Perhaps if you apologize to Dr Malone and also admit Ivermectin is effective, then you would broaden your support base. For you to be ignorantly selective regarding IVM (see your ridiculous article on the Malaysian IVM trial results) and being a rabid ad-hominem mouthpiece against Dr Malone and IVM precludes my support.
Perhaps if you apologize to Dr Malone and also admit Ivermectin is effective, then you would broaden your support base. For you to be ignorantly selective regarding IVM (see your ridiculous article on the Malaysian IVM trial results) and being a rabid ad-hominem mouthpiece against Dr Malone and IVM precludes my support.
Insulting your readers is unprofessional and unhelpful and pissed me off. An appology would be welcome even without accepting that IVM worked for myself and much of my family and friends. Even if the placebo effect was at work which I believe is possible telling your readers their stupid and calling an eminent Dr a quack is just wrong Alex.
Perhaps if you apologize to Dr Malone and also admit Ivermectin is effective, then you would broaden your support base. For you to be ignorantly selective regarding IVM (see your ridiculous article on the Malaysian IVM trial results) and being a rabid ad-hominem mouthpiece against Dr Malone and IVM precludes my support.
Insulting your readers is unprofessional and unhelpful and pissed me off. An appology would be welcome even without accepting that IVM worked for myself and much of my family and friends. Even if the placebo effect was at work which I believe is possible telling your readers their stupid and calling an eminent Dr a quack is just wrong Alex.