92 Comments
User's avatar
Dom Salvatori's avatar

the thing is that despite all the shenanigans from all these people, we all know Trump won in 2020. 81 million votes my ass. But just think - if Trump had won, no JD, no Marco etc. God has His Plan!

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

The Democrats also own those putrid vaccine mandates, which forced millions of hesitant people to take an ineffective, experimental "vaccine" which jeopardized their health or killed them outright.

Expand full comment
Just keep it real's avatar

I'm so shocked..... Pfizer lied about "good" trial results in a timely manner to tip the election. Fact check: there are no good results from that crappy "vaccine" and the 4 year "pause" allowed the dems to overplay their card and show their true colors.

Bourla can rot in hell full of mRNA jabs.

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Thanks for your dogged reporting, Alex. Bourla, Gottleib, and Zenilman should be in prison. They destroyed science and their reputations to help a senile criminal get elected.

Expand full comment
Brogan12's avatar

Operative WORDS are "should be", but this is America where accountability is nothing more than a good verbal scolding on the taxpayers dime, wrist slap or underlings fired with pay or worse yet these "servants" within the swamp will default to the " we must make certain none of this occurs again" which of course does because no one FEARS being held accountable, and the typical sheep voter buys into the redundant CON of the swamp each election cycle.

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

The footnotes have ALOT of really good info because as I was reading this, I got the impression that the mRNA shots were effective.

I was reading from the mobile device so to scroll to the footnotes then back to the article was time consuming, so as I read it, I kept thinking to myself, “wait are we saying the Pfizer shots worked?”

Couple of things:

1) the pandemic was a glorified control tactic and the vaccines are experimental.

2) Covid had a 95% survival rate. Same as the flu—because it was practically a flu/cold

3) anything that looks to make the pandemic anything more than this in a sense justifies the totalitarian regime we just came out of

Takeaway is that Covid should not have happens, experimental mRNA vaccines were not needed, and we need to set the truth straight or we’ll fall for whatever narratives are put out there:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/3-key-methods-to-decode-official

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-disease-causing-viruses-are-pseudoscience

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

I believe the survival rate of both COVID and the flu is well above 99%. The CDC says the mortality rate for the flu is 8.3 per 100,000.

Expand full comment
It's True's avatar

It was obvious at the time they held it until after the election. They are partisans and it should surprise no one.

Expand full comment
Dark Thomas's avatar

it was definitely to enable the mail in voting scams. which were, in turn, conducted to elect biden and the drunken hyena.

Expand full comment
Dark Thomas's avatar

who were, in turn, tasked with importing 10's of millions of new voters.

who would, in turn, vote for the D's in every election - giving them an unmatched electoral advantage.

which would, in turn, effectively turn the ruling of the country exclusively to the party that just so happens to have unmatched levels of fanfare and collusion from the corporate world, intelligence communities, media coverage, and activist billionaires not named elon musk.

which would, in turn, eventually remake our society into a fruity version of 1984.

Expand full comment
AG Fairfield's avatar

This post brings to mind a popular song from the 1960s: (To everything)Turn, Turn Turn; there is a season turn turn turn…

I think most here would agree that it was weirdly salutary to see just how bad things could be to provide a mandate for a much more successful second term for Trump

Expand full comment
Dark Thomas's avatar

agreed!

it was pretty telling that kamala was so unlikeable that the media tried to build her up into a presence without actually letting her talk, but trump's campaign countered by just airing unedited clips of her talking and ran away with the election

Expand full comment
Allison Brennan's avatar

Do you remember the way the media tried to sell her campaign as the campaign of "joy"?

Expand full comment
Dark Thomas's avatar

yeah, it's like on the one hand that's *probably* the best way to sell her particular brand of drunk/high/dim-witted because she does seem to be pretty content

but on the other hand, we would rather have the guy who jumps back up after getting shot in the face dealing with our enemies

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

That scenario seems likely. Imagine the complete lack of morals in people who would unleash a weaponized virus, lock down the world economy, and then mandate a dangerous vaccine in order to retain power and profits.

Expand full comment
Mike Bond's avatar

That's great Alex. And what do you say to the evidence the vaccine does nothing other than kill its victims?

Expand full comment
J. Gan.'s avatar

What does it matter, for a gene therapy serum "vaccine" that was never tested for any level of transmission -- after the general public was told it was safe and effective to take, whilst the strongest in society (professional athletes) were going down like tall timber on sports fields all over the globe?

Expand full comment
Brogan12's avatar

ALL of it has been tolerated and ALLOWED. Not ONE person responsible on the entire planet earth has remotely been held to account for hands down the greatest planned and deliberate crime against humnaity in SCOPE in the history of TIME. Not ONE! We sit now mid 2025 and not ONE!

