521 Comments

Why are they doing it at all?

Expand full comment

EXACTLY! I rarely "freak out" ... my question is, WTAF are the heartless ghouls up to now, with their precious little virus gain-of-function experiments and the murder of countless helpless mice? ENOUGH ALREADY, for God's sake.

Expand full comment

I would give you 500 "likes" if I could - totally, totally agree. ENOUGH.

Expand full comment

1,000! Likes 😀

Expand full comment

There is some chance any chimera will be worse than the two starting viruses. And there is no chance like that worth taking.

Expand full comment

Dual Use Research

aka

National Security Bioweapons Research, first and foremost. That's what this research is all about. This is why BARDA is involved.

Then if they can spin off one of these research projects into pHARMa profits, they will do so-- under the guise of PUBLIC HEALTH.

Stay up to date on your boosters, folks!

Expand full comment

Exactly right! It should be illegal

Expand full comment

In six months the Chinese will be blaming us. Some lab workers ate the bats. Lol

Expand full comment

They may also be doing this as a faults flag. Get everyone scared to leave the house and vote. Look people spread it around this Admin does not care about you and even go to Nuclesr War to stay in power. They only care about their stupid Utopia.

Expand full comment

They only care about Power. That’s utopia to them.

Expand full comment

And money.

Expand full comment

Power and equity. But not equity of power.

Expand full comment

Don't worry, they're just protecting us with Science.

Are you questioning Science?

Expand full comment

“She blinded me with Science!” - Thomas Dolby

Expand full comment

David, thank you for posting this. I just looked at the link you posted. I would tend to go with Byrum Bridle's perspective more than Alex's opinion since Bridle is a virology professor and researcher who has been providing accurate Covid information and accurate vaccine info from the beginning. Everyone should read Bridle's substack which gives a very different opinion from Alex's. For example, Bridle quotes from the Boston research: “…unlike naturally occurring Omicron, [the chimeric SARS-CoV-2] efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells.” Then Bridle explains: "…translation: the chimeric SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to cause infections deep in the lungs, where severe pneumonia would be the expected outcome."

So, one thing Bridle points out is, they have taking relatively harmless Omicron and changed it so that instead of staying only in upper airways, it now can readily get established in the lungs where it can cause pneumonia. Charming.

Bridle also points out the Boston researchers have just provided the recipe so that any bio-terrorist could make this in their own lab which is not necessarily going to be a level 3 or level 4 lab, but I guess they would not care, if they were planning to spread it around to others.

Further, Bridle points out that even though the Boston researchers conducted their research in a level 3 lab, the virus they created meets the criteria for requiring level 4 security.

It is an extremely worthwhile article to read.

Expand full comment

Excellent, thanks for posting! A whole 'Reply to Alex Berenson' section at the end :)

Expand full comment

Excellent link. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link. I'd never heard of this guy, but I like what I read. Frankly I like his angle. The "scientists" on covid vaccines have stopped doing science and are now just winging it. We should all be calling this out. It's true, and it avoids that whole anti-vax smear tactic from the vaccine cultists.

Expand full comment

Dr. Byrum Bridle is awesome. He is very active in the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which has a great website.

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/

If you go the website, and scroll down a bit, there is a video of Dr. Bridle on the right hand side that is titled, "It's Time to Stop the Shots; There is no justification for vaccinating children.

The website has a section devoted to Ivermectin including a documentary about Ivermectin https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin/ but numerous good resources, and tons of info about treatments, vaccines, etc. And even though it is Canadian, basically almost everything would apply to us in the US as well.

Expand full comment

I have been watching the Canadian situation with some interest and even contributed to the truckers. Well, at least I tried, but the money got frozen and then refunded. Personally, I'm not on the ivermectin train, but I think banning it was ridiculous. Scott Alexander did a great sum-up of the various published studies, and his conclusion was that it seemed to work in places like Brazil, which coincidentally also had high levels of undiagnosed parasite infections. His thesis, which seems as reasonable as any, is that it worked in covid because it killed the parasites, which gave the person's immune system some breathing room. As for HCQ, I don't have an opinion. But I do think it's odd that no one in government made the slightest effort (maybe via a YouTube livestream with a Q&A) to explain in clear, calm, scientific terms why they thought these things wouldn't work. At least that would have been a debate. But banning these things outright gave them a kind of outlaw appeal which was entirely counterproductive.

Anyway, thanks for your reply. Have a great day!

P.S. I'm also a big fan of Viva Frei on YouTube. So I know more than the average American about the horrors of what's gone on in Canada.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Kim. I'm actually a physician and I have seen with my own eyes that Ivermectin works very, very well - I've seen terribly ill patients who almost had to be admitted to hospital, who improved hugely as soon as we started Ivermectin. But as for the research - there are now 90 studies from 27 countries, most of them positive. 41 RCTs. Not just Brazil.

One mechanism of action is that it blocks a transport molecule which blocks transport of the virus into the nucleus of the cell - if the virus doesn't get into the nucleus, it can't replicate. But - if you wait a week and start treatment after the virus has already replicated, you can't at that point prevent replication. Ivermectin does work by several different mechanisms of action, and it does actually help at all stages, but it's not going to help as much as it could if one waits and starts later.

I have followed the situation in India closely because I have visited India for humanitarian work, and I have a foster daughter in India. Someone from WHO came to India and persuaded the Indian state of Tamil Nadu to stop using Ivermectin, and the death rates went up drastically - then they restarted use of Ivermectin and death rates came back down. There was also a huge slum area in Mumbai where there was an outbreak and they were afraid the number of deaths would be huge - the government gave everyone Covid kits that contained zinc and Ivermectin, and the spread of the virus was stopped there. I've heard that theory about Brazil, but the results in numerous countries have been good - it's not 100%, like every single person gets better, but it improved outcomes.

