Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elmore's avatar

I'd add something about practice guidelines, particularly those involving revised definitions. You might be surprised how often definitions are "updated" based the results of clinical trials of treatments for that condition.

No investigator in a trial for a treatment for X should br involved in treatment guidelines, criteria, definitions, or anything else for X.

All changes in these areas should be clearly, completely, and accurately explained.

Ideally, there would be clear comparisons of guidelines in the US vs other countries with nationalized medicine (which are less susceptible to pharma bullying). Eg: what are "normal" limits for a specific condition? Do other countries have "pre-" categories--diabetes, hypertension, etc.

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Agree with all of these. And I’ll add a Number 11:

“Examine the childhood vaccination link to Autism”

There are too many stories of parents seeing their healthy children turn autistic after vaccinations.

We shouldn’t ignore them anymore:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/vaccines-cause-autism-no-one-wants

Expand full comment
256 more comments...

No posts