Discussion about this post

User's avatar
rpwi10's avatar

This is one of the most important articles Alex has written. The truth is non-vaxxed are being attacked under the false belief that C19 vaccines significantly curb infection. In their eyes, this is the smallpox vaccine part 2...and "smallpox" is surviving because of "unvaxxed".

We know this is not the case based on many recent studies (eg https://news.wisc.edu/study-shows-virus-abundant-in-covid-19-cases-in-wisconsin-even-among-fully-vaccinated/) that shows the same viral load in vaxed. Same viral load means same amount of shedding. We also know that C19 (unlike say smallpox) has massive animal reservoirs (recent deer study showed 40% have it - https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/wild-us-deer-found-with-coronavirus-antibodies). Wait until they C19 test mice which are far dirtier and more numerous!

If the truth gets out that C19 vaccines do not stop the spread nor can it eradicate C19 like smallpox, then the vaxxed will be less fearful of the unvaxxed and less likely to irrationally attack them.

The truth is EVERYBODY will get C19 or already got it (and didn't realize this). Lockdowns, masks, vaccines, etc... aren't the solution. This is the most important truth that will let us get back to normal.

Expand full comment
webbsinferno's avatar

Thank you Alex. Just became a paid subscriber after trying it out for free for a few weeks. The truth needs to be said so I support you. Also, I gotta say, as someone who is a scientist (forensic biologist) and spent years studying biology, chemistry, organic chemistry, molecular/cell biology, genetics etc AND utilizes those scientific principles on a daily basis, the weirdest thing has been this psudeo-religious angle “the science” has taken. I see lawn signs saying “we believe in science”. Bitch, science is not something you “believe in”

The last 18-19 months has been frustrating because it is very apparent (to me) that there is no transparency. Professional ethics is such a major point of emphasis in my line of work, it is so infuriating when I see a CLEAR violation of professional ethics, especially in the sciences AND when people's lives are on the line. Hell, as I write this, I'm looking at my Guiding Principles of Professional Responsibility for Forensic Service Providers and Forensic Personnel document and the SECOND bullet point states "Conduct full and fair examinations. Conclusions are based on the evidence and reference material relevant to the evidence, not extraneous information, POLITICAL PRESSURE, or other outside influences."

Expand full comment
271 more comments...

No posts