As far as banning outright - most people are not aware that the FDA gets its mandate from the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act which gives the FDA the authority to regulate what drugs come to market in the first place, and for what uses they can be promoted by industry. That's all. It absolutely NEVER gave the FDA the authority to regulate how physician's prescribe. The FDA as organized under the name "FDA" has been in existence since 1930, nd never in the first 90 years of its existence has the FDA tried to overstep and regulate what doctors can prescribe and when and how, until Covid, probably in 2020. You can look at FDA documents and website information from the past that say clearly, that off-label prescribing is legal and ethical and not forbidden by the FDA or by the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, and in fact, the FDA has said that very often this was beneficial to the patient. It has never been their role to say, "You can use Ivermectin if it is for this diagnosis but not that." No, they could say the manufacturer can promote it for this diagnosis but not some other diagnosis - but the physician has the right and responsibility to use the medication that he or she believes in his/her medical opinion will best serve THIS patient with THIS symptom in THIS circumstance - it is an individual professional judgment and the FDA has not legal standing to interfere. So, it was not a true "ban" in any legal sense, they could not ban it, but an FDA bureau chief strong armed the heads of the state medical boards and state pharmacy boards, recommending that doctors who prescribe Ivermection should lose their medical license. One doctor treated a large number of patients in a prison where they all lived, but he was investigated, because he got them well with use of Ivermectin. But, no, there was no true "ban" and there was no "outlaw appeal" for physicians who were working our butts off trying to get people well, hoping to avoid putting people in the hospital where they kept dying on the ventilators. If I had someone whose oxygen was too low, they would have to go to the hospital but if it was at all reasonable - lower oxygen than it should have been, but not quite bad enough that hospitalization would have been mandatory, I would give them a chance to see if they would improve on Ivermectin to be able to keep them out of the hospital and off a ventilator. Ivermectin was one of the tools I relied on, and I certainly wasn't motivated by any outlaw appeal. People who were scared of going into the hospital and dying on a ventilator did want Ivermectin, but I wanted that as one of my tools because it worked.

The reason that the government docs didn't make videos in clear, calm, scientific terms about why Ivermectin and HCQ don't work - well if you haven't read Robert F. Kennedy's book The Real Anthony Fauci, it's worth reading. He talks about some of the financial conflicts of interest between pharma and the government agencies, how government employees own patents on some of the processes used in the new vaccines and new drugs. The other thing you may not know, Kennedy talks about some of the fraudulent research that was found out and had to be retracted, research to "prove" that HCQ didn't work, where the data was made up out of thin air. Both Lancet and the New England Journal had to retract one article each. A driving force behind this relentless persecution of older, repurposed meds is this - perhaps you don't know - IF there is any approved med that is safe, effective, and available, for a new emergency condition - such as, Covid 19, in that case, you have to use that med and the FDA cannot grant Emergency Use Authorization. So all the repurposed older meds, including Ivermectin and HCQ, are existential threats to all the mRNA vaccines, to remdesivir, to Paxlovid, etc. See if you can find out how many billions were made on these items - I think during 2021 Pfizer made about 36 billion total on its vaccine, and for 2022, the projected total is 29 billion. And that doesn't count Paxlovid which Pfizer owns. With all that money, that could be an incentive for a disinformation campaign to get rid of competition which I think is exactly what happened. I suspect that some of the government doctors along with others in pharma most likely knew these meds DID work and the vaccines DIDN"T work, and didn't want to be caught in their deceptions, didn't want to be caught in a debate with people who knew enough to make good arguments against the government / pharma narrative.

But as far as that Canadian website, it's not just about Ivermectin, there is research on other meds that have worked, analysis concerning the vaccine, good analysis of topics related to Covid, and, like the commentary on the Boston U gain of function research, a lot of what they post is pertinent to us also.

Expand full comment

Well Bill Gates has already said we should be worrying about the next pandemic so here you go.

They’ve already seen that enough fear will make people do whatever they want.

Expand full comment

We know why they are doing it because they said so at the end of the paper:

"This indicates that mutations in the Omicron spike have evolved in such a manner that they hinder antibody binding but preserve the receptor engagement. This opens up the possibility of targeting the conserved and structurally constrained regions of spike involved in ACE2 recognition for the design of broad-spectrum vaccines to control the current COVID-19 pandemic."

It is all about profit and control with vaccines.

But lab animals do escape. I have spoken with a Harvard neuroscientist who told me it's something you don't talk about, but nonetheless known. It is incredibly reckless what they are doing.

Expand full comment

Because...they CAN. There is no accountability and never has been. All the same players in all the same positions and we keep asking WHY is this happing. Quite surreal really people still asking WHY. Just sayin. We know WHY

Expand full comment

True, we do actually know why. They are horrifically arrogant, and they are idiots. No ethics, no brains. I guess the question might be - are these people actually human? I'm thinking Peter Daszak who recently got a huge new grant to do more of the same.

Expand full comment

Stupid smart people are the most dangerous!

Expand full comment

Stupid, MYOPICALLY smart, narrowly focused intellectuals playing Promethean games they don't understand the implications of are dangerous, yes. Most modern scientists are extremely unlearned when it comes to the study of the human things, the rerum humanarum. They know a lot about bits of viruses and injecting poor mice with them. They have never, or rarely, reflected on the most elementary presuppositions of their beloved activity. They are no more actually intelligent than solitaire players or stamp collectors, but a lot more dangerous. Billions are doled out on their (mostly) vile activities. Annually.

Expand full comment

And never forget what these ghouls did to the poor ORPHANS and BEAGLES.

Expand full comment

Yes. Myopically smart etc. And no inkling of any ethical principles whatsoever.

Expand full comment

Family and friends of these "scientists" should give them heavy pressure to cease and desist. They are individuals who have chosen to play chemist to see what happens. Make home/social life for them hellish (lonely, without relief).

Expand full comment

No, they are not human. Robert Bigelow once announced on a 60 Minutes episode that ET's are here on Earth right under our noses.