Expand full comment
kittynana's avatar

TY for footnote #1 because I was beginning to question my own sanity.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Risk's avatar

Criminal, mobster, scientifically and morally bankrupt. They should all be held to account, but nothing will happen. Awful, but there are still hardcore kooks out there who believe in the mandates and are getting their 11th jab.

Expand full comment
Dragonmom's avatar

Call me skeptical but I don't believe the vaccines work at all, despite what the study shows. We vaccinated our entire family in good faith so we could go take care of my 94 year old father-in-law in Hawaii in 2021 (Hawaii had very strict requirements) and while we did not suffer any adverse events that we know of, it didn't keep my children from getting Covid when they both went to college. In fact the kids who went to schools which required 3 and 4 boosters got Covid multiple times. I would not let my son get more than 2 shots so he went to a college that did not require a 3rd dose but two of the colleges he was accepted to in 2022 were still requiring boosters. He is an athlete and by then that was a hard no for me. But my daughters are adults and chose to keep getting boosted despite my encouraging them to refuse and my offer to sue the schools. We'll see if there is any long term consequences. So I'm not buying the results whether they were before or after the election. I'm not a scientist but even I could understand that the only way to know it worked was to expose all vaccine participants to the virus. As I understand it they just tracked how many people got Covid but without exposing them there is no way to know if the people who didn't get Covid were exposed to it. My husband and I have still never had Covid but that is probably just luck. I know I never had it because I haven't even had a cold since spring 2020 when I started taking Vitamin D daily.

Expand full comment
Brogan12's avatar

I had a surface conversation with a typical DEM on Memorial day who was almost giddy to hear about the suggested next booster for his age group will be available soon. I said be careful with that, and he said he has had 6 already and continues to take them because he KNOWS it would be so much worse IF he did not take the injections. This is NOT an uncommon response by many STILL! The psychosis is REAL!

Expand full comment
RJT's avatar

Another example of why no one trusts Big Pharma or the products it pushes to supposedly help people. It’s time to cut their influence by stopping all pharma ads on tv.

Expand full comment
Ken D.'s avatar

OK, Pfizer should be forced to return all the research governmental funding they received for the psuedo-vax.

Expand full comment
Ken D.'s avatar

they betrayed the public's trust.

Expand full comment
Ken D.'s avatar

what happened to "the speed of science"?

Expand full comment
I am not your Other's avatar

Effective???

Expand full comment
Rand J Cooley's avatar

"I'm shocked there's gambling going on here" I got the shot BEFORE I knew about Alex and only because I thought I would need it to get on a plane or in a bar. I live in WA state a nanny state like CA but I digress. I don't believe a word that comes out of the government's mouth. Even the GOP can be flakey, not as bad as dems but.... I am not conservative nor liberal but a blind man could see what was going on in the '20 election. The media and voters are to blame because no matter what media says voters aren't that sharp and that is being kind. I never got Covid and it wasn't because of the jab nor did I take special precautions. The mask edicts were a joke and if your Lib friends start on their mask nonsense ask them how many door knobs they touched. That's right every time you went into a public place you were contaminated mask or not.

Expand full comment
Carey P Page's avatar

No doubt Pfizer lied a lot and had wonderful collaboration with the FDA (regulatory capture) that delayed the release of the vax data until after the election. Worse still was the fact that all information regarding early treatment was suppressed or covered up with seriously flawed studies showing toxicity from early treatment with HCQ (WHO study). Had he real world data from early treatment been available, the EUA would have failed on its face. The Pfizer and Moderna RTCs were seriously flawed. The data were cooked because of the timeline when a subject was declared "vaccinated," and the data were not analyzed on an "intent to treat" basis. Without the manipulation, both studies would have shown a lack of efficacy and at lest some of the toxicity that has become evident over time (drop outs after toxicity from first jab, etc).

Expand full comment
Dark Thomas's avatar

they should have just said the active ingredients will only work if you all elect biden.

would have made as much sense that year as closing parks, cancelling funerals but letting everyone attend BLM marches.

Expand full comment
TE's avatar

Bourla should be arrested for crimes against humanity. The Pfizer studies were rigged to support, wait for it, the 'safe and effective' narrative. It wasn't. Sure they hid their own rigged 'favorable' results which to Pfizer were safe and effective. Surely, Pfizer never wanted to help Trump because Trump would never have mandated them, but cognitively sick and evil Biden would. They also knew that Biden, as with China, could be bought.

Expand full comment