Btw, and this is not in the Politico article: at one point Twitter’s lead counsel said I had said the “vaccine is a lie.” I had to grit my teeth not to jump out of my seat. As you all know, I never said that - not on Twitter, not on Tucker, not anywhere. Did I say mRNA shots didn’t work nearly as well or for long as public health authorities claimed? Yep. Or that they could have severe side effects including myocarditis? Uh-huh. (Does ANYONE disagree with those statements now?) Or that for younger people, their risks outweighed their benefits? Sure.
Did I say they were “a lie”? Of course not.If you’ve read me for even a few weeks, you know I’d never say that. What would it even mean? The vaccines are a potent biological product with risks and benefits. They are as real as nuclear fission. They are the furthest thing from a lie.
And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement? Or did she genuinely believe I’d said that? Is that the caricature of me she has?
Those who claim Biden's electoral "victory" was legitimate are going to have a very hard time providing an innocent explanation for the evidence that's in cell phone geo-location data and on government surveillance video. My guess is they won't even try. They'll do their best to either ignore it or gaslight the country into not believing their lyin' eyes.
I saw that. If there are ever trials for the defendants currently held (in violation of their Constitutional rights), defense counsel will be all over it. Prosecution also has a duty to disclose evidence which would tend to exonerate the defendants.
What makes you think the government attorneys feel bound by their duty? The FBI is duty free, the CIA, NSA, DOJ, etc etc all seem to think they are not bound by duty. Their own goals, superiority, and mandating/forcing/tyrannizing us into submission is enough justification. Duty?!? They don't need no stinkin' duty!
My God, Mr Berenson, you are taking on sociopaths who exist to lie, be hypocritical, cause harm destruction and death, show no remorse for consequences caused, and mock and disdain the fabric of healthy accountable humanity.
What in hell are you expecting in court?
People be fair and reasonable?!
Sheesh, that is why you are there to begin with!!!😳😳😳
Yes but maybe he wants to stand his logical ground, with the hope judges are turning back to constitutional grounds. I hope he sticks it to the Cali Woke Mob. His feedback on SF was on point. That childless homeless direction is for the rest of America. It always starts in Cali.....
You might want to check into the backgrounds of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Cosby, Stills. Nash, Morrison. Et al. Seeing as you brought uber und auus. it up. 50 years of mind control Everything you know is being manipulate;;aated brt und aus cousns xxx
Nope. Just following friends who put their lives on the line, and got s**t upon. One Two Three...what are we fighting for. I support the Constitution. And Bill Of Rights. If you never had those fair enough,, but if you had those, lived by those, you know the course....
And Schumer declared victory yesterday; he says he has confirmed 500+ (I believe that’s the number) new “diverse” federal judges across the country. They play the long game.
Gotta disagree with you a bit here. Alex does a great job of naming names and dates in Pandemia. It’s one of the more effective techniques for exposing their lies and hidden agendas.
Our press has become corrupt and in league with the people they’re supposed to be holding accountable. The media’s lack of outrage at Project Veritas door getting kicked in, spying on Rosen and Attkisson, etc. Without a genuine free press and now open attacks on free speech, we are living in strange times indeed.
Alex's job is not to take a stand, that's advocacy, not journalism. His job and business model is to look at the facts, find facts that those in power want to hide, and present them. He's done a lot of good, showing the data so parents like me can have the facts to decide getting boosters for young adult kids are not a good idea.
Back in the day, mid to late 1990s I used to listen to Democracy Now on our local Pacifica station. Although I found Goodman’s obsession with East Timor tedious, they would occasionally report something really good like the Gary Webb/crack cocaine story.
DN is now completely useless & I have said so a couple of times in their YouTube channel comments.
I am the same age as Goodman and she should know better. DN is ignoring the “laptop” and carrying water in a completely partisan way. Not to mention, being not at all curious about Dr Farmer (a hero of theirs) “dying in his sleep” at 62.
How about her last two years pushing the vacks agenda without debate or perspective. Not a single injury mentioned and no research on dangers. She lost my vote, support and annual donations.
It is really shocking how DN did not "at a minimum" follow the pharma money ... instead she interviews some journalist about diverted funds related to ventilators and PPE. Talk about ironically wrong.
The CIA, Bill Gates, and the rest of the evil NWO cabal have bought out almost all of the once at least theoretically "independent" journalists and "independent" news organizations. Democracy Now is just one of many.
I agree, it's sickening, even maddening, to realize this has happened. The entire Pacifica Radio network is the same way. Most of the hosts of the shows they produce and air probably are unaware of the fact, yet they all, without exception, toe the party line. They might question the military-industrial complex, or the prison-industrial complex, but you will never hear one word of questioning about the official covid propaganda. They buy it hook, line, and sinker, and they adhere to it blindly and enthusiastically, in every possible way.
I'm quite sure that most of their funding is from (clandestine) government sources, funneled through individuals on their payrolls, posing as individual donors. The Pacifica stations seem to need to have longer and / or more numerous fund drives than they did in previous years, but I've no doubt they'll never lack for funds to stay on the air, forever falsely claiming to be independent. I can't listen to any of their programs any longer. They all, without exception, make me sick.
