What do you mean by "excuses?" I don't know Darryl Cooper. Have never met him. He's never interacted with my children, I've never asked him for help and had him say yes or no, he wasn't there when grandparents died, I know nothing of Darryl Cooper. I'm not making "excuses" for someone I don't know. I have no vote, whatsoever, on if Darry…
What do you mean by "excuses?" I don't know Darryl Cooper. Have never met him. He's never interacted with my children, I've never asked him for help and had him say yes or no, he wasn't there when grandparents died, I know nothing of Darryl Cooper. I'm not making "excuses" for someone I don't know. I have no vote, whatsoever, on if Darryl Cooper is a good or bad person. I'm taking issue with misinterpreting the conversation he had with Tucker as an excuse TO determine that someone you've never met is a good or bad person. He may be wrong about something - to extrapolate that to the level that's been done is insane.
We used to understand this, because we used to not think that media personalities, celebrities, and "social media" whatevers were actually a part of our life. Now, for some insane reason, we judge the character of people because of the facade of reality that's painted in front of us. Disagree with what Darryl said, make a better argument that he did, give me an even more nuanced take on WWII that I can use to try to reframe my perspective and think a little deeper. Or don't. But to jump right to "he's a horrible human" because of his perception of a historical event that he's specifically talking about how nuanced it is is insane to me
What do you mean by "excuses?" I don't know Darryl Cooper. Have never met him. He's never interacted with my children, I've never asked him for help and had him say yes or no, he wasn't there when grandparents died, I know nothing of Darryl Cooper. I'm not making "excuses" for someone I don't know. I have no vote, whatsoever, on if Darryl Cooper is a good or bad person. I'm taking issue with misinterpreting the conversation he had with Tucker as an excuse TO determine that someone you've never met is a good or bad person. He may be wrong about something - to extrapolate that to the level that's been done is insane.
We used to understand this, because we used to not think that media personalities, celebrities, and "social media" whatevers were actually a part of our life. Now, for some insane reason, we judge the character of people because of the facade of reality that's painted in front of us. Disagree with what Darryl said, make a better argument that he did, give me an even more nuanced take on WWII that I can use to try to reframe my perspective and think a little deeper. Or don't. But to jump right to "he's a horrible human" because of his perception of a historical event that he's specifically talking about how nuanced it is is insane to me