so many religions, not the one and only faith that Jesus offers mankind were only He can grant salvation by His finished work at the cross which He paid in full in His blood for the sins of mankind which no man could ever do for we all have sinned, Jesus never did for He was the God-man after all and the only spotless lamb who could pay such a price for the sins of mankind.
I think there are degrees of anything, including this. We can only discuss this with anecdote and in generality. Curious: when you walked away from religion, did you walk away from belief in a Higher Power?
If the answer is no - and I'm guessing it is (as I am similar), then the point I was making still holds.
I think you have to hold - generally - a belief in a Supernatural power greater than Man in order to - generally - reject COVIDianism.
The Romans coined the word "religio" (a re-binding), a term they used to describe the cretin worship of their 'gods' of the tribes they would conquer (I'm giving you a Cliff Notes version). In essence it meant "something a man must do for a god or gods to gain salvation" .. in other words, works-based, and thus the tragic false belief that man can save himself, when no man can, hence why God manifested in the flesh (1Timothy3:16) and died for the sins of mankind for only He was worthy and the sinless lamb, so you see, if you read the Scriptures with proper exegesis, you learn that God/Jesus brought man the one and only faith, and when it is corrupted by satan, it became religion, man's utterly futile attempt to save himself by his works.
Wow. Interesting. Sad too.
I'm an atheist, too, and soon-to-be former democrat. I now to go a church every Sunday w/my new'ish warrior friends that I've made during this battle.
I'm in a blue state where schools stayed entirely closed over a year (then opened only 2 days a week.) I was able to get my kids into a Christian school & the passionate gratitude I feel towards this organization is powerful.
If they need me, I'm there.
I've actually debated attending services too!
As for "former dems," I'm debating staying registered Dem so I can vote in primaries & hopefully get out incumbents!! That way if Dems win, at least it won't be the same ones.
I'm learning more about biblical stories, and our pastor loves relating them to today's situation. Plus we have potlucks!
You make a good point about religion (hence why God/Jesus never gave man religion, but the one and only faith) but when you get to the "i'm an atheist, but at least i'm ideologically consistent in dismissing all superstition & dogma." part, such a position is not ideologically consistent when atheism is its own several thousand year old pagan religion - its the religion of self and of what God declares in Psalm 14, see the following video from a former hardcore atheist who became an ex-atheist after a trip to jail for attempted murder of his own father who tried to murder his father with a hammer to the head and jail-time gave him a reality check;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpnoFEgKUzY - Argument from Reason
Before you reply, all i ask is that you watch that video in full, not a long one, keeping the below in mind;
“Contempt prior to examination is an intellectual vice, from which the greatest faculties of mind are not free.” -William Paley, 1859 A.D.
It just hit me that you're way off base with this statement, "dismissing all superstition & dogma.... is not ideologically consistent with atheism"
Dogma = belief in something you aren't allowed to question. Must accept on faith and believe fully.
Not only do I "question" my atheism, I ENJOY doing so! Ha!
As to superstition, belief that 1 thing or action is a "cause" when there's no logical basis. I can't see how atheists have any at all. I don't have rituals, or idols or symbolism of any kind. There's literally nothing superstitious.
"It just hit me that you're way off base with this statement, "dismissing all superstition & dogma.... is not ideologically consistent with atheism"
Obviously you did not understand the video if you watched it, for if you undestood the video if you watched it, you'd concede that i'm not way off base.
"Dogma = belief in something you aren't allowed to question. Must accept on faith and believe fully. "
That's your definition which contains truth mixed with error, not the factual etymological definition. Questioning is allowed, for if you do not ask, how will you know better?
If you truly questioned your atheism, you would not be an atheist hence why the video i linked for you, which does not seem you watched it, or if you did, clearly did not understand how your position is a walking contradiction.
"As to superstition, belief that 1 thing or action is a "cause" when there's no logical basis. I can't see how atheists have any at all. I don't have rituals, or idols or symbolism of any kind. There's literally nothing superstitious."
The video i linked already refutes your position on what you state and claim above, the fact you do not see it, is expected, because being an atheist is not about and evidence issue, it's about a heart issue, they worship self, they are their own "God" thus humanism, thus the religion of self, which the Devil is the originator of.
