457 Comments

It’s almost like they’re against equal tweetment. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment

Or fweedom!! 🐦🚫

Expand full comment

Vewwy cwever MSRB & Paul E!

Expand full comment

Not just fweedom, but wuv. Twue wuv; that dweam wivin a dweam.....

Expand full comment

OMG! Loved that film!

Expand full comment

No. Not that. Paleez! 😩

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Any twuth to the rumor that Elon is a Twojan horse?

Expand full comment

Well, he's not a unicorn.

Expand full comment

Why it really should be called BITTER…

Wow, how accurate is that substitute…

Expand full comment

As in “Build Back Bitter”?

Expand full comment

It's "Build Back BADDER".

Expand full comment

It's Build Back Bankrupt.

Expand full comment

Build Biden’s Bankaccount.

Expand full comment

Bilk Back Better

Expand full comment

The best of this thread!

Expand full comment

It's getting badder all the time....

Expand full comment

Nah, the name fits. It’s for twits.

Expand full comment

I thought it was "Build Back Bummer," but I'm happy to accept all the other suggestions for a good name for this atrocity.

Expand full comment

How about this for the Democrat 2022 campaign slogan in general?:

“Bitter Bitches & Bastards??!!”

Expand full comment

Or as they say “tweet others like you would like to be tweeted”

Expand full comment

So these tweeters would be called twits, right?

Expand full comment

I believe it is twats.

Expand full comment

Twits? Twats? Is that for different genders? And if you’re not sure which gender you are, would you then be a Twhat?

Expand full comment

Omg did I need that laugh. 💜💜💜

Expand full comment

Love it. Crazy times!

Expand full comment

This is the best retort of the week, if not the perfect synopsis for BITTER!

Expand full comment

Very cute

Expand full comment

Bravo.

Expand full comment
founding

Imagine the threat to freedom and democracy if people can just say what they think.

Expand full comment

They somehow think that is bad. They are literally calling for more moderation (censorship). They can't see more than 5 minutes into the future.

Expand full comment

That's because they think the world will end in 10...

9...8...7...6...5...

Didn't that moronic little girl from Queens tell me so?

Expand full comment

Oh, you mean that girl from Westchester with a B.A. in Economics who was working as a bartender in the Bronx when she got elected?

Expand full comment

Yep, that's the one. The one who does makeup and skin-care videos.

Expand full comment

I wish I could be a Congressman for just one day, long enough to be able to say to her "now shut up and get me a drink".

Expand full comment

So difficult to believe she ever read a single chapter on economics much less got a degree. She maybe skated through as a mean girl or understands it and it very corrupt

Expand full comment

EXACTLY

Expand full comment

Even the lunatics who can't/don't/won't think.

Expand full comment

That’s right. Even complete idiots have the right to speak their minds, or what ever vestige of a mind they might have left. The antidote for idiot speech is not shutting the idiot down, but brilliant speech by me and you that persuades others that the idiot is an idiot.

Expand full comment

Working for the FDA or CDC or NIH or even being WH Media personality is the best way to be an idiot and have a speaking “platform”.

Expand full comment

and following "orders"

Expand full comment

And it's so much FUN when that happens.

Expand full comment
founding

That sounds like the Blue checks who run Twitter. Really

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Cheers!

Expand full comment

A threat to “our”democracy is the slogan. Translation: their democracy or club.

Expand full comment
founding

The saddest thing was all the people who died alone in hospitals and nursing homes. Whether they had covid or not.

Expand full comment

This. So true. What a lonely year+ for so many.

Expand full comment

Never forget that the medical establishment did that. They have lost trust on all levels. They don't seem to be trying to get it back. They are hiding the truth about the clot-shots, masks and long term immunity via contracting the not so deadly virus.

Expand full comment

And now paxlovid. Thats a heap of trash too.

Expand full comment

Definitely covid gods. Intelligent evil. Our Heavenly Father is still to be praised, although we walk through the valley of death, we will fear no evil. Our God has gone to prepare a place for us. Remember His words!

