Is the legacy media still being funded by the pharmaceutical industry? I know that Massachusetts state-funded insurance is funded by the pharmaceutical companies. Legacy media is desperate for revenue.
At this point, one has to be mentally ill to get injected with a COVID booster, given all the published harms in the last few years. That’s why it is so absurd that this product is still available for that cohort.
I hear you. Recently, while picking up a prescription at Walgreens, the first thing out of the attendant's mouth was, 'Are you here for a COVID booster?' I temporarily experienced Tourette's syndrome and instantly said, 'F**k no.'
They're not mentally ill. They are incapable of independent thought and still believe everything the MSM, Big Pharma and the government told them in 2020/2021. Last fall the latest booster had a slightly restricted indication/distribution period. My niece lied to get it by saying that she was a smoker - & she bragged about it.
I'd love to see the stats on just how many mRNA boosters the average WaPo/New York Times reader has received by this point..... (And, hmm, if they aren't "up to date," what does that say about their trust in those publications? )
I said 5 years ago and I will say again since it's always the same, and will be when I say it again in say 5 years from now for the people who continue to chase their tails asking WHY. The ONLY reason THINGS continue as they do is because they are simply "allowed" too. To DATE over 5 years after the single greatest CON and CRIME perpetrated against humanity not ONE person responsible for the planning and execution of the 2020 PLANdemic have remotely been held accountable. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin sure has tried, but most have just looked the other way, and moved on leaving all the same players SCOT FREE including Bourla and Fauci. None of these mongers fear any sort of repercussions so why wouldn't they continue the corruption of science and CON-CRIME using their useful idiot media covering for them. A rapist will rape until IT is not allowed too. This has NEVER been rocket science, yet here we are moving toward mid 2026! Just sayin...
The DOJ has indicted Fauci's advisor at NIAID, Dr. David Morens. His emails show they purposely hid a controversial research grant associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, effectively circumventing the Freedom of Information Act. Morens indictment consists of 5 felony counts, including conspiracy, and destruction or concealment of federal records. He faces decades in prison. I think the DOJ will now test the legitimacy of those "auto-pen" preemptive pardons. Fauci received one.
The interesting setup that going after Morens provides is that it puts Fauci in a perjury trap. His pardon (whether legitimate or not) only covers his crimes prior to the grant of the pardon. Therefore he can't plead the 5th under questioning regarding his activities around the plandemic as that constitutional right explicitly can't be used if one has been granted immunity. If he lies under oath, he is committing perjury and can be prosecuted for that crime as it is not covered by the pardon. If he tells the truth, it opens him up to all manner of civil prosecutions at the state level. Keep your fingers crossed that justice will finally be brought as Todd Blanche has the gonads that Pam Bondi obviously lacked.
Blanche seems to be moving in the right direction after 1 1/2 years of nothing of note from Bondi. We will see if lying under oath is treated the same way for the Democrat's favorite defendant as it was for Trump's advisors.
The asymmetry of the DOJ's use of force under Biden (Obama) as compared to that of Trump is shocking. How many pre-dawn raids on associates and operatives of Biden, Harris, Obama, the Clintons, Antifa and BLM clowns, etc. at their private homes and offices by heavily armed FBI agents and filmed by the media have we seen under Trump? Compare and contrast to Biden's (Obama's) treatment of Mike Flynn, Peter Navarro, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Allen Weisselberg, and Trump himself, not to mention the treatment of anyone near the capital on J-6, concerned parents protesting the tranyfication of their kids at school, or little old ladies praying near an abortion clinic. Now that the gauntlet has been thrown down, I hope Blanche hits them with equal force.
Are these tards REALLY still oblivious to the fact that these jabs cause your own cells to push out an antigen that is itself the most toxic and dangerous part of the virus - the spike protein - and in numbers that dwarf the viral infection by comparison?
How about another bolus load of systemic inflammation with a side order of myocarditis?
This country is divided in two. Either you're a devotee of the Clot Shot and won't hear a word against it and call anyone who attribute the increase in "died suddenly" reports as a conspiracy theorist whack job. On the other hand, we have those who avoid this thing like the plague delivered by syringe and call the other side whack. I've seen close to eight people I know die suddenly or develop several cancers at once or younger women with brain tumors that came on in 2022-23. Neither side is persuadable.