"Such a position is not ideologically consistent"
Depends how you define atheism.
I define it as simply, "NOT having a belief in God." ABSENCE of belief. That's not a religion.
I remember Joe Rogan saying it's arrogant to say, "I'm convinced there's no God!" Because we can't prove it.
Yeah... OK, but from what I know NOW, I'm quite confident that there's no all-powerful & all loving god.
Just like I don't currently "believe" in unicorns & dragons. Give me new evidence, I might change my mind.
As of now, I don't believe. So I think it makes sense to refer to my self as "atheist" even though Rogan shares my same beliefs & chooses to refer to himself as "Agnostic."
I don't see the need to split hairs like that. Esp since the idea of "God" as it is now in the USA equals "all powerful & all loving," so when I use the term atheist, I'm clarifying that I don't believe in that.
"Such a position is not ideologically consistent"
"Depends how you define atheism."
Depends how you define it? I'm a language custodian and purist and a linguist, if we actually used the factual definition/etymology of a word that has not been corrupted, there would be far less confusion. I define a-theism by the factual Greek to English definition. Must be real convenient to have a custom definition for atheism eh? This is what God declares in Psalm 14 (one of many places in His Holy Writ);
"(To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.) The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."
God does not lie, He created mankind, He knows best, He knows all men's hearts (that includes women's hearts), only He is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, omni-benevolent, omni-judex, omni-dimensional and omni-omni, not man.
"I define it as simply, "NOT having a belief in God." ABSENCE of belief. That's not a religion."
God calls the atheist a liar for claiming they do not believe in God since He has put knowledge of His existence into the very core of their being so that it is inescapable, so that to deny it is why He calls them a fool because He knows you know He exists, but like His Spirit declared through Paul in Romans 1:18-32, the atheist suppresses that eternal truth in unrighteousness;
[Romans 1:18-26]
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Therefore, atheists do have a religion, it's the religion of self, they have their high priests, their sacred book (Charles Darwin's " On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life" - take special notice of that "favoured races" part and read this short article to further comprehend what the atheist position is actually worshipping also = http://mwilliams.info/archive/2008/02/the-full-title-of-darwins-on-the-origin-of-species.php) and extra-sacred books, their assemblies, their rituals etc.
"I remember Joe Rogan saying it's arrogant to say, "I'm convinced there's no God!" Because we can't prove it."
He's actually correct there, he's being kind, it's actually quite arrogant/proud/prideful/vanity/haughty/hubristic. As the Scriptural verses i pasted above affirm, proof for God's existence is all around us so much so that it is inescapable, that to deny it, make one a true fool in God's eyes. Hence why i linked you that video "Argument from Reason" which you clearly you have not grasped if you did actually watch it.
"Yeah... OK, but from what I know NOW, I'm quite confident that there's no all-powerful & all loving god."
You're claiming to have omniscience, which no man or woman has, only one being does = God/Jesus. You do not know everything there is to know, how do you know God doesn't exist in the parts you do not know? Therefore once again, you keep demonstrating how atheism is ideologically inconsistent, tremendously, so to claim God does not exist, is instant self-refutation and thus indeed stark arrogance which is why atheism is madness/profound delusion. They are so spiritually blinded by satan, that they do not even see (yet) that the moment they discuss the existence of God, they have already acknowledged His existence (hence why i linked you the video Argument from Reason so you can learn why your position is inherently a walking contradiction.)
"Just like I don't currently "believe" in unicorns & dragons."
Uni-corn means "one-horn".. in the Bible it was the description for a Rhinoceros like creature that actually existed since we have fossils of it. As for 'dragons';
The word “Dinosauria/Dinosaur” was coined in 1841 by Sir Richard Owens *(Paleontologist, biologist, comparative anatomist) *and the word is from two Greek words “*deinos”* "terrible" + *“sauros”* "lizard". “Great / Terrible Lizard.” If you spend the time to diligently look into *(meaning taking much time than doing a 20 second search engine query)* what word(s) were used in English literature before the word “Dinosaur” was coined, you will find the most common word was **Dragons. ** I know this to be true for i spent much time investigating historical English literature in relation to these matters and truly before 1841, you always see more than anything this creatures referred to as Dragons. See following links for further review;
https://www.forbidden-history.com/dinosaurs-in-history.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fFtnQnSuW0 - Forbidden History - Dinosaurs and the Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVCpsDF5Mnk - Dragons or Dinosaurs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oajv-ntutUQ - Dragons or Dinosaurs Creation or Evolution 2010 Documentary HD
"Give me new evidence, I might change my mind."
