Btw, and this is not in the Politico article: at one point Twitter’s lead counsel said I had said the “vaccine is a lie.” I had to grit my teeth not to jump out of my seat. As you all know, I never said that - not on Twitter, not on Tucker, not anywhere. Did I say mRNA shots didn’t work nearly as well or for long as public health authorities claimed? Yep. Or that they could have severe side effects including myocarditis? Uh-huh. (Does ANYONE disagree with those statements now?) Or that for younger people, their risks outweighed their benefits? Sure.
Did I say they were “a lie”? Of course not.If you’ve read me for even a few weeks, you know I’d never say that. What would it even mean? The vaccines are a potent biological product with risks and benefits. They are as real as nuclear fission. They are the furthest thing from a lie.
And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement? Or did she genuinely believe I’d said that? Is that the caricature of me she has?
My God, Mr Berenson, you are taking on sociopaths who exist to lie, be hypocritical, cause harm destruction and death, show no remorse for consequences caused, and mock and disdain the fabric of healthy accountable humanity.
What in hell are you expecting in court?
People be fair and reasonable?!
Sheesh, that is why you are there to begin with!!!😳😳😳
I'll say it. "Safe and effective" is a lie, and in both parts. Further, the evidence appears to be mounting that the chemical companies knew this from the jump. In other words the EUA applications are a flagrant fraud.
Kathleen Hartnett lied to the judge and to the court. She is as delusional as the mannequin Uncle Joey in the White House. This is one thing you Do NOT do is lie under oath to the court.
Berenson vs. The Establishment. My hat is off to you, no matter which way this ends. You are up against a Wall of Lies. Berlin Wall comes to mind. Thank you for your bravery and clear perspective.
Twitter knows they are a controlled apparatus of the deep state. And like all apparatuses of the deep state, all they can do is lie. They have lost the war of ideas and their days are numbered. Truth is coming for them and they can’t stop it. Watching them try sure makes for good theater. Good luck with your lawsuit.
I know you are really focused on the trial and rightly so but in your research is it possible these outbreaks of unusual hepatitis in children is related to the vaccines, with Moderna trying to get approval for younger children this is very scary.
I appreciate Elon Musk's historic contribution to free speech, but legal victories will produce enduring precedents for future generations to enjoy and preserve.
I just got something interesting in my email inbox this morning. I'm a patent attorney in the Pharma space, so I subscribe to a few services to keep me updated on patent litigation in the field. Here is a snippet from something I got this morning.
"In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna developed and market mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines called Comirnaty and Spikevax, respectively. Both Comirnaty and Spikevax deliver modified nucleotides into a patient that cause the patient's cells to produce unique but harmless proteins that stimulate an immune response. For example, BioNTech/Pfizer’s Comirnaty delivers a single-stranded mRNA (designated “tozinameran”) encoding the viral spike (S) protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that can prompt an immune response that can protect a patient from Covid-19 infections."
The full article is about the fact that Moderna owns a lot of patents on this technology that they have voluntarily not been enforcing. Seems that is about to end.
Ok, so Moderna is going to start licensing or suing on its patents. Seems simple enough. But notice the few embellishments in that snippet. If you're writing about patents, why do you feel the need to throw in the word "harmless" when describing the spike proteins that are produced? Is that even true? Also, note that the vaccines "can" protect a patient. Are they saying that the vaccines might not work? I get a lot of email updates from this service, and never have I seen such language used when describing a product. Finally, notice that the article refers only to the names of the "approved" vaccines. Is that what has been distributed the past year and a half? Is that accurate reporting?
Maybe this is meaningless, but it just seems odd that an article on patents would use language like this.