Expand full comment

The only way this stops, is heads roll with accountability.

Expand full comment

So with you on that! Its just beyond words how not one single person has remotely been held to legit account in close to 3 years now and look what was done to humanity and still is allowed to continue. Truly a disgrace...

Expand full comment

All this crap will continue until we actually bring criminal charges against the FDA, CDC, NIH, pharmaceutical industry & Fauci along with MSM for pushing false information. We have documentation, videos and data to prove that they created and orchestrated crimes against humanity, case in point Fauci lied to congress about GOF which is a crime, yet nothing absolutely nothing done to hold him accountable; We can talk about their crimes from now and forever and it doesn't and will not stop nothing. I'm sick and tired of hearing what the criminals have done, we need action. Thanks for the reply.

Expand full comment

Those who produced the virus and the vax and ran the show these past couple years have enough money to buy a judge, and the best attornies. The money they made on the whole show. Accountability would be a good thing if we could do it. That does remain to be seen. We do have the receipts, all the documentation, but they can certainly out-lawyer any opposition, and buy a judge as well.

Expand full comment

Totally agree with you, we are not lacking documented evidence, the problem arises with a judiciary system that needs to be independent and do their jobs by the Oath they took, prayerfully there are those that are morally strong and have the courage to do just that. Let us continue to do whatever we can by calling and writing and showing up at town halls of our elected representatives and to make our voices heard.

Expand full comment

We are SO on the same page D! Its beyond measure how EVERYone can't see the #1 crisis we face. That being the utter lack of accountability ANYwhere! Not just slapping wrists and getting apologies, but serious accountability "we the people" who pay our servants to enforce.

Expand full comment

Far too many of our elected representatives don't even have the morals to uphold the oath they have taken to uphold our Constitution and we need to remind them of their duties to do so by writing, phoning and showing up at town halls and voicing our opinions.

Expand full comment

A series of unfortunate events

Expand full comment

Alex, Do not miss the point of most of those complaining. The real question is this: Why is this kind of experimentation going on without some kind of oversight. Have we learned nothing? How does it not get discovered until published? Those are the questions people are asking.

Expand full comment

well said and TRUE! Nothing is ever truly done to hold these "known" perps accountable. Why wouldn't it all simply continue

Expand full comment

I see it a bit differently: why do you assume that there is no oversight? Someone paid a grant to this University. Does the paper mention who paid for the study or who the scientists also work for? Maybe the last paper one of the scientists published would give you a clue...

Expand full comment

We paid for it, of course. Our tax dollars at work. Government grant.

Expand full comment

NIAID paid for it. You trust Fauci et al to conduct oversight?

Expand full comment

Exactly!

Expand full comment

This. Why in the hell is this stuff even being allowed to occur? Oh, I guess we know the answer. They want us dead.

Expand full comment

Indeed! There is no purpose to gain function research. The whole idea is you're going to create a more infectious virus so that you know how to deal with more infectious viruses is absurd.

Expand full comment

The purpose is and always has been nefarious and based in control and ability to profit for what they create or on it. Pharma loves that idea and always has

Expand full comment

Yes, and it is vaccine driven. They have a false paradigm guiding them that vaccines are this magic solution. So you can be reckless in what you create and then just make a vaccine. I read the book "Bitten" about the 50's to 70's bio warfare experimentation with tick-born diseases and it was amazing to see how confident they were about things they barely understood. The mentality of "we'll create a strain that harms our enemies and just make a vaccine for ourselves." It's insane. I recommend the book.

Expand full comment

Nature always trumps the EGO of man. Man is always tinkering with what naturally already works creating so many terrible side effects and chaos

Expand full comment

The lunatics in white coats are running the lab. ☢️☣️☠️🧠👀

Ah for the good ol' days when one of the biggest concerns was who had their finger hovering over the nuke buttons.

Expand full comment

Yes. This is the fundamental question. A stand against this 'research' needs to be included in the political platforms so we can at least make an attempt to get control over it - and that means not trusting this issue to the WHO.

Expand full comment

When you think you’re “god” this is what you do.... this is soooo irresponsible. This is science porn...

Expand full comment

Because these people just can't seem to stop looking for ways to harm other people. If not this one , it will be another, and then another and then another. If there is a real need to perform this type of research etc. then it has to be under true strict accountability . Not under the purview of people who really do not take good care or worse.... And then deny , deny deny.

We clearly saw the scientific institutions among so many others simply cannot be trusted any longer and that is unfortunate.

Expand full comment

Do you give some thought before you write a comment like this?

“They” do it to control, manipulate, terrorize, and blatantly put people at risk.

Stop underestimating and minimizing evil. Unless you want them to ruin and kill you without a fight…

Expand full comment

I’m guessing that it’s a depopulation tool, or a test run at social tyranny or just God exposing the sheer insanity of mass deception

Expand full comment

22 days to election...just what is gonna happen before?

Expand full comment

Right. That absolutely can NOT be discounted. Throwing an election was the whole reason for the original biological attack in 2020.

Expand full comment

desperate commiecrats are capable of ANYthing

Expand full comment

For the same reason the research in wuhan was done. To kill us.

Expand full comment

Indeed. They want you dead. It could not be more clear. Anyone who was willing to engage in critical thinking, step back, and analyze the entirety of the circumstances as far back as mid February of 2020 could have figured it out. So few did then, and so many still won’t or can’t do so now.

What is happening to us and what is being done to us are not the same. Until and unless more people understand that reality the disaster will continue unabated.

Expand full comment

I'm afraid the victims are mostly too stupid to comprehend due to psycho conditioning and panic syndrome emphasis. We had the SARS in the early teens. Nothing was done and it worked out fine. This time there was a plan to intensify the proposed results which went way overboard on personal freedoms and with means that were all bs. Masks, personal distancing, vaxxes that didn't work. Actually ones that modified your DNA. That is a no go from the get go. Big pharma stopped curing disease when they found out treating symptoms was more lucrative. Do no harm went out the window when the big bucks blew in. We've been had. I hope it is not too late. There is a way out, however. It is extremely physical.