You're joking, right? When is the last time (or the first time) you saw someone brought up on perjury charges for lying before Congress? It doesn't happen. And until it does, they are simply inviting more and more lies.
"Did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court?" C'mon. Of course, she did. When you don't have the facts or truth on your side, the only thing you can do is LIE and hope no one fact checks you.
Roger Stone, Manafort, Flynn….if you jaywalk and you’re a conservative you sit in a DC jail for 2 years in solitary. If you’re a committed anarchist on tv throwing bricks at a cops head, you’re bailed out by Kamala Harris and Cher.
I'll say it. "Safe and effective" is a lie, and in both parts. Further, the evidence appears to be mounting that the chemical companies knew this from the jump. In other words the EUA applications are a flagrant fraud.
I'll say even more. All vaccines are a Lie. Every, Single, One. Ever since Jenner scraped pus off a cow and stuck it in someone else. That was 1757 A.D. And it has been a Hoax ever since.
Kathleen Hartnett lied to the judge and to the court. She is as delusional as the mannequin Uncle Joey in the White House. This is one thing you Do NOT do is lie under oath to the court.
Oh you are correct that an attorney is ethically bound not to mislead the court. I was just pointing out that attorneys are not technically under oath.
to practice in any federal court a lawyer has to be admitted and part of the admissions process involves taking an oath to the specific federal court. so, they're under oath when they speak. and so is the judge.
they're formally admitted as officers of the court and have a constant duty not to mislead the court.
lawyers don't need to be sworn-in each time they speak because when they speak (as an officer of the court) they are under a continual ethical duty.
the issue is whether the judge will hold the lawyers accountable... too often courts do not tending (instead) to write off the behavior as not really substantively impactful.
Berenson vs. The Establishment. My hat is off to you, no matter which way this ends. You are up against a Wall of Lies. Berlin Wall comes to mind. Thank you for your bravery and clear perspective.
Twitter knows they are a controlled apparatus of the deep state. And like all apparatuses of the deep state, all they can do is lie. They have lost the war of ideas and their days are numbered. Truth is coming for them and they can’t stop it. Watching them try sure makes for good theater. Good luck with your lawsuit.
Google is much more dangerous. Twitter controls what is said, but google controls information itself. Does a falling tree make noise in the forest? Not if you can't goggle it.
But back then people didn't rely on Google for important information. Many people who didn't know which way was up before early to mid 2020 now don't even know how to find good information, especially the young. Google hides it and they don't even know about Brave browser and search engine, etc.
Students use chromebooks in school, Google docs..Google is so choking their lives that it's easy for them to stay uninformed.
I know you are really focused on the trial and rightly so but in your research is it possible these outbreaks of unusual hepatitis in children is related to the vaccines, with Moderna trying to get approval for younger children this is very scary.
The net outcome of these vaccines will be more death and more sickness than if covid was just allowed to run its course. And if you figure in the suppression of early treatment the vaccines look worse still. Focusing on early treatment, not shutting down society, that would have saved hundreds of thousands if not millions in this country alone. It's like living in a country where a silent war is going on. All this excessive mortality. But bombs aren't being dropped on us. No tanks. No cities reduced to rubble. It's a very bad feeling.
Very well said, I am not sure why Alex and many for that matter are still not aware of the massive negative impact. Unfortunately it is going to get worse as many of the double...triple jabbed have their immune system degrade.
"There are NO BENEFITS to this shot Alex." is NOT ACCURATE. 1) Lots of people are making lots of monetary benefits from the shot. 2) The side effects might be the INTENDED BENEFITS as they help big pharma-hospital industry make even more $...
I appreciate Elon Musk's historic contribution to free speech, but legal victories will produce enduring precedents for future generations to enjoy and preserve.
I just got something interesting in my email inbox this morning. I'm a patent attorney in the Pharma space, so I subscribe to a few services to keep me updated on patent litigation in the field. Here is a snippet from something I got this morning.
"In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna developed and market mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines called Comirnaty and Spikevax, respectively. Both Comirnaty and Spikevax deliver modified nucleotides into a patient that cause the patient's cells to produce unique but harmless proteins that stimulate an immune response. For example, BioNTech/Pfizer’s Comirnaty delivers a single-stranded mRNA (designated “tozinameran”) encoding the viral spike (S) protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that can prompt an immune response that can protect a patient from Covid-19 infections."
The full article is about the fact that Moderna owns a lot of patents on this technology that they have voluntarily not been enforcing. Seems that is about to end.
Ok, so Moderna is going to start licensing or suing on its patents. Seems simple enough. But notice the few embellishments in that snippet. If you're writing about patents, why do you feel the need to throw in the word "harmless" when describing the spike proteins that are produced? Is that even true? Also, note that the vaccines "can" protect a patient. Are they saying that the vaccines might not work? I get a lot of email updates from this service, and never have I seen such language used when describing a product. Finally, notice that the article refers only to the names of the "approved" vaccines. Is that what has been distributed the past year and a half? Is that accurate reporting?
Maybe this is meaningless, but it just seems odd that an article on patents would use language like this.