I'm 79. I recently had my annual physical. My doctor offered a variety of vaccinations: shingles, RSV, COVID (he did say it wasn't the right time for the flu vaccine). I said "No, thanks" to all.. While I'm not against vaccines for common childhood illnesses (e.g., MMR and polio), I see no reason for adults to get injected. Vaccines are not subject to the same testing as other meds.
My husband and I had the 2 original Pfizer shots in Jan & Feb of 2021. (Yes, we now regret it.) He was 71and I was 66. Neither of us had any noticeable adverse effects then or since. And neither of us had covid afterwards. He's never had it. I had it before we'd ever heard of it (probably had pretty solid naturally acquired immunity.) We felt we had to get the shots to live a somewhat normal life. Our age group was pretty paranoid at the time. I don't really credit the vaccine with our not getting covid but we both wondered at the time what it might do to our immune system long term. I still wonder.
I did the same, Mom O'Scots. Got the first two Pfizer shots and one booster. Luckily, have had no side effects but will NEVER get another shot again. They scared me half to death into getting those vaccines, but I'm too well educated now to buy into their scams. I will never forgive them for how they terrified the average person into following each other like sheep to line up for the vaccines. Now we all know better! But like you, we still don't know the long term effects we might still suffer.
To understand the Media (i. e. NYT) one must understand the 2020-2024 Covid Trifecta. The Government buys billions of the Extremely Dangerous Experimental Drug (EDED) and mandates its use, Moderna and Pfizer advertise with mega millions on the Legacy Media (not NEWSMAX), and the Legacy Media heavily supports the use of the drugs and the Democrat Party. To expose the farce trials and the fact that the EDED killed a lot of people would blow the Media's cover. We don't read the NYT because we believe doing so would be bad for our health.
I don’t understand the essence of the fault he finds with this study: “In this case, though, comparing adverse events in the three weeks immediately after vaccination to the three weeks after that produces a bias hugely in favor of vaccine safety. Why?
Because people are unlikely to get vaccinated if they aren't feeling well. They will wait.”
It was argued that they played games with counting who got sick by saying that people weren’t vaccinated until two weeks after their second dose. So “unvaccinated” people got sick more than “vaccinated” people. They played games by not counting side effects and deaths after the shots in a similar fashion.
This study seems to take the opposite tack, yes? That the side effects didn’t happen any more in the first three weeks than in the next three weeks. What an I missing?
My guess is that people recovering from a cold or some other mild sickness aren't likely to relapse soon, Suppose everyone gets a cold once a year, regular as clockwork. Odds of that happening during any three weeks is 3/52. If you've just gotten your cold and postpone your jab until it's over, you won't get that same cold again for 49 weeks.
Obviously real colds don't come regularly like clockwork, but if you get colds several times a year, irregularly, odds of one cold following right on the heels of another are lower than a cold showing up, say, 10 or 20 weeks later, on the grounds that having a cold builds up some small immunity against another cold, which gradually wears off and allows another cold to show up, months later.
I have no idea if this is really true. My instinct is it must be, otherwise one cold would lead to more colds following, and they'd never stop. But colds do stop, at least for a while, so the theory sounds plausible.
IANAD! I'm just rationalizing something Alex believes to be real, and that's good enough for me to assume it is a real thing.
Will the evil ever relent?!, As long as there is a sizeable population who are gullible, easily misled controlled peons who will do what they’re told, the scum of the Earth will wipe out as many people as they can.
It’s just incredible to me how the average person in this country will invariably do as they’re told without any real challenge. I only have one word for people who are aconfrontational, aconflictual, and just passive and willingly controlled:
Even in countries where they have done high-quality studies across the entire population and seen that the jabs cause worse outcomes—no self-selecting healthy users involved—it still doesn’t make any difference. We have an official report here in Austria showing higher death rates for the jabbed and they still went ahead with mandatory injections.
For the thousandth time: facts won’t change anything. We have all the facts on our side and we’re still a minority.
Is the legacy media still being funded by the pharmaceutical industry? I know that Massachusetts state-funded insurance is funded by the pharmaceutical companies. Legacy media is desperate for revenue.
As long as you see pharmaceutical advertisements, YES big pharma is paying to silence every media outlet.
Fun fact: advertising is why drugs in the US are so high. Not research and development, but advertising: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-are-drug-prices-so-high-hint
Brought to you by Pfizer.
You can’t turn on a sports event or most TV stations now without seeing it.
At this point, one has to be mentally ill to get injected with a COVID booster, given all the published harms in the last few years. That’s why it is so absurd that this product is still available for that cohort.
They were lined up for them at my Walgreens this fall. And I live in medically-free Florida.