There is increasingly mountains of evidence of one horned Rhinocerous'and dinosaurs.
"As of now, I don't believe."
God/Jesus declares otherwise.
"So I think it makes sense to refer to my self as "atheist" even though Rogan shares my same beliefs & chooses to refer to himself as "Agnostic.""
More inconsistency (the inherent incontrovertible position of the atheist, 24/7 self-contradiction). He obviously does not share your world-view, to think he does, is just more evidence of not "sense" and how it must be real convenient to have such an inconsistent world-view where it's guided by animalistic proclivities and situational morality/ethics where you can justify whatever you want because you make the rules, if it feels good do it.
"I don't see the need to split hairs like that."
Of course you do not, because it's the worship of self, you do what feels good and is "right" in your eyes, not God's/Jesus', that's what the Devil teaches.
"..Esp since the idea of "God" as it is now in the USA equals "all powerful & all loving," so when I use the term atheist, I'm clarifying that I don't believe in that."
God/Jesus doesn't believe in atheists since He knows they do not exist, He's the omniscient one, not us.
Mass Formation Psychosis --delivered relentlessly by MSM, and Local News.
I told my daughter that from now on, when her kids need vaccinations, that she must insist on witnessing the drawing up of each vial, so she can see EXACTLY what they are getting. No more walking in with a tray of syringes. You cannot trust, that they won't slip in the clot shot.
I still think MOST nurses & docs are honest & wouldn't deceive, but yes, it's possible. There have been cases. IIRC, one hungry kid was told he could have some pizza at school if he agreed to the shot.
There are definitely evil Covidians in this world, & some work in healthcare.
Because the line is still "safe and effective"
Neighbors kid boldly proclaimed to my kid that she a) absolutely is not allowed to go inside my house and b) she's fully vaccinated
She's 5.
or simply cannot fathom facing the reality they were duped...a psychosis in itself!
Bingo
Because the FDA is not an "advisory board" with the goal of protecting public health. They are politically and financially driven and an arm of whoever is in power. You're not talking about people who have any other goal than their own enrichment and continued employment. Once you understand that, this all makes sense.
They are the epitome of "conflicts of interest"
The FDA are a bunch of evil whores. Bought and paid for 100%.
I am contemplating whether or not I will watch the advisory board meeting on the 15th. Know thy enemy thinking suggests I should, but I don't know if I can take another hit to my confidence in humanity after watching the 5-11 years meeting.
The 5-11 meeting made me throw up in my mouth.
Exactly. It was rough. Especially the pediatrician member who admittedly states his own comorbidities all of the time and puts that bias toward recommendations for children.
It's rough. They all walk lock step towards the cliff. It's just disgusting. No questions. No comments. Just keep walking down the path to destruction.
We had more scientifically literate discussions in AP Biology in high school.
Why do I imagine Get Smart in these situations?
Maxwell Smart: " I can tell you two shots will be enough for immunity for your toddler."
Parents: "We don't believe you."
Maxwell Smart: "Will you believe three shots and a booster?"
This is from a Pediatrician friend who can't post this on FB so he has an email list.
A big concern of mine at present is the pending possible authorization of the Pfizer 3 ug dose mRNA vaccine for babies and children from 6 months to 4 years of age. We have looked at the well documented low burden of disease in this age group, which mirrors my personal experience. And we've discussed possible risks associated with this particular model of vaccine. Not too long ago, we discussed the concept of "Original Antigenic Sin", seen with other viruses, in which the first antigens used to stimulate the host's immune response will determine all subsequent responses. Our fear was that imprinting on the old, now obsolete, Wuhan spike protein configuration, which comprises the current mRNA vaccines, would cause future immune responses to variants with very different spike protein configurations to still be geared to the Wuhan spike, therefore lessening the efficacy and protection.
