Robert F. Kennedy's remaking of the federal advisory panel on immunizations offers a chance to rethink the constant push for more and more expensive, less and less effective jabs.
The current vaccine schedule is insane. Right out of the womb, babies are pushed to get Hep B and Vitamin K. Some schools mandate annual flu shots to attend as well. Blue states have become biomedical prisons and many of us were forced to choose between our jobs or the jab. I asked a few simple questions about vaccines relatives who were doctors, but they weren't able to answer because they didn't learn anything about them in med school yet worship the "science" and "experts" like false gods: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-do-no-harm-part-3
So true! And yet ironic that it was Reagan who signed into the law the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which -- giving Pharma companies freedom from liability for vaccine injuries -- paved the way for the current massive expansion of mandated childhood vaccines.
The real reason they give Hep B at birth, which doctors will not tell you but if you look close the experts will halfway admit, is so that your baby doesn’t catch Hep B from the hospital staff. There is no other good reason, and that is a very very embarrassing real reason, which is why when most people ask their docs the docs don’t have a good answer…
Actually, it's just the opposite. The first population to be required to get the HepB vaccine was healthcare workers. I enrolled in a nurse refresher program At Beth Israel Hospital in 1991 & had to get the HepB vaccine in order to begin the program.
The HepB hysteria ("run for the hills - everybody's going to get HepB") began in the 1980s. I believe it was a pure deflection move - to call attention away from the true host populations of HepB: recent Chinese & Russian immigrants & especially the HIV+/AIDS population (particularly those that were IV drug users).
It was also, of course, a bonanza for the pharmaceutical companies: a 3-dose series @ $45 per dose. That means when it was mandated for NYC public school attendance (1 million students) the revenue intake was $135,000,000. The mandate began in 1999. When I began in school nursing in 2004 my colleagues were already noticing a huge increase in food allergies, asthma & eczema. When they started giving it to all newborns it was an unmistakable money grab.
As to Vitamin K: it is not a vaccine, but a treatment. It is given to prevent hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. Also given were eye drops (originally silver nitrate) to prevent
transmission gonorrheal conjunctivitis (regardless of mother's risk factors for actually having the disease).
They got us all when I started medical school… we were “special” because we got in on hepatitis b vaccines early.🤮. If only I knew then what I know now.
Thank you for that link. It was good to have my memories of that era
officially confirmed. It seems that there was a definite propaganda campaign & that those of us that were forced to take it & then let our kids take it did so without truly informed consent.
I remember being told we were more likely to get hep b than hiv from a needle stick. They really wanted us afraid of hep b, and wanted us thinking we were at extreme risk of getting it every day.
Knowing what I know today, if I were a young married I’d encourage my wife to give birth at home with a mid wife or other alternative. Anything to stay out of the hospital
When I trained, it was freely admitted that targeted HepB control had failed. There was talk of giving it in the early teens, but I totally missed the transition to newborns. GMS. 🤬 Zero benefit to nearly all, and the SIDS and autism inclusion in the package insert confirms (at minimum) a safety signal.
Interesting, I did not know that. What would be the mechanism of transmission from staff members to the infant? But, now that you say it, doesn't that actually make the case for giving babies the Hep B vaccine? I think your point is that the medical establishment just does not want to admit why the vaccine is necessary for babies, and not that babies should not have the vaccine. Right?
There’s probably several scenarios in which a doctor/nurse/tech with an infection could pass it to a newborn under their care, newborns get lots of pokes and prods in the hospital.
Basically, they’ve done big studies of rates of babies getting Hep B, and you’d think logically if you gave the appropriate treatment to those born to moms who have Hep B, there’d be no issue. But they find that if you limit intervention only to moms who test positive for Hep B in pregnancy, a certain percentage of kids born to Hep B negative moms *still* get Hep B.
This makes no obvious sense, so what docs say is that a mom who tests negative for Hep B in month 7 of pregnancy must’ve picked it up sometime in month 8 or 9.
The other option is that the mom never picked up Hep B at any time and the kid got it at the hospital…
Or the studies could be wrong! Wouldn’t be the first time.
Here’s an interesting piece about the changing PR of hep B over the decades:
Thank you, but not buying the excuse that it is to protect infants from staff. Takes time for immunity to develop and the babies are long gone (except preemies, who BTW get the same dose at 8oz as an 8lb term; 🤬). Furthermore, the rationale doesn’t seem to be to protect them from HepB later in life, because immunity wanes long before they are likely to be exposed (some patients excepted, like sickle cell disease). Originally , younger groups were chosen because targeting high risk groups completely failed. IDK why they target newborns of HBsAg negative mothers when, IMHO, the risks waaay outweigh any possible benefit.
