A scientist offers a simple, fascinating theory why mRNA jabs may have caused diffuse problems in so many people

Unreported Truths has clearly become a forum (maybe the ONLY forum) for open, non-conspiratorial public/scientific discussion about possible drivers of mRNA damage. I want to keep the ball rolling.

It’s turned into mRNA science week at Unreported Truths!

After yesterday’s piece about how the unwillingness of top scientists to admit any problems with the mRNA Covid jabs, a reader who works in mRNA vaccine development wrote in to say researchers are extensively discussing potential concerns:

[At] the mRNA Health conference, in Boston, in November 2024, as a skeptic, I was amazed and surprised at the admissions of LNP (the lipid nanoparticle, the fatty bubble around the mRNA itself) cytotoxicity and truncated RNA immunogenic issues…

But here’s the thing.

—

(Want to know the thing? Sign up as a paid subscriber. Or wait a week. Can you really wait a week to know the thing?!? And the simple explanation? A week is a long time!)

—

Here’s the thing.

Yesterday’s piece and this morning’s email can BOTH be true.

Bench scientists in academia and at the mRNA companies can be talking aggressively to each other about how to develop and improve this still-novel biotechnology, even as the scientific establishment circles the wagons against outside questioners.

As I emailed that researcher, in a note headlined “internal vs external conversations”:

I am not surprised to hear these topics are top of mind for frontline researchers who are talking about them amongst themselves as they try to improve (or arguably save) the technology.

And I have no doubt executives at the companies and senior independent scientists are very aware of the problems too. That's their job.

The question is how those senior folks talk about the technology publicly, and whether other senior people in biomedicine - people who are NOT in mRNA but are thought leaders - are pushing back and questioning them. And that's obviously not happening at all. And meanwhile the CDC is still pushing the jabs - though I think that's likely to change soon.

—

We will see. But the more we can move these conversations and questions about the mRNAs out of the shadows and into the public sphere, the better off we’ll be.

Which brings me to yet another suggestion from yet another reader about yet another potential mechanism of harm from the mRNAs: could the short, intense post-jab inflammatory process they caused in many people have increased the risks of many different disorders and diseases later?

Lots of people had intense inflammatory reactions to the mRNA vaccinations. That's part of the reason nobody wants to take them, they made you feel like death for 3 days. Regardless of what is causing the inflammation, just having an one at all can cause epigenetic changes.

I find this theory simple and compelling. (Which doesn’t mean it’s true.) Chronic inflammation is a known risk for… well, for almost everything, from cardiovascular disease to Alzheimer’s to cancer.

Could a few days of really severe inflammation have marginally sped up the process of those diseases in millions or tens (or even hundreds) of millions of jab recipients? Essentially, could the shots have done the equivalent of aging many of their recipients a few months or a year or two — in a few days?

This theory is, of course, highly speculative. It would require a massive scientific effort to evaluate, much less prove.

Yet deaths remain somewhat above normal in the mRNA countries even now, compared to before Covid began. And large studies have found that Covid causes NO long-term risk in mortality, even in people who became ill enough to be hospitalized. (The risk is high for six months in those patients but then vanishes.)

Something is causing those deaths.

Sure would be nice to know what that something is.

If you’re a researcher, scientist, or physician who has any information about the mRNAs you think might be interesting, please email me at alexberensonauthor at protonmail or gmail. Confidentiality assured, unless you say otherwise.