This has now been shown to be true for SARS-CoV-2. The study is "Immune Imprinting, Breadth of Variant Recognition, and Germ Center Response in Human SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination", from Stanford University, posted on CELL online on 25 January 2022. Here's the link:
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018
Here's some quotes and conclusions:
1) "Antibody breadth against the variants is less after infection compared to all vaccines evaluated, but improves over several months."
2) "By 9 months, spike-specific IgG had decreased approximately 20-fold from the maximum" [for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine]."
3) "We quantify a strong imprinting effect of prior vaccination with Wuhan-H-1 spike antigen on antibody specificities following breakthrough infection with viral variants."
So, the mRNA model, which was ideal as far as the rapidity of development and distribution, elicits a robust, strong IgG response (anti-S antibodies), which saved many vulnerable lives, but the antibodies wane quickly, requiring boosters. Natural immunity elicits a more subdued, broader, less robust response, which strengthens over time, providing long-term protection. That is my argument for awaiting traditional vaccine models which approximate the natural response for the low risk children, given the obvious fact that they are in this for the long-haul. There is no urgency regarding them, for natural infection itself is of low risk (not no risk...low risk).
But point 3 is the bigger take-away from this study. They studied the immune response in subjects fully vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine and then infected with either the alpha or delta variants, and found the main antibody response was to the old Wuhan spike protein, not the variant spike protein, which had mutated. This is consistent with Original Antigenic Sin, and this response was not seen in the unvaccinated, who mounted robust antibody responses to the variant's spike protein.
Do you see my concern with subjecting our healthy young children to this vaccine model? We will be priming their immune systems to mount a primary antibody response against an old protein that doesn't even exist anymore, and probably never will again, instead of to the configuration of spike protein they will encounter when confronted with infection. We could be forever limiting their ability to mount a truly protective response that would be broad and durable. This isn't just theory when it comes to SARS-CoV-2 anymore.
I just don't get the rush to push this thing through. I trust the FDA's advisory committee members, who know a lot more than I do about these things, are looking at the big picture...at the long-haul...for that is how we must approach any intervention directed toward the children. Their meeting is on 15 February. It's a big deal.
An since their immune system are not fully trained the suppression on their immune systems will be greater than an adult who's immune sysem is more trained.
So based on the most recent judge ruling on FDA FOIA on Pfizer - they have until or before March 1 to produce the first 20-50, 000 pages of documents. How convenient that VRBPAC for EUA for 6mo-4 yrs just happens to be scheduled before then?
Hence the rush pell-mell
The only thing I disagree with here is the last paragaph - "I trust the FDA's advisory committee members.. are looking at the big picture." Only if the big picture includes their future giant salaries at big Pharma.
Does that make it resemble what happens with the current flu vaccine?? The shot you get this year is for last years version of the flu. The jab may lessen the effects but does not prevent contracting the current version. I am open to correction.
I always thought they were guessing on what the next strain would be every year. But I could be wrong.
Yes and no. They guess four Strains based on what’s circulating. The Who admits this shouldn’t be given to everyone. It has very low efficacy (often well below 50%), and protection drops quickly (3-4 months). Cochrane collaboration has a great summary. In essence, immunocompromised and older folks might benefit (and that’s a big might). As far as I know the USA is the only country that wants all citizens six months and older to get this (and many folks don’t do this).
And yes it too is a leaky vaccine.
Sounds like another one I've heard of recently!
A competent FDA would have stopped the whole vax program long ago. There would have been no EUA. They are owned. But they are still murderers.
As much as I hate it, I've lost ALL respect for the FDA, CDC and NIH. Basically, simply don't feel like I can trust the medical community anymore.
I could not agree more! After cancer, I realized that medical "care" is reduced to drugs and knives. For cancer, they throw in burning via radiation. It's all destructive and as an industry, they never seriously talk about proper nutrition and won't even consider non-pharmaceutical solutions. If I were to break a leg, I'd be more inclined to find an old eagle scout to set it than go to the hospital.