Ryan’s Wife here - and I was recently floored to discover that five years ago my newborn son was given the HepB vax at one day old in the hospital *without my knowledge or consent.* 🤬
Was looking up vaccine records to send in for Kindergarten and noticed it on the list. I was never asked permission- and I certainly would not allow my child to be given a vax one day after birth.
I feel like hospitals take advantage of mothers coming in under duress. In my case: preeclampsia, emergent c-section, hemorrhaging & heavy pain medications were all part of his birth story - how could anyone make an informed medical decision on infant vaccines in this situation??
Even my husband, who was fully cognizant & our advocate, was not asked about this vaccine before the hospital administered it to our child.
It’s the form that’s signed when you’re admitted. It covers their liability when consent is questioned. It’s important to bring directives now to the hospital, certified copies.
You are absolutely correct about consent & consciousness. It isn’t
acceptable at all. But here we are.
Their goals are two fold; maximum services allowed, & not get sued.
My daughter has had 2 hospital births & brought all papers, etc.
They STILL ask about newborn shots! Multiple times. It’s exhausting to see how vigilant a new parent must be to maneuver through this maze of corruption.
Most nurses are respectful & understanding, “ but still have to ask” 🥵
(Ryan’s Wife) Yes, I figured there was some sort of clause in the admissions paperwork, but it’s still frustrating that hospitals make it so difficult to opt-out. Especially when you are admitted in stressful situations.
I’ve been in other surgical situations where the doctors literally read paperwork out loud (effects of anesthesia, etc.) before you are allowed to sign consent. It’s just never transparent when it comes to those newborn shots. Hmmm… makes you wonder why… (we know why)
I like that you pointed out the false god nature of vaccine worship. I used that argument when I filled out my religious exemption form required by my hospital for those not covid jabbed. I wrote on the form that as a Christian, I’m forbidden from worshipping false idols, and the jabs (and being forced to share your status) are being treated like idols.
Glad you got your exemption. I wrote a medical exemption request (I'm a nurse practitioner) for my son who was an attorney for NYC H+H (our massive public hospital system). It was denied by an anonymous committee. He had to resign or would have been fired by Nov. 1, 2021. He ended up being re-hired by his old law firm so he had a relatively soft landing. Part of the reason I objected to him getting the covid "vaccine" is that I think his health (especially GI) was irreparably harmed by the HepB vaccine that I foolishly let him get when he was 13 years old. Of course, I have no proof (just a strong feeling as a mother & a pediatric nurse of 50 years). When I've mentioned the possibility to doctors they look at me like I'm insane.
It’s insidious how we in the medical community are so propagandized about vaccines… they didn’t even have to try very hard, it’s just a given vaccine =good. We didn’t attend extensive classes on vaccines or anything, we just accepted it.
No one knows more about vaccines than a parent with an injured kid.
Or a school nurse in NYC. Our city & state health departments never met a vaccine they didn't love. ACIP's recommendations become requirements for school attendance almost immediately. Other states seem to be a bit more reasonable (I don't think NJ ever required the HepB vaccine).
I agree with you about the propaganda. I've taken both pharmacology & advanced pediatric pharmacology & can't remember vaccines being covered in either course.
NYC also requires pre-K students to get the influenza vaccine. I think it may be the culprit behind the current rise in incidence of Type 1 diabetes in NYC public schools. Many of these students are diagnosed between the ages of 4 & 5. It also tracks with the theory of Type 1 diabetes being caused by a viral trigger in a genetically susceptible person. It's gotten so bad that the city DOE had to hire 5 diabetes educators (one for each borough) to help school nurses cope.
You're welcome. When I started in school nursing in 2004 I quickly realized that 10% of my school's population had food allergies &/or asthma. That's an epidemic & the only thing I could think of causing it was the voluminous immunization schedule. My high school graduating class had 1100 students; I knew of only one person with a food allergy & no one with asthma or diabetes (I'm a boomer, graduated in 1970).
Alex, you said: “...the rise in autism in the United States in the last 30 years as a counterexample. But much if not most of that increase is likely due to the reclassification of mental retardation.”
Wrong. 1/4 of current autistic children will never be able to go to the bathroom unassisted. This problem did not exist 40 years ago, is spiraling exponentially out of control and you dismiss it out of hand. You can do better
Many of us were alive 30 years ago (and longer 🤣), and simple observation tells us that autism rates have exploded. Note that we are only exposed to the functional
I have to agree. I can see where a portion of the increase is due to reclassification but going from a 1 in 2000 or so ratio to 1 in 36 in 30 years just due to reclassification is alarming. I’m not saying it is due to vaccines. There may be other factors, as well. Look at how our diets have changed in the last few decades amongst other things.