Expand full comment

Sad but true. And many won't have the strength and or the courage for physical resistance.

Prayers for peace, if only mental peace....

Expand full comment

As planned. This is what happens when you have highly competent psychological planners at work. Protect others by killing yourself. It is so noble and remember to chose the compost method of body disposal instead of the massive pollution of cremation or burial.

Expand full comment

It is a radical change from prior practice. We used to be able to trust the govt (a little). Never again comes to mind.

Back then they were mostly stupid. Now they are evil.

I prefer the stupid ones over the current batch.

Expand full comment

All part of the WEF’s Great Reset

Expand full comment

Except there is NO WILD TYPE

Expand full comment

OK I just completed preview of 306 medical studies. Can't go into details becouse it has to be approved. I haven't looked at this controversy in details yet because it hit desk 2 sec ago. The way Science works Agencies must duplicate the study or provide supporting evidence. I'm not a Doctor. In my opinion the numbers look large because so many have taken the vaccines or forced to. My opinion larger than it should be. There are allot of other factors complicating the issues. But have not seen anything not even 80%. If they said blended getting 2 viruses at the same time they may be creating a condition unlikely to occur in nature. In the UK Omicron became the dominets strain. Which means getting both at high enouph consintrations, improbable. The worst is Myocarditis which is 1 in 800. That's all I have to say.

Expand full comment

Right?!! Geez. What is wrong with these people!!

Expand full comment

Honestly it’s not what’s wrong with them. It’s what’s wrong with “us”. For allowing this type of stuff to occur, unfettered and unwatched. It’s really no different than what we have allowed to occur in government schools. 50 plus years off the March of Communism and Marxism through the institutions have brought us to where we are now.

Expand full comment

You are so, so right!!

Expand full comment

I am NOT freaking out, I am ANGRY.

There is NO REASON WHATSOEVER for these sorts of experiments to be conducted at all.

Expand full comment

Seriously. The money for this latest BS came from somewhere. I don't know where but I can guarantee it wasn't from someone invested in advancing medical science for the benefit of humankind. We can't cure diabetes, cancer, essential hypertension, kidney disease, or any other disease that already kills people. But we can figure out how to make an average illness more deadly. 🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment

From NIH and NIAID mostly. Really. What would you expect?

Expand full comment

So we paid for it ourselves!? We're financing research to find more efficient ways to kill ourselves? It would funny if it weren't such a perfect encapsulation of where we are as a nation.

Expand full comment

actually good point... need to find the paper, you can usually figure out where the money came from, all US grants are publicly available. I found the EcoHeatlh - wuhan grant back in the summer of 2020 long before EcoHealth's name was ever in the news. Same can be done here.

Expand full comment

Yes, this Boston U study is our tax dollars at work, and speaking of EcoHealth, they just got ANOTHER grant apparently to do more of the same. Again, our tax dollars at work. WE are paying for all this nonsense - useless at best or... what we had to deal with for the past couple years.

Expand full comment

Actually, we might be able to do away with them all, according to this series: https://stopfattyliver.com/

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, simple diet and lifestyle changes are not sufficiently profitable for our captured public agencies to pursue.

Expand full comment

Yup. Only the disease model turns a hefty profit. Healthy people don’t fill up hospitals or run up tabs at their 5 minute doctor visits. Mend and medicate. That’s the name of the game. Healthcare? What a joke.

I call it hellcare.

Expand full comment

Another grant coming from our tax dollars. WE paid for this, but they just didn't tell us till it came out now.

Expand full comment

Exactly. JUST STOP. Period. No more GOF research. Burn these Biolabs to the ground. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

Expand full comment

If anyone reading doesn't understand the 'why' for this insanity at this point: you're the patsy. Time to wake up and smell your own democide.

Here is a shareable image version of the 'Abstract' of the BU study with the 80% kill rate revelation:

http://tritorch.com/degradation/!!!BostonUniversityCreatesOmincronVariantWith80PercentMortalityRate.png

Send it to everyone you know because if we do not raise awareness and stop this madness, we will all be the targets of this new weapon...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 17, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You would have to be brain-dead at this point to trust any institution with this research.

The people in charge are psychopaths, shots, famine, and energy shortages give them a warm feeling inside as they watch us squirm. Killer viruses are just icing on that cake.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 17, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Heart disease and cancer - well, the shots cause myocarditis, and apparently the shots also impair our ability to repair damaged DNA so that a cancer that has been in remission recurs and is unstoppable - but of course when people die of these things, it's not counted as related to the shot. And no one is doing autopsies. Not so much the virus as the vaccines, and apparently they were made in tandem or so it seems to many - which "El Gato Malo" mentions in his analysis of one of of Peter Daszak's grant applications. They were working on vaccines while working on the gain of function research it appears.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Exacerbated by the shots.

Expand full comment

Well, true that cancer and heart disease were already leading causes of death, but all-cause mortality has gone way up since the shots, and the life insurance industry knows this, and the embalmers have noticed this. There are reports that there never were so many coffins sold for children until after the children started getting the shots.

Pharma, particularly Pfizer, have worked hard to obfuscate, but if the truth could be fully known - IF - I would bet on the shots now being the leading cause of death, or certainly a very major one. I think the truly scary thing about Covid and potential new contagious diseases is that physicians are forbidden to treat, and agencies tasked with assuring public health are actually trying hard to enforce non-treatment. So that if I got Covid, most doctors would not prescribe Ivermectin or HCQ for me, most pharmacies won't sell it, and if I went to the hospital with severe Covid (and severe Covid could happen to me due to age and unavoidable comorbities) a hospital would be likely to offer me only treatment that could kill me, while preventing any doctor from giving me even Vitamin D.