Expand full comment

You win the best comment award. 🤣

Expand full comment

LOL

Expand full comment

the new narrative now is the 1st amendment of free speech is out of date and never planed on dealing with fake news and misinformation. You should trust people that fact check it

Expand full comment

It funny right? Somehow people didn't lie 250 years ago. Somehow today, people can't see the lies being fed to us by the MSM. Today we need government authorities to set us straight. So funny.

Expand full comment

You win!

Expand full comment

And they actually are against equal treatment…

Expand full comment

He’s a white-wing extwemist!

Expand full comment

actually a south Texas white wing is a dove. What better to get rid of the blue bird (nasty little mean bird) and choose a bird of peace. the dove.

Expand full comment

It's not enough for Elon to win.

The Left has to also lose. Lose badly. Lose badly enough that they are destroyed in the process. The Left needs to be destroyed.

Expand full comment

There is no left. There are only right-wing and left-wing corporatists and the culture warriors that support both by getting paid to have us all to concentrated upon abortion or transgender ridiculousness etc. while hundreds of thousands of people die from lack of early treatment and forced vaccines. Progressives and the left historically would be against vaccine mandates, and conservatives would be for actual free markets. Both have been swamped by corporatist neo-liberals and neo-conservatives. What we really need is a resurgence of old school liberals, progressives, conservatives, and libertarians to create a coalition and throw these jokers out!

Expand full comment

There was no "Right" until the "Left" came along, and now there's no "Center". We need our "Center" back because, you know the saying....Divided We Fall.

Expand full comment

Well.. I'm not so sure that the "right" moved... but the "left" sure as heck did. And that is about 90% of the problem. I have not moved an inch from the views and positions that I had in the 70's - and I was a "center right" person at that time.

Expand full comment

Excellent point on the divisiveness effect. Tactic of war. These people will believe the lie, and consider it true. Would rather mock God than praise God. Anger is their friend. We will choose the truth over a lie. His Word pure truth.

Expand full comment

Progressivism has ugly roots. I'll pass.

Expand full comment

Yeah, like being anti-slavery, pro-women's right to vote, pro-civil rights, pro working class against corporate rapists and clowns, and the list goes on. Now "progressive" means being a pharma fascist and being woke/delusional where "follow the science" means doing the opposite. Same delirium as Trumpies and Q-Anoners who still think Trump is president. I hope these respective derangement syndromes will pass and be healed, Amen!

Expand full comment

Bunch of leftist nonsense you're spewing.

Anti-slavery is and was inseparable from pro individual liberty. These things are classic liberal ideas, not "progressivism" which was a term coined by actual anti-liberty and free market leftists. "Pro civil rights" is just a euphemism for pro certain identities over others, another progressive con job. Equal treatment under the law is guaranteed by the Constitution. Anything beyond that is just progressives using the state to force outcomes on otherwise free people.

"Rights to vote" are and have always been anti-liberty, pro democracy movements. Mob rule (democracy) and liberty are opposite things and only liberty is a virtue here. The advancement of mob rule over liberty is a progressive idea for sure, and one lefties like yourself endorse. Women could vote long before sufferage...as long as they owned property when voting was tied to property rights because property owners were less likely to vote themselves the property of others. Few women, however, possessed deeds to property in their name at the time.

There is no "working class." The rich work longer and harder than your favored leftist group of "victims" do on average. There is only the productive class and the welfare class and some in the productive class are more productive and reap the rewards of that than others. Of course others benefit greatly from their productivity. The "corporate rapist" is a figment of your lefty imagination. The corporation is a creation of the state and any raping allowed happens with the protection of the state/politicians.

Expand full comment

Yay!!! Someone who knows what democracy really is!

Expand full comment

And what progressivism really is. I like to shorten it as 'a cancer on liberty and free enterprise.'

Expand full comment

You can bring a man to history, but you cannot make him drink, when all he drinks is his own Kool-aid.

Expand full comment
Apr 14, 2022·edited Apr 14, 2022

Pfizer today recommends boosters for the kids. Who were never in danger. Like Starbucks should recommend that we drink more Americanos with add-ons. Where does Health chime in? Looked at Reuters feed today - under "Health" was just a lot of Pharma miracles aka manufacturer to end buyer marketing. Advertisements. And this will be disseminated as Fact through the usual channels.