Any parent that would get their baby or toddler injected in light of this data has to be suffering from mental health issues. I’d say the same applies to parents of healthy children of any age, but really, it’s indisputable for the youngest ages group- all risk for absolutely NO benefit.
We think that because even though we’re not medical experts, our common sense and reading everything we can get our hands on about this issue has given us reason to pause…ask questions…and follow the money.
I think many people follow doctors’ orders. Other people have been absolutely terrified by the scare tactics of Fauci & Friends and the media. But there are many (like those giving their toddlers and children the jab) who think they’re smarter, know better and so go ahead. A friend’s daughter is in brain research and she said she and her friends have “looked at the vaxes and found them to be safe”…and her friends are offering up their young children as guinea pigs. Huge problem. They don’t know what they don’t know.
I agree. It’s frightening to me also that anyone could make this decision.
Yes. Living in San Francisco it’s like everyone turned into a zombie. Scared to death of Covid and ‘anti vaxxers’. Can’t wait to inject babies because they’re convinced they’ll die from it. It truly is some sort of mass hypnosis or neurosis.
I guess the Branch Covidians must have mental health issues anyway, so no doubt they will be lining their kids up. Canada has been vaccinating the 5 - 11 year age group since last summer. Don't even think about trying to find follow-up data. It's all buried.
" So Pfizer is in trials to add a third shot "
Pfizer should be on trial and face a firing squad
There i fixed it for you
Remember the top FDA vaccine officials who stepped down 8/31/21?
If the FDA will approve Covid shots for children under 5, what won't the FDA approve? Makes one wonder about the efficacy and safety of every drug ever approved by the FDA. I don't even want to take Advil anymore.
Not wrong
In my view, approving this shot for children is a criminal act.
I think, unfortunately, that the uptake will be a lot more than 0. So many sheep have been brainwashed and will either vax their young kids out of fear or out of peer pressure & virtue signaling.
You got that right. Here in Northern VA and MD, the uptake is thru the roof. My high end kids private HS - middle school is reporting 95% uptake on the covid dashboard. 95%!!
Awful
Frankly, parents have had to do the FDAs job for years. They’ve never cared about the artificial colors or flavors added to many foods that are marketed specifically to children. Nor have they cared how many injections or the level of toxins in those injections that are to be given to the most vulnerable and precious of all beings, our newborn babies. They’ve been allowed to run amok for decades and they must be stopped.
On a similar note, check with the FDA regarding the % of insect parts and rodent droppings permissible in ground pepper. Makes one want to buy whole peppercorns and grind their own.
Tastes better anyway :). But I’m a food snob 🤪
"uptake will likely be near zero". I don't know about that. There are many hysterical Karens out there who think Covid could be deadly for their healthy child (because media told them so) and also "don't want to kill grandma" (pass virus to elders). Media has created a mental illness in people.
Alex, I think you're wrong that uptake will be near zero. That 30% stuck in the mass psychosis would jump at the chance to inject their young children. I still see 3 and 4 year old children at the pre-K section of my daughter's elementary school IN TEXAS with double masks.
In the deep blue areas deep in the heart of Texas people are deeply crazy over this.
Yup, here in Austin
Austin is not really in Texas.
True dat.
Indeed lol
I know people in Austin who were lying about their kids' age to get the 12-15 year old full adult dose shot early.
And adults who lied about having a condition that would qualify them to get the booster during the first round. Don't get me started on how we let people walk up to a Walmart pharmacy and get a jab without any review by a physician, antibody test for recent infection, etc. Oh how many ways they've failed us!
I told my husband no bringing kids back to the US as long as they require masking for kids (in Europe it’s 12+ but no one really checks for kids).
And of course no shots.
Abs 90% here in Northern California.
Near zero, but not zero. There are brainwashed parents who will give their innocent children these jabs.
Exactly. Just like the masks. Many, many parents are DEMANDING they stay masked. Stupidity or conformity? Coordinated child abuse.
Don't count on the uptake being near ZERO, I know of Kool-aid induced madness in a Young mother with two toddlers. I'm praying she sees the light and says no.
Unfortunately Alex, you are wrong about the uptake with parents. In the insane asylum blue states (like here in WA), 95% of parents are lining up their kids for these toxic shots. All while double masked, of course.