In a sense, it is a bit similar to being locked up in a prison camp, and I truly mean no disrepect to those who have suffered much, much worse - but knowing that there are authorities who plan for me to be dead who are intentionally withholding lifesaving treatment. I am thinking of Dr. Marik resigning from the hospital he worked, after the hospital forbade him to prescribe even Vitamin C and Vitamin D for his patients - previously when people failed conventional hospital treatment of remdesivir and vent, they would be sent to Marik's care in ICU where he tried less conventional treatment that saved many lives, but after he was forbidden to use his regular treatments, and he watched patients die who could have been saved - he resigned .

Thinking also of other hospitals where people died while asking for Ivermectin even sending attorneys to court to litigate for a right to try Ivermectin and being turned down by a judge. True, someone might get Ivermectin, recover quickly from Covid, only to die of cancer or heart disease later.

But Covid is scary when you know it is a disease that CAN kill people rather quickly, there IS treatment that might actually make this no more worrisome than a strep throat treated with penicillin - but the treatment is intentionally withheld, and only inferior and sometimes lethal treatments are forced. I am not living in fear because I have the items that I would need for prevention or treatment, but there was a window of time when certain items were unavailable in my area - and it is a scary thought to realize that treatment is being withheld so that everyone can be pushed toward EUA products that are actually harmful, or ventilators that too frequently lead to death. A situation created where, if you get the illness, you are trapped.

And it is not only the very elderly who are harmed by lack of treatment. I have known people in their 30's who had heart damage from the Covid virus - and there has been research showing a surprisingly high number of people having cariac inflammation on imaging after otherwise recovering from acute Covid. Whether it's the virus or the vax, either way the spike protein can cause heart damage.

You are right, they push the fear of germs, like, with monkeypox, pushing so much, to sell monkeypox shots, when 98% of the cases were among men who have sex with men, and if you are not doing that, you probably won't get monkeypox, and the current monkeypox virus is not very lethal anyway. I get that there are people who are very interested in pushing fear of germs to sell so-called vaccines, and people who were so unrealistically fearful that they got shots that in many cases caused harm instead of benfit.

And I think one could make the cause that the greatest risk of all may be iatrogenic - if you look at the various definitons, "caused by the words or actions of physicians," or by the treatments provided or treatments withheld. I think one could make the case that iatrogenic illness, caused by the very agenicies that are supposed to looking out for health, may be a greater total cause of death currently than any of the chronic illnesses that have been at the top of the list - but it's confounded by the reality that the iatrogenic illnesses, disability and deaths are also kill by way of some of the well-known chronic illnesses. The shot gives heart disease, the virus causes heart damage - how to sort that out, especially with no autopsies, and anyway, heart disease does cause a lot of deaths, as we know.

The misinformation or conflicting information from the government agencies is also a nice touch - wear masks, don't wear masks, they help, they don't, wash all your packages when you come home from shopping - there was certainly a lot of careful attention to keeping people occupied with things that would never help without giving them info about things that would actually help, like Vitamin D, which Fauci takes but didn't put that on any list of talking points.

Many nurses no longer want to work in healthcare because they are being forced to get the shot - the Medicare mandate is still in force against health care providers... health care professionals and patients are in many cases mistrusting and avoiding the system - and hard to say how that will affect health in the long run. Avoiding treatment of known health problems in some cases because people don't want the vax and their doctor may require it (because his pay will be cut by the corporation he works for if he doesn't get enough to take the shot), so they don't get the shot, and avoid that harm, but they don't get other problems treated.

Anyway, I'm thinking that today, iatrogenic illness is likely a leading cause of death if not edging up higher than some of the other candidates, but it seems unlikely this will show up in any published papers.

Expand full comment

But I self-identify as a mouse so I'm still freaking out (mouse/mice/mices)

Expand full comment

Aww yay! The furries to the rescue! 🐀🐁

Expand full comment

🤣😂

Expand full comment

Yeah it’s a bitch being a mouse.

Expand full comment

Lol.

Expand full comment

Shut this shit down. Just cuz they can doesn't mean they should.

Expand full comment

And they use the taxes of the people who they have tortured for the past two and a half years to pay for the research. Insult to injury. Shut it down.

Expand full comment

Can't they, perhaps, try reduction of function research?

Expand full comment

It seems that Alex is implying this is "reduction of function" research.

Yeah, uh, we're busy making it less deadly for the next outbreak. And we need to do these experiments to make a better vax. Nope, nothing to see here at all ....

Expand full comment

Omicron could have been just that, and maybe it was.

Expand full comment

Can we start with a question why the hell they are playing Gods?!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

It's a feature!

Expand full comment

I disagree with the premise of this post. If there is "anything we've learned", it's that the people and agencies funding this type of research are demented. Why are they playing around with this stuff. Was one lab leak not enough?

Expand full comment

Demented, yes. Or another word could be... evil? Or batsh_t crazy. There are many good adjectives to consider.

Expand full comment

Omicron was weaker than original. So it’s in the middle somewhere.

Still don’t understand why they keep dicking around. Now let’s find the grant Fauci gave them. Lol

Expand full comment

The grant Fauci gave him that YOU paid for and I paid for with our tax dollars. Our tax dollars at working making viruses that are either useless or dangerous. But I didn't want to pay for making viruses, did you? Who wanted to buy these viruses? Is there anyone other than Fauci and the mad scientists who wanted this? They did it with our money.

Expand full comment

Maybe they are trying to get control of something genetic, such as aging. It is complicated; they have mRNA, but it must be delivered to all the subjects cells, right? Maybe they are using the flu virus as a delivery vehicle for some genetic pay-off.

Expand full comment

I'm for them not f'ing around with this stuff at all. Just stop.

Expand full comment

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me into taking five ineffective and dangerous experimental shots for a mostly harmless virus, that's pharmaceutical-grade stupid.

Expand full comment

"that's pharmaceutical-grade stupid"

KEEPER!!

Expand full comment

There is only one way to see if that 80% fatality rate is accurate.

