Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Volman777's avatar

So reading about his visit from the FBI and the questions they asked, I had a whole different feeling than I originally thought. As a minister, there are things that if I heard, confidentiality goes out the window. (And i will tell people that in advance. FYI if a crime involves child abuse...im going to the police.)

After reading the questions, I wondered about this. When and how did he get the manifesto? Did he keep quiet so he could have a big story after the murder? And so on. These are not questions that are meant to intimidate, but rather see if he was involved.

As I said, I originally thought that this was blatant intimidation. After reading tge questions given to his attorney, the questions were valid and should be answered.

He should have answered them before he published the manifesto too.

Expand full comment
Bob Park's avatar

The FBI agents were doing their job. They did not arrest or threaten Klipperstein. When he asked them to leave, they left. The police, including the FBI, cannot function without the help of citizens who cooperate with them. As a journalist, Kilpperstein has every right to publish the manifesto and keep his sources confidential, but there is no law requiring him to do so. The FBI had every right to try to find out what he knew, when and how he knew it. This case is entirely different from your case, where the feds, in conjunction with social media platforms, censored you and others who were trying to tell the truth about COVID.

Expand full comment
96 more comments...

No posts