The whole point of suits like this, from a conservatives standpoint, is discovery. That’s where opposition lawyers are compelled by the court to share their depositions, docs, etc that comprise their case or other info as may be reasonably requested by the other party. Alex referred to this recently bc as his case seems to be moving forward he can literally
“discover” the dirty deeds of Twitter under court scrutiny. All their crap, conservative skewed algorithms, etc. are open for play. This is why you see Twitter followers magically going up on many conservative sites and going down on, for example, AOC’s site upon purchase by Musk-they’re trying to cover up how they rigged the whole game ala Lois Lerner and IRS/conservative 501c3 org scam . That’s the left’s only play, they have to cheat bc their crap doesn’t sell in the real world…hence the Biden “admin” starting up their hilarious Disinformation Bureau or whatever beautiful sounding name they created for their new ministry of absolute truth. Based on Alex arguments, and Musk’s purchase, Twitter is sitting in a ticking time bomb me thinks. A couple of American hero’s me thinks.
You can’t safely deploy a new vaccine on a new platform in less than a decade. If you do, the risks of the target disease must be dire. They were not. We had other options. Demand justice.
The vaccines were a lie. 95% effective at what? Stopping transmission? Stopping infection? Stopping the pandemic? Were they 95% at being safe and effective?
The vaccines were a lie. Big lie. A big lie that came with several others.
Risks vs benefit...hmmm... what I see is mostly risk and extremely little benefit. Actually, I'm trying to think, if I was in court, is there ANY benefit that I could testify to - I'm thinking hard - Steve Kirsch just today posted a newsletter about three new published papers, including one of them that has multiple authors from NIH and from Moderna, and summing up these three papers, the newsletter says - and I agree for what it's worth - "the Vaccines haven't saved any lives. Zero..... The vaccines damage our immune system..... The vaccines impair our ability to resist furture variants of the virus. The more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become." These are the conclusions of these three papers, and it's guys from NIH and Moderna who concluded that the more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become. So - I'm thinking, what benefits are we talking about? You get a vaccine and it damages your immune system and makes you more vulnerable to getting the very illness you were trying to fight off. So, I'm trying to see where the benefit is. Missing that, don't see it. Risks, yes, that would be the myocarditis, strokes, blood clots and fertility impairment - well, some might see that as a benefit, but not everyone was going for that. A lot of people would not see that as a benefit. But the true benefit would have been preventing Covid except it just wrecks your immune system and helps you to have Covid more often, which is a benefit if you want to kill someone, yes, that. And here is the link to Kirsch's newsletter: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/three-new-papers-everyone-should?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1NjYyMjM0LCJfIjoiU0Y2Q00iLCJpYXQiOjE2NTExOTYwNTQsImV4cCI6MTY1MTE5OTY1NCwiaXNzIjoicHViLTU0ODM1NCIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.pAtf61eem99K_OLT4iOdzlk0x97rks4eMEdv5RbVi-Q&s=r
This might make a great movie! Maybe you SHOULD have jumped out of your seat for the drama! The Twitter lead attorney knew exactly what she was saying, there wasn’t one word uttered that wasn’t rehearsed, plotted, tested....DONT let down your guard these are professional liars.
"And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement?" Whenever I have testified whether in court or in a deposition and I have been reminded, "Remember that you are under oath" my response has always been "Yes, I am aware that I am am under oath and must tell the truth and I am also aware that you are not under oath and that you can and will say anything that you want."
One more time in the latest annual SEC filing BioNTech admits that experimental Gene Therapy injections are toxic and they are not able to demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy. This poison must be halted!
Today I was put in Twitter jail for quoting from this document. New "Free" Musk's Twitter where the FDA and SEC docs considered "misleading information"
If you're going to make a claim of fact in a court of law (especially as counsel, with the ability to practice law at risk if you're caught lying), you'd think you'd want to have an iron-clad source. Since there isn't one, I suspect she genuinely believes this interpretation of what Alex said.
Alex - Is it possible that Elon may keep you banned so this goes forward in a court of law? You get to depose Twitter employees and have discovery. If any Twitter employee lies, or covers up, or destroys evidence, or tampers with evidence, he or she can be held accountable.
Check out the Johnny Depp trial for a tutorial on how these guys stretch the truth, twist it until you can’t tell what it is anymore. Both sides do it - it’s part of the judicial fabric in this country. We are fucking great at it. But you already know that by now
" ... most interesting ..." Could be. The Biden White House has already acknowledged to the White House press corps that it would get in touch with .... Which social medium was it? YouTube? ... when it saw something about vaccines it didn't like.