Expand full comment

I read this today & now pray our youngest 2 grands don’t get the boosters 😢

Expand full comment

75% of all TV advertising comes from Pharma. 4.5 Billion Dollars.

Expand full comment

There's a new drug out every week, I swear. And with a host of possible side effects.

Expand full comment
founding

Truly terrifying

Expand full comment
founding

At its base its evil

Expand full comment

You coined a good term: respective derangement. But I am afraid it can only pass after a cataclysm. The right and the left both moved into the fringes: nationalism on the right and socialism in the left. But history shows that they meet! People forget that National Socialism was the ideology of the Nazi Party that ruled Germany from 1932 to 1945. That’s the danger of the derangement we are witnessing.

Expand full comment
founding

You're Right. Look at "horse-shoe" theory

Expand full comment

Exactly. And the idea is that extreme left and extreme right are closer to each other than either of them to the political center. They do not necessarily collide but tend to use the same nasty tactics in fight for ideological purity, which leads to totalitarian control. Hitler and Stalin had a lot in common. Many were afraid that if Trump wins in 2020, he will become an authoritarian, but look where we are now.

Expand full comment

I don’t much care what people call themselves. What is the fruit of their lives?

Expand full comment

Progress =/= Progressivism

Expand full comment

can't "heart" your comment. Strange .

Expand full comment

substack sometimes does that. The heart will appear eventually, even though you cannot see it

Expand full comment

"What we really need is a resurgence of old school liberals, progressives, conservatives, and libertarians"

I think there is an easier solution than this: COMMON SENSE. Politicians, particularly those who have been in any combination of "public office" for the majority of their working years (however short or long) and beyond seem to lose it in an "inverse ratio" to that. Biden, Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer, McConnell, and so many others are so spent, they can't even remember if the last time they ever used it or if they ever had any at all.

Expand full comment

But you can't teach common sense. And those without it think they have it. those are the "booksmart" folks who think they have it all over the rest of us. My eyes have really been opened to the closed minds and superiority complexes of the "booksmart"!

Expand full comment
Apr 15, 2022·edited Apr 15, 2022

The center would get a lot bigger if the Republican party divorced itself from the religious right and removed abortion as a platform issue. They could seize this moment to grab huge market share -- given the disillusionment of many Democrat-leaning independents (myself included) who feel politically homeless after witnessing all of the authoritarianism, censorship, non-science and cancel culture behavior we have witnessed the last two years. They could own the votes of suburban moms (and dads) if they focused on sound spending, a fair tax code and a transparent public health administration, and left abortion off the table (or embraced freedom of choice, in line with true libertarianism), leaving the social debates largely to academics and religious leaders. To really earn our trust now, they would also have to put some distance between themselves and big pharma, and install a rigorous, independent drug and vaccine approval process.

Expand full comment

Nah. Your party is melting down now that it’s led by Sandy Cortez, Eric Swalwell, and the rest of the social justice bandits. And I don’t think it’s the Republican Party that’s in bed with big pharma. Abortion is the tip of the eugenics iceberg, and no way in hell will we leave “social debates” to leftist academics and “religious leaders.” (The imposter pope has already informed Catholics today that the west is full of racists.) The “center” is just a name for people who prefer not to hold an opinion.

Expand full comment

I somewhat agree with your sentiment, but the abortion and transgender issues are extremely important and not distractions. I agree with your overall point, however, regarding the importance of these other topics and how corporatist folks (regardless of label) are destroying both sides.

Expand full comment

Transgender issues are nothing more than a wedge issue used by Marxists to divide Americans. Abortion is an important issue to the helpless unborn.

Expand full comment

I guess you don’t have any children or you might be a bit concerned about the state of our culture.

Expand full comment

On paper they LOSE in a HUGE way, but who makes the paper, who controls the paper and who counts the votes? Someone once said its not who votes it's who counts the votes

Expand full comment

That was Uncle Joe (Stalin)

Expand full comment

And we saw that in November 2019...

Expand full comment

Well according to Dinesh D'Sousa's new doc 2000 Mules, it's who stuffs the ballot boxes with forged votes that matters.