The whole point of suits like this, from a conservatives standpoint, is discovery. That’s where opposition lawyers are compelled by the court to share their depositions, docs, etc that comprise their case or other info as may be reasonably requested by the other party. Alex referred to this recently bc as his case seems to be moving forward he can literally
“discover” the dirty deeds of Twitter under court scrutiny. All their crap, conservative skewed algorithms, etc. are open for play. This is why you see Twitter followers magically going up on many conservative sites and going down on, for example, AOC’s site upon purchase by Musk-they’re trying to cover up how they rigged the whole game ala Lois Lerner and IRS/conservative 501c3 org scam . That’s the left’s only play, they have to cheat bc their crap doesn’t sell in the real world…hence the Biden “admin” starting up their hilarious Disinformation Bureau or whatever beautiful sounding name they created for their new ministry of absolute truth. Based on Alex arguments, and Musk’s purchase, Twitter is sitting in a ticking time bomb me thinks. A couple of American hero’s me thinks.
Society did exist before Twitter. There are plenty of places to voice an opinion. Look where we are right now. Alex isn’t owed a voice on Twitter. And thankfully Twitter is suffering for their censorship, a lot of the lefty crazy people are going to lose their jobs when Elon takes over. That’s the way it should work. The market speaks.
Not so sure IF that will be allowed (definitely not before the elections) + the latest revelations in the last filing give him grounds to renegotiate as well as a fraud case...
You can’t safely deploy a new vaccine on a new platform in less than a decade. If you do, the risks of the target disease must be dire. They were not. We had other options. Demand justice.
The vaccines were a lie. 95% effective at what? Stopping transmission? Stopping infection? Stopping the pandemic? Were they 95% at being safe and effective?
The vaccines were a lie. Big lie. A big lie that came with several others.
Risks vs benefit...hmmm... what I see is mostly risk and extremely little benefit. Actually, I'm trying to think, if I was in court, is there ANY benefit that I could testify to - I'm thinking hard - Steve Kirsch just today posted a newsletter about three new published papers, including one of them that has multiple authors from NIH and from Moderna, and summing up these three papers, the newsletter says - and I agree for what it's worth - "the Vaccines haven't saved any lives. Zero..... The vaccines damage our immune system..... The vaccines impair our ability to resist furture variants of the virus. The more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become." These are the conclusions of these three papers, and it's guys from NIH and Moderna who concluded that the more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become. So - I'm thinking, what benefits are we talking about? You get a vaccine and it damages your immune system and makes you more vulnerable to getting the very illness you were trying to fight off. So, I'm trying to see where the benefit is. Missing that, don't see it. Risks, yes, that would be the myocarditis, strokes, blood clots and fertility impairment - well, some might see that as a benefit, but not everyone was going for that. A lot of people would not see that as a benefit. But the true benefit would have been preventing Covid except it just wrecks your immune system and helps you to have Covid more often, which is a benefit if you want to kill someone, yes, that. And here is the link to Kirsch's newsletter: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/three-new-papers-everyone-should?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1NjYyMjM0LCJfIjoiU0Y2Q00iLCJpYXQiOjE2NTExOTYwNTQsImV4cCI6MTY1MTE5OTY1NCwiaXNzIjoicHViLTU0ODM1NCIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.pAtf61eem99K_OLT4iOdzlk0x97rks4eMEdv5RbVi-Q&s=r
This might make a great movie! Maybe you SHOULD have jumped out of your seat for the drama! The Twitter lead attorney knew exactly what she was saying, there wasn’t one word uttered that wasn’t rehearsed, plotted, tested....DONT let down your guard these are professional liars.
"And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement?" Whenever I have testified whether in court or in a deposition and I have been reminded, "Remember that you are under oath" my response has always been "Yes, I am aware that I am am under oath and must tell the truth and I am also aware that you are not under oath and that you can and will say anything that you want."
One more time in the latest annual SEC filing BioNTech admits that experimental Gene Therapy injections are toxic and they are not able to demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy. This poison must be halted!
Today I was put in Twitter jail for quoting from this document. New "Free" Musk's Twitter where the FDA and SEC docs considered "misleading information"
If you're going to make a claim of fact in a court of law (especially as counsel, with the ability to practice law at risk if you're caught lying), you'd think you'd want to have an iron-clad source. Since there isn't one, I suspect she genuinely believes this interpretation of what Alex said.
Yes, what does that “vaccine is a lie” statement mean? At best she is too lazy to actually read what Alex has written, or believes her own propaganda. More likely she is creating a disparaging shorthand or straw man intended to categorize Alex as belonging in the nut house of holocaust or “climate change” “deniers”. All to avoid the fact that reasonable minds can differ over vaccine efficacy and safety.
Alex - Is it possible that Elon may keep you banned so this goes forward in a court of law? You get to depose Twitter employees and have discovery. If any Twitter employee lies, or covers up, or destroys evidence, or tampers with evidence, he or she can be held accountable.
Check out the Johnny Depp trial for a tutorial on how these guys stretch the truth, twist it until you can’t tell what it is anymore. Both sides do it - it’s part of the judicial fabric in this country. We are fucking great at it. But you already know that by now
" ... most interesting ..." Could be. The Biden White House has already acknowledged to the White House press corps that it would get in touch with .... Which social medium was it? YouTube? ... when it saw something about vaccines it didn't like.
