A second paper confirms the mRNA shots cause recipients to make less effective antibodies to the coronavirus over time
alexberenson.substack.com
No one knows yet what the long-term effects of this change may be, but - spoiler alert - they probably aren't good. Also: what did Pfizer know and when did the company know it?
I think that the problem now is that if the CDC/FDA were to admit that there is a problem after this many people have taken this vaccine, it would be a political earthquake. Some voters might even switch poltical parties over it.
So instead, it is something that many if not most know is true, but is difficult/impossible to admit in the open. I think people that took these vaccines are mostly now just not taking any more and hoping/pretending that the vaccines are simply ineffective, rather than dangerous. If they saw on TV that the government had admitted the vaccines are dangerous, they could no longer keep hoping/pretending that the vaccines are only ineffective.
Good thing we jabbed all our soldiers and our first responders with something that makes them all uniformly susceptible to a particular antigen.
I used to worry, for the jabbed, about the pathogen evolving into something more virulent after listening to Geert.
But, something more sinister occurred to me. I read somewhere a challenge of bioweapons is that you can't control who it targets -- you might end up wiping out your own side, unless you prime them with an inoculation up front, which has its own challenges. This is like the reverse -- a good portion of the Western world has primed itself to be vulnerable to the same biological attack vector. Scares me.
My daughter has had 3 shots of Pfizer. So far she's had covid 3 times that I know of. This last time was bad. She lost her voice. Her husband has had it twice, also after 3 shots. They are educated 40 somethings who would not listen to anyone but the CDC and the fear mongering media. Luckily by the time the shots were available for kids, I managed to convince her not to vaccinate her 2 and 4 year olds. I kept repeating, kids do not need to get a shot, it's like a cold for them, don't get them the shot.
I saw a screen shot of a tweet of yours from March 12, 2020. Is it true that you made fun of "antivaxxers" and said they'd be begging for the COVID vaccines when they were available? Did you actually say, "Maybe time for a new rule? If you won't get your kids vaccinated, no soup for you . . .)?
Level of education has nothing to do with level of intelligence, which has nothing to do with level of common sense, which has everything to do with avoiding irreversible experiments and government schemes.
Imagine a cabal of globalist predator/grifters got together and poisoned a few billion people, hiding behind "the law", for their personal enrichment. What would our response be? To chase our tails in a circle analyzing all of the associated minute details, or to declare a crime has occurred and put everything on full stop while the offenders are brought to justice, which includes their bankruptcy & imprisonment? What part of the Nuremberg Code is not clear?
Hmmm. So, past vaccines were tested and studied for up to five YEARS before deciding whether they're fit for human consumption.
These poison shots were tested for, what?, ninety DAYS before being unleashed on the world?
If we'd followed the tried-and-true three to five year protocol, we'd only now be entering Year 3 of the process. And just look at ALL we now know about the risks of the clot shots. I wonder how many guinea pigs around the world would NOT have agreed to be jabbed, how many employers would NOT have jabbed-or-fired their employees, if all of this (AND whatever else we'll learn over the next 11-35 months) had been tested properly.
In the meantime, the WHO quietly continues to promote a pandemic preparedness treaty, including a Digital Health Certificate (I wonder what that could possibly be?), in a manner that has all the hallmarks of taking the extremely profitable pharma regulatory capture within the US onto the global stage...
Martha Stewart is now doing an ad campaign for Pfizer/Biontech. In the ad I saw she wields a samurai sword and exposes her should to reveal a jab band-aid. I'm sure they've invested a lot of money to get her to endorse. I think we've gone well past the stage where any of these pesky data matter: a minor PR inconvenience for a marketing campaign that indicates no intention of being concerned with any evidence from research of clinical trials. It's full speed ahead and the train's only got one track!
IgG4 antibodies? Not just more. hundreds of times increase in IgG4 present. So these mRNA transfected billions will be treating future , replicating Sars Cov 2 viruses as if they were pollen? As in, the immune system will learn to tolerate a nasty, replicating virus as if it were a mere allergen? Great. (Not).
Anyone remaining alive thinking these globalists did not already know the consequences of these jabs? They've had them since 1988. That's plenty of times to study, test, look at every aspect of pathology and mutations with minimum risk of exposure to their work.
This just confirms what I've suspected since the beginning. The overdose provided by the mRNA antigens looks to our immune system more like a snake bite or bee sting that it does a viral infection. .
“ The long-term impact of the switch to IgG4 antibodies is unclear” but two things are demonstrably true 1) repeated infections wear down the bodies systems especially if the immune response is weak 2) If a variant develops thats more lethal they (we) are in big trouble.