Round up the research team and expose them to this man-made virus.

Expand full comment

And don’t let them have hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, paxlovid or any other therapeutic.

Expand full comment

But don't forget those who funded / enabled this research. The whole funding team, the ethics (oh the irony?!) approval team. They are all just as bad, if not worse.

Expand full comment

That is truly a brilliant idea. Yes!

Expand full comment

We absolutely should be screaming about this. Not because of what the study found necessarily but because they are experimenting on mutating the virus to create a more deadly version in the first place. How short are people’s memories?

Also this study was funded by NIAID grants (likely with approval from Tony Fauci himself) to the tune of around $3 million over the last two years. So why is OUR tax money being used for this kind of research in the first place?

It sounds to me like you are saying, “We gave millions of dollars to scientists in labs to try to create a deadly bioweapon, but they failed so we have nothing to worry about!”

Expand full comment

I don’t know if I was being trolled, but I spent about an hour last night on another Substack, trying to talk someone down from eating their morphine patch, because they were ready to give up over the new virus…

Thank you for posting this. Some people need some fresh air, which this post happens to be.

Expand full comment

I guess what you keep for the end time reveals individual character. Lol

I still see masked in car and alone with hands at 10/2 on my commute.

Expand full comment

At the beginning, Black people were almost totally non compliant.

Now, oddly, I see more masked Blacks than anyone non Black, both old and young.

Expand full comment

Actually, black Americans were dying at much higher rates than white people. Maybe a lot of them finally discovered that fact and are doing what they think they know to stay safe. I think some of it could be related to Vitamin D levels and nutrition, but could be also something related to the virus and genetics. I don't think anyone ever came up with any definitive reason, but it is a fact that blacks had more deaths, proportionally, than whites, or at least I have read that, and understood that from a black leader who I have talked with. So, it's understandable they are trying to be careful, only they don't understand there is not much help from the masks.

Expand full comment

Sunlight and nutrition are the key, not following the nonsense directives. As for reporting of outcomes for African Americans, I wouldn’t trust it. It was most likely a ploy to get African Americans on board with the true disease of fear. Same old tactics, different era.

Expand full comment

Mostly vit D. Africa has done extremely well the last 2 years, there are a number of factors, Vit D, diet, Ivermectin.

Expand full comment

"Across the 36 states for which a total vaccination rate could be calculated by race/ethnicity as of July 11, 2022, 87% of Asian, 67% of Hispanic, and 64% of White people had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, higher than the rate for Black people (59%)."

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/latest-data-on-covid-19-vaccinations-by-race-ethnicity/

So, it looks like Blacks are still a bit more suspicious of vax propaganda than other groups.

African-Americans are more likely to be obese, especially the women, and obesity is a big risk factor in dying from COVID.

"Among African-American adults, nearly 48 percent are clinically obese, 37.1 percent of men and 56.6 percent of women, compared to 32.6 percent of whites."

https://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/ethnicity-health/african-american/obesity#:~:text=Among%20African%2DAmerican%20adults%2C%20nearly,and%2032.8%20percent%20of%20women).

Due to skin pigmentation, they also have lower Vitamin D levels in the northern hemisphere.

Blacks in Africa seem to have done just fine against COVID, as obesity rates are lower and vitamin D levels higher. Also vax uptake in Africa is quite low, so by now natural immunity has put a stop to the endless COVID merry-go-round of variants, panics and lockdowns. In Africa, COVID is largely last year's news.

Expand full comment

Well, that’s disappointing. I would expect the African to know better.

Expand full comment

luckily 20% of the mice were able to properly fit their tiny n95s

Expand full comment

LMAO!!

But seriously ... the "humans" involved in this "research" will pay big league in the afterlife for what they're doing to the damned mice.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣 you win comment of the day. Thanks for the giggle.

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

Lol.

Expand full comment

People are just pissed we continue to eff around with viruses. There is no need.

Expand full comment

I dont think the point is spreading hysteria or the lethality. The point is the public has been mislead / bullied / coerced into following directions that have reduced their quality of life for the last 3 years under the pretense of containing a virus, while concurrently the so called leaders purposely work to increase the spread.

Its the same question as why should I give a **** about climate change from someone preaching to me from the steps of their private jet?

Expand full comment

I always feel safer when a high security lab is used to prevent unwanted transmission of a virus and I’m so glad we’ve never had lethal or moderately lethal escape from one of these high security labs. In fact, I’m super stoked that Lyme never escaped from plum island because of it had, then I wouldn’t have gotten it. Wow, I’m cured!

Expand full comment

Missing the point of concern, Alex.

That is: we’ve already seen the fruits of this kind of scientific hubris, tinkering with things we don’t fully understand. We are way over our heads, and it should be obvious to everyone.

It’s not about the particulars of this study. It’s about why this kind of research continues at all.

Expand full comment

It should be criminal to tinker around with any virus that can be transmitted to humans. I can't believe these people are allowed to continued to experiment on humanity....

Expand full comment

“But truly, if the last two years have taught us anything, it’s that the biggest risk from Sars-Cov-2 is hysteria, not the virus itself.” Absolutely. Hysteria caused by the very entities charged with ridding us of the virus they developed to cause the hysteria in the first place.

Eyes on the prize, people. They WILL pay (eventually). The most important lesson has been the irrefutable truth that we can no longer trust the freaking government.

Expand full comment

How is this your take? These researchers are conducting GOF research, the very thing that gave us Covid to begin with, and your response is “...stop freaking out, yes they made Omicron more deadly but not nearly as deadly as the Wuhan strain...” WTAF man?

Expand full comment

Berenson has been making less and less sense lately.

Expand full comment

THANKS for the info! The bivalent injections contain 50% of the original SARS-CoV-2 Spike sequence the other 50% is the mutated Omicrorn version! That 'paper' looks like a VERY good catch to 'convince people to get the new injections, otherwise they will die... For quite a while there were 'only' 6 deaths in VAERS AFTER the bivalent injections, 2 weeks ago it jumped to 19, last week new status 26. It grows FAST. People STOP getting injected with ANYTHING!