During a press briefing Thursday, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that the White House was collaborating with social media companies to censor COVID “disinformation.”
In response to a reporter’s question, she said the federal government has ramped up its disinformation research and tracking.
“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,” she said.
She discussed four key steps the federal government is taking to hold Facebook and other tech titans accountable for identifying and restricting content deemed factually incorrect surrounding the COVID vaccine.
Peppermint Patty and the Biden cabal are the worst. The projection onto Trump on "collusion" is so obvious now - they collude with everyone in the media (and now it seems - Woke corporations) to censor/block/cancel anything that goes against the "narrative".
Just like to point out. This is exactly what the first amendment was designed to stop. The government prohibiting free speech. I know there's an argument that Twitter is a private company and they can put what they want on their platform. I suppose that's debatable. But when the government tries to work with Facebook or Twitter or Google that violates the first amendment. Real dangerous stuff.
Exactly true. This would be like government hiring a private security firm to go through your house without a warrant, and then claiming there was no Fourth Amendment violation because the government didn't do the actual snooping.
Lawyers lie in court, and get away with it. Realized it first hand in court vs a town when I took them to court for a FIOA request. Lied thru their teeth. We won in the end, but never having sued anyone before, I couldn't believe the bold face lies! My friend, who's a big time lawyer in another state, laughed when I told him, and said that's what they're paid for. An eye opening experience.
It looks the opposing counsel is illegally testifying, which is grounds for a motion to dismiss the offending attorney from representing Twitter. A second motion should be to immediately swear, under oath, the offending attorney as a witness, to produce the evidence that you lied. (This could be fatal to Twitter's defense.)
Remember this is the same 'attorney' who, when she heard about Elon Musk's successful bid to purchase Twitter, wept. Methinks she cannot see straight through her tears.
Why DON'T we get the documents and bust everything wide open? If you've got nothing to hide, and all that!
And while we're at it, release all the videos of 1/6! Surely if they are so damning, this will strengthen public support!
Ya… bring in Dinesh’s 2000 Mules movie!
Those who claim Biden's electoral "victory" was legitimate are going to have a very hard time providing an innocent explanation for the evidence that's in cell phone geo-location data and on government surveillance video. My guess is they won't even try. They'll do their best to either ignore it or gaslight the country into not believing their lyin' eyes.
Just bought tickets!!
Incarcerate all who have abjectly failed us in leadership influence and control…
Umm, who will be left to replace them all put away?
All in these positions have failed us.
ALL OF THEM!!!
Regardless of party affiliation!…
Yes most leaders of the Free World top of that list. We have been hijacked. And our children, and their children.
And the heads of so many public and private institutions!
Agendas . Not your kids....
A lot of CEO's cashing out these days,
I’m… the punishment for treason is death.
Yeah, on what planet is that ruling going to happen?…
My dad always said… if you throw enough shit at the wall some is gonna stick! 😂
Or be in charge :(
Incinerate or Incarcerate? I prefer the first.
I am in favor of the former.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
You might be interested in this explanation of why this won't happen.
🤦♀️
Bandit great link
Thanks, Brandon. It's heartbreaking. I see it as what "we" get for thinking we lived in a "free country."
People take "freedom" for granted. Most are too busy watching the Kardashian's.
Or trying to keep their heads above water, working all the time. That's where I was for at least 20 years. SMDH. Talk about something I regret.
Kartrashians... corrected for ya.
Nothing new here, we can never forget!! Let freedom ring!! Let’s Go Brandon!
Let's go Brandon, I agree!
We don't get to look at the documents or the videos because they contradict the narrative.
Exactly. Sure would like to see somebody explain this one:
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/at-least-20-federal-assets-present
I saw that. If there are ever trials for the defendants currently held (in violation of their Constitutional rights), defense counsel will be all over it. Prosecution also has a duty to disclose evidence which would tend to exonerate the defendants.
What makes you think the government attorneys feel bound by their duty? The FBI is duty free, the CIA, NSA, DOJ, etc etc all seem to think they are not bound by duty. Their own goals, superiority, and mandating/forcing/tyrannizing us into submission is enough justification. Duty?!? They don't need no stinkin' duty!
SimulationCommander another good link/writing.
Wow! Crazy stuff!
My God, Mr Berenson, you are taking on sociopaths who exist to lie, be hypocritical, cause harm destruction and death, show no remorse for consequences caused, and mock and disdain the fabric of healthy accountable humanity.
What in hell are you expecting in court?
People be fair and reasonable?!
Sheesh, that is why you are there to begin with!!!😳😳😳
Yes but maybe he wants to stand his logical ground, with the hope judges are turning back to constitutional grounds. I hope he sticks it to the Cali Woke Mob. His feedback on SF was on point. That childless homeless direction is for the rest of America. It always starts in Cali.....
You might want to check into the backgrounds of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Cosby, Stills. Nash, Morrison. Et al. Seeing as you brought uber und auus. it up. 50 years of mind control Everything you know is being manipulate;;aated brt und aus cousns xxx
Nope. Just following friends who put their lives on the line, and got s**t upon. One Two Three...what are we fighting for. I support the Constitution. And Bill Of Rights. If you never had those fair enough,, but if you had those, lived by those, you know the course....