Data and scientific analysis are always the guideposts to follow and in the case of vaccine caused autistic symptoms they have not been. Alex still has the same visceral reaction that I once did about mentioning the connection. “That’s what got RFK labeled a kook”. “Hell no I’m not saying that, or even implying it”! Alex worked at The Times, Sharyl Atkinson has more to offer on this subject.
A big study by the MIND Institute in California disproved that substitution theory ages ago. California keeps excellent records regarding developmental disabilities.
I was born in 1960. We called everyone “retarded”, but I never met a real retarded person until I was an adult, nor anyone who would be considered mildly autistic. I grew up in the city and there were some big families, lots with double didget kids, and never crossed paths with anyone’s retarded siblings. Things are way way worse now.
But even besides that, vaccinated children are sicker than unvaccinated children with multiple studies to show and vaccines cause encephalopathy — which we call autism
The more you read and learn about the vaccines the more you realize that so much of the so called science behind them has been faked by people who want to make money selling snake oils that have a 100% liability shield and that everyone involved in the approval process has been corrupted. We do not know if anything we have been told is true. I do know that the MRNa shots are neither safe nor effective but the FDA continues to claim otherwise and until they correct this lie do not ever trust them again.
As RFK has always said 99% of these injections have never been put thru rigorous safety testing and protocol, yet the MONGERS "we the people" pay in these Pharma influenced ($$$) goverment agencies made sure to TOW the line on "safe and effective"!
The "controls" in all the previous vaccine trials were given, not an inert substance like saline, but a different vaccine or the "carrier" solution for the vaccine without the target antigen. The completely unjustified assumption in either situation is that those "controls" had no adverse effects of their own and were entirely safe. The one trial I read about, of an anthrax vaccine in sheep, they did use saline as the control and the adverse effect profile of the vaccine was so horrific that they never did a trial that way again.
Additionally, while medical liability cases often go off the rails, vaccine manufacturers refuse to stand behind their products and the government, who is supposed to be where you go for compensation, refuses to acknowledge most cases as well. After all, they too are claiming that these vaccines are nearly perfect and hardly anyone gets hurt by them. It's clearly untrue but the government will lie to maintain face, which has the exact opposite effect.
Hm. Not sure if you read 'Dissolving illusions' by Roman Bystrianyk and Susanne Humphries, Alex. I held the same view to 'traditional' vaccines as you describe them (after quickly realizing the mRNA's were bad news). But even your cautious approach is way too positive towards the vaccine story. They caused an enormous amount of suffering. Unless Humphries and Bystrianyk got it wrong. But the book is full of graphics and massive vaccine failures. I found it very convincing. The improved sanitation and other improvements play a major role in this book. Dont think I would let my children be vaccianated with my current knowledge. Apparently non-vaccinated kids are much healthier than vaccinated. Various reports have proven that. Then again, not sure what sources can be trusted. Please consider to read this. If you disagree I would be interested in the arguments. I know its a lot too ask..
Read about Dr Semmelweis who discovered in 1847 that sanitation (doctors washing their hands before delivering babies) improved the percentage the child would not get fever and die). The standard medicine at that time would not accept his finding, he lost his job and dies penniless. Now there is fabulous museum in Budapest for his discovery.
Vaccines work by using adjuvants to force the body to create a huge whole body immune response, and then they introduce an antigen that the body is supposed to recognize as a threat, like a dead virus, and form antibodies against.
What if the body not only forms an immune response against the virus but also against something benign like peanuts or eggs? After 39 to 72 forced artificial immune responses, this could easily explain why some kids have anaphylactic allergies against certain foods. There is already a proven link between vaccines and some allergic responses, what we need to do is a more through study on if vaccines are the cause of such widespread food allergies that didn’t exist 40 years ago.
And a follow up is that autistic children have a > 3X incidence of food allergies so it’s a logical next step to investigate.
Mr Bereson , i KEEP posting over and over but these shots are NOT going anywhere. CVS Pharmacy still requires them. University of New England still requires UPDATED boosters. I know a student who got her booster 3 months before the last updated booster came out, and UNE told her she was not considered "vaccinated" until she got the updated booster and if she didn't, she could not continue in the dental program. She is 3 years into it, what is she going to do? I can go on and on. You seem to be making people think they are going away and I can tell you from personal experience, they ae NOT!!!!!
If vaccines are so beneficial, why are they the only major product for which manufacturers need complete immunity from legal liability for injuries and deaths?
An important issue, if not the key issue, for vaccines is coercion. Vaccines are used as a social control mechanism. It became completely obvious during the Covid hoax.
Personally, I don't care of there are 1,000 vaccines. If someone wants to get a different injection every day, go for it. My body, my choice. But when citizen rights and privileges are conditioned on taking chemical injections, it's tyranny.