Uptake does not matter. Pfizer needs this to be on the CDC Recommended Childhood Vaccine Schedule so that they can have immunity from prosecution for injuries and illness caused by their toxic shot. Immunity applies to children and adults when it is on the CDC schedule. 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
And what Pfizer wants from the FDA and the CDC, Pfizer gets.
And still need the masks and illusion of emergency to buy time until that's approved.
Uptake will be about the same % as joe bidens approval percentage
and it will be the same people vaxxing their kids that think Biden is doing a good job
With big pharma, the FDA, CDC and AMA, we are dealing with purely criminal organizations and agencies. They have sunk lower than the lowest gutter. Big pharma wants these mRNA poisons to be added to the regular vac schedules thus ensuring control and profits. That way they can add more and more horrific injections and nobody will say boo-hoo. And all without a speck of responsibility, culpability or conscience.
It's irrelevant what uptake is - that is not pharma's end game. Clearance for the babies is the first step to get it on the childhood vaccine schedule which will be the holy grail for them for permanent liability protection. We must hold the line here if there is ever a chance of getting justice for the vaccine injured.
Don't forget the part of forcing it on kids to be in school nationwide once "FDA approved". They aren't going to stop until someone stops them.
I understand a "requirement" for children will lead to no liability to the manufacturers. Praying the fraud will be proved.
We can only hope the uptake will be near zero. The parents of about a quarter of 5-11 yo have revealed themselves to be utterly braindead.
I fear my locals here in San Francisco will have an uptake that’s high. Teens are 90+, five and older quite high too.
Just like the flu shot, 50% efficacy or less.
And that shot is not a trial and it's been through all the hoops for approval and safety.
This is not shocking if you understand the way the FDA and CDC schedule of all childhood immunizations has been created. None of this is new. Start researching the vaccines on that schedule and then get back to me.
Here’s a tidbit… Hep B, only passed thru needles and sex and rarely serious, was added to the schedule for infants simply because at risk teens wouldnt take the shot. It has 250mcg aluminum in it and is given on the day of birth, and 3 more times before the age of 4. Oh and treating the rare hep b positive or at risk mom while pregnant is VERY easy.
If you start researching you’ll find that the case for covid 19 vaccines for under 5s is almost logical in the context of the full
CDC immunization schedule.
I did not allow my daughter to take the Hep B vaccine as an infant, but since they were required for kindergarten, she needed to take them in the months leading up to the start of school. There was no reason whatsoever for her to take multiple doses of this vaccine as a healthy 5 year old. I sincerely regret allowing her to take them. The childhood vaccine schedule is designed to generate profit for the pharmaceutical companies, not to promote children's health.
My children had 3 of their Hep B shots before I woke up. They will never have another shot after I thoroughly read every single insert and researched every illness. It takes a lot to stand against the tide, especially when schools require them and states with zero ways to get exemptions. Youre 100% right, all for profit, just like Covid.
Yes, yes! People who are skeptical of the Clot Shot need to further awaken to the terrible reality of the childhood vaxxes. Too many think all was well until COVID came to town.
The lies about the covid shots were so blatant that they have made me rethink earlier vaccines.
I never allowed it. Coming from Europe I knew this was crazy (it’s not given at birth there).
We can go on with craziness - injected vitamin K vs oral (oral the norm in Europe) - why inject if you can ingest? Less harsh. Or antibiotic eye ointment. Again only offered back home if mom has a history of STDs. American health policies aim to shoot at the largest possible crowd for the smallest potential effect. I suspect strongly now after the Covid mess Pharma is behind all of this.
Thanking God every day I don't have school-age kids. And if I did, I'd be homeschooling them.
I wish my kids were young enough to yank out of school to make a statement.
same here. my kids are high school seniors. i can't yank em
The FDA has been a criminal enterprise for decades. It takes tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars and about a decade to "normally" get a drug to market. They have rallied on a massive scale around not only this so-called "vaccine," but that it defies ordinary vaccine methods with the mRNA delivery. All-cause death rates (not just those loosely attributed to COVID) are at record levels since the vax mandates began--and they still double-down on pushing these jabs.