And Schumer declared victory yesterday; he says he has confirmed 500+ (I believe that’s the number) new “diverse” federal judges across the country. They play the long game.
So should he roll over and play dead?
Gotta disagree with you a bit here. Alex does a great job of naming names and dates in Pandemia. It’s one of the more effective techniques for exposing their lies and hidden agendas.
Our press has become corrupt and in league with the people they’re supposed to be holding accountable. The media’s lack of outrage at Project Veritas door getting kicked in, spying on Rosen and Attkisson, etc. Without a genuine free press and now open attacks on free speech, we are living in strange times indeed.
Woof woof.
Pour yourself a cold one and relax a bit.
Alex's job is not to take a stand, that's advocacy, not journalism. His job and business model is to look at the facts, find facts that those in power want to hide, and present them. He's done a lot of good, showing the data so parents like me can have the facts to decide getting boosters for young adult kids are not a good idea.
Agree. That's why I've been following him all along.
Back in the day, mid to late 1990s I used to listen to Democracy Now on our local Pacifica station. Although I found Goodman’s obsession with East Timor tedious, they would occasionally report something really good like the Gary Webb/crack cocaine story.
DN is now completely useless & I have said so a couple of times in their YouTube channel comments.
I am the same age as Goodman and she should know better. DN is ignoring the “laptop” and carrying water in a completely partisan way. Not to mention, being not at all curious about Dr Farmer (a hero of theirs) “dying in his sleep” at 62.
Yep - she is ultra smarmy.
How about her last two years pushing the vacks agenda without debate or perspective. Not a single injury mentioned and no research on dangers. She lost my vote, support and annual donations.
It is really shocking how DN did not "at a minimum" follow the pharma money ... instead she interviews some journalist about diverted funds related to ventilators and PPE. Talk about ironically wrong.
Sure, throw out some red-herrings to throw as many sheep off the path as possible.
Who knows? Maybe she's compromised in one way or another and just doing evil bidding against her conscience.
The CIA, Bill Gates, and the rest of the evil NWO cabal have bought out almost all of the once at least theoretically "independent" journalists and "independent" news organizations. Democracy Now is just one of many.
I agree, it's sickening, even maddening, to realize this has happened. The entire Pacifica Radio network is the same way. Most of the hosts of the shows they produce and air probably are unaware of the fact, yet they all, without exception, toe the party line. They might question the military-industrial complex, or the prison-industrial complex, but you will never hear one word of questioning about the official covid propaganda. They buy it hook, line, and sinker, and they adhere to it blindly and enthusiastically, in every possible way.
I'm quite sure that most of their funding is from (clandestine) government sources, funneled through individuals on their payrolls, posing as individual donors. The Pacifica stations seem to need to have longer and / or more numerous fund drives than they did in previous years, but I've no doubt they'll never lack for funds to stay on the air, forever falsely claiming to be independent. I can't listen to any of their programs any longer. They all, without exception, make me sick.
Yes - forget which reason but at some point I woke up to their marxism and sellout and gave up on them. No more donations
They sold out
Pathetic watching Secretary Mayorkas lie over and over again to Congress. Is there no punishment for people lying after swearing to tell the truth?
Clapper, Brennan, Comey…all lied under oath and…nothing
You're joking, right? When is the last time (or the first time) you saw someone brought up on perjury charges for lying before Congress? It doesn't happen. And until it does, they are simply inviting more and more lies.
"Did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court?" C'mon. Of course, she did. When you don't have the facts or truth on your side, the only thing you can do is LIE and hope no one fact checks you.
Roger Stone, Manafort, Flynn….if you jaywalk and you’re a conservative you sit in a DC jail for 2 years in solitary. If you’re a committed anarchist on tv throwing bricks at a cops head, you’re bailed out by Kamala Harris and Cher.
I'll say it. "Safe and effective" is a lie, and in both parts. Further, the evidence appears to be mounting that the chemical companies knew this from the jump. In other words the EUA applications are a flagrant fraud.
I'll say even more. All vaccines are a Lie. Every, Single, One. Ever since Jenner scraped pus off a cow and stuck it in someone else. That was 1757 A.D. And it has been a Hoax ever since.
It might have been nice to have read this in our "health classes", in high school.
Check out Naomi Wolf’s Daily Clout website for her teams’ findings on “truth” with respect to Pfizer data. It’s astounding and they’re not done.
Kathleen Hartnett lied to the judge and to the court. She is as delusional as the mannequin Uncle Joey in the White House. This is one thing you Do NOT do is lie under oath to the court.
absolutely correct
she's no "rookie" litigator
what she said to the court was asserted as a "fact" - not her opinion
we'll see if the court gives a sh-t
The judge May school her in front of everyone as well.
Attorneys are not under oath.
You can not lie or miss lead in any environment Period. Even more so when it's a critical situation. No excuses without consequence.