Sorry Alex, but I'm not buying that vaccines are either safe or effective. COVID permanently queered that deal. No doubt they're hugely profitable. Lest you think me a hypocrite, I confess to having taken the pneumonia vaccine. I have COPD, and a significant respiratory infection is really risky for me. But I routinely (politely) turn down others my MD offers me. I'm so grateful not to have to navigate a child's vaccine schedule!
It definitely seems prudent to say the position that they are "safe and effective" is compromised because the process for determining such has been hijacked for decades by interests profiting from their mass release. They might be so, but it has yet to be determined. This has is RFK Jr's position that gives me careful optimism.
Speaking of easy jabs, you should see the number of people rushing out to get injected with GLP-1s. And these are not morbidly obese people either, they are mostly people who need to lose about 20-30 vanity pounds.
Waiting for your piece on how peter marks override his team to approve the sarepta drug which has now killed 2 kids. While he doesn't compare to faucis evil and arrogance he is up there. He then when protesting when he was fired instead of being glad he is not in jail. Looking forward to his appointment on sareptas BoD
Autoimmune diseases are often caused by vaccination. Many devastating ones. Vaccines cause far more damage than “just” autism. And it will be proven soon.
Anyone questioning that needs to read the (alarmingly few) vax-unvaxxed observational studies. Dr. Paul Thomas’ study was retracted, but it is not wrong.
Sorry, one more thing. Try staying in Public school in Maine without have any of these shots. You can't. Period. Religious and philosophical exemptions are not an option and good luck getting a medical exemption. If you think a doctor is trading and exemption for their medical license, you're nuts. This movement was led by Dr. Dora Mills, sister of the current lock down loving Gov, Janet Mills. Dr Dora Mills, was fired previously by Gov. Paul Lepage, and promptly got a job with the heavily pharma funded Maine Health, which used pharma money to get the exemption removal bill passed. Dr. Shah was hire by Janet Mills to fill her position. Yes, the same Dr. Shah that got run out of Illinois after his Vet Hiome failure.
Vaccines haven’t even been proven to be safe and effective in cattle. If a vaccine was safe and effective in cattle, then its use in cattle would tend to produce either: 1) More meat, 2) Better meat, or 3) A combination of 1) and 2). And this would be clearly known in the free market. But it’s clearly *not known* in the free market - which is why cattle vaccination is heavily regulated and subsidized by governments.
Another invention that helped reduce disease. Window screens play a crucial role in preventing the spread of insect-borne diseases by acting as a barrier against pests like mosquitoes, flies, and ticks. They help reduce the risk of spreading bacteria from animal waste, contracting diseases like malaria, West Nile virus, and Lyme disease, which are transmitted by these insects. While not a foolproof solution against all viruses, window screens significantly contribute to a healthier indoor environment by minimizing insect entry.
I'm working from memory, so I could be wrong, but I recall reading a number of years ago that, when California banned single use grocery bags, incidence of food borne illnesses increased. Apparently, people don't know that you are supposed to wash the reusable bags in hot water after each use.
I first read of the benefits of single use bags and the costs of reusable bags about 15 years ago in an NPR article of all places. They came down squarely on the side of single use plastic bags because they are cheap, are very resource efficient, and prevent food contamination. And any environmental impact is smaller than the resources and energy needed to wash reusable bags. Apostasy now.
Yes, I did the same thing. The efficient use of resources is the key. The number that sticks in my head was 150 uses of the reusable bags to equal the energy used to make one of the thin, single use plastic bags. I can't recall which reusable bags were the point of comparison, but I don't think that included the energy used in laundering them. The heavy plastic bags which are available for purchase at the check out counter get worn very quickly when laundered. I had already been lugging canvas tote bags to the grocery store long before any of the bag bans, so this has nothing to do with personal preference.
The current vaccine schedule is insane. Right out of the womb, babies are pushed to get Hep B and Vitamin K. Some schools mandate annual flu shots to attend as well. Blue states have become biomedical prisons and many of us were forced to choose between our jobs or the jab. I asked a few simple questions about vaccines relatives who were doctors, but they weren't able to answer because they didn't learn anything about them in med school yet worship the "science" and "experts" like false gods: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-do-no-harm-part-3
“I’m from the government and I’m here to help”. Per Reagan, the nine most terrifying words in the English language
So true! And yet ironic that it was Reagan who signed into the law the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which -- giving Pharma companies freedom from liability for vaccine injuries -- paved the way for the current massive expansion of mandated childhood vaccines.