Expand full comment

They will lose. It’s inevitable. They destroy everything they touch.

Expand full comment

It's always good to have the opposition, until the opposition opposes the opposition.

Expand full comment
founding

Unless it's opposite day

Expand full comment

Bullets

Expand full comment

There is no such coherent cohesive political entity as The Left. The notion is an abstract spacial metaphor, the meaning of which has become increasingly confused ever since the French Revolution when it was coined. Get fifty people who are regarded as left wing in a room and you will get endless arguments over fifty completely incompatible ideas about how to change the world. Of course we could just use the term as a lazy sneery pejorative, but we're better than that, aren't we?

Expand full comment

"The notion is an abstract spacial metaphor, the meaning of which has become increasingly confused ever since the French Revolution when it was coined." Increasingly confused, huh?

Funny, so far at least 121 UNconfused folks have thumbs-upped my comment. Maybe you're the only confused one.

Also, if the term has become "increasingly confused"...how did YOU know it was a pejorative? How did YOU know what or who I meant by it?

I mean, if instead I had called them "the Jelly-Bean Eaters" would you have understood THAT to mean "Leftists", too?

"The Jelly-Bean Eaters have to also lose. Lose badly. Lose badly enough that they are destroyed in the process. The Jelly-Bean Eaters need to be destroyed."

Oh, and what's not to love about your condescending, self-indulgent, self-congratulatory "...but we're better than that, aren't we?"

That's on a par with ahole Lefti- I mean, that's on a par with ahole Jelly-Bean Eaters who love to say "that's not who we are", as if THEY are the only legitimate arbiters of what's allowed and what's not.

Expand full comment
founding

"You can tell alot about a fellow's character by his way of eating jellybeans"

Ronald Reagan

Expand full comment

Man, I wonder what the different ways are, and what they mean. I seem to do 2 at a time, but not over and over and over at the same time. 2 now, 2 again in a little bit, then 2 again, etc. I hope that's a conservative, pro-liberty way to eat JBs.

Expand full comment
founding

Now, that's some funny shit

Expand full comment

For a real Lefty, the label is everything. I had a Lefty friend with whom I happily played music for 10 years. I never told him I voted for Trump because I knew he wouldn’t take it very well. When he finally found out, he did not hesitate to break off our friendship and to hell with the music!

Expand full comment

Unbelievable. And yet, not really. Leftism, or Jelly-Beanism for those who don't understand the term "the Left", is a totalitarian ideology. It's that simple, and undeniable. It's on display everywhere, and all the time.

Expand full comment

Ah, well, ah, I guess, maybe, we are... but a "lazy sneery pejorative, well, that's pretty hard to dismiss....LOL !

Expand full comment

First of all, your assertion that 50 leftwingers would offer endless arguments over fifty completely incompatible - COMPLETELY incompatible! - ideas about how to change the world is patently absurd. To illustrate, take 44 left-wingers and add The Squad, and at worst you'd get 45 incompatible arguments. At worst. That's stipulating your absurd premise for argument's sake. The Squad proves the fallacy of your assertion.

Second, your "there is no such coherent cohesive political entity as The Left" is pure straw man. I never made such an assertion, so you're not rebutting anything I wrote. Also, I didn't call them The Left. I called them the Left. The capitalization on my "The"s was merely because those words began sentences. You should've noticed that.

As for "the Left" being "a lazy sneery pejorative", it's succinct and used enough in this day and age to be be sufficiently descriptive and understandable, when used in particular contexts, to all but the most pedantic among us.

Expand full comment

It’s a useful term and most reasonable, intelligent people know what it means. Quibbling over definitions is disingenuous.

Expand full comment

As I see it, The Left is a pejorative, as it well should be. It is also course in its gradation as to encompass all who hold Anti-American values and views.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

A dog is a clearly defined thing.

Expand full comment
founding

How’s this: they are unaware bots with zero self awareness seeking salvation from “others” or, more specifically, looking anywhere but within their own self.