Forgot to add, will check the paper, but I doubt already the mice were injected with N-methylpseudouridine mmRNA.....

Expand full comment

Ah, that makes sense as a motivation. Of course. Just one more shot... the research is to promote boosters. Agree, no more shots.

Expand full comment

I've scrolled awhile to see if someone thought of this! I think this is it exactly!

Also, I'm thinking it could serve a dual purpose of CYA in case these hybrid shots are worse than ever before, like enhanced infectivity, transmission, severity. It'd be easier to blame an "oops" lab accident than to blame the bivalent shots themselves.

It's a no-lose situation for gov/pharma. The paper stirs fear to drive the low uptake.. and if the shot fails or harms, then they've got the research to fall back on, or- claim a leak.

Expand full comment

My 24 year old son had COV-2 SARS, ARDS in 2013. Was close to death on a vent from a pneumonia shot. A PNEUMONIA SHOT! A week later in ICU!

He was in a coma induced for 5 days.

This is all bs!

Expand full comment

I hope your son recovered fully. I won’t ever get another shot.

Expand full comment

He died one year later was never the same had a seizure and I’m dead with him.

I would never trust a doctor or Big Pharma I’ll live in pain and die at home. Never going to a hospital don’t care. Thanx xxo

Expand full comment

I will never find the courage to ever get another shot. Once it got added to the flu shot, I realized they can add it to any shot (perhaps). I'm no scientist. I am a hypochondriac, though.

Expand full comment

Exactly. I don’t trust them any longer

Expand full comment

Let me just add this virus is real, I had it. But recovered. It’s a weird strain but it has therapeutics to help it go away. The protocols in the hospital are the problem.

Expand full comment

😂😂😂 I can’t believe anybody would believe anything from the government lol. Which includes all the fear porn 😂😂😂. If they say “go left”… I strongly suggest you “go right”!

Expand full comment

I strongly suggest, think for yourself. Not left or right. What happened to the middle and coming together?

Expand full comment

Yes… strictly speaking you are correct… it is a common ‘old saying’ (not politically speaking) - I should have said “if they told me it was night outside-I’d have to go look to make sure!” Lol

Expand full comment

Lots of leftover "vax" that no one wants, so let's try scaring people with some new "Franken-virus."

And while they're at it, how about more claims that masks are needed?

Expand full comment

Nail hit firmly on the head, my friend.

Expand full comment

Masks made of plastic wrap, handed out at Conservative/ Republican precincts in three weeks…

Expand full comment

My alma mater... where Ibram X. Kendi replaced Elie Wiesel as the most prominent professor. It's not surprising... they do lots of stupid things there.

Expand full comment

Don't forget, they graduated AOC with an economics minor.

Expand full comment

Her final was balancing a checkbook and she had to cheat to pass

Expand full comment

It's also where MLK received his masters a degree... a great case study in the decline of universities.

Expand full comment

I agree with 99%, Alex but did want to point out re: "so blending the two together produces a virus with intermediate lethality."

Non-aggressive honey bees and non-aggressive African bees were combined. Ask folks in areas where killer bees swarm how that went.

Combining things unnaturally isn't the best idea.

Expand full comment

I have Pandemia, The Real Anthony Fauci, The Courage to Face COVID-19. For the last two plus years I have read countless papers & articles by you & others mainly MD’s & Immunologists. No shots.

No COVID. Follow America’s Frontline Doctors protocol. Watched a good friend with two shots & two boosters get the China virus 2x. Watched Remdesiver kill him in the hospital.

Notice a marked rise in sudden & unexpected deaths being reported in our local obituaries.

Yet we keep allowing these ghoulish bastards to keep experimenting with viruses.

Our laws are worthless when these Researchers keep screwing with gain of function research.

Alex we do need to be concerned about this & get it stopped. Panic no! Sanity yes!

Expand full comment

Sorry Alex, I'm in disagreement. You shouldn't be telling people to stop freaking out anymore than Twitter should be silencing you. As an engineer I can tell you that unexpected things do happen in complex fool-proof systems all of the time. It's not because physics had changed but because a corner case was overlooked. Concerned people are an excellent motivator for scientists to double and triple-check. So, my advice is to encourage concerned citizens to question the methods and procedures used and to hold experimenters to answerable for their work.

I know you hate to see people going off on something without all of the info, but then I recently heard you call Tulsi crazy and could not back that up when confronted.

I do enjoy your writing and I aM a subscriber, so I'm not going anywhere.

Expand full comment

Are they just trying to distract me from the looming threat of nuclear annihilation?

Expand full comment

At this point, I'm much more trusting of Putin than any of the clowns running the late great U.S.A.

Expand full comment

I think that if the last two years have taught us anything, it's we need to stop fucking around with viruses!

Expand full comment

I don’t know anyone who is “freaking out.”

In fact I doubt most of my coworkers are even aware.

I want to know -

1. What is the point of this?

2. The security at US labs is better but my faith in anything we do is NOT what it was 3 years ago.

3. Does anyone believe these are innocent experiments?

4. Or that they wouldn’t use it to coerce us more?

Expand full comment

> if the last two years have taught us anything...

Well, also that our trusted and beloved $cience bureaucracy created a novel and deadly pathogen in a lab that somehow got out, killed millions and wreaked havoc all over the globe.

At some point we might want to get to the bottom of that, just for future reference.

In fact, as far as lessons go, I might rank that above "C19 wouldn't have been as bad if the reckless fools who created it weren't also in charge of the response "

Expand full comment

But why are they doing this research anyway, I thought that it was banned!

Expand full comment

Apparently Small Pox taught us nothing

Expand full comment

Election variant? Btw. I can freak out if I want to.. whatever happened to those California docs from April 2020 who said lots of virus little death?

Expand full comment

Wolf!!!