Whatever the doctors tell these clowns to do, they do!
I hear you. Recently, while picking up a prescription at Walgreens, the first thing out of the attendant's mouth was, 'Are you here for a COVID booster?' I temporarily experienced Tourette's syndrome and instantly said, 'F**k no.'
I rolled my eyes at all of them. When doc said “which vaccine are you here for” one of the men said “all of them”. I couldn’t help but spurt out “OMG”
FOOLS.
@David- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You mean whatever msnow, ny times, npr, etc tell them, and maybe their docs.
They're not mentally ill. They are incapable of independent thought and still believe everything the MSM, Big Pharma and the government told them in 2020/2021. Last fall the latest booster had a slightly restricted indication/distribution period. My niece lied to get it by saying that she was a smoker - & she bragged about it.
I agree, can't reason with nor fix stupid
In other words, one has to be a liberal.
I'd love to see the stats on just how many mRNA boosters the average WaPo/New York Times reader has received by this point..... (And, hmm, if they aren't "up to date," what does that say about their trust in those publications? )
I said 5 years ago and I will say again since it's always the same, and will be when I say it again in say 5 years from now for the people who continue to chase their tails asking WHY. The ONLY reason THINGS continue as they do is because they are simply "allowed" too. To DATE over 5 years after the single greatest CON and CRIME perpetrated against humanity not ONE person responsible for the planning and execution of the 2020 PLANdemic have remotely been held accountable. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin sure has tried, but most have just looked the other way, and moved on leaving all the same players SCOT FREE including Bourla and Fauci. None of these mongers fear any sort of repercussions so why wouldn't they continue the corruption of science and CON-CRIME using their useful idiot media covering for them. A rapist will rape until IT is not allowed too. This has NEVER been rocket science, yet here we are moving toward mid 2026! Just sayin...
The DOJ has indicted Fauci's advisor at NIAID, Dr. David Morens. His emails show they purposely hid a controversial research grant associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, effectively circumventing the Freedom of Information Act. Morens indictment consists of 5 felony counts, including conspiracy, and destruction or concealment of federal records. He faces decades in prison. I think the DOJ will now test the legitimacy of those "auto-pen" preemptive pardons. Fauci received one.
The interesting setup that going after Morens provides is that it puts Fauci in a perjury trap. His pardon (whether legitimate or not) only covers his crimes prior to the grant of the pardon. Therefore he can't plead the 5th under questioning regarding his activities around the plandemic as that constitutional right explicitly can't be used if one has been granted immunity. If he lies under oath, he is committing perjury and can be prosecuted for that crime as it is not covered by the pardon. If he tells the truth, it opens him up to all manner of civil prosecutions at the state level. Keep your fingers crossed that justice will finally be brought as Todd Blanche has the gonads that Pam Bondi obviously lacked.
Blanche seems to be moving in the right direction after 1 1/2 years of nothing of note from Bondi. We will see if lying under oath is treated the same way for the Democrat's favorite defendant as it was for Trump's advisors.
The asymmetry of the DOJ's use of force under Biden (Obama) as compared to that of Trump is shocking. How many pre-dawn raids on associates and operatives of Biden, Harris, Obama, the Clintons, Antifa and BLM clowns, etc. at their private homes and offices by heavily armed FBI agents and filmed by the media have we seen under Trump? Compare and contrast to Biden's (Obama's) treatment of Mike Flynn, Peter Navarro, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Allen Weisselberg, and Trump himself, not to mention the treatment of anyone near the capital on J-6, concerned parents protesting the tranyfication of their kids at school, or little old ladies praying near an abortion clinic. Now that the gauntlet has been thrown down, I hope Blanche hits them with equal force.
I would love to see Fauci's home raided. Unfortunately I just read the statute of limitations is up on May 11th to charge Fauci.
Yes another "underling" being targeted to take the fall. Will this lead to those who SHOULD be held accountable? Maybe just maybe this leads to more!
My fingers are crossed that they get evidence against the little covid dictator, Fauci.
My dad who made it to 102 would refer to this as flogging a dead horse!
Are these tards REALLY still oblivious to the fact that these jabs cause your own cells to push out an antigen that is itself the most toxic and dangerous part of the virus - the spike protein - and in numbers that dwarf the viral infection by comparison?
How about another bolus load of systemic inflammation with a side order of myocarditis?