Any type of natural medicine or supplement is taken off market immediately if they even "claim" to help a condition in any way--whether they actually do or not. The reason? It's not putting money in the pockets of Big Pharma, which has OWNED the FDA since the 1960's. Did Alex's research not show clearly that only 16% of the regulators voting to approve "emergency use" of the vaccines did NOT have a financial interest in the vaccines' approval? How about the swift defamatory reactions to--and restrictions on availability--of Ivermectin, an inexpensive treatment that showed early on that it combatted COVID? All to push shots that repeatedly proved they did not actually work longterm, if at all--and with the boosters, actually made those who got jabbed more likely to contract it!
We don't need government agencies run by unelected bureaucrats to be our "parents" for a lifetime! All we really need is a wave of NEW blood in Congress and the Administration--new blood pumping through the veins of people with conscience that will run these bureaucrats, along with the career politicians who've profitably enabled them, straight to Gitmo. (Or the gallows, but I digress.)
They do IT because there is ZERO accountability. Why would it change ?
we need a tsunami of blood to flow.
No surprise here -pharma wants it to become part of the "mandatory" childhood vax schedule. They will pay off the regime and its puppets as needed to accomplish the mission.
Yes, there will be very low uptake of the jabs in very young children. But some parents will get their children jabbed, and some "doctors" will recommend the jabs (do they still get a jab bonus?). Children will be hurt by this. Some may die.
The FDA, CDC, and NIH have to be disbanded.
There was a news story in Germany that some parents got pediatricians to give the 5-11 vax to their toddlers because ‘they were in agony to get their toddlers protected’. 🤮
Telling you, we need names. Post these people names and addresses on line. See how wise they become once that happens.
The FDA has been corrupt for far longer than COVID-19 has been around. This is just bringing it to the attention of more of the population.
Corruption in govt agencies doesn't surprise me and shouldn't surprise anyone but I have to admit it wasn't until Covid-19 that I started to realize the extent of the corruption and the relatively small group with so much centralized power. But even a lot of corruption isn't the worst problem.. the worst problem is when you mix in a few people that have enough ego to believe they are smart enough to figure out how to dramatically change the world.
So sick of these corrupt fuckers.
Absolutely disgusting!
“But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” - Matthew 18:6
Here is a strategy that Steve Kirsch' is pushing.
*How you can help persuade the FDA committee not to approve Pfizer for kids under 5*
This takes < 42 seconds of your time (John did it in 28 seconds). The more people who do it the better. Even though it will be ignored, we don't want to have them claim that nobody opposed it.
Read the newsletter and follow the instructions. What is being sought is sheer volume of responses, not actual explanations on why the FDA is promoting a bad idea because they are not going to read anything that's written. He asks that this newsletter & instructions be passed onto other just to get the numbers up.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-you-can-help-persuade-the-fda.
For those who are who don't know why Pfizer & the FDA are pushing to get this passed: Pfizer needs to push this onto children and than declare it a success, not really but the FDA is a captured entity, to get on the regular Children Vaccine schedule which will give them complete liability on the shot forever. The immunity will apply to the current Pfizer once the EUA is lifted because it's covered by the blanket immunity given to shots on the Children's schedule. U.S. Supreme Court removed vaccine product liability in 2011. This is their plan.
Opposed.
A reminder that this article serves as a rebuttal to the 'Collapse of Team Apocalypse' article. Team Apocalypse is not nearly collapsed yet. Every hopeful sign is contradicted by two new pieces of evidence that the madness is not retreating anytime soon.
They are going after the kids because kids can't say no to the boosters like adults can.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/the-proper-role-of-science
The proper role of the experts is to honestly inform everybody of their actual risks, and ways to mitigate said risks. In the case of covid, we know that other than age (which we can’t do anything about), obesity and vitamin D deficiency are the best indicators of bad outcomes. Thus, the proper role of government here would have been to encourage people to eat healthy, lose weight, and get out in the sunshine.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT KEEPING YOU HEALTHY. This is about overriding your personal preferences with that of unaccountable ‘experts’. This is about you giving up your autonomy for the collective. And if you happen to be one of the eggs who gets broken, perhaps via vaccine injury or your child regressing in school, the collective will shrug and say you’re simply the cost of making the omelet.
judges will rule that kids can decide on their own and dont need parents consent to get vaxxed ... lalala land ...