Seems to work every time that COVID is uttered , true, Mr Berenson?

Thank you again for the opportunity to comment by the way

Expand full comment

My biggest complaint about this type of research is that it serves no positive purpose. GAF should not be allowed with any virus. EVER.

Expand full comment

Test all new medications authorized for emergency use on politicians first.

Expand full comment

What’s the point of doing all this? I believe it’s twofold. First, create more fear wherever you can… Second, try to drive as many more people as possible toward the so-called “vaccines”.

Expand full comment

I think that if we've learned anything it's that they won't release anything deadly. They're too afraid. Look at monkeypox. By that time most of the criminals had contracted the corona. And with the monkeypox no one has died. The hype will get worse but the facts will be less dangerous. And I'd guess the answer will always be easy access, like the vitamin D, getting outside, not masking, mixing with people kind of thing.

At some point, the artificial hysteria will out their games. I'm already done. Nuclear war? What am I going to do? Make dinner as usual. Three years ago I would have disintegrated into a pool of tears, fear, and sweat and still be there months later. I've learned a lot since the dawn of this scam.

Expand full comment

Alex, not for nothing but you have a history of misinterpreting studies - i.e. Ivermectin. In this case, you completely miss the larger implications that a US lab is involved with any kind of gain of function experiment and that NIH/NIAD - i.e. Tony "the science" Fauci - continues to fund these labs. I'll give you this much though - you've become an expert in missing the forest for the trees and you do so with such perfectly executed snark.....

Expand full comment

How about we just ban gain of function research, ban funding for gain of function research, and throw in prison for life anyone who engages in either?

Expand full comment

Because you have to add the caveat Ör anyone who offshores it, to Wuhan or to Ukraine or any other damn country. Do you get it?

Expand full comment

Yeah, I was gonna add that we visit predator drones upon anyone beyond our shores who does it. So consider it added to my original comment.

Still, banning the financing of it by US entities would go a long way toward banning it, period.

Expand full comment

I think it would be a step in the right direction, except Fauci, the Bagman, used an intermediary, Eco Health Alliance. I think we would have to ban that, as well as tiering it through a series of these corporations...just like money laundering, and RICO.

Right now, our lawmakers cannot pass bills not approved by DOD/DARPA/BARDA/HHS and the deep state bioweapons spooks. There is an entire laundry list of things they can do (see Bailiwick News) where the power has been transferred over....and of course, if a lawmaker wants to overturn these regulations and laws, he will be bought off or threatened with his family being hurt. I now think we need to cut the head off the snake...which includes Patriot Act and all laws going forward from there.

Expand full comment

please add to WALENSKY's THREAT tactics idea with this new 'paper' also my most recent post:

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/sudden-death-blood-groups-walenskys

One needs to EXPOSE WALENSKY NOW!

Expand full comment

I am never afraid. Fear never ever drives me. Only love. I love everyone even if they are rascals. It has healed me from so many diseases! I appreciate your wisdom. Hysteria shuts down the prefrontal cortex where we have logic. It's toxic to the body and it lowers the immune system.

But did you see, Dear Alex, that Biden signed a dual purpose bioweapon gain of function executive order? I have the feeling more of this research will be conducted unless he rescinds the order. I voted for him, but for sure will not again. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/manmade-pandemics-cola/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=0ddbdd63-8b73-4ae1-9640-62df2d883a48 I love you and I love all. Even Biden. Even Fauci, Even Covid. Even Vaccines. Heck, love is what fuels me. I still have discernment though!

Expand full comment

You ‘love’ the very people that are trying to kill you. I think your discernment went out the window a long time ago. I don’t know if you noticed but love never defeated an enemy that was trying to murder you.

Expand full comment

Why are the EGGHEADS messing with it ????

Expand full comment

A plausible explanation (not mine) is that by cultivating a coronavirus (very difficult prior to Sars viruses) with a particular immunogenic protein (with inserts from another virus eg. HIV) this would serve as a method to immunize against those viruses.

Expand full comment

If they were not such idiots, they would know that Vitamin D, zinc and Ivermectin can take care of the virus, but ... they see dollar signs when they think of vaccines, and they want to do something that can be patented where they get royalties. That is the biggest motivator. Then they think of nice excuses to make it look kosher. It's about the patents, the money and getting to be God for a day.

Expand full comment

You CANNOT IMMUNIZE AGAINST A RESPITORY VIRUS. END.

HAve you learned NOTHING?

Expand full comment

I never said you could. I was merely quoting their reasoning. The suggestion was that they could use a respiratory virus as a vector to immunize against HIV. That's how they get grants...

Expand full comment

Them my humble apologies...I am sorry. And I confess I didn see the asinine remark about using a respitory virus to immunize against HIV ...which obviously they tried with the Sars -2 virus because it contains HIV inserts. Oh Lord come soon.

Expand full comment

No worries. It's a touchy subject for all of us. But it is a plausible reason for how they got grant money to research the 'perfect' antibody..(cause they can't make or sell tcell or nk cell immunity)

Expand full comment

Thank you for that Alex. It's hard not to panic when you read some of these ridiculous headlines. it's just same old same old, trying to push the fear factor up again. (and thank you for allowing us to comment -I lost my job and cannot afford to pay any subscription charges. But I DID buy your very first 4 booklets about Covid when they first came out- they are dog eared and highlighted all over 😊)

Expand full comment

Have you tried piecing together your own tailor-made career to replace your old job. May I suggest thepennyhoarder.com, ratracerebellion.com, and https://www.sidehustlenation.com/ for ideas to get you started.

Expand full comment

Do you work for these mad men? Why are you defending them at all?!?!?

Expand full comment

I think the major point is missed here Alex... This is more gain of function being funded by Fauci and the NIH. Yes, the NIH funded this research. Why in the hell does this need to continue? And so soon after the original “whoopsie in Wuhan”? Have these morons learned nothing?

Expand full comment