Lawyers lie in court, and get away with it. Realized it first hand in court vs a town when I took them to court for a FIOA request. Lied thru their teeth. We won in the end, but never having sued anyone before, I couldn't believe the bold face lies! My friend, who's a big time lawyer in another state, laughed when I told him, and said that's what they're paid for. An eye opening experience.
It looks the opposing counsel is illegally testifying, which is grounds for a motion to dismiss the offending attorney from representing Twitter. A second motion should be to immediately swear, under oath, the offending attorney as a witness, to produce the evidence that you lied. (This could be fatal to Twitter's defense.)
Remember this is the same 'attorney' who, when she heard about Elon Musk's successful bid to purchase Twitter, wept. Methinks she cannot see straight through her tears.
From Politico’s article on the hearing:
Why DON'T we get the documents and bust everything wide open? If you've got nothing to hide, and all that!
And while we're at it, release all the videos of 1/6! Surely if they are so damning, this will strengthen public support!
My God, Mr Berenson, you are taking on sociopaths who exist to lie, be hypocritical, cause harm destruction and death, show no remorse for consequences caused, and mock and disdain the fabric of healthy accountable humanity.
What in hell are you expecting in court?
People be fair and reasonable?!
Sheesh, that is why you are there to begin with!!!😳😳😳
Pathetic watching Secretary Mayorkas lie over and over again to Congress. Is there no punishment for people lying after swearing to tell the truth?
I'll say it. "Safe and effective" is a lie, and in both parts. Further, the evidence appears to be mounting that the chemical companies knew this from the jump. In other words the EUA applications are a flagrant fraud.
Kathleen Hartnett lied to the judge and to the court. She is as delusional as the mannequin Uncle Joey in the White House. This is one thing you Do NOT do is lie under oath to the court.
Berenson vs. The Establishment. My hat is off to you, no matter which way this ends. You are up against a Wall of Lies. Berlin Wall comes to mind. Thank you for your bravery and clear perspective.
If Kathleen Hartnett said to the court that you called the vaccines a lie, she mislead the court.
that's not an"opinion"...
that's a serious ethics violation and your lawyer should file a complaint with the judge and the Bar...
May the truth break through; always.
The vaccines are in a category I describe as "100% true bullshit" 😄
Twitter knows they are a controlled apparatus of the deep state. And like all apparatuses of the deep state, all they can do is lie. They have lost the war of ideas and their days are numbered. Truth is coming for them and they can’t stop it. Watching them try sure makes for good theater. Good luck with your lawsuit.
this is going to be good...real good !!! great work Alex !
I know you are really focused on the trial and rightly so but in your research is it possible these outbreaks of unusual hepatitis in children is related to the vaccines, with Moderna trying to get approval for younger children this is very scary.
There are NO BENEFITS to this shot Alex.
UK DATA in Mark Steyn Video
Death within 28 days of positive COVID-19 test by date of death between week 9 2022 (we 6 March 2022) and week 12 2022 (we 27 March 2022)
Week 3 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 70 and over.
Week 6 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 60 and over
Week 9- More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 50 and over.
Week 12- More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 40 and over
Week 13 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons
.18 and over
You need to to your homework.
@MarkSteynOnline
has the best research I have seen on the #covid19 V A X debate from Official UK DATA - he starts at 7:30 on the video - https://youtube.com/watch?v=a8kdH2Xgf-k&t=556s
I appreciate Elon Musk's historic contribution to free speech, but legal victories will produce enduring precedents for future generations to enjoy and preserve.
Sounds like Judge Alsup himself is quite curious about what went down. That's a good sign. Let's hope Musk doesn't settle.
I just got something interesting in my email inbox this morning. I'm a patent attorney in the Pharma space, so I subscribe to a few services to keep me updated on patent litigation in the field. Here is a snippet from something I got this morning.