Oh you are correct that an attorney is ethically bound not to mislead the court. I was just pointing out that attorneys are not technically under oath.
to: 2357958
not really sure what you mean
to practice in any federal court a lawyer has to be admitted and part of the admissions process involves taking an oath to the specific federal court. so, they're under oath when they speak. and so is the judge.
they're formally admitted as officers of the court and have a constant duty not to mislead the court.
lawyers don't need to be sworn-in each time they speak because when they speak (as an officer of the court) they are under a continual ethical duty.
the issue is whether the judge will hold the lawyers accountable... too often courts do not tending (instead) to write off the behavior as not really substantively impactful.
I am not in the Law business but I know that this is how it goes in an ICU CCRU anyway. Thanks for the debate and I want only the best for Berenson.
Regardless, judges don't like being lied to.
Correct
Berenson vs. The Establishment. My hat is off to you, no matter which way this ends. You are up against a Wall of Lies. Berlin Wall comes to mind. Thank you for your bravery and clear perspective.
If Kathleen Hartnett said to the court that you called the vaccines a lie, she mislead the court.
that's not an"opinion"...
that's a serious ethics violation and your lawyer should file a complaint with the judge and the Bar...
She'll claim she didn't mean it literally, but that the whole of his criticism amounts to a constructive lie.
And where are Alex’s lawyers objecting to this statement? Was this given in openings where you can’t object?
May the truth break through; always.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😕😕😕🤨🤨😡😡
Oh, you are serious?…
The vaccines are in a category I describe as "100% true bullshit" 😄
Twitter knows they are a controlled apparatus of the deep state. And like all apparatuses of the deep state, all they can do is lie. They have lost the war of ideas and their days are numbered. Truth is coming for them and they can’t stop it. Watching them try sure makes for good theater. Good luck with your lawsuit.
Google is much more dangerous. Twitter controls what is said, but google controls information itself. Does a falling tree make noise in the forest? Not if you can't goggle it.
Yet, somehow we all muddled through 240 years of free speech before Google came along.
And Bill Gates.
Look up Gates' dad, another real "winner".
Think: Eugenics, CSH Labs and exporting influence to Germany.
But back then people didn't rely on Google for important information. Many people who didn't know which way was up before early to mid 2020 now don't even know how to find good information, especially the young. Google hides it and they don't even know about Brave browser and search engine, etc.
Students use chromebooks in school, Google docs..Google is so choking their lives that it's easy for them to stay uninformed.
Boy, do I feel stupid. I never heard of Brave browser but I am now. Thanks.
Oh, don't feel stupid, not when the powerful have so vested an interest in keeping us from knowing our other options. But I'm glad it's helpful!
Thank you.
If a fish falls noiselessly into the ocean, you goggle it.
this is going to be good...real good !!! great work Alex !
I know you are really focused on the trial and rightly so but in your research is it possible these outbreaks of unusual hepatitis in children is related to the vaccines, with Moderna trying to get approval for younger children this is very scary.
Yes!
There are NO BENEFITS to this shot Alex.
UK DATA in Mark Steyn Video
Death within 28 days of positive COVID-19 test by date of death between week 9 2022 (we 6 March 2022) and week 12 2022 (we 27 March 2022)
Week 3 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 70 and over.
Week 6 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 60 and over
Week 9- More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 50 and over.
Week 12- More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons 40 and over
Week 13 - More deaths among the triple-vaccinated than unvaccinated for persons
.18 and over
You need to to your homework.
@MarkSteynOnline
has the best research I have seen on the #covid19 V A X debate from Official UK DATA - he starts at 7:30 on the video - https://youtube.com/watch?v=a8kdH2Xgf-k&t=556s
The net outcome of these vaccines will be more death and more sickness than if covid was just allowed to run its course. And if you figure in the suppression of early treatment the vaccines look worse still. Focusing on early treatment, not shutting down society, that would have saved hundreds of thousands if not millions in this country alone. It's like living in a country where a silent war is going on. All this excessive mortality. But bombs aren't being dropped on us. No tanks. No cities reduced to rubble. It's a very bad feeling.
Very well said, I am not sure why Alex and many for that matter are still not aware of the massive negative impact. Unfortunately it is going to get worse as many of the double...triple jabbed have their immune system degrade.
"There are NO BENEFITS to this shot Alex." is NOT ACCURATE. 1) Lots of people are making lots of monetary benefits from the shot. 2) The side effects might be the INTENDED BENEFITS as they help big pharma-hospital industry make even more $...
Great point. Take the time to watch Mark Steyn in that video!
I appreciate Elon Musk's historic contribution to free speech, but legal victories will produce enduring precedents for future generations to enjoy and preserve.
Sounds like Judge Alsup himself is quite curious about what went down. That's a good sign. Let's hope Musk doesn't settle.
I just got something interesting in my email inbox this morning. I'm a patent attorney in the Pharma space, so I subscribe to a few services to keep me updated on patent litigation in the field. Here is a snippet from something I got this morning.
"In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna developed and market mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines called Comirnaty and Spikevax, respectively. Both Comirnaty and Spikevax deliver modified nucleotides into a patient that cause the patient's cells to produce unique but harmless proteins that stimulate an immune response. For example, BioNTech/Pfizer’s Comirnaty delivers a single-stranded mRNA (designated “tozinameran”) encoding the viral spike (S) protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that can prompt an immune response that can protect a patient from Covid-19 infections."