This country is divided in two. Either you're a devotee of the Clot Shot and won't hear a word against it and call anyone who attribute the increase in "died suddenly" reports as a conspiracy theorist whack job. On the other hand, we have those who avoid this thing like the plague delivered by syringe and call the other side whack. I've seen close to eight people I know die suddenly or develop several cancers at once or younger women with brain tumors that came on in 2022-23. Neither side is persuadable.
Make sure every democrat is given the vaccine every 90 days. For protection, of course.
I'm 79. I recently had my annual physical. My doctor offered a variety of vaccinations: shingles, RSV, COVID (he did say it wasn't the right time for the flu vaccine). I said "No, thanks" to all.. While I'm not against vaccines for common childhood illnesses (e.g., MMR and polio), I see no reason for adults to get injected. Vaccines are not subject to the same testing as other meds.
My husband and I had the 2 original Pfizer shots in Jan & Feb of 2021. (Yes, we now regret it.) He was 71and I was 66. Neither of us had any noticeable adverse effects then or since. And neither of us had covid afterwards. He's never had it. I had it before we'd ever heard of it (probably had pretty solid naturally acquired immunity.) We felt we had to get the shots to live a somewhat normal life. Our age group was pretty paranoid at the time. I don't really credit the vaccine with our not getting covid but we both wondered at the time what it might do to our immune system long term. I still wonder.
I did the same, Mom O'Scots. Got the first two Pfizer shots and one booster. Luckily, have had no side effects but will NEVER get another shot again. They scared me half to death into getting those vaccines, but I'm too well educated now to buy into their scams. I will never forgive them for how they terrified the average person into following each other like sheep to line up for the vaccines. Now we all know better! But like you, we still don't know the long term effects we might still suffer.
"Credibility loss. Maybe we should add that to the list of mRNA side effects."
Excellent point!
To understand the Media (i. e. NYT) one must understand the 2020-2024 Covid Trifecta. The Government buys billions of the Extremely Dangerous Experimental Drug (EDED) and mandates its use, Moderna and Pfizer advertise with mega millions on the Legacy Media (not NEWSMAX), and the Legacy Media heavily supports the use of the drugs and the Democrat Party. To expose the farce trials and the fact that the EDED killed a lot of people would blow the Media's cover. We don't read the NYT because we believe doing so would be bad for our health.
It won't stop until drug advertisements in the media are banned again.
I don’t understand the essence of the fault he finds with this study: “In this case, though, comparing adverse events in the three weeks immediately after vaccination to the three weeks after that produces a bias hugely in favor of vaccine safety. Why?
Because people are unlikely to get vaccinated if they aren't feeling well. They will wait.”
It was argued that they played games with counting who got sick by saying that people weren’t vaccinated until two weeks after their second dose. So “unvaccinated” people got sick more than “vaccinated” people. They played games by not counting side effects and deaths after the shots in a similar fashion.
This study seems to take the opposite tack, yes? That the side effects didn’t happen any more in the first three weeks than in the next three weeks. What an I missing?
My guess is that people recovering from a cold or some other mild sickness aren't likely to relapse soon, Suppose everyone gets a cold once a year, regular as clockwork. Odds of that happening during any three weeks is 3/52. If you've just gotten your cold and postpone your jab until it's over, you won't get that same cold again for 49 weeks.
Obviously real colds don't come regularly like clockwork, but if you get colds several times a year, irregularly, odds of one cold following right on the heels of another are lower than a cold showing up, say, 10 or 20 weeks later, on the grounds that having a cold builds up some small immunity against another cold, which gradually wears off and allows another cold to show up, months later.
I have no idea if this is really true. My instinct is it must be, otherwise one cold would lead to more colds following, and they'd never stop. But colds do stop, at least for a while, so the theory sounds plausible.
IANAD! I'm just rationalizing something Alex believes to be real, and that's good enough for me to assume it is a real thing.
Will the evil ever relent?!, As long as there is a sizeable population who are gullible, easily misled controlled peons who will do what they’re told, the scum of the Earth will wipe out as many people as they can.
It’s just incredible to me how the average person in this country will invariably do as they’re told without any real challenge. I only have one word for people who are aconfrontational, aconflictual, and just passive and willingly controlled:
Symbiotes…
Even in countries where they have done high-quality studies across the entire population and seen that the jabs cause worse outcomes—no self-selecting healthy users involved—it still doesn’t make any difference. We have an official report here in Austria showing higher death rates for the jabbed and they still went ahead with mandatory injections.
For the thousandth time: facts won’t change anything. We have all the facts on our side and we’re still a minority.