The real reason they give Hep B at birth, which doctors will not tell you but if you look close the experts will halfway admit, is so that your baby doesn’t catch Hep B from the hospital staff. There is no other good reason, and that is a very very embarrassing real reason, which is why when most people ask their docs the docs don’t have a good answer…
Actually, it's just the opposite. The first population to be required to get the HepB vaccine was healthcare workers. I enrolled in a nurse refresher program At Beth Israel Hospital in 1991 & had to get the HepB vaccine in order to begin the program.
The HepB hysteria ("run for the hills - everybody's going to get HepB") began in the 1980s. I believe it was a pure deflection move - to call attention away from the true host populations of HepB: recent Chinese & Russian immigrants & especially the HIV+/AIDS population (particularly those that were IV drug users).
It was also, of course, a bonanza for the pharmaceutical companies: a 3-dose series @ $45 per dose. That means when it was mandated for NYC public school attendance (1 million students) the revenue intake was $135,000,000. The mandate began in 1999. When I began in school nursing in 2004 my colleagues were already noticing a huge increase in food allergies, asthma & eczema. When they started giving it to all newborns it was an unmistakable money grab.
As to Vitamin K: it is not a vaccine, but a treatment. It is given to prevent hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. Also given were eye drops (originally silver nitrate) to prevent
transmission gonorrheal conjunctivitis (regardless of mother's risk factors for actually having the disease).
They got us all when I started medical school… we were “special” because we got in on hepatitis b vaccines early.🤮. If only I knew then what I know now.
There is no reason to give babies hep b vaccines!
Interesting refresher on all that:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3092064/
Thank you for that link. It was good to have my memories of that era
officially confirmed. It seems that there was a definite propaganda campaign & that those of us that were forced to take it & then let our kids take it did so without truly informed consent.
I remember being told we were more likely to get hep b than hiv from a needle stick. They really wanted us afraid of hep b, and wanted us thinking we were at extreme risk of getting it every day.
That is my exact memory of the situation in the early 1990s.
Knowing what I know today, if I were a young married I’d encourage my wife to give birth at home with a mid wife or other alternative. Anything to stay out of the hospital
When I trained, it was freely admitted that targeted HepB control had failed. There was talk of giving it in the early teens, but I totally missed the transition to newborns. GMS. 🤬 Zero benefit to nearly all, and the SIDS and autism inclusion in the package insert confirms (at minimum) a safety signal.
What does GMS mean?
Sorry - give me strength! :)
Interesting, I did not know that. What would be the mechanism of transmission from staff members to the infant? But, now that you say it, doesn't that actually make the case for giving babies the Hep B vaccine? I think your point is that the medical establishment just does not want to admit why the vaccine is necessary for babies, and not that babies should not have the vaccine. Right?
There’s probably several scenarios in which a doctor/nurse/tech with an infection could pass it to a newborn under their care, newborns get lots of pokes and prods in the hospital.
Basically, they’ve done big studies of rates of babies getting Hep B, and you’d think logically if you gave the appropriate treatment to those born to moms who have Hep B, there’d be no issue. But they find that if you limit intervention only to moms who test positive for Hep B in pregnancy, a certain percentage of kids born to Hep B negative moms *still* get Hep B.
This makes no obvious sense, so what docs say is that a mom who tests negative for Hep B in month 7 of pregnancy must’ve picked it up sometime in month 8 or 9.
The other option is that the mom never picked up Hep B at any time and the kid got it at the hospital…
Or the studies could be wrong! Wouldn’t be the first time.
Here’s an interesting piece about the changing PR of hep B over the decades:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3092064/
Thank you, but not buying the excuse that it is to protect infants from staff. Takes time for immunity to develop and the babies are long gone (except preemies, who BTW get the same dose at 8oz as an 8lb term; 🤬). Furthermore, the rationale doesn’t seem to be to protect them from HepB later in life, because immunity wanes long before they are likely to be exposed (some patients excepted, like sickle cell disease). Originally , younger groups were chosen because targeting high risk groups completely failed. IDK why they target newborns of HBsAg negative mothers when, IMHO, the risks waaay outweigh any possible benefit.
Wow! That is incredible and very disturbing that infants may be infected by hospital staff. That just should not happen...Thanks!
Newborns (except preemies) long gone from the hospital before any immunity develops. Thats not the answer.
Ryan’s Wife here - and I was recently floored to discover that five years ago my newborn son was given the HepB vax at one day old in the hospital *without my knowledge or consent.* 🤬
Was looking up vaccine records to send in for Kindergarten and noticed it on the list. I was never asked permission- and I certainly would not allow my child to be given a vax one day after birth.
I feel like hospitals take advantage of mothers coming in under duress. In my case: preeclampsia, emergent c-section, hemorrhaging & heavy pain medications were all part of his birth story - how could anyone make an informed medical decision on infant vaccines in this situation??