"In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna developed and market mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines called Comirnaty and Spikevax, respectively. Both Comirnaty and Spikevax deliver modified nucleotides into a patient that cause the patient's cells to produce unique but harmless proteins that stimulate an immune response. For example, BioNTech/Pfizer’s Comirnaty delivers a single-stranded mRNA (designated “tozinameran”) encoding the viral spike (S) protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that can prompt an immune response that can protect a patient from Covid-19 infections."
The full article is about the fact that Moderna owns a lot of patents on this technology that they have voluntarily not been enforcing. Seems that is about to end.
Ok, so Moderna is going to start licensing or suing on its patents. Seems simple enough. But notice the few embellishments in that snippet. If you're writing about patents, why do you feel the need to throw in the word "harmless" when describing the spike proteins that are produced? Is that even true? Also, note that the vaccines "can" protect a patient. Are they saying that the vaccines might not work? I get a lot of email updates from this service, and never have I seen such language used when describing a product. Finally, notice that the article refers only to the names of the "approved" vaccines. Is that what has been distributed the past year and a half? Is that accurate reporting?
Maybe this is meaningless, but it just seems odd that an article on patents would use language like this.
Brandon and Pelosi want a Ministry of Tooth because they're in dentures civil servants.
Simulation commander
The whole point of suits like this, from a conservatives standpoint, is discovery. That’s where opposition lawyers are compelled by the court to share their depositions, docs, etc that comprise their case or other info as may be reasonably requested by the other party. Alex referred to this recently bc as his case seems to be moving forward he can literally
“discover” the dirty deeds of Twitter under court scrutiny. All their crap, conservative skewed algorithms, etc. are open for play. This is why you see Twitter followers magically going up on many conservative sites and going down on, for example, AOC’s site upon purchase by Musk-they’re trying to cover up how they rigged the whole game ala Lois Lerner and IRS/conservative 501c3 org scam . That’s the left’s only play, they have to cheat bc their crap doesn’t sell in the real world…hence the Biden “admin” starting up their hilarious Disinformation Bureau or whatever beautiful sounding name they created for their new ministry of absolute truth. Based on Alex arguments, and Musk’s purchase, Twitter is sitting in a ticking time bomb me thinks. A couple of American hero’s me thinks.
If she made a misrepresentation to the Court, she is duty bound to file a correction.
This whole war with Twitter is so boring. Sorry. They can ban whomever they want. Thankfully Elon is taking over and will reinstate you!
Alex, make sure you’re exercising, eating well— this has to be very stressful.
I guess I don't belong in court... I would have called her a f bitch.
I argued with both prosecutor and defense attorney in same jury selection...
You can’t safely deploy a new vaccine on a new platform in less than a decade. If you do, the risks of the target disease must be dire. They were not. We had other options. Demand justice.
The vaccines were a lie. 95% effective at what? Stopping transmission? Stopping infection? Stopping the pandemic? Were they 95% at being safe and effective?
The vaccines were a lie. Big lie. A big lie that came with several others.
Risks vs benefit...hmmm... what I see is mostly risk and extremely little benefit. Actually, I'm trying to think, if I was in court, is there ANY benefit that I could testify to - I'm thinking hard - Steve Kirsch just today posted a newsletter about three new published papers, including one of them that has multiple authors from NIH and from Moderna, and summing up these three papers, the newsletter says - and I agree for what it's worth - "the Vaccines haven't saved any lives. Zero..... The vaccines damage our immune system..... The vaccines impair our ability to resist furture variants of the virus. The more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become." These are the conclusions of these three papers, and it's guys from NIH and Moderna who concluded that the more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become. So - I'm thinking, what benefits are we talking about? You get a vaccine and it damages your immune system and makes you more vulnerable to getting the very illness you were trying to fight off. So, I'm trying to see where the benefit is. Missing that, don't see it. Risks, yes, that would be the myocarditis, strokes, blood clots and fertility impairment - well, some might see that as a benefit, but not everyone was going for that. A lot of people would not see that as a benefit. But the true benefit would have been preventing Covid except it just wrecks your immune system and helps you to have Covid more often, which is a benefit if you want to kill someone, yes, that. And here is the link to Kirsch's newsletter: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/three-new-papers-everyone-should?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1NjYyMjM0LCJfIjoiU0Y2Q00iLCJpYXQiOjE2NTExOTYwNTQsImV4cCI6MTY1MTE5OTY1NCwiaXNzIjoicHViLTU0ODM1NCIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.pAtf61eem99K_OLT4iOdzlk0x97rks4eMEdv5RbVi-Q&s=r
This might make a great movie! Maybe you SHOULD have jumped out of your seat for the drama! The Twitter lead attorney knew exactly what she was saying, there wasn’t one word uttered that wasn’t rehearsed, plotted, tested....DONT let down your guard these are professional liars.