PERFECTLY SAID! Thanks, you just kept me from walking off the ledge.
Don't give up now! There's light at the end of the tunnel!
PERFECTLY SAID! Thanks, you just kept me from walking off the ledge.
I saw a poll that said 39 percent of parents of children under five are going to rush right out and get the Covid-19 vaccine for their children as soon as it is available. In fact, this is what Pfizer and the FDA are banking on. They know there are millions of parents who will not wait for evidence that the third shot does the trick. They've been sufficiently scared out of their minds into believing that their children are in mortal danger from Covid.
So, unfortunately, uptake will not be near zero. And there will be deaths -- not from the virus, from the vaccine.
Not my 6 yo or 18 mo. They won’t be getting near any of those shots. Homeschooling is what I’ve decided on and works great even with full time job.
Sounds like the mass psychosis percentage. About right.
Disgusting move by big pharma and even bigger government to grift the world out of money big government will turn around and loan into existence. I'm done with anyone telling me what to do and how to live. The U.S. is doomed. We need a major black swan event to clear the slate and start over. The great reset needs to be 50 free and independent States with no federal overlord. D.C. can become a camp for former "leaders" to serve time until they are hung in the public square for crimes against humanity. RESIST.
Hanged, you mean. I would prefer the guillotine.
I hang corrected :) which is fitting and less messy. Thank you.
Great email to printout and send to the paediatric practice of your choice in a nice big No Myocarditis Heart Valentine.
If someone knows an influential social media person I actually think starting a campaign to send Valentines to doctors and Children’s Hospitals is a fantastic idea, if I do say do myself 😉
Because TPTB own the FDA via Big Pharma $$$. "The “approval” by the FDA, the agency owned by the elites, is just a show to deceive the masses. In the next few months, we can expect Pfizer to “seek” FDA approval to vaccinate newborns" :
The Real Face Of Evil: 17-Year-Old Sean Hartman Was Killed By The Pfizer Jab. Twitter Removed His Dad's Account For Speaking The Truth
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-real-face-of-evil-17-year-old
The same way they recommend HepB vaccine at birth, 4 months and 6 months. The only chance an infant has of contracting HepB is if Mom is HepB positive. Hep B is contracted through IV drug use. Just test Mom.....but no. Every baby is given HepB vaccine despite the fact, FDA and CDC know that by age 18, only 1% of population maintains immunity. That's all risk and no benefit.
Genuine question- if a 6 month old baby experiences chest pain after the shot, how the fuck is it supposed to articulate that to its parents?
We were just having a conversation about this over breakfast. Probably 5 year olds couldn’t even describe palpitations . 😢
Steve Kirsch posted how you can send an email saying you oppose:
Open the Online Form - https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2022-N-0082-0001
Complete the Online Form -
(1) COMMENT: Limit of 5000 characters. May I suggest you just write “oppose.” It’s not like anyone will read 100,000 comments anyway, so we are just going for numbers. Feel free if you write something longer but I don’t think it is going to make a difference.
(2) WHAT IS YOUR COMMENT ABOUT: pick “INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER”
(4) EMAIL ADDRESS Optional - if you want an email receipt from them for a record of your submission.
(5) TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF: most likely “INDIVIDUAL”[they’ll ask for contact information] or “ANONYMOUS” [no contact info.] Your identifying information is NOT required.
(6) SELECT – “I am not a robot”. However, if you are a Robot, don’t check the box. You don’t want to lie.
(7) SUBMIT comment.
What about the half million kids in foster care? Does the state make them take the jab?
Yes
Kids in headstart preschool will be targeted too.
Many people are waking up to vaccine scam. Yes, all of them are a scam. Check out this 6 min video I recorded over the weekend.
https://rumble.com/vub1ub-do-vaccine-safety-studies-use-valid-control-groups.html
Soon enough The Bag of bones in the white house the Delusional mannequin is going to be sending you a brand new Crack pipe. I am sure that was FDA CDC NIH Fauci and Collins approved warp Mach one speed.