I think that the problem now is that if the CDC/FDA were to admit that there is a problem after this many people have taken this vaccine, it would be a political earthquake. Some voters might even switch poltical parties over it.
So instead, it is something that many if not most know is true, but is difficult/impossible to admit in the open. I think people that took these vaccines are mostly now just not taking any more and hoping/pretending that the vaccines are simply ineffective, rather than dangerous. If they saw on TV that the government had admitted the vaccines are dangerous, they could no longer keep hoping/pretending that the vaccines are only ineffective.
Also: what did Pfizer know and when did the company know it?
---------
They knew it all, the whole time.
Good thing we jabbed all our soldiers and our first responders with something that makes them all uniformly susceptible to a particular antigen.
I used to worry, for the jabbed, about the pathogen evolving into something more virulent after listening to Geert.
But, something more sinister occurred to me. I read somewhere a challenge of bioweapons is that you can't control who it targets -- you might end up wiping out your own side, unless you prime them with an inoculation up front, which has its own challenges. This is like the reverse -- a good portion of the Western world has primed itself to be vulnerable to the same biological attack vector. Scares me.
My daughter has had 3 shots of Pfizer. So far she's had covid 3 times that I know of. This last time was bad. She lost her voice. Her husband has had it twice, also after 3 shots. They are educated 40 somethings who would not listen to anyone but the CDC and the fear mongering media. Luckily by the time the shots were available for kids, I managed to convince her not to vaccinate her 2 and 4 year olds. I kept repeating, kids do not need to get a shot, it's like a cold for them, don't get them the shot.
I saw a screen shot of a tweet of yours from March 12, 2020. Is it true that you made fun of "antivaxxers" and said they'd be begging for the COVID vaccines when they were available? Did you actually say, "Maybe time for a new rule? If you won't get your kids vaccinated, no soup for you . . .)?
Level of education has nothing to do with level of intelligence, which has nothing to do with level of common sense, which has everything to do with avoiding irreversible experiments and government schemes.
Will this be enough for USA to drop the border mandate. The last country in the world, seriously...
Imagine a cabal of globalist predator/grifters got together and poisoned a few billion people, hiding behind "the law", for their personal enrichment. What would our response be? To chase our tails in a circle analyzing all of the associated minute details, or to declare a crime has occurred and put everything on full stop while the offenders are brought to justice, which includes their bankruptcy & imprisonment? What part of the Nuremberg Code is not clear?
Hmmm. So, past vaccines were tested and studied for up to five YEARS before deciding whether they're fit for human consumption.
These poison shots were tested for, what?, ninety DAYS before being unleashed on the world?
If we'd followed the tried-and-true three to five year protocol, we'd only now be entering Year 3 of the process. And just look at ALL we now know about the risks of the clot shots. I wonder how many guinea pigs around the world would NOT have agreed to be jabbed, how many employers would NOT have jabbed-or-fired their employees, if all of this (AND whatever else we'll learn over the next 11-35 months) had been tested properly.
People need to swing for this.
In the meantime, the WHO quietly continues to promote a pandemic preparedness treaty, including a Digital Health Certificate (I wonder what that could possibly be?), in a manner that has all the hallmarks of taking the extremely profitable pharma regulatory capture within the US onto the global stage...
Ka-ching...
Martha Stewart is now doing an ad campaign for Pfizer/Biontech. In the ad I saw she wields a samurai sword and exposes her should to reveal a jab band-aid. I'm sure they've invested a lot of money to get her to endorse. I think we've gone well past the stage where any of these pesky data matter: a minor PR inconvenience for a marketing campaign that indicates no intention of being concerned with any evidence from research of clinical trials. It's full speed ahead and the train's only got one track!
IgG4 antibodies? Not just more. hundreds of times increase in IgG4 present. So these mRNA transfected billions will be treating future , replicating Sars Cov 2 viruses as if they were pollen? As in, the immune system will learn to tolerate a nasty, replicating virus as if it were a mere allergen? Great. (Not).
Anyone remaining alive thinking these globalists did not already know the consequences of these jabs? They've had them since 1988. That's plenty of times to study, test, look at every aspect of pathology and mutations with minimum risk of exposure to their work.
This just confirms what I've suspected since the beginning. The overdose provided by the mRNA antigens looks to our immune system more like a snake bite or bee sting that it does a viral infection. .
“ The long-term impact of the switch to IgG4 antibodies is unclear” but two things are demonstrably true 1) repeated infections wear down the bodies systems especially if the immune response is weak 2) If a variant develops thats more lethal they (we) are in big trouble.
Confirms what immunologist Robert Clancy from Australia has been saying for over a year.