Mr. Berenson, you and your liberal friends brought us to where we're at when you voted for Biden.
It's all about The Narrative, not The Truth.
Remember the great Tom Petty "I won't back down"
Looks like an interim victory for Alex though
What's a bigger lie?
The vax is safe and effective, OR, justice is blind?
DOWN WITH THE CENSORS AND THE FASCIST DICTATORSHIP OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!
"And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement?" Whenever I have testified whether in court or in a deposition and I have been reminded, "Remember that you are under oath" my response has always been "Yes, I am aware that I am am under oath and must tell the truth and I am also aware that you are not under oath and that you can and will say anything that you want."
One more time in the latest annual SEC filing BioNTech admits that experimental Gene Therapy injections are toxic and they are not able to demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy. This poison must be halted!
BioNTech 2022 SEC Filing: We May Not Be Able To Demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy or Safety of Our COVID-19 Vaccine. Significant Adverse Events Could Delay or Prevent Regulatory Approval https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/biontech-2022-sec-filing-we-may-not
Today I was put in Twitter jail for quoting from this document. New "Free" Musk's Twitter where the FDA and SEC docs considered "misleading information"
The Harry Reed Rule: It doesn't matter if it's true. What matter is if it works.
Lying lyers will keep lying to support their lies.
Twits stepped in it Alex make them own it.
The little bird spreading misinformation in court over a case involving a misinformation claim. It doesn't get any better than that,
Why are there NO consequences when Attorney’s knowing provide false information to the Courts??
If you're going to make a claim of fact in a court of law (especially as counsel, with the ability to practice law at risk if you're caught lying), you'd think you'd want to have an iron-clad source. Since there isn't one, I suspect she genuinely believes this interpretation of what Alex said.
Alex - Is it possible that Elon may keep you banned so this goes forward in a court of law? You get to depose Twitter employees and have discovery. If any Twitter employee lies, or covers up, or destroys evidence, or tampers with evidence, he or she can be held accountable.
Check out the Johnny Depp trial for a tutorial on how these guys stretch the truth, twist it until you can’t tell what it is anymore. Both sides do it - it’s part of the judicial fabric in this country. We are fucking great at it. But you already know that by now
She was probably “fact schooled” by their ridiculous “fact checkers.” Then there’s what really happened….
" ... most interesting ..." Could be. The Biden White House has already acknowledged to the White House press corps that it would get in touch with .... Which social medium was it? YouTube? ... when it saw something about vaccines it didn't like.
It's a straw man construction, an age old rhetorical fallacy. The purpose is to undermine your character, you liar you. But you know that.
Lawyers lie in court, and get away with it. Realized it first hand in court vs a town when I took them to court for a FIOA request. Lied thru their teeth. We won in the end, but never having sued anyone before, I couldn't believe the bold face lies! My friend, who's a big time lawyer in another state, laughed when I told him, and said that's what they're paid for. An eye opening experience.
It looks the opposing counsel is illegally testifying, which is grounds for a motion to dismiss the offending attorney from representing Twitter. A second motion should be to immediately swear, under oath, the offending attorney as a witness, to produce the evidence that you lied. (This could be fatal to Twitter's defense.)
A lawyer lying. Can you imagine that?
Remember this is the same 'attorney' who, when she heard about Elon Musk's successful bid to purchase Twitter, wept. Methinks she cannot see straight through her tears.
That's effed up.