Expand full comment

All of that is certainly true, but "bots", hummm, not sure, sometimes I do believe they can "think", just choose not to, saw a clip of one of the women of The View, absolutely RANTING about even thinking of removing the mask mandate on planes ! SHE didn't even want to THINK about being on a plane with other people casting all their Covid germs ALL OVER HER ! She had no concept of the little children, babies, healthy young adults, etc. on the plane, only herself, nothing else around her seemed to even exist ! ? ? ?

Expand full comment

That was disturbing. 5 years ago who cared, except immunodeficient, who still made it from A to B. The "bots" are MSM now. As for self-awareness..... like a TikTok?

Don't want to give away my age but this is manipulation, of the mind. Truly unforgivable.

Expand full comment
founding

Hey, my post is certainly not the final say. Let’s just call it a start to get the ball rolling. All input is welcome! So what would you call her? Self centered? Self-absorbed? Insecure?

Expand full comment

I think that’s called NPD.

Expand full comment

But but but what if the dog identifies as a zebra?

Expand full comment

Actually a dog is not a clearly defined thing. I know a dog named Ernest. He lost one leg, lost his fur, lost his tail, has no teeth and can't bark. How then can we know he is a dog?

Expand full comment

And he answers to the name “lucky” when called! Not ernest

Expand full comment

I expect he still has canine genes. Biological questions, although sometimes difficult with no obvious answer on the surface, can have some objective criteria applied to them. Political philosophy is more subjective.

Expand full comment

With one glance we can tell Ernest is a dog. Ok, maybe it would take a second or two given his condition, but we would all know what it is.

Expand full comment

corporate personhood too

Expand full comment

"It's a private company!" was obviously never a serious argument. Parler was a private company, too, and they were still attacked and deplatformed. Lefties will say anything they have to in order to gain more power.

Expand full comment

The problem with Parler was they used Amazon's server system which was not theirs. If they'd built it from the ground up like they've had to do now, they would have never been shut down by a liberal host.

Expand full comment

But then they would go after Comcast for owning the pipes taking the website to your house. These people are authoritarians.

Expand full comment

That's where Musk's StarLink comes into play....game over.

Expand full comment

Gab has made such an offer to Musk.

Expand full comment

Waiting for my dish!!

Expand full comment

Gab just posted that they believe that's the next step the censors will take to take down places such as gab.

Expand full comment

They also took no precautions when it was obvious this was coming, then vacillated about how to respond to the de-platforming. Finally they tried to take a Gab like approach but now they are an also-ran. Not that Gab or Gettr have panned out to be particularly interesting places. Substack, and maybe a few other subscriber-only models like Locals, are the big winners in the end.

Expand full comment

Parler possibly didn’t have sufficient resources or leadership competent enough to resist the de-platforming. GETTR supposedly learned on their experience, but I have to agree that it is not an exciting place to be, to put it mildly.

Expand full comment

Gab is the definition of an echo chamber with an unhealthy obsession with Jewish conspiracies.

That's why Twitter is so important in this fight to have open public debate among all sides.

Expand full comment

That explains it. Why did they use amazon?? Crazy

Expand full comment

Yes but, this was all new territory for us at the time. Never in our wildest dreams, did Americans think our freedom of speech would be infringed. Poor Parler...

Expand full comment

The private company narrative was to get niaive Republicans to agree with supporting the rights of private companies to censor who they want.

The left's tactics are quite brilliant really.

Expand full comment

and soooo many did!

Expand full comment

and sooooo many did!

Expand full comment

absolutely will do ANYthing!

Expand full comment
founding

The scary thing is - these people truly believe that free speech means only liberal speech. They truly believe that something as simple as an opposing viewpoint, is a threat to democracy.

They've literally lost the true definition of freedom, free speech, capitalism... all the things that have made America the best country on the planet

Expand full comment

Yes. These are the people who want to amend the First Amendment. They concocted "hate speech" -- whatever the hell that is.

Further perversions of language include "misgender" and pretty much the entire woke glossary.

Expand full comment

Agree and I think my acid reflex is rearing it’s ugly head.

Expand full comment

I keep telling them that I will be for banning of hate speech when I am the one who decides what it is.

They don't seem interested in that.

Expand full comment

Funny

Expand full comment

You are so on target! Rules for Thee not for Me! Pathetic Losers!