Even my husband, who was fully cognizant & our advocate, was not asked about this vaccine before the hospital administered it to our child.
It’s the form that’s signed when you’re admitted. It covers their liability when consent is questioned. It’s important to bring directives now to the hospital, certified copies.
You are absolutely correct about consent & consciousness. It isn’t
acceptable at all. But here we are.
Their goals are two fold; maximum services allowed, & not get sued.
My daughter has had 2 hospital births & brought all papers, etc.
They STILL ask about newborn shots! Multiple times. It’s exhausting to see how vigilant a new parent must be to maneuver through this maze of corruption.
Most nurses are respectful & understanding, “ but still have to ask” 🥵
I warn all my younger family members about hep B at birth and how they will sneak permission to give it into the admission paperwork.
They sneak permission to do it in the admission paperwork you sign. They did the same for my two autistic sons.
(Ryan’s Wife) Yes, I figured there was some sort of clause in the admissions paperwork, but it’s still frustrating that hospitals make it so difficult to opt-out. Especially when you are admitted in stressful situations.
I’ve been in other surgical situations where the doctors literally read paperwork out loud (effects of anesthesia, etc.) before you are allowed to sign consent. It’s just never transparent when it comes to those newborn shots. Hmmm… makes you wonder why… (we know why)
I like that you pointed out the false god nature of vaccine worship. I used that argument when I filled out my religious exemption form required by my hospital for those not covid jabbed. I wrote on the form that as a Christian, I’m forbidden from worshipping false idols, and the jabs (and being forced to share your status) are being treated like idols.
Glad you got your exemption. I wrote a medical exemption request (I'm a nurse practitioner) for my son who was an attorney for NYC H+H (our massive public hospital system). It was denied by an anonymous committee. He had to resign or would have been fired by Nov. 1, 2021. He ended up being re-hired by his old law firm so he had a relatively soft landing. Part of the reason I objected to him getting the covid "vaccine" is that I think his health (especially GI) was irreparably harmed by the HepB vaccine that I foolishly let him get when he was 13 years old. Of course, I have no proof (just a strong feeling as a mother & a pediatric nurse of 50 years). When I've mentioned the possibility to doctors they look at me like I'm insane.
It’s insidious how we in the medical community are so propagandized about vaccines… they didn’t even have to try very hard, it’s just a given vaccine =good. We didn’t attend extensive classes on vaccines or anything, we just accepted it.
No one knows more about vaccines than a parent with an injured kid.
Or a school nurse in NYC. Our city & state health departments never met a vaccine they didn't love. ACIP's recommendations become requirements for school attendance almost immediately. Other states seem to be a bit more reasonable (I don't think NJ ever required the HepB vaccine).
I agree with you about the propaganda. I've taken both pharmacology & advanced pediatric pharmacology & can't remember vaccines being covered in either course.
NYC also requires pre-K students to get the influenza vaccine. I think it may be the culprit behind the current rise in incidence of Type 1 diabetes in NYC public schools. Many of these students are diagnosed between the ages of 4 & 5. It also tracks with the theory of Type 1 diabetes being caused by a viral trigger in a genetically susceptible person. It's gotten so bad that the city DOE had to hire 5 diabetes educators (one for each borough) to help school nurses cope.
I wouldn't be surprised. Real science supports that probability. Thanks for sharing this disheartening and troublesome information!
You're welcome. When I started in school nursing in 2004 I quickly realized that 10% of my school's population had food allergies &/or asthma. That's an epidemic & the only thing I could think of causing it was the voluminous immunization schedule. My high school graduating class had 1100 students; I knew of only one person with a food allergy & no one with asthma or diabetes (I'm a boomer, graduated in 1970).
Alex, you said: “...the rise in autism in the United States in the last 30 years as a counterexample. But much if not most of that increase is likely due to the reclassification of mental retardation.”
Wrong. 1/4 of current autistic children will never be able to go to the bathroom unassisted. This problem did not exist 40 years ago, is spiraling exponentially out of control and you dismiss it out of hand. You can do better
I hear that same excuse often. How about if we research it and track down what the problem is or Alex show the data that backs up your comment.
Many of us were alive 30 years ago (and longer 🤣), and simple observation tells us that autism rates have exploded. Note that we are only exposed to the functional
subsection.
I have to agree. I can see where a portion of the increase is due to reclassification but going from a 1 in 2000 or so ratio to 1 in 36 in 30 years just due to reclassification is alarming. I’m not saying it is due to vaccines. There may be other factors, as well. Look at how our diets have changed in the last few decades amongst other things.