The full article is about the fact that Moderna owns a lot of patents on this technology that they have voluntarily not been enforcing. Seems that is about to end.
Ok, so Moderna is going to start licensing or suing on its patents. Seems simple enough. But notice the few embellishments in that snippet. If you're writing about patents, why do you feel the need to throw in the word "harmless" when describing the spike proteins that are produced? Is that even true? Also, note that the vaccines "can" protect a patient. Are they saying that the vaccines might not work? I get a lot of email updates from this service, and never have I seen such language used when describing a product. Finally, notice that the article refers only to the names of the "approved" vaccines. Is that what has been distributed the past year and a half? Is that accurate reporting?
Maybe this is meaningless, but it just seems odd that an article on patents would use language like this.
Brandon and Pelosi want a Ministry of Tooth because they're in dentures civil servants.
That’s bad….but I did smirk…😏
Ditto!
har!!
Simulation commander
The whole point of suits like this, from a conservatives standpoint, is discovery. That’s where opposition lawyers are compelled by the court to share their depositions, docs, etc that comprise their case or other info as may be reasonably requested by the other party. Alex referred to this recently bc as his case seems to be moving forward he can literally
“discover” the dirty deeds of Twitter under court scrutiny. All their crap, conservative skewed algorithms, etc. are open for play. This is why you see Twitter followers magically going up on many conservative sites and going down on, for example, AOC’s site upon purchase by Musk-they’re trying to cover up how they rigged the whole game ala Lois Lerner and IRS/conservative 501c3 org scam . That’s the left’s only play, they have to cheat bc their crap doesn’t sell in the real world…hence the Biden “admin” starting up their hilarious Disinformation Bureau or whatever beautiful sounding name they created for their new ministry of absolute truth. Based on Alex arguments, and Musk’s purchase, Twitter is sitting in a ticking time bomb me thinks. A couple of American hero’s me thinks.
If she made a misrepresentation to the Court, she is duty bound to file a correction.
This whole war with Twitter is so boring. Sorry. They can ban whomever they want. Thankfully Elon is taking over and will reinstate you!
They shouldn't be able to ban people over free speech. If you can say it on the street you should be able to say it on Twitter
Society did exist before Twitter. There are plenty of places to voice an opinion. Look where we are right now. Alex isn’t owed a voice on Twitter. And thankfully Twitter is suffering for their censorship, a lot of the lefty crazy people are going to lose their jobs when Elon takes over. That’s the way it should work. The market speaks.
Not so sure IF that will be allowed (definitely not before the elections) + the latest revelations in the last filing give him grounds to renegotiate as well as a fraud case...
Alex, make sure you’re exercising, eating well— this has to be very stressful.
I guess I don't belong in court... I would have called her a f bitch.
I argued with both prosecutor and defense attorney in same jury selection...
Guessing you got your out card…
I have never been picked.
I wanted to
You can’t safely deploy a new vaccine on a new platform in less than a decade. If you do, the risks of the target disease must be dire. They were not. We had other options. Demand justice.
Perfectly succinct.
The vaccines were a lie. 95% effective at what? Stopping transmission? Stopping infection? Stopping the pandemic? Were they 95% at being safe and effective?
The vaccines were a lie. Big lie. A big lie that came with several others.
Risks vs benefit...hmmm... what I see is mostly risk and extremely little benefit. Actually, I'm trying to think, if I was in court, is there ANY benefit that I could testify to - I'm thinking hard - Steve Kirsch just today posted a newsletter about three new published papers, including one of them that has multiple authors from NIH and from Moderna, and summing up these three papers, the newsletter says - and I agree for what it's worth - "the Vaccines haven't saved any lives. Zero..... The vaccines damage our immune system..... The vaccines impair our ability to resist furture variants of the virus. The more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become." These are the conclusions of these three papers, and it's guys from NIH and Moderna who concluded that the more we vaccinate the more vulnerable we become. So - I'm thinking, what benefits are we talking about? You get a vaccine and it damages your immune system and makes you more vulnerable to getting the very illness you were trying to fight off. So, I'm trying to see where the benefit is. Missing that, don't see it. Risks, yes, that would be the myocarditis, strokes, blood clots and fertility impairment - well, some might see that as a benefit, but not everyone was going for that. A lot of people would not see that as a benefit. But the true benefit would have been preventing Covid except it just wrecks your immune system and helps you to have Covid more often, which is a benefit if you want to kill someone, yes, that. And here is the link to Kirsch's newsletter: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/three-new-papers-everyone-should?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1NjYyMjM0LCJfIjoiU0Y2Q00iLCJpYXQiOjE2NTExOTYwNTQsImV4cCI6MTY1MTE5OTY1NCwiaXNzIjoicHViLTU0ODM1NCIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.pAtf61eem99K_OLT4iOdzlk0x97rks4eMEdv5RbVi-Q&s=r
This might make a great movie! Maybe you SHOULD have jumped out of your seat for the drama! The Twitter lead attorney knew exactly what she was saying, there wasn’t one word uttered that wasn’t rehearsed, plotted, tested....DONT let down your guard these are professional liars.
Mr. Berenson, you and your liberal friends brought us to where we're at when you voted for Biden.
It's all about The Narrative, not The Truth.