Expand full comment
founding

Berenson, has been saying these words for more than 2 years.

Expand full comment

Like I said earlier, no matter what happens, seeing these pathetic petulant children lose their minds at the possibility they might not be able to censor everything they don't like is absolutely priceless.

Expand full comment

Agreed!

Expand full comment

Me too.

Expand full comment
Apr 14, 2022·edited Apr 14, 2022

I do enjoy your posts Alex - and appreciated your books. I am not on any “social media”(unless this counts?!) and live in an obnoxiously, so called, liberal community on an island on the west coast of Canada. Know that you are touching many elements of society. Thanks for what you are contributing.

Expand full comment

Me too. I’m Australian and Alex has really helped me get through this plandemic without losing my mind.

Expand full comment

It’s been a ride hasn’t it… Alex has been a balm of reason, coherence and sanity. In a small community, it’s hard to be swimming against the current let’s say. A number of like minded “big picture” thinkers around and fortunately we have found one another. Hope you have that.

Expand full comment

Only on line. In real life, even if people smell a rat, they are too busy/afraid to really look behind the curtain. This whole episode has taught me that most people choose the blue pill.

Expand full comment

Mind boggling isn’t it - they don’t want to hear another perspective (what I call “the truth”!!), only what fits their narrative- which makes me double check mine. I like to think I approach others with acceptance but it’s getting harder. Until we have true “free press”/un-censored commentators etc, they never will.

Expand full comment
founding

My mind boggles at the amount of time my mind boggles. Alice in wonderland on ground hogs day. Move to Florida!

Expand full comment

We might do that when we are allowed to leave! Frogs in the warming pot for now.... with no exit allowed except private charter - boggling indeed!

Expand full comment

There's a number of reasons people don't want to question the dominant narrative of X,Y and Z.

One obvious one, is the realisation that something you thought was true was actually a lie.

There's a famous saying about that one.

Day to day life is a little easier if you just go along with the official narratives.

Most people exert a lot of effort every day just to live a normal working life.

From the moment we wake up until the moment we fall asleep at night our life is a series of tasks that must be completed, from waking up on time, leaving on time, navigating the outside world to get to work, dealing with people at work you like or dislike in various degrees, all while actually being productive in your workplace.

Then the commute home, visiting the grocery store, gym before getting home, cooking and general household tasks, before you finally relax for a short time before bed. And if you have bad neighbours or live in a noisy street even then you never fully relax for long.

So you have all of that to deal with 5 days a week and then someone comes along and tells you that vaccine you felt pressured in to taking wasn't needed and worse, it may have actually harmed you!

It's not surprising that many people don't want to hear the truth on top of everything else they have to deal with just to maintain an ok existence.

Expand full comment

Cue Elon!

Expand full comment

I believe he’s in Vancouver! Bill Gates not getting quite the warm welcome (a Ted Talk)

Expand full comment

I believe there is even more to what you commented than met the eye. The "cancelling", banning, whatever you want to term it, of people, goes right back to the isolate, extricate, eliminate, exterminate type of well known psychological war fare. When people can not touch base in anyway with someone who may be thinking the same thing, that's a winning strategy for those who wish to dominate. It's always been practiced in prisoner of war camps, if only two begin to think there might be a way to actually escape, it could spread faster than a virus, faster than Covid even, can't have people being able to reach others who may be having the same thoughts, doubts, questions, and internet forums, as we KNOW (China, China, Cuba Cuba) MUST be carefully controlled. Better for the Great Cause, that people like you, in Australia, continue to feel alone, to ?" Better you are kept isolated, it would be "dangerous" to find out there are those of us in the USA, in Canada, in France, or Germany, or.... name it, who are thinking exactly like YOU ! Doubting a money making vaccine that appears to at best do nothing, at worst is harming some, well, THAT could be a very dangerous thing. To begin to question if a mask made of quilting cotton really does "protect" you from much of anything, say from getting WET from someone sneezing right on you, but your brain says, does that really also protect me from the actual "germs", or are "they" so small they go right through the fabric... why I think my 5th grade teacher explained all about the size of MICRO particles... let's see, what did she say about that ???