Data and scientific analysis are always the guideposts to follow and in the case of vaccine caused autistic symptoms they have not been. Alex still has the same visceral reaction that I once did about mentioning the connection. “That’s what got RFK labeled a kook”. “Hell no I’m not saying that, or even implying it”! Alex worked at The Times, Sharyl Atkinson has more to offer on this subject.
A big study by the MIND Institute in California disproved that substitution theory ages ago. California keeps excellent records regarding developmental disabilities.
I was born in 1960. We called everyone “retarded”, but I never met a real retarded person until I was an adult, nor anyone who would be considered mildly autistic. I grew up in the city and there were some big families, lots with double didget kids, and never crossed paths with anyone’s retarded siblings. Things are way way worse now.
People who say things like this about autism need to spend ‘a day in the life’ with a family who has a severely autistic child.
ugh, the first 2 paragraphs you got it ALL WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please read Dr Suzanne Humphries book " Dissolving Illusions" for the correct history.
Just posted the same recommendation. See below.
Yep - vaccines literally have no benefits to humanity.
One thing to call out is that modern vaccines focus on viruses, but when you study the work of Dr. John Franklin Enders — father of vaccines — you see that itself is a fallacy: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-disease-causing-viruses-are-pseudoscience
But even besides that, vaccinated children are sicker than unvaccinated children with multiple studies to show and vaccines cause encephalopathy — which we call autism
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/vaccinated-children-are-sicker-than
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling
The more you read and learn about the vaccines the more you realize that so much of the so called science behind them has been faked by people who want to make money selling snake oils that have a 100% liability shield and that everyone involved in the approval process has been corrupted. We do not know if anything we have been told is true. I do know that the MRNa shots are neither safe nor effective but the FDA continues to claim otherwise and until they correct this lie do not ever trust them again.
As RFK has always said 99% of these injections have never been put thru rigorous safety testing and protocol, yet the MONGERS "we the people" pay in these Pharma influenced ($$$) goverment agencies made sure to TOW the line on "safe and effective"!
The "controls" in all the previous vaccine trials were given, not an inert substance like saline, but a different vaccine or the "carrier" solution for the vaccine without the target antigen. The completely unjustified assumption in either situation is that those "controls" had no adverse effects of their own and were entirely safe. The one trial I read about, of an anthrax vaccine in sheep, they did use saline as the control and the adverse effect profile of the vaccine was so horrific that they never did a trial that way again.
Additionally, while medical liability cases often go off the rails, vaccine manufacturers refuse to stand behind their products and the government, who is supposed to be where you go for compensation, refuses to acknowledge most cases as well. After all, they too are claiming that these vaccines are nearly perfect and hardly anyone gets hurt by them. It's clearly untrue but the government will lie to maintain face, which has the exact opposite effect.
Hm. Not sure if you read 'Dissolving illusions' by Roman Bystrianyk and Susanne Humphries, Alex. I held the same view to 'traditional' vaccines as you describe them (after quickly realizing the mRNA's were bad news). But even your cautious approach is way too positive towards the vaccine story. They caused an enormous amount of suffering. Unless Humphries and Bystrianyk got it wrong. But the book is full of graphics and massive vaccine failures. I found it very convincing. The improved sanitation and other improvements play a major role in this book. Dont think I would let my children be vaccianated with my current knowledge. Apparently non-vaccinated kids are much healthier than vaccinated. Various reports have proven that. Then again, not sure what sources can be trusted. Please consider to read this. If you disagree I would be interested in the arguments. I know its a lot too ask..
Or watch Humphries being interviewed by Joe Rogan. She's impressive and modest.
"improved sanitation" is HUGE!!
Read about Dr Semmelweis who discovered in 1847 that sanitation (doctors washing their hands before delivering babies) improved the percentage the child would not get fever and die). The standard medicine at that time would not accept his finding, he lost his job and dies penniless. Now there is fabulous museum in Budapest for his discovery.
Vaccines work by using adjuvants to force the body to create a huge whole body immune response, and then they introduce an antigen that the body is supposed to recognize as a threat, like a dead virus, and form antibodies against.
What if the body not only forms an immune response against the virus but also against something benign like peanuts or eggs? After 39 to 72 forced artificial immune responses, this could easily explain why some kids have anaphylactic allergies against certain foods. There is already a proven link between vaccines and some allergic responses, what we need to do is a more through study on if vaccines are the cause of such widespread food allergies that didn’t exist 40 years ago.
And a follow up is that autistic children have a > 3X incidence of food allergies so it’s a logical next step to investigate.