Remember the great Tom Petty "I won't back down"
Looks like an interim victory for Alex though
What's a bigger lie?
The vax is safe and effective, OR, justice is blind?
DOWN WITH THE CENSORS AND THE FASCIST DICTATORSHIP OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!
"And I wonder - did Kathleen Hartnett know she was deceiving the court when she made that statement?" Whenever I have testified whether in court or in a deposition and I have been reminded, "Remember that you are under oath" my response has always been "Yes, I am aware that I am am under oath and must tell the truth and I am also aware that you are not under oath and that you can and will say anything that you want."
One more time in the latest annual SEC filing BioNTech admits that experimental Gene Therapy injections are toxic and they are not able to demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy. This poison must be halted!
BioNTech 2022 SEC Filing: We May Not Be Able To Demonstrate Sufficient Efficacy or Safety of Our COVID-19 Vaccine. Significant Adverse Events Could Delay or Prevent Regulatory Approval https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/biontech-2022-sec-filing-we-may-not
Today I was put in Twitter jail for quoting from this document. New "Free" Musk's Twitter where the FDA and SEC docs considered "misleading information"
I don't believe Elon is in control of Twitter just yet.
So Elon is just more controlled opposition
Another scion to herd up the sheep
Good times
The Harry Reed Rule: It doesn't matter if it's true. What matter is if it works.
Lying lyers will keep lying to support their lies.
Twits stepped in it Alex make them own it.
The little bird spreading misinformation in court over a case involving a misinformation claim. It doesn't get any better than that,
Why are there NO consequences when Attorney’s knowing provide false information to the Courts??
If you're going to make a claim of fact in a court of law (especially as counsel, with the ability to practice law at risk if you're caught lying), you'd think you'd want to have an iron-clad source. Since there isn't one, I suspect she genuinely believes this interpretation of what Alex said.
Yes, what does that “vaccine is a lie” statement mean? At best she is too lazy to actually read what Alex has written, or believes her own propaganda. More likely she is creating a disparaging shorthand or straw man intended to categorize Alex as belonging in the nut house of holocaust or “climate change” “deniers”. All to avoid the fact that reasonable minds can differ over vaccine efficacy and safety.
Alex - Is it possible that Elon may keep you banned so this goes forward in a court of law? You get to depose Twitter employees and have discovery. If any Twitter employee lies, or covers up, or destroys evidence, or tampers with evidence, he or she can be held accountable.
He or she is too non-inclusive.
What about zie or sie or ey or ve or tey or e?
You know when I wrote that I thought how grammar has been "woked."
Ahhhh. Get them to believe absurdities….you know the rest.
Check out the Johnny Depp trial for a tutorial on how these guys stretch the truth, twist it until you can’t tell what it is anymore. Both sides do it - it’s part of the judicial fabric in this country. We are fucking great at it. But you already know that by now
Justice at its finest
She was probably “fact schooled” by their ridiculous “fact checkers.” Then there’s what really happened….
" ... most interesting ..." Could be. The Biden White House has already acknowledged to the White House press corps that it would get in touch with .... Which social medium was it? YouTube? ... when it saw something about vaccines it didn't like.
https://news.yahoo.com/psaki-white-house-flagging-covid-185647266.html
During a press briefing Thursday, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that the White House was collaborating with social media companies to censor COVID “disinformation.”
In response to a reporter’s question, she said the federal government has ramped up its disinformation research and tracking.
“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,” she said.
She discussed four key steps the federal government is taking to hold Facebook and other tech titans accountable for identifying and restricting content deemed factually incorrect surrounding the COVID vaccine.
Peppermint Patty and the Biden cabal are the worst. The projection onto Trump on "collusion" is so obvious now - they collude with everyone in the media (and now it seems - Woke corporations) to censor/block/cancel anything that goes against the "narrative".
Just like to point out. This is exactly what the first amendment was designed to stop. The government prohibiting free speech. I know there's an argument that Twitter is a private company and they can put what they want on their platform. I suppose that's debatable. But when the government tries to work with Facebook or Twitter or Google that violates the first amendment. Real dangerous stuff.
Exactly true. This would be like government hiring a private security firm to go through your house without a warrant, and then claiming there was no Fourth Amendment violation because the government didn't do the actual snooping.
Excellent
😳
It's a straw man construction, an age old rhetorical fallacy. The purpose is to undermine your character, you liar you. But you know that.
Lawyers lie in court, and get away with it. Realized it first hand in court vs a town when I took them to court for a FIOA request. Lied thru their teeth. We won in the end, but never having sued anyone before, I couldn't believe the bold face lies! My friend, who's a big time lawyer in another state, laughed when I told him, and said that's what they're paid for. An eye opening experience.
It looks the opposing counsel is illegally testifying, which is grounds for a motion to dismiss the offending attorney from representing Twitter. A second motion should be to immediately swear, under oath, the offending attorney as a witness, to produce the evidence that you lied. (This could be fatal to Twitter's defense.)
A lawyer lying. Can you imagine that?
Remember this is the same 'attorney' who, when she heard about Elon Musk's successful bid to purchase Twitter, wept. Methinks she cannot see straight through her tears.
That's effed up.