Expand full comment

I hope you can fix your once fine country. I wish you luck!

I know we're trying to do the same for the US. We need all the luck we can get here in America.

Expand full comment

Ya'll gave up your guns and now you are just a slave to your government.

Expand full comment

You can never, never, NEVER bow to this "guns" ARE the problem line of thinking, people absolutely MUST (and I don't know how we can convince them) understand that once we do that, it's over. You confiscate all fire arms (by force , by fines, by simply putting manufacturers out of business by making them PAY for all the evil guns they produce that have a mind and brain of their own, and just go "out of control" one night and go out and kill people. It's like the SUV's you read about daily in the newspapers. Always says: "an SUV went out of control, crashed through the restaurant, and killed 3, injured 11, etc. It's always those evil, gas guzzling, SUV's. Someone please cut out and send me the article from your local paper that has the headline: Green electric crashes into local Starbucks killing 4 innocent college students... that's WHEN you see that printed. Guns, cars, saying and printing the emotional words is what counts ! Logic.... OUT the window. More MORE MORE gun laws, and finally, maybe, these darn guns will stop allowing themselves to migrate into the hands of the very criminals we don't want to have them, and if we make the language of the laws VERY strong, maybe it will scare the criminals, drug lords, etc. into REGISTERING them legally ! Let's do this the right way, we know they will cooperate after all.... More laws, less prosecution, more illegal migration, it all adds up to a safer, more peaceful country, right ? Right ?

Expand full comment
founding

From my cold dead hands

Expand full comment

Yep I’m locked and loaded.

Expand full comment

Well, that might just be the case, remember what 'ol Joe did to Corn Pop with just a chain, you might be next and not chain, with your own gun next time. Don't mess with Joe.

Expand full comment

Right....

Expand full comment

And... if Joe doesn't get you on the first try, HE PROMISED, LIVE ON EVERY NETWORK, he would send Beto, on his fastest skateboard, to get your gun(s) and HE WILL succeed.

Expand full comment

Stay strong there in Canada! You’re probably on one of those lovely islands like Salt Spring… all of us are benefiting from Alex’s search for the truth..,greetings from a former Canadian living in Switzerland!

Expand full comment

Almost! I used to live on Salt Spring, now closer to Vancouver and blush at my former leftie self.... how manipulated we allowed ourselves to be. Which way is up? It’s getting frighteningly clearer but rather red pilled than not. ...and yes, some of us are prisoners in our chosen country (ex pat UK) and hold our breath and try to enjoy the views and make a difference. I will not comply with this tyranny. Blessings to you and all in this space.

Expand full comment

I never complied either but my whole family of origin did! They all still live there, I’ll stay untested, unmasked and unjabbed! You need to rid your country of Trudeau and his followers!!?

Expand full comment

Trudeau is a flower. I’m still not over what he did to those truckers.

Expand full comment
founding

I live in Tampa and my blood boils for you guys in Canada. Every. Damn. Day.

Stay strong guys!

Expand full comment

Me either my Canadian flag still up.

Expand full comment

Me too - from Ontario where it's now consdiered divisive to fly the flag, but mine's still flying!

Expand full comment

Good for you!

Expand full comment

He has another 3 years and 6 months - but who’s counting?!!

Expand full comment

Washington State? LOL

Expand full comment

BC, Canada… very Left Coast, smug and woke - help! 🙃

Expand full comment

Don't celebrate just yet. I doubt the GLOBALISTS will give up easily on censorship

Expand full comment

They never will

Expand full comment
founding

Watch Tucker Carlson tonight. It's already happening

Expand full comment

If Musk wins control of Twitter they will come for twitter.

Watch how fast Twitter gets removed from the app stores if the likes of Alex are allowed back on to promote their Covid19 'misinformation'.

Watch all the celebrities start a boycott, the online 'grassroots' petitions spring up, the public denouncements etc etc.

Just watch the cancellation of Russia to see where this goes.

This play is unfortunately doomed to fail.