Mr Bereson , i KEEP posting over and over but these shots are NOT going anywhere. CVS Pharmacy still requires them. University of New England still requires UPDATED boosters. I know a student who got her booster 3 months before the last updated booster came out, and UNE told her she was not considered "vaccinated" until she got the updated booster and if she didn't, she could not continue in the dental program. She is 3 years into it, what is she going to do? I can go on and on. You seem to be making people think they are going away and I can tell you from personal experience, they ae NOT!!!!!
Bring in the lawyers!!
If vaccines are so beneficial, why are they the only major product for which manufacturers need complete immunity from legal liability for injuries and deaths?
An important issue, if not the key issue, for vaccines is coercion. Vaccines are used as a social control mechanism. It became completely obvious during the Covid hoax.
Personally, I don't care of there are 1,000 vaccines. If someone wants to get a different injection every day, go for it. My body, my choice. But when citizen rights and privileges are conditioned on taking chemical injections, it's tyranny.
Sorry Alex, but I'm not buying that vaccines are either safe or effective. COVID permanently queered that deal. No doubt they're hugely profitable. Lest you think me a hypocrite, I confess to having taken the pneumonia vaccine. I have COPD, and a significant respiratory infection is really risky for me. But I routinely (politely) turn down others my MD offers me. I'm so grateful not to have to navigate a child's vaccine schedule!
It definitely seems prudent to say the position that they are "safe and effective" is compromised because the process for determining such has been hijacked for decades by interests profiting from their mass release. They might be so, but it has yet to be determined. This has is RFK Jr's position that gives me careful optimism.
Speaking of easy jabs, you should see the number of people rushing out to get injected with GLP-1s. And these are not morbidly obese people either, they are mostly people who need to lose about 20-30 vanity pounds.
Waiting for your piece on how peter marks override his team to approve the sarepta drug which has now killed 2 kids. While he doesn't compare to faucis evil and arrogance he is up there. He then when protesting when he was fired instead of being glad he is not in jail. Looking forward to his appointment on sareptas BoD
I just heard about that too! When will we learn?
Autoimmune diseases are often caused by vaccination. Many devastating ones. Vaccines cause far more damage than “just” autism. And it will be proven soon.
Anyone questioning that needs to read the (alarmingly few) vax-unvaxxed observational studies. Dr. Paul Thomas’ study was retracted, but it is not wrong.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674
Sorry, one more thing. Try staying in Public school in Maine without have any of these shots. You can't. Period. Religious and philosophical exemptions are not an option and good luck getting a medical exemption. If you think a doctor is trading and exemption for their medical license, you're nuts. This movement was led by Dr. Dora Mills, sister of the current lock down loving Gov, Janet Mills. Dr Dora Mills, was fired previously by Gov. Paul Lepage, and promptly got a job with the heavily pharma funded Maine Health, which used pharma money to get the exemption removal bill passed. Dr. Shah was hire by Janet Mills to fill her position. Yes, the same Dr. Shah that got run out of Illinois after his Vet Hiome failure.
Alex,
Vaccines haven’t even been proven to be safe and effective in cattle. If a vaccine was safe and effective in cattle, then its use in cattle would tend to produce either: 1) More meat, 2) Better meat, or 3) A combination of 1) and 2). And this would be clearly known in the free market. But it’s clearly *not known* in the free market - which is why cattle vaccination is heavily regulated and subsidized by governments.
Another invention that helped reduce disease. Window screens play a crucial role in preventing the spread of insect-borne diseases by acting as a barrier against pests like mosquitoes, flies, and ticks. They help reduce the risk of spreading bacteria from animal waste, contracting diseases like malaria, West Nile virus, and Lyme disease, which are transmitted by these insects. While not a foolproof solution against all viruses, window screens significantly contribute to a healthier indoor environment by minimizing insect entry.
Funnily enough, single use grocery bags also helped reduce food contamination. Now, this innovation is under attack.
I'm working from memory, so I could be wrong, but I recall reading a number of years ago that, when California banned single use grocery bags, incidence of food borne illnesses increased. Apparently, people don't know that you are supposed to wash the reusable bags in hot water after each use.
I first read of the benefits of single use bags and the costs of reusable bags about 15 years ago in an NPR article of all places. They came down squarely on the side of single use plastic bags because they are cheap, are very resource efficient, and prevent food contamination. And any environmental impact is smaller than the resources and energy needed to wash reusable bags. Apostasy now.
Yes, I did the same thing. The efficient use of resources is the key. The number that sticks in my head was 150 uses of the reusable bags to equal the energy used to make one of the thin, single use plastic bags. I can't recall which reusable bags were the point of comparison, but I don't think that included the energy used in laundering them. The heavy plastic bags which are available for purchase at the check out counter get worn very quickly when laundered. I had already been lugging canvas tote bags to the grocery store long before any of the bag bans, so this has nothing to do with personal preference.