Expand full comment
Apr 15, 2022·edited Apr 15, 2022

I disagree, twitter is way too convenient and incorporated in the daily life of most politicians, journalists, decision makers, etc. crap egomaniacs. There is no real alternative. And after November the monopoly power and arrogance of the libtarded tech-megas WILL be curbed at minimum. The world needs free speech platform, whether someone uses it or not (like I don't but would like to have the option if needed)

Expand full comment

I'm not as optimistic as you, Alex. Until I see real change, censorship is winning.

Yes, Elon Musk has got everyone talking.

Meanwhile, a former president and one of the best reporters ever (hint: the author of this Substack) are still banned from Twitter.

Expand full comment
founding

Have faith. Elon is negotiating with folks who wouldn't know how to negotiate at a garage sale

Expand full comment

I really hope Elon succeeds. If you want a laugh, read the blue check panic over the possibility of Elon acquiring Twitter.

Expand full comment
founding

I know, right?! There's only so many times I can belly laugh without puking through my nose

Expand full comment

Absolutely love what he is doing!! Exposes all the jackasses in one fell swoop.

Expand full comment

When one side stops caring that they spew blatant hypocrisy, it is time to stop believing that there is a conversation to be had and start realizing that there is a war that Musk be won.

Expand full comment

This is a war-https://youtu.be/O9a_P0evO7Y

Expand full comment

Try again, please. Link seems broken?

Expand full comment

Got my fingers crossed he pulls this off. He might be saving the world. You can tell when he wouldn't censor Russia he won't censor anyone. Including the idiot liberals. I will never understand why they think silencing people is ever right. If you have truth on your side, it will be obvious. (Well, I guess that's why, eh?)

Expand full comment

They think silencing people is righteous because any viewpoint that's not theirs is violence in their mind.

Expand full comment

Perfectly well put! 👆👆👆

Expand full comment

Well the indoctrinated believe that, the ones pushing the narratives know full well it's about power and control of the masses.

Expand full comment
Apr 14, 2022·edited Apr 14, 2022

Elon put free speech in check on the chessboard.

We rooks, pawns, and other pieces on the board are glad for it.

Expand full comment

Elon gonna Elon

Expand full comment
Apr 14, 2022·edited Apr 15, 2022

Elon Musk is crazy like a fox.

Some of the entertainment value of this pageant is watching the second-guessing, the people who are trying to figure out what he's up to...because he's Elon Musk, he's always up to something.

His brain operates 1,000x faster than the average person. He's 75 moves ahead in every chess game.

Personally, because I'm no where near as smart as Musk, I'm enjoying the hysterics of the Twitter-scape along with the tantalizing idea that Musk could tank the company.

Expand full comment

YES, YES, YES!

Expand full comment

I don’t think the board will approve the sale. There is a faint glimmer of hope because Twitter is controlled most through institutional investment companies and they will stand to make a handsome return.

However, if by some miracle Elon does pull this off he will quadruple the value of the company within a few years. Then he can take it public again, still retain control and make a tidy profit.

I do think he is serious about the free speech bit, so there are a lot of positives in this for him (and the rest of us)

Expand full comment

This is what I'm talking about: the second-guessing. There's always the hostile takeover avenue.

See? Second guessing by employing the financial machinations available.

BTW, I don't think the institutional investors give a rip about free speech, censorship.

Expand full comment

Larry Fink of Blackrock is involved and it seems like he is full woke, ESG scores and all. I’m thinking he will be the road block. I hope not 🤞🏻

Expand full comment

Again, I don't think any of the institutional investors care that much--never mind ESG scores. I think that's just pandering--good for annual reports & shareholder meetings. I doubt one investor would object to making a boatload of money.

Expand full comment
founding

The institutional investors are the biggest threat with his offer. Collectively they're worth trillions. Musk is pot committed. The government and the institutional investors are already rabid dogs. He is merely a David vs. Goliath. But as you say, he's crazy like a fox. I like his chances, but it'll be a cage match

Expand full comment

Hope you can answer: How long has Musk given them (whomever that is),to say yes or no; if that is what happens…..thanks

Expand full comment
founding

4/20. And his offer was $54.20. He likes pot and he's punking them

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

I noticed those numbers as well. :)

Expand full comment